Ontologia

Le renard du Cap

Vulpes chama(A. Smith, 1833)

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Canidae
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Vulpes chama.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2014 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Generally common to fairly abundant across much of its range, although problem animal control activities have resulted in population reductions in some areas. Estimates are only available for South Africa's Free State province where an average density of 0.3 foxes per km² was estimated with a total population of 31,000 individuals (Bester 1982). Annual offtake resulting from problem animal control programmes averaged roughly 16% up to 1985, with no obvious declines in overall populations (Bester 1982). Range and numbers have increased in the south-west and east of South Africa (Coetzee 1979, Stuart 1981). Estimated population sizes or numbers are not available, but it is thought that populations are currently stable across their entire range.

Menaces identifiées(2 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 5_1_2
    Unintentional effects (species is not the target)
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 9_3_3
    Herbicides and pesticides
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
There are no major threats to the species. Habitat loss/changes are not a major factor influencing the conservation status of the Cape Fox. In fact, in western Cape Province and elsewhere, changing agricultural practices have resulted in range extensions for this species, as well as for the Bat-eared Fox (Stuart 1981). Expansion of semi-arid karroid vegetation during the process of desertification, especially eastwards, has also resulted in range extensions of this canid. Heavy direct and indirect problem animal control measures do not seem to have had a major impact on populations of the Cape Fox, even though they have resulted in declines in some areas. The illegal but widespread and indiscriminate use of agricultural poisons on commercial farms poses the main threat (Stuart and Stuart 2013).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 3_8Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 6Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
  • 14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Not listed in the CITES Appendices. Occurs in many protected areas across its range, including a number of provincial and private nature reserves, as well as on game ranches in all South African provinces, although the species has a much more restricted range in Limpopo Province and KwaZulu-Natal (Stuart 1981, Rautenbach 1982, Lynch 1975, Rowe-Rowe 1992). In Swaziland, the species may occur in Nhlangano Nature Reserve in the south-west and pups have been successfully reared in Milwane Game Reserve (Monadjem 1998).

Although treated as a problem animal across most of its range, it is partially protected in several South African provinces, as it does not appear on the official lists of problem species. However, no permit is required from any authority to kill this fox in problem animal control operations. No protection measures are currently enforced and at the present time, this is not necessary.

Although the Cape Fox has been extensively studied in South Africa's Free State province (Lynch 1975, Bester 1982, Kok 1996), there is little information available elsewhere within its range. Aspects such as diet and reproduction are quite well known, but little information is available on aspects of social ecology and behaviour in the wild. Some investigation into the role, if any, this species plays in disease transmission is necessary.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 2_1Site/area management
Stress écologiques (2)Expert
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_1Species mortality
Priorités de recherche (2)Expert
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 4Other
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Afrotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (19)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 12 June 2014).
  2. Nel, J.A.J., Stuart, C. and Stuart, T. 2013. <i>Vulpes chama</i> Cape Fox. In: J. Kingdon, and M. Hoffmann (eds), <i>Mammals of Africa. Volume V: Carnivores, Pangolins, Equids and Rhinoceroses</i>, pp. 62-65. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK.
  3. Rathbun, G.B. (subeditor). 2005. Macroscelidea. In: J.D. Skinner and C.T. Chimimba (eds), <i>The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion, 3rd edition</i>, pp. 22-34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  4. Monadjem, A. 1998. <i>Mammals of Swaziland</i>. The Conservation Trust of Swaziland and Big Game Parks.
  5. Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (comps and eds). 1996. <i>1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  6. Kok, O. B. 1996. Diet composition of different carnivores in the Free State, South Africa. <i>South African Journal of Science</i> 92: 393-398.
  7. Lynch, C.D. 1994. The mammals of Lesotho. <i>Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein</i> 10(4): 177-241.
  8. Rowe-Rowe, D.T. 1992. <i>The Carnivores of Natal</i>. Natal Parks Board, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  9. Crawford-Cabral, J. C. 1989. Distributional data and notes on Angolan carnivores (Mammalia: Carnivora). 1. Small and median-sizes species. <i>Garcia de Orta, Série de Zoologia, Lisboa</i> 14: 3-27.
  10. Bester, J. L. 1982. Die gedragsekologie en bestuur van die silwervos <i>Vulpes chama</i> (A. Smith, 1833) met spesiale verwysing na die Oranje-Vrystaat. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Pretoria.
  11. Rautenbach, I. L. 1982. Mammals of the Transvaal. <i>Ecoplan monograph, N.S. Supplemento</i> 1: 111-211.
  12. Stuart, C.T. 1981. Notes on the mammalian carnivores of the Cape Province, South Africa. <i>Bontebok</i> 1: 1-58.
  13. Coetzee, P. W. 1979. Present distribution and status of some of the mammals of Albany. Albany Divisional Council and Grahamstown Municipality, South Africa.
  14. Coetzee, C.G. 1977. Order Carnivora. Part 8. In: J. Meester and H.W. Setzer (eds), <i>The Mammals of Africa: An Identification Manual</i>, pp. 1-42. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  15. Lynch, C. D. 1975. The distribution of mammals in the Orange Free State, South Africa. <i>Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum, Bloemfontein</i> 3: 109-139.
  16. Stuart, C. T. 1975. Preliminary notes on the mammals of the Namib Desert Park. <i>Madoqua</i> 4: 5-68.
  17. Smithers, R.H.N. 1968. <i>A check list and atlas of the mammals of Botswana</i>. The Trustees of The National Museums of Rhodesia, Salisbury, Rhodesia.
  18. Travassos Dias, J. A. 1968. <i>Fauna selvagem de Mocambique No.1. Radio Mocambique Mensario Boletim mensal de Radio Clube de Mocambique</i>. Lourenco Marques, Mozambique.
  19. Roberts, A. 1951. <i>The Mammals of South Africa</i>. Central New Agency, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Hoffmann, M.
contributor
Stuart, C. & Stuart, M.
evaluator
Sillero-Zubiri, C.

Hoffmann, M. 2014. Vulpes chama. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T23060A46126992. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 5 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
4 kg
AnAge
Longueur
53,2 cm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
10 ans
PanTHERIA
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Taille de portée
4
AnAge
Sevrage
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
9 mois
AnAge
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Gestation
1,7 mois
AnAge
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA

Écologie & habitat(9)

Invertébrés (%)
30 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Fruits (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (1)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Canis chamaA. Smith, 1833

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).