Tillandsia candida
Leme
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.
Liste rouge IUCN
VU · Vulnérablecritères B2ab(iii)?Inconnue- Évaluation
- 2014 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 1000 – 1000 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
This species is only known from the type collection. The size and dynamics of the population are unknown.
Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
5_2_1Intentional use (species is the target)UnknownUnknownOngoing2_1_1Shifting agricultureOngoing2_1_2Small-holder farmingOngoing5_3_4Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]Ongoing7_1_3Trend Unknown/UnrecordedOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
In Central and South America, epiphytes have experienced dramatic population decreases mainly because of habitat loss and extraction activities, which have driven many species close to extinction (Mondragon et al. 2006). Caatinga originally covered ca 70% of the vegetative cover of northeast Brazil. At least 50% of the Caatinga has been either completely converted from its native vegetation or modified in a major way by human activities (i.e., the second/third most degraded ecosystem in Brazil) (Da Silva 2001, Leal et al. 2005). Specific activities include: unsustainable timber extraction for fuel, clearance for pastures, overgrazing, slash and burn agriculture, "Sertanjos" (conversion of remnant vegetation to new and short lived crops), extensive and uncontrolled fires and, more recently, cotton and sugar cane cultivation.
Fragmentation of forests is a major cause of bromeliad extinction. It causes local and regional extirpation of emergent trees (key habitats for epiphytic bromeliads) and vertebrate seed dispersers, a reduction in pollinator abundance and leads to habitat desiccation and invasion of ruderal plants. Fragments are therefore more prone to fire, which appears to be detrimental to many bromeliad species (Benzing 2000, Ariani et al. 2004, Filho and Leme 2007). Forest fragmentation also facilitates the extraction of ornamental species (Benzing 2000, Filho and leme 2006, Filho and Tabarelli 2006), including many Tillandsia spp. However, microclimatic conditions in fragmented landscapes, which are generally drier and more exposed force a shift from shade loving, mesic to sun loving and drought tolerant bromeliads (Wolf 2005, Filho and Leme 2006, Cascante-Marin et al. 2009). Type V Tillandsia are usually drought tolerant and often heliophile. Tillandsoid epiphytes, especially atmospheric (type V) Tillandsia, are frequently reported to occur in higher abundance compared to other bromeliad species and types of epiphytes in disturbed sites, where higher light and drought stress are common (Cascante-Marin et al. 2008, Reyes-Garcia et al. 2008).
Many bromeliads have become very important horticultural plants because of their unique appearance (Barfuss et al. 2005). Bromeliads may also be of ornamental or ceremonial value to indigenous people. As a consequence, there is a local and rapidly expanding international market for bromeliads, which are collected in large numbers from natural populations without control of the extraction rate (Read 1989, Wolf and Konings 2001). Over the last 20 years, bromeliads have become more popular in Brazil as home and garden ornamentals and this has promoted increasing collection pressures on wild populations (Versieux and Wendt 2007). It is not known whether T. candida is collected for these purposes but commercial exploitation of wild populations may develop unchecked as new groups of plants become fashionable (Read 1989, Cascante-Marin 2009). Tillandsia species are relatively difficult to propagate and take several years to flower from seeds. Propagation by offsets, which form after flowering, is only in a limited number. These increase the incentive to collect wild specimen for direct sale. There is considerable evidence that many plants for sale are collected from the wild in Central and South America.
In the northeastern Atlantic Forest, some ornamental bromeliads have been intensively collected and almost eliminated from forest fragments close to human settlements (Filho and Tabarelli 2006). In Mexico, the volume of illicitly traded epiphytes in local markets exceeds legal exports and comprise many species (Toledo-Aceves and Wolf 2008). Bromeliads with narrow geographic distribution can be considered extremely vulnerable to commercial exploitation. Grey leaved Tillandsia, like T. candida, are the most at risk.
Fragmentation of forests is a major cause of bromeliad extinction. It causes local and regional extirpation of emergent trees (key habitats for epiphytic bromeliads) and vertebrate seed dispersers, a reduction in pollinator abundance and leads to habitat desiccation and invasion of ruderal plants. Fragments are therefore more prone to fire, which appears to be detrimental to many bromeliad species (Benzing 2000, Ariani et al. 2004, Filho and Leme 2007). Forest fragmentation also facilitates the extraction of ornamental species (Benzing 2000, Filho and leme 2006, Filho and Tabarelli 2006), including many Tillandsia spp. However, microclimatic conditions in fragmented landscapes, which are generally drier and more exposed force a shift from shade loving, mesic to sun loving and drought tolerant bromeliads (Wolf 2005, Filho and Leme 2006, Cascante-Marin et al. 2009). Type V Tillandsia are usually drought tolerant and often heliophile. Tillandsoid epiphytes, especially atmospheric (type V) Tillandsia, are frequently reported to occur in higher abundance compared to other bromeliad species and types of epiphytes in disturbed sites, where higher light and drought stress are common (Cascante-Marin et al. 2008, Reyes-Garcia et al. 2008).
Many bromeliads have become very important horticultural plants because of their unique appearance (Barfuss et al. 2005). Bromeliads may also be of ornamental or ceremonial value to indigenous people. As a consequence, there is a local and rapidly expanding international market for bromeliads, which are collected in large numbers from natural populations without control of the extraction rate (Read 1989, Wolf and Konings 2001). Over the last 20 years, bromeliads have become more popular in Brazil as home and garden ornamentals and this has promoted increasing collection pressures on wild populations (Versieux and Wendt 2007). It is not known whether T. candida is collected for these purposes but commercial exploitation of wild populations may develop unchecked as new groups of plants become fashionable (Read 1989, Cascante-Marin 2009). Tillandsia species are relatively difficult to propagate and take several years to flower from seeds. Propagation by offsets, which form after flowering, is only in a limited number. These increase the incentive to collect wild specimen for direct sale. There is considerable evidence that many plants for sale are collected from the wild in Central and South America.
In the northeastern Atlantic Forest, some ornamental bromeliads have been intensively collected and almost eliminated from forest fragments close to human settlements (Filho and Tabarelli 2006). In Mexico, the volume of illicitly traded epiphytes in local markets exceeds legal exports and comprise many species (Toledo-Aceves and Wolf 2008). Bromeliads with narrow geographic distribution can be considered extremely vulnerable to commercial exploitation. Grey leaved Tillandsia, like T. candida, are the most at risk.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★2_1Savanna - Dry★3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
This species was collected outside any protected areas. It does not benefit from any legal protection in Brazil. Less than 1% of the Caatinga is protected in parks or reserves (Da Silva 2001). Although biodiversity conservation has consistently been one of the lowest investment priorities in the region, new conservation initiatives on small scale are now being implemented and new protected areas developed (Leal et al. 2005).
Current occurrence of the taxon needs first to be confirmed. Surveys and census should be conducted in the type locality and potentially suitable sites of occurrence to determine the current size and range of the population and whether local extinction has occurred. The population should be closely monitored and its dynamics studied. The habitat conditions, availability of propagules, dispersal characteristics and requirement for seedlings establishment as well as breeding system and genetic structure of the population should be studied (Cascante-Marin et al. 2006).
The taxon is grown in various botanical institutions. Seeds have not yet been collected for germplasm conservation. There is no national protection in law covering this species.
Current occurrence of the taxon needs first to be confirmed. Surveys and census should be conducted in the type locality and potentially suitable sites of occurrence to determine the current size and range of the population and whether local extinction has occurred. The population should be closely monitored and its dynamics studied. The habitat conditions, availability of propagules, dispersal characteristics and requirement for seedlings establishment as well as breeding system and genetic structure of the population should be studied (Cascante-Marin et al. 2006).
The taxon is grown in various botanical institutions. Seeds have not yet been collected for germplasm conservation. There is no national protection in law covering this species.
Actions de conservation (6)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection2_1Site/area management3_4_2Genome resource bank4_3Awareness & communications5_1_2National level5_1_3Sub-national level
Stress écologiques (7)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation
Usage & commerce (1)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
13Pets/display animals, horticultureinternationalnationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (5)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats1_6Actions3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Neotropical
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
EpiphyteForb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (24)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 12 June 2014).
- Cascante-Marín, A., von Meijenfeldt, N., de Leeuw, H.M.H., Wolf, J.H.D., Oostermeijer, J.G.B. and den Nijs, J.C.M. 2009. Dipsersal limitation in epiphytic bromeliad communities in a Costa Rican fragmented montane landscape. <i>Journal of Tropical Ecology</i> 25: 63-73.
- Martinelli, G., Magalhães Vieira, C., Gonzalez, M., Leitman, P., Piratininga, A. Ferreira da Costa, A. and Campostrini Forzza, R. 2008. Bromeliaceae da Mata Atlântica Brasileira: lista de espécies, distribuição e conservação. <i>Rodriguésia; Revista do Instituto de Biologia Vegetal, Jardim Botânico e Estaçao Biologica do Itatiaya</i> 59(1): 209-258.
- Cascante-Marín, A., Wolf, J.H.D, Oostermeijer, J.G.B. and den Nijs, J.C.M. 2008. Establishment of epiphytic bromeliads in successional tropical premontane forests in Costa Rica. <i>Biotropica</i> 40(4): 441-448.
- Reyes-García, C., Griffiths, H., Rincón, E. and Huante, P. 2008. Niche differentiation in tank and atmospheric epiphytic bromeliads of a seasonally dry forest. <i>Biotropica</i> 40(2): 168-175.
- Marques, A.R. and de Lemos Filho, J.P. 2008. Fenologia reproductive de especies de bromelias na Serra da Piedade, MG, Brasil. <i>Acta Botânica Brasilica</i> 22(2): 417-424.
- Toledo-Aceves, T. and Wolf, J.H.D. 2008. Germination and establishment of <i>Tillandsia eizii</i> in the canopy of an oak forest in Chipas Mexico. <i>Biotropica</i> 40(2): 246-250.
- Filho, J.A.S. and Leme, E.M.C. 2007. <i>Fragments of the Atlantic forest of Northeast Brazil</i>. Andrea Jakobsson Estudio, Rio de Janeiro.
- Winkler, M., Hülber, K. and Hietz, P. 2007. Population dynamics of epiphytic bromeliads: Life strategies and the role of host branches. <i>Basic and Applied Ecology</i> 8(1): 183-196.
- Cascante-Marín, A., de Jong, M., Borg, E.D., Oostermeijer, J.G.B., Wolf, J.H.D. and den Nijs, J.C.M. 2006. Reproductive strategies and colonizing ability of two sympatric epiphytic bromeliads in tropical premontane Habitat. <i>Internationnal Journal of Plant Science</i> 167(6): 1187-1195.
- Mondragon, D. and Calvo-Irabien, L.M. 2006. Seed dispersal and germination of the epiphyte <i>Tillandsia brachycaulos</i> (Bromeliaceae) in a tropical dry forest, Mexico. <i>The Southwestern Naturalist</i> 51(4): 462-470.
- Filho, J.A.S. and Tabarelli, M. 2006. Bromeliads species of the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil: losses of critical populations of endemic species. <i>Oryx</i> 40: 218-223.
- Leal, I.R., da Silva, J.M.C., Tabarelli, M. and Lacher, T.E. 2005. Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the caatinga of northeastern Brazil. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 19(3): 701-706.
- Barfuss, M.H., Samuel, R., Till, W. and Stuessy, T.F. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Broemliaceae) based on DNA sequence data from seven plastids region. <i>American Journal of Botany</i> 92(2): 337-351.
- Wolf, J.H.D. 2005. The response of epiphytes to anthropogenic disturbance of pine oak forests in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. <i>Forest Ecology and Management</i> 212(1-3): 376-393.
- Ariani, C.V., Menezes, V.A., Vrcibradic, D. and Rocha, C.F.D. 2004. The negative effect of fire on populations of three bromeliad species at a Restinga habitat in the southern state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. <i>Vidalia</i> 2(2): 44-49.
- Andrade, J.L. 2003. Dew deposition on epiphytic bromeliad leaves: an important event in a Mexican tropical dry deciduous forest. <i>Journal of Tropical Ecology</i> 19: 479-488.
- Sanderson, E.W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M.A., Redford, K.H., Wannebo, A.V. and Woolmer, G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. <i>Bioscience</i> 52(10): 891-904.
- Wolf, J.H.D. and Konings, C.J.F. 2001. Toward the sustainable harvesting of epiphytic Bromeliads: a pilot study from the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. <i>Biological Conseravtion</i> 101: 23-31.
- da Silva, J.M.C. 2001. Caatinga (NT1304). Available at: <a href="http://worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/nt1304">http://worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/nt1304</a>.
- Benzing, D.H. 2000. <i>Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation</i>. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Hietz-Seifert, U., Hietz, P. and Guevara, S. 1996. Epiphyte vegetation and diversity on remnant trees after forest clearnce in southern Veracruz, Mexico. <i>Biological Conservation</i> 75(2): 103-111.
- Read, M. 1989. Bromeliaceae threatened by trade. <i>Curtis Botanical Magazine</i> 6(1): 22-29.
- Leme, E.M.C. 1987. Novas Bromeliads nativas do Brasil.V. <i>Bradea</i> 59(4): 392.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Romand-Monnier, F.
evaluator
Moraes, M.
Romand-Monnier, F. 2014. Tillandsia candida. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T44392544A44494099. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.