Ontologia
Civette Indienne

Civette Indienne

Viverricula indica(É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1803)

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
4 photos · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Viverricula indica.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2024 · v3.1
Altitude
02500 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Small Indian Civet remains widespread and common in India and Sri Lanka (Choudhury 2013, Mudappa 2013, S. Ratnayeke pers. comm. 2007)  and in Bangladesh, where it has recently been camera-trapped in the North-east, South-east and in the Sundarbans' largest mangroves (Feeroz et al. 2011, 2012; Hasan Rahman pers. comm. 2014). Its population status in South-east Asia is less well known than that of some other sympatric small carnivores, because recent survey efforts have mostly not been appropriate for assessing the species. This is well shown by records from Thailand, where in several survey areas with intensive coverage, camera-trapping failed to find the species yet there were incidental records by other methods (Chutipong et al. 2014). Similarly, in Myanmar, Su Su (2005) found that it was the second most common species of small carnivore recorded in Hlawga Wildlife Park in Myanmar, a secondary small isolate of semi-natural habitat in the outskirts of Yangon, a former capital city, subject to little-controlled poaching and other forms of encroachment, where few other species of small carnivore persist in significant numbers. Camera-trapping showed that it is also abundant (by far the most frequently photographed nocturnal small carnivore) in Alungdaw Kathapa National Park (Thaint Thaint Myo pers. comm. 2007), although intensive camera-trapping for Tiger Panthera tigris a few years earlier at this site had recorded the species only twice. This reflected the focus of the Tiger survey on little-disturbed evergreen forest, a habitat little-used by the species in South-east Asia, rather than the edge, disturbed and secondary areas the focus of the latter survey (Than Zaw et al. 2008). The habitat degradation and hunting patterns of these two sites in Myanmar where the species is common are representative of much of non-Sundaic South-east Asia, and incidental records from various other sites (e.g. Duckworth and Robichaud 2005) imply large populations in total in this region, although it is likely that in at least Viet Nam and Lao PDR populations are somewhat depleted by snaring and other forms of hunting. This is also likely to be true in southern China (sensu Lau et al. 2010; Guangxi, Guangdong and Hainan), an area where most small carnivores are somewhat to greatly depleted; Small Indian Civet remains one of the most widely recorded small carnivores there (Lau et al. 2010). It is also widespread and common on Hong Kong (Pei et al. 2010). The widespread tendency for camera-trap and spotlight surveys to go to the least encroached habitat blocks, with a focus on evergreen forest, has certainly much reduced the number of recent records of the species from South-east Asia. In Cambodia, where more camera-trapping has taken place in deciduous forest, it is commonly photographed (e.g. Holden & Neang 2009, Schank et al. 2009, Gray et al. 2014). Under-survey of appropriate habitat was suspected to be responsible for the relatively few recent records from Lao PDR (Duckworth et al. 1999) and explains the rather low proportion of camera-trap survey areas in Viet Nam with records (Willcox et al. 2014: Table SOM3; D.H.A. Willcox pers. comm. 2014), and may also have generated earlier remarks such as in Thailand, this species is rather rare (Lekagul and McNeely 1977); in fact, it is common in degraded and open habitats (Chutipong et al. 2014). Similarly, in Java, a survey programme found it in only one area, an agricultural landscape, with no records from forest. There is little information on current status in West Malaysia and Sumatra; these are being dominated, pre-clearance, by evergreen forest would be expected to hold small populations, although these might have increased with recent major deforestation. A collation of incidental records from West Malaysia (Low 2011) had none of this species, despite many of other species from road-sides and degraded areas, from where come many records elsewhere in the species' range. A trade survey of civets at Medan, Sumatra, found none (Shepherd 2008), implying only small, at most, wild populations there.

Considering trends of habitat change, potentially populations will have increased with the degradation and fragmentation of closed evergreen forest across much of the specie's range in recent decades; the ability of the species to take advantage of this will have been offset, in some parts of its range, notably northern South-east Asia and southern China, by increased trade driven-hunting, especially using non-selective methods. Overall the population is likely to be relatively stable.

Menaces identifiées(1 menace classée CMP-IUCN)

  • 5_1_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Small Indian Civet is widely used, for various reasons. There has been heavy harvest for skins in China (Lau et al. 2010) and probably to some extent elsewhere. For the production of its perineal gland secretion, 'civet' musk, a raw ingredient in the perfume, medicine and other industries, large numbers are kept in India and, increasingly, Thailand; these are sourced almost entirely from the wild (e.g., Balakrishnan and Sreedevi 2007, Chutipong et al. 2014). It is the second most commonly traded civet in Java, Indonesia, where there is a current craze for keeping civets at pets, with the mushrooming of civet-'lovers' clubs; numbers in this trade are however dwarfed by those of Common Palm Civet, with almost 20 times as many of the latter seen (Nijman et al. 2014). While hunting (including the use of traps for civets) seems to be rare in some of its range, such as Java (Rode-Margono et al. 2014), a large part of its range - North-east India, southern China and northern South-east Asia - has heavy to very heavy mammal hunting using, in great part, non-selective techniques such as snaring, for domestic consumption and, in many areas, sale into the urban and international wildlife trade. In the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh, local people kill Small Indian Civets (for meat consumption) with poison (S. Chakma per H. Rahman pers. comm. 2014). The demand for civet meat in Chinese and Viet Namese markets has increased rapidly since the 1980s (Bell et al. 2004) and remains high. This species is perhaps somewhat insulated from the heaviest pressures because such activities are mostly within closed evergreen forest, only a marginal habitat of this species. On the other hand, its use of marginal and degraded habitats means it might suffer more than do the more closed-forest associated small carnivores from retaliatory killing (as a pest of poultry), secondary accumulation of rodenticides (heavily used in some parts of its range) and killing by domestic dogs. It is reasonably clear that, in aggregate, these threats are not causing steep declines in India, Myanmar and southern China (where it remains common even though most other small carnivores are severely depleted (Lau et al. 2010); the situation is less clear in northern South-east Asia, where hunting is highest, because of the species' limited occurrence in closed evergreen forest, which hosts the majority of wildlife survey and research. It is clearly widespread even in Viet Nam and Lao PDR, but populations there are probably well below what they would be in the absence of hunting.

Forest loss and degradation are unlikely to be, overall, a threat to this species; the opening-up of large areas of closed-canopy old-growth evergreen forest in South-east Asia has probably increased the total habitat availability, more than offsetting the losses from conversion of open deciduous forest to habitats supporting lower densities of this species (such forests are being lost rapidly, at present, in Cambodia and perhaps Myanmar). Its use of agriculture-dominated landscapes, while common, is poorly understood: it is quite plausible that the rapid intensification of field crop systems in Java, Thailand, Vietnam, China and, increasingly, Lao PDR and Cambodia will be reducing habitat suitability over large areas, particularly through loss of uncultivated patches: daytime resting sites in Hlawga Park, Myanmar, were typically at ground level in dense shrubby tangles (Su Su and Sale 2007); and such patches are also likely to increase food supply over that in crop monoculture.

In sum, while further information would be useful in elaborating the detail of the response to the various potential threats facing this species, its continued abundance in most of its range indicates that it is well able to survive the current levels of threats.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 3_6Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 4_6Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded
  • 14_3Artificial/Terrestrial - Plantations
  • 1_7Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level
  • 1_8Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp
  • 3_7Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland

+ 5 habitats supplémentaires

Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species is totally protected in Myanmar under the Wildlife Act of 1994 (Su Su 2005) and in Bangladesh under the Wildlife Act 2012 (Hasan Rahman pers. comm. 2015). It is protected in Thailand, with captive breeding allowed (Chutipong et al. 2014). It is listed on Category II of the China Wildlife Protection Law (1988) (Li et al. 2000) and as ‘Vulnerable’ in the China Red List (Wang and Xie 2004). It is listed on CITES Appendix III by India. It has been recorded in many protected areas across its range. There is no harvest management plan; while this is probably not problematic at present, if agricultural intensification does reduce habitat suitability and if trade demand for 'civet' remains high, because this is a species living primarily in areas with some to heavy human use, it is possible that off-take might drive declines in the future and that a harvest management plan (or captive breeding to supply 'civet' production units) would be warranted.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 3_1_1Harvest management
Stress écologiques (1)Expert
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    subsistance
  • 6Other chemicals
    nationalsubsistance
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2024. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2024-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 28 October 2024).
  2. IUCN. 2015. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015-4. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 19 November 2015).
  3. Willcox, D.H.A., Tran Q.P., Hoang M.D. and Nguyen T.T.A. 2014. The decline of non-<i>Panthera</i> cat species in Vietnam. <i>Cat News </i> Special Issue 8: 53–61.
  4. Rahman, H.A. and McCarthy, J.L. 2014. Efficacy of camera trapping in felid research: lessons learned from north-east Bangladesh. Symposium on Wildlife Research Technique. Ugyen Wangchuck Institute of Conservation and Environment. Bumthang, Bhutan.
  5. Rode-Margono, E.J., Voskamp, A., Spaan, D., Lehtinen, J.K., Roberts, P.D., Nijman, V. and Nekaris, K.A.I. 2014. Records of small carnivores and of medium-sized nocturnal mammals on Java, Indonesia. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 50: 1–11.
  6. Gray, T.N.E., Pin C., Phan C., Crouthers, R., Kamler, J.F. and Prum S. 2014. Camera-trap records of small carnivores from eastern Cambodia, 1999–2013. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 50: 20–24.
  7. Nijman, V., Spaan, D., Rode-Margono, E.J., Roberts, P.D., Wirdateti and Nekaris, K.A.I. 2014. Trade in Common Palm Civet <i>Paradoxurus hermaphroditus</i> in Javan and Balinese markets, Indonesia. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 51: 11–17.
  8. Chutipong, W., Tantipisanuh, N., Ngoprasert, D., Lynam, A.J., Steinmetz, R., Jenks, K.E., Grassman Jr., L.I., Tewes, M., Kitamura, S., Baker, M.C., McShea, W., Bhumpakphan, N., Sukmasuang, R., Gale, G.A., Harich, F.K., Treydte, A.C., Cutter, P., Cutter, P.B., Suwanrat, S., Siripattaranukul, K., Hala-Bala Wildlife Research Station, Wildlife Research Division and Duckworth, J.W. 2014. Current distribution and conservation status of small carnivores in Thailand: a baseline review. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 51: 96–136.
  9. Naniwadekar, R., Shukla, U., Viswanathan, A. and Datta, A. 2013. Records of small carnivores from in and around Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 49: 1–8.
  10. Mudappa, D. 2013. Herpestids, viverrids and mustelids. In: A.J.T. Johnsingh and N. Manjrekar (eds), <i>Mammals of South Asia: ecology, behaviour and conservation, 1</i>, pp. 471–498. Universities Press, Hyderabad, India.
  11. Kalle, R., Ramesh, T., Sankar, K. and Qureshi, Q. 2013. Observations of sympatric small carnivores in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 49: 53–59.
  12. Choudhury, A. 2013. <i>The mammals of North east India</i>. Gibbon Books and the Rhino Foundation for Nature in NE India, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  13. Goodman, S. 2012. <i>Les Carnivora de Madagascar</i>. Association Vahatra, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
  14. Feeroz, M.M., Hasan, M.K. and Hossain, M.K. 2012. <i>Biodiversity of protected areas of Bangladesh, Vol. 2: Dudpukuria-Dhopacharia Wildlife Sanctuary</i>. Bio Track. Arannayak Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  15. Feeroz, M.M., Hasan, M.K. and Khan, M.M.H. 2011. <i>Biodiversity of protected areas of Bangladesh, Vol. 1: Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary</i>. Bio Track. Arannayak Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  16. Low, C.H.S. 2011. Observations of civets, linsangs, mongooses and non-lutrine mustelids from Peninsular Malaysia. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 45: 8–13.
  17. Jennings, A.P. and Veron, G. 2011. Predicted distributions and ecological niches of 8 civet and mongoose species in Southeast Asia. <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i> 92: 316–327.
  18. Pei, K.J.-C., Lai, Y.-C., Corlett, R.T. and Suen, K.-Y. 2010. The larger mammal fauna of Hong Kong: species survival in an highly degraded landscape. <i>Zoological Studies</i> 49: 253–264.
  19. Lau, M.W.N., Fellowes, J.R. and Chan, B.P.L. 2010. Carnivores (Mammalia: Carnivora) in South China: a status review with notes on the commercial trade. <i>Mammal Review</i> 42: 247–292.
  20. Charoo, S.A., Sharma, L.K., Sathyakumar, S. and Naqash, R.Y. 2010. First record of Small Indian Civet <i>Viverricula indica</i> in the Kashmir Himalaya, India. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 43: 42–43.
  21. Holden, J. and Neang T. 2009. Small carnivore records from the Cardamom Mountains, southwestern Cambodia. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 40: 16–21.
  22. Chen, M., Tewes, M.E., Pei, K. and Grassman, L.I., Jr. 2009. Activity patterns and habitat use of sympatric small carnivores in southern Taiwan. <i>Mammalia</i> 73: 20–26.
  23. Schank, C., Pollard, E.H.B., Sechrest, W., Timmins, R., Holden, J. and Walston, J. 2009. First confirmed records of Large-toothed Ferret Badger <i>Melogale personata</i> in Cambodia, with notes on country records of <i>Melogale</i>. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 40: 11–15.
  24. Kock, D. and Stanley, W.T. 2009. Mammals of Mafia Island, Tanzania. <i>Mammalia</i> 73: 339–352.
  25. Pillay, R. 2009. Observation of small carnivores in the southern Western Ghats, India. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 40: 36–40.
  26. Than Zaw, Saw Htun, Saw Htoo Tha Po, Myint Maung, Lynam, A.J., Kyaw Thinn Latt and Duckworth, J.W. 2008. Status and distribution of small carnivores in Myanmar. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 38: 2–28.
  27. Shepherd, C.R. 2008. Civets in trade in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia (1997–2001) with notes on legal protection. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 38: 34–36.
  28. Khan, M.M.H. 2008. <i>Protected areas of Bangladesh- A guide to wildlife</i>. Nishorgo Program. Bangladesh Forest Department, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  29. Balakrishnan, M. and Sreedevi, M.B. 2007. Captive breeding of the Small Indian Civet <i>Viverricula indica</i> (É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1803). <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 36: 5–8.
  30. Mudappa, D., Noon, B.R., Kumar, A. and Chellam, R. 2007. Responses of small carnivores to rainforest fragmentation in the southern Western Ghats, India. <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 36: 18–26.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Choudhury, A.U., Duckworth, J.W., Timmins, R.J., Chutipong, W., Willcox, D.H.A., Rahman, H., Ghimirey, Y. & Mudappa, D.
contributor
Diyan, A.A., Ghimire, B. & Kakati, K.
evaluator
Schipper, J.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Choudhury, A.U., Duckworth, J.W., Timmins, R.J., Chutipong, W., Willcox, D.H.A., Rahman, H., Ghimirey, Y. & Mudappa, D. 2024. Viverricula indica (amended version of 2015 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T41710A259358589. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 8 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
3 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
11 ans
PanTHERIA
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Gestation
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Taille de portée
4
AnAge
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Sevrage
4,2 mois
AnAge

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
40 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (6)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Civetta indicaGeoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1803
  • Viverra indicaÉ. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1803
  • Viverra malaccensisGmelin, 1788
  • Viverricula hanensisMatschie, 1907
  • Viverricula indica(Desmarest, 1804)
  • Viverricula malaccensis

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).