Tulipa jacquesii
Zonn.
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Tulipa jacquesii.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
VU · Vulnérablecritères B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v); C2a(i)↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2022 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 650 – m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
The overall population is estimated to be less than 10,000 mature individuals. Generally there are around 100 flowering individuals in each subpopulation, but there could be up to around 1,000 mature individuals. In some subpopulations density of this species can be up to 15 plants per square metre, however in more damaged areas it can be as low as one plant per square metre. Notably, it is more rare in these areas than Tulipa ferganica that can be found growing in the same habitat. Known subpopulations exist within the same valley region and are therefore not severely fragmented. One subpopulation occurs on sacred land, which may offer it some protection. Overall the number of individuals of this species is thought to be declining across the majority of subpopulations with a suspected decline of between 10 to 20% of the overall population likely within 30 years or three generations.
Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
11_1Habitat shifting & alterationUnknownWhole (>90%)Ongoing2_3_1Nomadic grazingSlow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing3_2Mining & quarryingVery Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
The main threats to this species are livestock overgrazing and mining activities. The majority of this species habitat is used as grazing areas for livestock and this is leading to habitat degradation as well as damage to plants through trampling and grazing, especially by goats. Livestock numbers are thought to be increasing across much of Central Asia, including Kyrgyzstan and therefore this threat is likely to escalate in future years (Borchardt and Dorre 2012). In addition, in parts of the range of this species, specifically around Kurpsay, extensive gold and coal mining activities are ongoing, which is both leading to habitat loss and degradation and declines in at least one subpopulation. Climate change may also pose a threat to this species with projections suggesting large areas of suitable habitat will disappear for a range of tulip species (Wilson et al. 2021). However, due to limited location data for this species, projections were not possible and so the impact of climate change on this species remains uncertain.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
14_2Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland★3_4Shrubland - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
This species was described in 2015 (Zonneveld 2015) and currently is not recognised on the national red list of Kyrgyzstan and is not reported to occur in any protected areas. This species is rarely found in ex situ collections with it recorded from only a single collection on BGCI's PlantSearch tool (BGCI 2022), although it was recently added to the collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Gareev Botanical Garden in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. This species may require translocation efforts as rapid habitat shifts will occur as the impacts of climate change increase (Wilson et al. 2021). In addition, control of livestock grazing during flowering time will be important either through improved management schemes, providing hay to farmers during this time as an alternative food source for livestock, or by fencing areas of important tulip habitat to prevent grazing, although this would need to be enforced. Moreover, a protected area should be established in Beke Chal where there is a forestry unit and an important subpopulation of this species exists.
Actions de conservation (6)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection1_2Resource & habitat protection2_1Site/area management3_4_1Captive breeding/artificial propagation4_3Awareness & communications6_1Linked enterprises & livelihood alternatives
Stress écologiques (14)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_3_7Reduced reproductive success2_3_7Reduced reproductive success2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (1)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
16Establishing ex-situ production *internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_5Threats3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Palearctic
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Geophyte
Références bibliographiques (10)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- BGCI. 2022. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - PlantSearch. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2022).
- Wilson, B., Dolotbakov, A., Burgess, B.J., Clubbe, C., Lazkov, G., Shalpykov, K., Ganybaeva, M., Sultangaziev, O. and Brockington, S.F. 2021. Central Asian wild tulip conservation requires a regional approach, especially in the face of climate change. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 30: 1705-1730.
- Chen, T., Bao, A., Jiapaer, G., Guo, H., Zheng, G., Jiang, L., Chang, C. and Tuerhanjiang, L. 2019. Disentangling the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on arid and semiarid grasslands in Central Asia during 1982–2015. <i>Science of The Total Environment</i> 653: 1311-1325.
- Zonneveld, B.J.M. 2015. <i>Tulipa jacquesii</i> (Liliaceae), a new species from western Kyrgyzstan. <i>Phytotaxa</i> 218(2): 184-188.
- Wilford, R. 2013. Cultivation of Tulips. In: R. Linklater (ed.), <i>The Genus </i>Tulipa<i>. Tulips of the World</i>, pp. 25-32. Kew Publishing, London.
- Borchardt, P. and Dorre, A. 2012. Changing systems, changing effects — pasture utilization in the post-Soviet transition. <i>Mountain Research and Development</i> 32(3): 313-323.
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
- Davletkeldiev, D.D. 2006. <i>Red Data Book of Kyrgyz Republic</i>. FAO NFPF, Bishkek.
- Botschantzeva, Z. 1982. <i>Tulips: taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeography and physiology</i>. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Wilson, B., Sultangaziev, О.E., Dolotbakov, A., Shalpykov, K., Ganybaeva, M., Lazkov, G. & Usupbaev, A.
contributor
Brockington, S., Cherniavskaia, M, Christenhusz, M., Gill, D., Kabaeva, A., Samanchina, J. & Tagaev, B.
evaluator
Sennikov, A.
facilitators
Davies, K.
Wilson, B., Sultangaziev, О.E., Dolotbakov, A., Shalpykov, K., Ganybaeva, M., Lazkov, G. & Usupbaev, A. 2022. Tulipa jacquesii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T184531473A184539293. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s
Phénologie
Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s