Ontologia
Stangeria eriopus

Stangeria eriopus

(Kunze) Baill.

VULR Monde (IUCN)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Stangeria eriopus.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

VU · Vulnérablecritères A2acd+4acdDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
10750 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
There are numerous subpopulations spread across its range. It is estimated that there are more than 100,000 plants in the wild.

Abundance at known localities:

a) Past and current:
Since at least 1965, there have been reports of Stangeria eriopus becoming scarce, rare and extirpated in many areas of its range. Vast numbers of plants were eradicated along the KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape coast as sugar cane fields and the pineapple industry respectively replaced the natural vegetation. Stangeria eriopus was once a usual sight in coastal and scarp forests and coastal grassland from Bathurst to Kosi Bay, but today it is far less common. Furthermore, plants within the borders of designated nature reserves are not altogether safe. Regular visitors to Ngoye have also reported drastic reductions in population numbers, and a recent half-day survey in the Gwaliweni forest north of Jozini in KwaZulu-Natal failed to locate any specimens. Between Durban and Hluhluwe,  S. eriopus was lost at many localities due to habitat transformation for sugar cane and gum plantations. Very little natural vegetation exists in these areas today, and S. eriopus tends to be found in isolated pockets. Stangeria is therefore currently rare and of low abundance in this specific area.

S. eriopus has also been intensively harvested for medicinal use. Osborne et al. (1994) recorded more than 3,000 specimens per month being traded in local markets in KwaZulu Natal and this would contribute to population declines.

b) Future
The possible future construction of a coastal highway through the Eastern Cape would threaten many the subpopulations. Parts of the former Transkei are currently a refuge for Stangeria, but coastal urban development will threaten the habitat and the range as forest refugia become more accessible to collectors.

In summary:

There are 34 known Quarter Degree Squares (QDS) records from PRECIS (the Pretoria Herbarium Specimen Database), the literature and personal observations. The following threats were noted:
a) In 14 known QDS (41%), habitat transformation and degradation has occurred from the Eastern Cape to KwaZulu-Natal for plantations (pineapple, sugar cane and pine trees). S. eriopus tends to occupy vegetation pockets within these areas or has been permanently extirpated (past decline).
b) 14 QDSs (41%) stand to be affected by the proposed new N2 highway through the Eastern Cape, hence destroying habitats and making previous S. eriopus refugia potentially accessible to collectors (future decline).
c) In at least 9 QDSs (26%), S. eriopus has been observed to be scarce, declining and actively targeted by collectors (current decline)

Therefore, in total, in at least 27 QDS (79%) that we know of (through personal observations and the literature), the S. eriopus population has experienced past declines OR is currently declining OR is facing potential decline due to past, current and future threats from habitat transformation and traditional medicine harvesting.

The tuber is sometimes branched into several growing points and because of this, it is usually not possible to uproot all of the plant without damaging and leaving behind some of the caudex. It is sometimes possible for regeneration to occur from the damaged caudex. It is, therefore, also possible that a portion of the caudex may be left behind during incomplete excavations for the traditional medicine (muti) trade, and that some regeneration may occur in areas that have been targeted by harvesters. Growth from seed is slow.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_2_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Ongoing
  • 2_2_2
    Agro-industry plantations
    Ongoing
  • 4_1
    Roads & railroads
    Future
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
This species has been affected by over collecting (for medicinal and ornamental use). Habitat destruction has also had an effect on the plants in the wild (pineapple and sugar cane farming). Vast numbers of plants were eradicated along the KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape coast as sugar cane fields and the pineapple industry respectively replaced the natural vegetation. Between Durban and Hluhluwe, Stangeria eriopus was lost at many localities due to habitat transformation for sugar cane and gum plantations. Very little natural vegetation exists in these areas today, and S. eriopus tends to be found in isolated pockets.

The possible future construction of the highway through the Eastern Cape will threaten many of the subpopulations. Parts of the former Transkei are currently a refuge for S. eriopus, but coastal urban development threatens the habitat and the range as forest refugia become more accessible to collectors.

At least 20% of the habitat has been lost over the last three generations (90 years) (generation length is about 30 years) and harvesting for the traditional medicine trade has caused at least a further 10-20% decline in population size. The habitat is further threatened with future transformation and increased harvesting as a result of the N2 highway being extended through the Eastern Cape.

S. eriopus is a sought after medicinal plant which has been severely over-exploited over much of its distribution range. The habitat is rapidly being degraded because of woodcutting and the expansion of crop farming. The lignotuber is used for traditional medicine, hence harvesting is destructive and whole plants are usually killed. Estimates of an annual sale of 233 bags (50 kg-size) by 54 traders in the Durban markets have been made - possibly accounting for ¼ of the total sales in the province. In a survey conducted in July 1992, 28 out of 170 gatherers (16.5%) in two Durban muti markets sold the tubers. The mean mass of caudices on sale = 0.7 kg; mean mass sold/month/trader = 85 kg; mean number of plants sold/month/trader = 122; total mass sold/month = 2,380 kg; total number of plants sold/month = 3,410 individual caudices (or, 40,920 plants per year). The unknown quantity of tubers sold by the muti shops in the city would have added considerably to the annual volume sold in the region. The plants were said to have been harvested from areas in the Transkei, southern and northern KwaZulu-Natal, and concerns were raised that the rate of exploitation would lead to a rapid demise of S. eriopus in the wild, especially if the herbal medicine trade continued to expand (as it has).

The popularity of S. eriopus is such that it is traded outside of its range in Mpumalanga and Gauteng. Trade figures for Johannesburg showed that 58% of muti shops stocked the species in 1994, 18% of which said it was scarce. The annual volume estimated to have been sold was 243 bags (50 kg-size). In the Faraday market in 2001, 9% of traders sold it with a combined volume of 38 bags.

More recently, evidence has been found of S. eriopus tubers having been excavated in the Manguzi, presumably for the traditional medicine trade. Possibly more than 50 plants had been removed from the site, and that conservatively hundreds had been excavated in the last few months. On a recent visit to the Faraday market, 20 traders with S. eriopus, each with about 20 plants per trader, were found.

In terms of habitat destruction, vast numbers of plants have been eradicated along the KwaZulu-Natal coast as sugar cane fields replaced the natural vegetation, and the expansion of the pineapple industry in the Eastern Cape had caused similar diminution in the distribution of S. eriopus in that area.

Cycad collectors have also threatened the Stangeria population. A post-war anecdote has been cited in which a field botanist active along the Natal south coast was offered one pound per plant to send as many living Stangeria plants as could be collected to a Chicago museum. The botanist refused, and the field full of Stangeria that was mentioned in the anecdote was subsequently visited 30 years later to find that it had been overgrazed and not a single plant remained.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species is listed in Appendix I of CITES. This species occurs in at least five protected areas, including the Ubombo (Lebombo) Mountain Nature Reserve and the Dwesa and Cwebe Nature Reserves. There is a need for an education and awareness programme to support the conservation of this species as it is a sought after medicinal plant throughout most of its distribution range. Setting aside further areas to conserve this species as well as a harvest monitoring programme is needed to ensure its protection and conservation.
Actions de conservation (4)Expert
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 3_1_1Harvest management
  • 3_1_2Trade management
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (10)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
  • 3Medicine - human & veterinary
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Afrotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

CycadShrub - small
Références bibliographiques (10)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2023. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 07 December 2023).
  2. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 21 July 2022).
  3. Cousins, S.R. and Witkowski, E.T.F. 2017. African cycad ecology, ethnobotany and conservation: A synthesis. <i>The Botanical Review</i> 83: 152-194.
  4. Williams, V.L., Raimondo, D., Crouch, N.R., Cunningham, A.B., Scott-Shaw, C.R., Lötter, M. and Ngwenya, M. 2008. Detailed Species Report for Threatened Species Project - <i>Stangeria eriopus</i>. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
  5. Peckover, R.G. 2006. The sad demise of a Cites I plant, <i>Stangeria eriopus</i> at Kosi Bay. <i>Veld & Flora</i> 92(1): 13.
  6. Whitelock, L.M. 2002. <i>The Cycads</i>. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.
  7. Scott-Shaw, C.R. 1999. <i>Rare and Threatened Plants of KwaZulu-Natal and Neighbouring Regions</i>. KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation Services, Pietermaritzburg.
  8. Osborne, R., Grove, A., Oh, P., Mabry, T.J., Ng, J.C. and Seawright, A.A. 1994. The magical and medicinal usage of <i>Stangeria eriopus</i> in South Africa. <i>Journal of Ethnopharmacology</i> 43(2): 67-72.
  9. Cunningham, A.B. 1988. An investigation of the herbal medicine trade in Natal/KwaZulu. Investigational Report No. 29. Institute of Natural Resources, Pietermaritzburg.
  10. Vorster, P. and E. 1985. Focus on <i>Stangeria eriopus</i>. <i>Encephalartos</i> 2: 8-15.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Bösenberg, J.D.
contributor
Donaldson, J.S., Williams, V.L., Raimondo, D., Crouch, N.R., Cunningham, A.A., Scott-Shaw, C.R., Lötter, M.C. & Ngwenya, M.A.
evaluator
Donaldson, J.S.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Bösenberg, J.D. 2022. Stangeria eriopus (errata version published in 2023). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T41939A243383945. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (10)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Encephalartos lanuginosus var. katzeriRegel ex J.Schust.
  • Lomaria coriaceaKunze
  • Lomaria eriopusKunze
  • Lomaria lagopusT.Moore
  • Stangeria eriopus(Kunze) Nash
  • Stangeria katzeriRegel
  • Stangeria paradoxaT.Moore
  • Stangeria sanderianaJ.Schust.
  • Stangeria schizodonW.Bull
  • Zamia katzeriRegel ex J.Schust.

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).