Ontologia
Trillium pusillum

Trillium pusillum

Michx.

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Chargement du graphe…

Indicateurs du réseau écologique

Comment lire ce graphe

Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Trillium pusillum et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.

Limites principales

  • Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
  • Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
  • Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
  • Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
  • Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
  • Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.

Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées

Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :

  • Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
  • Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
  • Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
  • Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
  • Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)

Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).

Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).

Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata

3 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.

Partenaires
3
Espèces avec interactions documentées
Types d'interactions
2
Prédation, pollinisation, parasitisme…
Connectance
0.143
Densité des liens dans le sous-graphe affiché
Rang plantae
47 %
Percentile vs ensemble des plantae

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
01360 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert

Ozarkanum cluster

Though several taxa within the T. pusillum complex are rare or uncommon, as a collective, their population is quite large. Trillium ozarkanum is abundant in several occurrences and largely drives this trend (Case and Case 2009, NatureServe 2019). The combined known population of all subtaxa probably exceeds 150,000 individuals suggesting population of the species complex is not limited at a level that qualifies for threatened status. Trillium ozarkanum has an estimated population of 135,000 individuals in 44 subpopulations (NatureServe 2019). Trillium alabamicum is described as common in portions of its range and several occurrences composed of many thousands of plants are known (NatureServe 2019). Population declines may be occurring in some areas, but are not likely to present a substantial extinction risk to the species at this time.

Pusillum Cluster

By contrast, T. pusillum sensu stricto has a population of fewer than 10,000 individuals (NatureServe 2019). Trillium telmacola has an extremely restricted population composed of potentially fewer than 50 mature individuals (Farmer pers comm 2019).

Virginianum Cluster

Trillium virginianum has a population of fewer than 10,000 individuals (NatureServe 2019). Of the 55 documented occurrences of this taxon, 17 are historic, and two have been extirpated as a result of habitat disturbance. The remaining population is extremely fragmented and concentrated into very few sites containing more than 1,000 individuals. Trillium monticola is known from two occurrences each comprised of approximately 300 stems (Bodkin and Reveal 1982, Bodkin and Reveal 1983). Trillium palustris is known from nine total occurrences, seven of which have been observed in the past 30 years (NatureServe 2019). Trillium carolinianum is known from eight occurrences. Two of these could not be relocated when last visited. Subpopulations that have been revisited repeatedly appear to undergoing population declines (NatureServe 2019).

The population trajectory of the entire species complex is not well understood but is likely to be declining.

Menaces identifiées(12 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Past, Unlikely to Return
  • 7_2_4
    Abstraction of surface water (unknown use)
    Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 1_2
    Commercial & industrial areas
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 2_2_2
    Agro-industry plantations
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 2_3_3
    Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 4_2
    Utility & service lines
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 8_1_2
    Named species
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 8_1_2
    Named species
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing

+ 2 menaces supplémentaires

Description complète des menacesExpert
Predation of subaerial structures by White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) has been shown to depress population and reduce fecundity in Trillium grandiflorum and Trillium erectum (Augustine and Frelich 1998, Goetsch et al. 2011, Kalisz et al. 2014, Knight 2004, Rooney and Gross 2003, Webster et al. 2015), but herbivory may also provide a critical means of seed dispersal (Vellend et al. 2003). In some regions, Trillium fecundity is reduced through non-consumptive interactions with deer (Knight et al. 2009). Increasing deer populations in much of the species complex’s range are expected to result in net declines in fecundity for the taxon (Dávalos et al. 2014). In some areas with particularly high deer population, declines in Trillium population may be sufficient to trigger Threatened status under Criterion A. The specific impact of deer predation on the Trillium pusillum complex is not well studied. However, several taxa are expected to be negatively impacted by deer herbivory.

Within the range of Trillium monticola, White-tailed Deer density in Augusta and Rockingham Counties, Virginia was greater than 30 individuals per square mile in 1988. As of 2004, the population index of White-tailed Deer in Rockingham and Augusta Counties was listed as Low and Medium, respectively, on both privately held and public land. Augusta County is only slightly below the threshold for qualification as Medium in both cases. More recent data (reported from 2012-2014) suggests relative deer population abundance is moderate in Augusta County and High in Rockingham County (VDGIF 2015). Deer predation in this area is likely to result in continuing habitat quality declines for Trillium monticola which, given its restricted distribution and small total population, may be especially sensitive to herbivory. White-tailed Deer are also present in large numbers at the Savannah River Site (Johns and Kilgo 2005) and predation is likely to pose a threat to T. telmacola in this area.

Feral pigs (Sus domesticus) are likely to impact several taxa within the T. pusillum complex. Mortality and habitat quality declines caused by feral pigs have been documented among several Trillium species (Howe and Bratton 1976, Plants for a Future 2018). Feral pig populations are relatively large in much of the southern United States (McClure et al. 2015) and could present a potential threat to Trillium species anywhere within this range. The impact of feral pigs is likely to be much more severe for species which occur in wetland habitats including T. alabamicum, T. pusillum, T. telmacola, and T. virginianum. In particular, large numbers of feral pigs are present on the Savannah River Site posing a major threat to Trillium telmacola (Mayer and Brisbin 2009).

Threats which may have paradoxical impacts on individual subtaxa include forestry practices and the opening of forest canopy. Several members of the species complex are relatively tolerant of disturbance (NatureServe 2019, Swick 2019) and can occur along the margins of artificially cleared areas (utility rights-of-way, clearcut margins, etc.). Disturbance caused by large-scale forest clearance has been shown to negatively impact some taxa (including T. pusillum, and T. virginianum) (NatureServe 2019), but limited clearance of small areas may increase habitat suitability for a number of subtaxa. Silvicultural practices which promote monotypic coniferous stands may also negatively impact the some members of the species complex.

Habitat loss resulting from residential and industrial development is thought to present a threat to T. virginianum and T. pusillum (NatureServe 2019). Within T. pusillum’s range, Brunswick and Pender Counties, North Carolina have among the highest rates of urban expansion in North Carolina and predicted population increases between 2010 to 2030 are 58% and 45%, respectively (Claggett et al. 2015). Subpopulations in South Carolina may face variable impacts due to urban expansion as Dorchester County is rapidly expanding in population while Calhoun and Sumter Counties have recently experienced population declines (United States Census Bureau 2019).

Trillium virginianum is threatened by grazing (NatureServe 2019). Hydrologic changes which could alter critical wetland habitats may pose a threat for those taxa relying on these areas (NatureServe 2019). Though Trillium ozarkanum’s population is relatively stable, development and associated hydrological changes has extirpated several subpopulations in northwest Arkansas and these processes threaten additional subpopulations in southwestern Missouri (NatureServe 2019).

Competing invasive plant species may have negative impacts on some subpopulations of T. alabamicum and T. carolinianum. Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) may cause population declines due to habitat modification and has been implicated in the extirpation of at least one subpopulation of T. carolinainum (NatureServe 2019).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_4Forest - Temperate
  • 5_4Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert

Additional taxonomic research is required to clarify the status of several . Population monitoring is needed to inform future conservation efforts. Surveys should be conducted for subpopulations which have not been visited in many years and which may have been extirpated to better prioritize efforts. Due to the ephemeral nature of some subpopulations, particularly in the case of T. telmacola which may bloom for very brief periods prior to prostrating and becoming very difficult to observe, additional studies of the life-history of the species complex are needed. Without this information, surveys may inaccurately portray the conservation status of some subpopulations. Additional surveys are needed, including in subpopulations that have not been relocated, to better document the species complex’s range, population, threats, and population trend.

Protected status of each member of the species complex varies considerably. Inadequate protection exists for those taxa which do not occur in any protected areas (NatureServe 2019). Trillium pusillum var. virginianum is listed as Threatened in Maryland and Endangered in North Carolina (USDA, NRCS 2019). Additional long-term protection may be warranted for all members of the T. pusillum complex in Maryland, North Carolina, and eastern Virginia. Both T. p. var. ozarkanum and T. p. var. pusillum are listed as Endangered in Kentucky, North Carolina, and Tennessee (USDA, NRCS 2019).

Trillium telmacola occurs entirely within the Savannah River Site, a nuclear research facility with extremely limited public access. Though the area is protected from most forms of land conversion, control of white-tailed deer and feral pig population may be inadequate in the area (Johns and Kilgo 2005, Mayer and Brisbin 2009).

Six of the nine documented occurrences of T. palustris are in protected areas (NatureServe 2019). Trillium carolinianum occurs in protected areas in Nash County, North Carolina (three sites), and Grayson County, Virginia, though the status of the latter is unknown and it may have been extirpated (NatureServe 2019).

Systematic population monitoring should be conducted for taxa with small distributions, particularly in cases where population declines may be occurring (as with T. carolinianum) and for taxa with increasing threat levels.

Ex situ collections of the species are held at 30 botanic garden sites (BGCI 2019).



Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 2_2Invasive/problematic species control
Stress écologiques (23)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_2Competition
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    national
Priorités de recherche (6)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Nearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or HerbGeophyte
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 13 June 2020).
  2. Swick, E.N. 2019. Ecological Investigation of a Population of Trillium pusillum at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. Biological Sciences, Auburn University.
  3. Board of Trustees, RBG Kew. 2019. Plants of the World Online Portal. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org">http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org</a>.
  4. USDA, NRCS. 2019. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, NC Available at: <a href="http://plants.usda.gov">http://plants.usda.gov</a>. (Accessed: 3 January 2019).
  5. NatureServe. 2019. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Arlington, Virginia Available at: <a href="http://explorer.natureserve.org">http://explorer.natureserve.org</a>. (Accessed: 3 January 2019).
  6. United States Census Bureau. 2019. TIGERweb Online Application. Available at: <a href="https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/tigerwebmain/TIGERweb_main.html">https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/tigerwebmain/TIGERweb_main.html</a>. (Accessed: 5 December 2019).
  7. Chauhan, H. K., Bisht, A. K., Bhatt, I. D., Bhatt, A. and Gallacher, D. 2019. Trillium – toward Sustainable Utilization of a Biologically Distinct Genus Valued for Traditional Medicine. <i>The Botanical Review</i> 85(3): 252-272.
  8. BGCI. 2018. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  9. Plants for a Future. 2018. Trillium erectum Beth Root - Indian Balm, Red trillium, Wakerobin, Purple Trillium. Available at: <a href="https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Trillium+erectum">https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Trillium+erectum</a>. (Accessed: 14 December 2018).
  10. United Plant Savers. 2018. Trillium. Available at: <a href="https://unitedplantsavers.org/trillium/">https://unitedplantsavers.org/trillium/</a>. (Accessed: 19 December 2018).
  11. Claggett, P., Hearn, Jr., P. P. and Donato, D. I. 2015. Historic and forecasted population and land-cover change in eastern North Carolina, 1992-2030. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
  12. Weakley, A.S. 2015. Flora of the Southern and Mid-Atlantic States. Working draft. Available at: <a href="http://herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2015-05-29.pdf">http://herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2015-05-29.pdf</a>.
  13. VDGIF. 2015. Virginia Deer Management Plan 2015-2024. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, VA.
  14. McClure, M. L., Burdett, C. L., Farnsworth, M. L., Lutman, M. W., Theobald, D. M., Riggs, P. D., Grear, D. A. and Miller, R. S. 2015. Modeling and Mapping the Probability of Occurrence of Invasive Wild Pigs across the Contiguous United States. <i>PLOS ONE</i> 10(8): e0133771.
  15. Webster, C. R., Jenkins, M. A. and Poznanovic, A. J. 2015. Spatial patterning and floral synchrony among trillium populations with contrasting histories of herbivory. <i>PeerJ</i> 3: e782.
  16. Dávalos, A., Nuzzo, V. and Blossey, B. 2014. Demographic responses of rare forest plants to multiple stressors: the role of deer, invasive species and nutrients. <i>Journal of Ecology</i> 102(5): 1222-1233.
  17. Kalisz, S., Spigler, R. B. and Horvitz, C. C. 2014. In a long-term experimental demography study, excluding ungulates reversed invader’s explosive population growth rate and restored natives. <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i> 111(12): 4501-4506.
  18. Goetsch, C., Wigg, J., Royo, A. A., Ristau, T. and Carson, W. P. 2011. Chronic over browsing and biodiversity collapse in a forest understory in Pennsylvania: Results from a 60 year-old deer exclusion plot. <i>The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society</i> 138(2): 220-224.
  19. Case, F. W. and Case, R. B. 2009. <i>Trilliums</i>. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  20. Mayer, J. and Brisbin, I. L. 2009. Wild pigs: biology, damage, control techinques and management. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC.
  21. Knight, T. M., Dunn, J. L., Smith, L. A., Davis, J. and Kalisz, S. 2009. Deer Facilitate Invasive Plant Success in a Pennsylvania Forest Understory. <i>Natural Areas Journal</i> 29(2): 110-116.
  22. Farmer, S.B. 2007. A Systematic Study of Trillium subgenus Delostylis. Botany, University of Tennesee.
  23. Johns, P. E. and Kilgo, J. C. 2005. White-tailed deer. In: J. C. Kilgo and J. I. Blake (eds), <i>Ecology and management of a forestlandscape: fifty years on the Savannah River Site</i>, pp. 380-389. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  24. Knight, T. M. 2004. The Effects of Herbivory and Pollen Limitation on a Declining Population of Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Ecological Applications</i> 14(3): 915-928.
  25. Rooney, T. P. and Gross, K. 2003. A demographic study of deer browsing impacts on Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Plant Ecology</i> 168: 267-277.
  26. Vellend, M., Myers, J. A., Gardescu, S. and Marks, P. L. 2003. Dispersal of Trillium Seeds by Deer: Implications for Long-Distance Migration of Forest Herbs. <i>Ecology</i> 84(4): 1067-1072.
  27. Flora of North America (FNA) Editorial Committee. 2002. <i>Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales</i>. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  28. Kalisz, S., Hanzawa, F. M., Tonsor, S. J., Thiede, D. A. and Voigt, S. 1999. Ant-mediated seed dispersal alters pattern of relatedness in a population of Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Ecology</i> 80(8): 2620-2634.
  29. Augustine, D. J. and Frelich, L. E. 1998. Effects of White-Tailed Deer on Populations of an Understory Forb in Fragmented Deciduous Forests. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 12(5): 995-104.
  30. Ohara, M. 1989. Life history evolution in the genus Trillium. <i>Plant Species Biology</i> 4(1): 1-28.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Meredith, C.R. & Trillium Working Group 2019
contributor
Farmer, S.B., Schilling, E., Floden, A., Oliver, L., Schotz, A. & O'Bryan, S.
evaluator
Leaman, D.J.
institutions
ABQ BioPark

Meredith, C.R. & Trillium Working Group 2019 2020. Trillium pusillum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T146086995A146089295. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale

Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (10)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Trillium alabamicumJ.G. Garrett ex S.B. Farmer
  • Trillium carolinianumS.B. Farmer
  • Trillium monticola(Bodkin & Reveal) S.B. Farmer
  • Trillium palustrisS.B. Farmer
  • Trillium pusillum var. kentuckianumMichx.
  • Trillium pusillum var. monticolaMichx.
  • Trillium pusillum var. monticulumMichx.
  • Trillium pusillum var. ozarkanumMichx.
  • Trillium pusillum var. virginianumMichx.
  • Trillium telmacolaS.B. Farmer

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).