Ontologia
Renard gris

Renard gris

Urocyon cinereoargenteus(Schreber, 1775)

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Canidae
5 photos · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Urocyon cinereoargenteus.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2016 · v3.1
Altitude
0 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The species is generally common, but appears to be restricted to locally dense habitats where it is not excluded by sympatric Coyotes (Canis latrans) and Bobcats (Lynx rufus) (Farias 2000b).

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 1_2
    Commercial & industrial areas
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 2_1_4
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 2_3_4
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 8_5_2
    Named species
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
There are no major range-wide threats to the species, but extreme habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation may be problematic in regions where human habitation is increasing rapidly and habitat is converted for agricultural, industrial, and urban uses. However, they are overall relatively adaptable and have become increasingly common even in urban environments. Grey foxes have been involved in some large die-offs due to canine distemper virus in parts of their range, and may also be affected by canine parvovirus and rabies.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_4Forest - Temperate
  • 1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
  • 3_6Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
  • 3_8Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation
  • 14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land
  • 14_2Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland
  • 14_5Artificial/Terrestrial - Urban Areas
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Legislation
Not listed in the CITES Appendices. The Grey Fox is legally protected as a harvested species in Canada and the United States (Fritzell 1987). 

Presence in protected areas
Grey Foxes occur in numerous protected areas throughout their range, such as Big Bend NP, San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge, Rocky Mountain NP and Everglades and Dry Tortugas NP, and Adirondack NP (Fuller and Cypher 2004).

Presence in captivity
A number of foxes are held in captivity, although there may be more in the hands of private collections/individuals who do not report to ISIS. Grey Foxes appear to fare well in captivity and commonly are on display at zoos and wildlife farms.

Gaps in knowledge
Because of the relatively high abundance and low economic value of Grey Foxes, surprisingly little research has been conducted on this species. Basic ecological and demographic information is needed for each of the major habitats occupied by Grey Foxes, and there remains limited information available on the impacts of disease (such as canine distemper and canine parvovirus) in most parts of the range, although ongoing work in north-western Mexico will provide new and important information (R. List pers. comm. 2015). Also, additional research on the response of Grey Foxes to human-altered landscapes (e.g., urban environments) is needed. In general, extremely little is known about the status and ecology of Grey Foxes outside of the USA and Canada. The effects of Grey Foxes on populations of smaller vertebrates, especially in urban and suburban settings without larger predators, may be important.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 2_1Site/area management
Stress écologiques (9)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 10Wearing apparel, accessories
    nationalsubsistance
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (3)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

NearcticNeotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (10)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
  2. Castellanos Morales, G., García Peña, N. and R. List. 2008. Uso de recursos del cacomixtle Bassariscus astutus y la Zorra Gris Urocyon cinereoargenteus en una reserva urbana de la ciudad de México. In: C. Lorenzo, E. Espinoza, J. Ortega and G.C. Ceballos (eds), <i>Avances en el estudio de los mamíferos II. </i>, pp. 377-390. Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A.C., México.
  3. Fuller, T.K. and Cypher, B.L. 2004. Gray fox <i>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</i> (Schreber, 1775). In: C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffmann and D.W. Macdonald (eds), <i>Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan</i>, pp. 92-97. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  4. Farias, V. 2000b. Gray fox distribution in southern California: detecting the effects of intraguild predation. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.
  5. Harrison, R.L. 1997. A comparison of gray fox ecology between residential and undeveloped rural landscapes. <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i> 61: 112-122.
  6. Linscombe, G. 1994. U.S. fur harvest (1970-92) and fur value (1974-1992) statistics by state and region. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  7. Eisenberg, J.F. 1989. <i>Panamá, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana</i>. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
  8. Fritzell, E.K. 1987. Gray fox and island gray fox. In: M. Novak, J.A. Baker, M.E. Obbard and D. Malloch (eds), <i>Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America</i>, pp. 408-420. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ontario Trappers Association, Ontario, Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  9. Fritzell, E.K. and Haroldson, K.J. 1982. Urocyon cinereoargenteus. <i>Mammalian Species</i> 189: 1-8.
  10. Hall, E.R. 1981. <i>The Mammals of North America</i>. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Roemer, G., Cypher, B. & List, R.
contributor
Fuller, T. & Ramirez-Chaves, H.
evaluator
Hoffmann, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.
facilitators
Hoffmann, M. & Thresher, S.

Roemer, G., Cypher, B. & List, R. 2016. Urocyon cinereoargenteus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22780A46178068. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

21 valeurs · 7 sources

Morphologie(5)

Masse adulte
4,75 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
95 g
AnAge
Masse cerveau
35 g
AnimalTraits
Masse au sevrage
520 g
AnAge

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
16 ans
AnAge
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Maturité sexuelle
11,3 mois
AnAge
Gestation
1,9 mois
AnAge
Intervalle naissances
1 ans
AnAge
Taille de portée
4
AnAge
Portées par an
1
AnAge
Sevrage
1,8 mois
AnAge

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Chant

4 captations · Xeno-canto
criA
9s
enregistrementB
24s
criB
22s
criB
13s

Hot-link CDN Xeno-canto. Chaque captation porte sa propre licence Creative Commons (visible quand la piste est active) et l'attribution de son auteur.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (1)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Canis cinereoargenteusSchreber, 1775

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).