.png?width=220)
Trille blanc
Trillium grandiflorum(Michx.) Salisb.
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Trillium grandiflorum.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2020 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 20 – 700 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
In suitable habitat, the species occurs in large numbers and it is unlikely to meet the thresholds necessary for threatened status under criteria C or D (Chmielewski and Ringius 1987). NatureServe (2018) notes the species to be rare at the margins of its range in Nova Scotia, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Alabama. The species has possibly been extirpated in the state of Maine (NatureServe 2018).
Population trends differ dramatically between subpopulations (Knight et al. 2009) but predation by White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) has demonstrable negative impacts on population, and results in dramatic declines in the number of mature individuals in individual subpopulations (Augustine and Frelich 1998, Knight et al. 2009, Rooney and Gross 2003). Given the pervasiveness of White-tailed Deer overabundance throughout the range of White Trillium (Russell et al. 2001), it is likely that overall population is declining. Observed population declines range from stability or growth, to declines of more than 10% annually (Knight et al. 2009). Under predation pressure, declines of one to three percent have been observed in several areas within the northern portion of the species’ range (Augustine and Frelich 1998, Knight et al. 2009, Rooney and Gross 2003). Though comprehensive studies of the overall population trajectory have not been conducted within the entirety of the species’ range, population declines throughout the species' range are unlikely to reach the necessary thresholds for listing under criterion A given its potential for recovery, extremely large population, and wide geographic range.
Menaces identifiées(11 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
1_1Housing & urban areasRapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing1_2Commercial & industrial areasRapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing2_2_2Agro-industry plantationsCausing/Could cause fluctuationsMinority (<50%)Ongoing3_1Oil & gas drillingCausing/Could cause fluctuationsMinority (<50%)Ongoing5_2_1Intentional use (species is the target)Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMajority (50-90%)Ongoing8_1_2Named speciesCausing/Could cause fluctuationsMinority (<50%)Ongoing8_2_2Named speciesNegligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing8_1_1Unspecified speciesUnknownMajority (50-90%)Ongoing8_2_2Named speciesSlow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing9_5_1Acid rainSlow, Significant DeclinesUnknownOngoing
+ 1 menaces supplémentaires
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
The primary threat to White Trillium subpopulations is the large increase in White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations over the past 50 years (Russell et al. 2001). High levels of herbivory have been shown to reduce the number of reproductive plants relative to nonreproductive plants as deer preferentially browse on the largest, reproductive individuals in a given subpopulation (Anderson 1994, Augustine and Frelich 1998, Knight 2007). The impact of deer predation varies seasonally. Early spring herbivory results in recruitment failure for the year and decreases likelihood of flowering the following year where late season herbivory is less likely to impact fecundity in subsequent years (Knight 2007). Herbivory levels exceeding 15% of large 3-leaf stage and reproductive individuals within a subpopulation are predicted to result in population declines in western Pennsylvania (Knight et al. 2009).
Observed levels of herbivory in studied populations vary considerably. Rates of herbivory (among all age classes) within observed subpopulations range from 0% - 60% in western Pennsylvania (Knight et al. 2009). This study demonstrated that eight of the twelve observed subpopulations were under herbivory pressure exceeding the 15% threshold, indicating ongoing population declines. Subpopulations in northern Wisconsin and western upper Michigan have observed rates of herbivory among all size classes ranging from 0% - 30% (Rooney and Gross 2003). In southeastern Minnesota, annual rates of observed herbivory range from 24% - 77% of reproductive plants (Augustine and Frelich 1998).
Some uncertainty remains regarding the impact of White-tailed Deer overabundance across a regional scale. The areas where demographic studies specific to White Trillium have been conducted correspond to regions where the broader impact of White-tailed Deer overabundance is comparatively well characterized. By contrast, less is known about the impact of White-tailed Deer overabundance in the southern Appalachians (Russell et al. 2001). The population trends observed in the northern range of White Trillium are expected to occur in southern regions where impacts of overabundance are less well understood, but additional monitoring, and exclusion studies are necessary. Elk (Cervus elephus) reintroduction efforts in eastern North America have had varying levels of success over the course of the last century, but herds exceeding 10,000 individuals are now present in southeastern Kentucky (Popp 2017). Large herds in Kentucky have been noted to cause declines in Trillium subpopulations in the area and are likely to cause minor declines in other areas where Elk reintroduction efforts are successful. At present, declines attributable to Elk predation are thought to be very localized in scope.
Though the species is self-compatible (Irwin 2000), it may become pollen limited in fragmented forest habitats, and areas where heavy predation pressure reduces floral density, though this impact is not thought to alter population trajectories (Knight 2004). However, forest fragmentation is correlated with increases in deer populations and may result in greater predation pressure within remaining forested areas (Augustine and Frelich 1998, Horsley et al. 2003). Soil acidification resulting from industrial air pollution may cause significant and irreversible declines in populations, particularly on the Allegheny Plateau (Thompson and Sharpe 2005). Other threats to the species include habitat loss caused by development, competing invasive plants, logging, and mining. The intensity and scope of these threats varies across the expansive range of the species. Rooting from feral hogs may impact the southern margins of the species' range.
The cumulative impact of threats to the species is not well understood. Population trends differ between subpopulations at a local level in response to predation pressure, but the threats impacting populations are pervasive throughout the species’ range indicating that range-wide declines are likely. The impact of declines due to White-tailed Deer herbivory is also not linear through time. Declines primarily impact reproductive individuals resulting in subpopulations dominated non-reproductive three-leaf stage individuals (Knight et al. 2009). Over time, reductions in the overall fecundity of the population resulting from demographic changes are likely to result in population decline.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_4Forest - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
The species is classified as Exploitably Vulnerable in New York (USDA, NRCS 2018). Though no specific protections exist for the species in much of its range, the species incidentally occurs in a number of protected areas (IUCN and UNEP-WCMC 2018).
Additional monitoring of population is necessary to better characterize the species' population trajectory. As the primary threat to the survival of the species is overabundance of White-tailed Deer, effective conservation measures must focus on management of these populations through changes to game management practices, or re-introduction of natural predators.
Actions de conservation (1)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
2_2Invasive/problematic species control
Stress écologiques (26)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (3)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - human13Pets/display animals, horticulturenational3Medicine - human & veterinary
Priorités de recherche (3)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_6Actions3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Formes de croissance
Références bibliographiques (23)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 13 June 2020).
- (USDA, NRCS) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro Available at: <a href="https://plants.usda.gov">https://plants.usda.gov</a>. (Accessed: 21 February 2018).
- NatureServe. 2018. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 6.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: September 6, 2018).
- IUCN and UNEP-WCMC. 2018. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, U.K. Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>.
- Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center. 2018. Native Plant Database. Native Plant Information Network. Available at: <a href="http://www.wildflower.org/plants/result.php?id_plant=HEAN4">http://www.wildflower.org/plants/result.php?id_plant=HEAN4</a>. (Accessed: 1 June).
- Moerman, D. 2018. Native American Ethnobotany. A Database of Foods, Drugs, Dyes and Fibers of Native American Peoples, Derived from Plants. Dearborn Available at: <a href="http://naeb.brit.org/">http://naeb.brit.org/</a>. (Accessed: 15 August 2018).
- Popp, J. N. 2017. Population Dynamics of Reintroduced Elk (Cervus elaphus) in Eastern North America. Boreal Ecology, Laurentian University.
- Knight, T. M., Caswell, H. and Kalisz, S. 2009. Population growth rate of a common understory herb decreases non-linearly across a gradient of deer herbivory. <i>Forest Ecology and Management</i> 257(3): 1095-1103.
- Knight, T. M. 2007. Population-Level Consequences of Herbivory Timing in Trillium grandiflorum. <i>American Midland Naturalist</i> 157(1): 27-38.
- Rooney, T., and Millam, K. 2006. Population Demography and Herbivory of Trillium Grandiflorum. <i>Aliso</i> 22(1): 593-597.
- Thompson, J. A. and Sharpe, W. E. 2005. Soil Fertility, White-tailed Deer, and Three Trillium Species: A Field Study. <i>Northeastern Naturalist</i> 12(4): 379-390.
- Knight, T. M. 2004. The Effects of Herbivory and Pollen Limitation on a Declining Population of Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Ecological Applications</i> 14(3): 915-928.
- Rooney, T. P. and Gross, K. 2003. A demographic study of deer browsing impacts on Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Plant Ecology</i> 168: 267-277.
- Horsley, S. B., Stout, S. L. and deCalesta, D. S. 2003. White-Tailed Deer Impact on the Vegetation Dynamics of a Northern Hardwood Forest. <i>Ecological Applications</i> 13(1): 98-18.
- Flora of North America (FNA) Editorial Committee. 2002. <i>Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales</i>. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
- Russell, F. L., Zippin, D. B. and Fowler, N. L. 2001. Effects of White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on Plants, Plant Populations and Communities: A Review. <i>The American Midland Naturalist</i> 146(1): 1-26.
- Irwin, R. E. 2000. Morphological variation and female reproductive success in two sympatric Trillium species: evidence for phenotypic selection in Trillium erectum and Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). <i>American Journal of Botany</i> 87(2): 205-214.
- Kalisz, S., Hanzawa, F. M., Tonsor, S. J., Thiede, D. A. and Voigt, S. 1999. Ant-mediated seed dispersal alters pattern of relatedness in a population of Trillium grandiflorum. <i>Ecology</i> 80(8): 2620-2634.
- Augustine, D. J. and Frelich, L. E. 1998. Effects of White-Tailed Deer on Populations of an Understory Forb in Fragmented Deciduous Forests. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 12(5): 995-104.
- Anderson, R. C. 1994. Height of white-flowered trillium (Trillium grandiflorum) as an index of deer browsing intensity. <i>Ecological Applications</i> 4(1): 104-109.
- Chmielewski, J. G. and Ringius, G. S. 1987. Biomass-allocation patterns in populations of Trillium erectum and T. grandiflorum in southern Ontario. <i>Canadian Journal of Botany</i> 65(8): 1671-1675.
- Patrick, T. S. 1973. Observations on the life history of Trillium grandiflorum (Michaux) Salisbury. Cornell University.
- King, J., Felter, H. W. and Lloyd, J. U. 1905. <i>King’s American Dispensatory</i>. Ohio Valley Company, Cincinnati, OH.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (5)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Meredith, C.R. & Trillium Working Group 2019 2020. Trillium grandiflorum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T116996347A135833540. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (33)— redirigent vers cette page
- Trillium erythrocarpumCurtis
- Trillium chandleriFarw.
- Trillium chandleri f. foliaceumFarw.
- Trillium chandleri f. gladewitziiFarw.
- Trillium chandleri f. palaceumFarw.
- Trillium chandleri f. plenumFarw.
- Trillium chandleri f. subulatumFarw.
- Trillium grandiflorum f. chandleri(Farw.) Vict.
- Trillium grandiflorum f. dimerumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. divisumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. elongatumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. grandiflorum
- Trillium grandiflorum f. lirioides(Raf.) Vict.
- Trillium grandiflorum f. petalosumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. polymerumVict.
- Trillium grandiflorum f. regressumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. roseumFarw.
- Trillium grandiflorum f. striatumLouis-Marie
- Trillium grandiflorum f. virideFarw.
- Trillium grandiflorum var. lirioidesVict.
- Trillium grandiflorum var. macropetalumRegel
- Trillium grandiflorum var. minimumN.Coleman
- Trillium lirioidesRaf.
- Trillium lirioides f. albomarginatumFarw.
- Trillium lirioides f. giganteumFarw.
- Trillium lirioides f. subsessileFarw.
- Trillium lirioides f. ungulatumFarw.
- Trillium lirioides f. variegatumFarw.
- Trillium lirioides var. longepetiolatumFarw.
- Trillium lirioides var. longipetiolatumFarw.
- Trillium liroides f. vegetumFarw.
- Trillium obcordatumRaf.
- Trillium rhomboideum var. grandiflorumMichx.
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).