Ontologia
Fragon hypoglosse

Fragon hypoglosse

Ruscus hypoglossumL.

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Ruscus hypoglossum.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2014 · v3.1
Altitude
251650 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The population over the range is inferred not to be small, although it is often not common, for example, it is noted to be rare in Greece (Greekflora.gr 2014). Even at the northern edge of its range in Slovakia, where it is considered Critically Endangered and rare, a study of the population at eight sites found from 126 to 595 shoots at each site. The study also found that it had some resistance to disturbances and, together with vegetative reproduction, allowed the populations, surveyed between 1987 and 1998 in a 100 m2 permanent plot, to remain stable (Halada and Erdekska 2005). In  Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia it was noted to be abundant in three research plots (Trifunov et al. 2013). However, it is suspected that over-exploitation pressures in parts of its range, for example Serbia and Bulgaria are leading to population decreases.

Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_2_3
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_2_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
In Slovakia populations are threatened by forestry causing habitat disturbance, shoot collecting for decorative purposes, and grazing by animals, especially deer (Halada and Erdekska 2005). It is a popular ornamental plant and its slow growth and low germination rate hamper cultivation commercially and it is threatened by collection from the wild. In Bulgaria it is under the regulation of the biodiversity act of 2002, however, it is frequently found in local flower markets and it is also collected from the wild in Romania (Marossy 2006, Ivanova et al. 2013). The beech forest habitat of this species in Bulgaria is also noted to be threatened by unregulated logging, logging roads and erosion related to them, infrastructure development, grazing and forest plantations (Gussev 2014). It is also under over-exploitation pressure in Serbia (Radovic and Kozomara 2011).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_4Forest - Temperate
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species is listed from 25 Natura 2000 sites, such as the regional nature Park of Monte Cornero in Italy  (EUNIS 2014) and other protected areas such as the Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia. It is recorded from 90 botanic gardens worldwide (BGCI 2013). It is not known whether it is conserved in any seed bank. Micropropagation protocols are being investigated for commercial cultivation and hopefully to reduce the pressures of collection from wild populations (Ivanova et al. 2013).

It is considered a rare and threatened species of the Slovak flora and is listed as Critically Endangered there, in Kosovo (Feráková et al. 2001, Millaku 2006) and in Austria (Niklfeld and Schratt-Ehrendorfer 1999). It is at the northern edge of its range in Slovakia and the population is small. It is listed as Endangered in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Muftic et al. 2011). It is also considered rare and possibly Near Threatened in Hungary (Király 2007). It is included in the Habitat Directive 92/43/EEC as a plant of economic importance and conservation value and in Bulgaria it is under the regulation of the biodiversity act of 2002 (Ivanova et al. 2013). In Romania and Croatia it is also protected by law (Marossy 2006) and in Croatia considered Near Threatened (Nikolic and Topic 2007). It is listed in the red data books of Albania and Ukraine (Kremer et al. 2009) and is noted to be rare in Greece (Greekflora.gr 2014).
Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (9)Expert
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnationalsubsistance
  • 3Medicine - human & veterinary
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (5)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_2Harvest level trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Palearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Geophyte
Références bibliographiques (23)Expert
  1. BGCI. 2017. Botanic Gardens Conservation International: Plant Search. Richmond Available at: <a href="http://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">http://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: November 2017).
  2. GRIN. 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Beltsville Available at: <a href="http://www.ars-grin.gov/">http://www.ars-grin.gov/</a>. (Accessed: 2014).
  3. EUNIS. 2014. Biodiversity Database. Available at: <a href="http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/">http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/</a>. (Accessed: 2014).
  4. IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 24 July 2014).
  5. Govaerts, R. 2014. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. London Available at: <a href="http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/">http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>. (Accessed: 2014).
  6. Gussev, C. 2014. Forests of Oriental beech (<i>Fagus orientalis</i>). Red Data Book of the Republic of Bulgaria. Volume 3 - Natural habitats. Sofia: Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research / Ministry of Environment and Waters Available at: <a href="http://e-ecodb.bas.bg/rdb/en/vol3/12G1.html">http://e-ecodb.bas.bg/rdb/en/vol3/12G1.html</a>.
  7. Bakış, Y., Babaç, M.T. and Uslu, E. 2014. Turkish Plants Data Service (TÜBİVES). Available at: <a href="http://www.tubives.com/index.php">http://www.tubives.com/index.php</a>. (Accessed: January 2016).
  8. Millaku, F. (Ed). 2013. The Red Book of the vascular flora of the Republic of Kosovo. Available at: <a href="http://www.ammk-rks.net/repository/docs/Libri_i_Kuq_i_Flores_vaskulare_Shqip_(permbledhje).pdf">http://www.ammk-rks.net/repository/docs/Libri_i_Kuq_i_Flores_vaskulare_Shqip_(permbledhje).pdf</a>. (Accessed: 3-2014).
  9. IVANOVA, T., DIMITROVA, D., ANGELOV, G., GUSSEV, C., BOSSEVA, Y. and STOEVA, T. 2013. CALLUS CULTURES AND INDIRECT REGENERATION OF <i>RUSCUS HYPOGLOSSUM</i> IN VITRO. <i>Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science</i> 19(2): 49-51.
  10. TRIFUNOV, S., KRAŠIĆ, D., MARKOV, Z., MUDRI-STOJNIĆ, S., BUTORAC, B. and VUJIĆ, A. 2013. FOREST CHANGES DUE TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN THE NATIONAL PARK “FRUŠKA GORA” (SERBIA) – ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS. <i>Archives of Biological Science</i> 65(2): 709-719.
  11. Botanical Society of the British Isles and the Biological Records Centre. 2012. Online Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Available at: <a href="http://www.brc.ac.uk/plantatlas/">http://www.brc.ac.uk/plantatlas/</a>.
  12. Radovic, I. and Kozomara, M. (Eds). 2011. Biodiversity Strategy of the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade.
  13. Muftić, F., Velić, S. and Baŝić, B. 2011. ENDANGERED MEDICINAL PLANTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND POSSIBILITIES OF THEIR EFFECTIVE PROTECTION. In: Redžić, S. (ed.), "MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS IN GENERATING OF NEW VALUES st IN 21 CENTURY" SPECIAL EDITIONS VOL. CXL. Sarajevo.
  14. Kremer, D., Karlovic, K. and Grubesic, R.J. 2009. MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY OF SEEDS AND FRUITS OF <i>RUSCUS HYPOGLOSSUM</i> IN CROATIA. <i>ACTA BIOLOGICA CRACOVIENSIA Series Botanica</i> 51(1): 91-96.
  15. Nikolić, T. and Topić, J. (eds). 2007. <i>Red Book of Vascular Flora of Croatia</i>. Ministry of Culture, State Institution for Nature Protection, Zagreb.
  16. Redzic, S.S. 2007. The Ecological Aspect of Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina. <i>Coll. Antropol</i> 31(3): 869-890.
  17. Király, G. (ed.). 2007. <i>Vörös Lista: A magyarországi edényes flóra veszélyeztetett fajai [Red List of the Vascular Flora of Hungary]</i>. pp. 73. Saját kiadás, Sopron.
  18. Marossy, A. 2006. Wild Plant Species Endangered Through Intensive Harvest. <i>Nature Conservation Environmental Science and Engineering</i>: 65-67.
  19. Halada, L. and Erdekska, O. 2005. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF RUSCUS HYPOGLOSSUM L. IN SLOVAKIA. <i>ACTA BIOLOGICA CRACOVIENSIA Series Botanic</i> 47(1): 213-217.
  20. Feráková, V., Maglocký, Š. and Marhold, K. 2001. Červený zoznam papraďorastov a semenných rastlín (Red List of Ferns and Flowering Plants). <i>Ochrana prírody</i> Suppl.(20): 44–76.
  21. Niklfeld, H. and Schratt-Ehrendorfer, L. (eds). 1999. Rote Listen gefährdeter Pflanzen Österreichs [Red List of Threatened Plants of Austria]. <i>Grüne Reihe</i>, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Vienna.
  22. RBG Edinburgh. 1998. Flora Europaea. Edinburgh Available at: <a href="http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html">http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html</a>.
  23. Panova, D., Nikoloff, S. and Achtardjieff, C. 1974. Steroid sapogenins and sterols from <i>Ruscus hypoglossum </i>. <i>Planta medica</i> 26(1): 90-93.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Chadburn, H.
evaluator
Allen, D.J.

Chadburn, H. 2014. Ruscus hypoglossum (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T202967A2758303. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Indicateurs écologiques

Indicateurs écologiques Ellenberg-type

EIVE 1.0 — Dengler 2023

Position de l'espèce sur les 5 dimensions écologiques européennes (M / N / R / L / T), échelle 0-10. La zone estompée représente la niche width (variabilité tolérée).

MNRLT
Humidité
xérophile hygrophile
4.5
intermédiaire
Azote
oligotrophe nitrophile
5.5
nitrophile
Réaction (pH)
silicicole calcicole
6.1
calcicole
Lumière
sciaphile héliophile
3.6
sciaphile
Température
cryophile thermophile
5.4
intermédiaire

Source : EIVE 1.0 (Dengler et al. 2023). CC-BY 4.0. Échelle harmonisée 0-10 (équivalent inverse-rang sur les systèmes Ellenberg, Landolt, Pignatti, etc.). Niche width = écart-type d'estimation, indicateur de fiabilité (zone estompée).

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (6)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Platyruscus hypoglossum(L.) A.P.Khokhr. & V.N.Tikhom.
  • Ruscus alexandrinusGarsault
  • Ruscus humilisSalisb.
  • Ruscus hypoglossum var. laticladodiaYalt.
  • Ruscus hypophyllum var. hypoglossum(L.) Baker
  • Ruscus troadensisE.D.Clarke

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).