Ontologia

Tulipa kolpakowskiana

Regel

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Tulipa kolpakowskiana.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéecritères B2b(i,ii,iii,iv,v)Décroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The overall population of this species is large at over 100,000 mature individuals with 100,000 occurring in Kazakhstan and 10,000 in Kyrgyzstan. The size of the Chinese population is unknown. There are a number of subpopulations that are large and grow extremely densely such as the subpopulation in the Ili-Alatau National Park site in Kazakhstan where nearly 1,000 tulips were observed within one square metre. Historical declines in the population have occurred (Davletkeldiev 2006) with an estimated 10% of the population lost. Due to ongoing threats from infrastructure development and conversion of habitat for agriculture around 10-15% of subpopulations are expected to disappear in the next three generations. Overall therefore there is a decline in the population.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 4_1
    Roads & railroads
    Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 11_1
    Habitat shifting & alteration
    UnknownWhole (>90%)Ongoing
  • 2_3_1
    Nomadic grazing
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_2_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    Very Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert

This species is threatened by livestock overgrazing, urbanisation and infrastructure development, expansion of agricultural land, climate change, and collection and trade. Livestock overgrazing is causing declines in habitat quality across large areas of Central Asia as trampling and grazing causes damage to ecosystems including to this species which is often found growing in areas used for livestock grazing (Davletkeldiev 2006). The development of infrastructure and expansion of urban areas, including roads, is leading to the loss of subpopulations that were growing near settlements, whilst the enlargement of agricultural areas is also leading to similar declines in habitat areas and the loss of some subpopulations especially as ploughing of these fields causes severe damage to tulips. In addition, this species is also often collected from wild subpopulations and in Kazakhstan there is a local trade in specimens of this plant leading to damage to subpopulations especially those near settlements and roads which are the easiest to collect from. Finally, climate change is projected to cause large areas of habitat to become unsuitable in the future (Wilson et al. 2021), although there remains some uncertainty around the accuracy of these predictions, meaning the impact of climate change needs to be monitored carefully for this species. Currently the main threats are from infrastructure development and agriculture especially ploughing of areas where tulips are growing.


Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_2Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland
  • 3_4Shrubland - Temperate
  • 4_4Grassland - Temperate
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert

This species is reported as Vulnerable in Kyrgyzstan (Davletkeldiev 2006), Threatened in Kazakhstan (Baitulin 2014), and Near Threatened in China (BGCI 2022b). This species is known to occur in the Ile-Alatau National Park, Almaty National Reserve, Altyn-Emel National Park, and Alakol Biosphere Reserve in Kazakhstan, although this covers only a small part of the population with no protection for higher altitude subpopulations. This species is not in any protected areas in Kyrgyzstan. The species is in 46 ex situ collections (BGCI 2022a) including the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. This species may require translocation efforts in the near future due to rapid shifts in habitat caused by climate change (Wilson et al. 2021), which given the limited dispersal ability of tulips, this species may not be able to naturally migrate with. There is a need to improve awareness and education surrounding this species.


Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (28)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
  • 16Establishing ex-situ production *
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Palearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Geophyte
Références bibliographiques (13)Expert
  1. BGCI. 2022b. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - ThreatSearch. Richmond, UK. Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Available at: <a href="http://www.bgci.org/threat_search.php">http://www.bgci.org/threat_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2022).
  2. BGCI. 2022a. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - PlantSearch. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2022).
  3. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  4. GBIF. 2021. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="https://www.gbif.org/.">https://www.gbif.org/.</a>.
  5. Wilson, B., Dolotbakov, A., Burgess, B.J., Clubbe, C., Lazkov, G., Shalpykov, K., Ganybaeva, M., Sultangaziev, O. and Brockington, S.F. 2021. Central Asian wild tulip conservation requires a regional approach, especially in the face of climate change. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 30: 1705-1730.
  6. Xing, G., Qu, L., Zhang, Y., Xue, L., Su, J. and Lei, J. 2017. Collection and evaluation of wild tulip (Tulipa spp.) resources in China. <i>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution</i> 64(4): 641-652.
  7. Baitulin, I.O. 2014. <i>Red Data Book of Kazakhstan. Volume 2: Plants.</i> AprPrintXXI, Astana, Kazakhstan.
  8. Everett, D. 2013. <i>The Genus </i>Tulipa<i>. Tulips of the World</i>. Kew Publishing, London.
  9. Wilford, R. 2013. Cultivation of Tulips. In: R. Linklater (ed.), <i>The Genus </i>Tulipa<i>. Tulips of the World</i>, pp. 25-32. Kew Publishing, London.
  10. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  11. Davletkeldiev, D.D. 2006. <i>Red Data Book of Kyrgyz Republic</i>. FAO NFPF, Bishkek.
  12. Rechinger, K.H. 1990. <i>Flora Iranica: Vol. 165: Liliaceae II</i>. Vienna.
  13. Botschantzeva, Z. 1982. <i>Tulips: taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeography and physiology</i>. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Wilson, B., Sultangaziev, О.E., Epiktetov, V., Usupbaev, A., Shalpykov, K., Ivashenko, A., Lazkov, G., Ganybaeva, M. & Dolotbakov, A.
contributor
Brockington, S., Cherniavskaia, M, Christenhusz, M., Gill, D., Kabaeva, A., Samanchina, J. & Tagaev, B.
evaluator
Sennikov, A.
facilitators
Davies, K.

Wilson, B., Sultangaziev, О.E., Epiktetov, V., Usupbaev, A., Shalpykov, K., Ivashenko, A., Lazkov, G., Ganybaeva, M. & Dolotbakov, A. 2022. Tulipa kolpakowskiana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T184531618A184539308. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (9)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Tulipa borszczowiiBaker
  • Tulipa aristataRegel
  • Tulipa dykesianaVved.
  • Tulipa hoeltzeri(Regel) Dykes
  • Tulipa kolpakovskianaRegel
  • Tulipa kolpakowskiana miniataTubergen
  • Tulipa kolpakowskiana splendensTubergen
  • Tulipa triphyllaRegel
  • Tulipa triphylla var. hoeltzeriRegel

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).