Ontologia

Quercus crispipilis

Trel.

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Quercus crispipilis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéecritères B2ab(iii)?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
7502700 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Populations of Quercus crspipilis are rather scarce and can be dense where found (González-Espinosa et al. 2011). There are no quantitative studies of this species population size, but it is often a dominant in the forest fragments where it is found (Jiménez-Ferrer et al. 2007). Habitat fragmentation caused by traditional land use patterns may not not seem to hinder, and may even facilitate, the natural regeneration of tropical highland pine-oak forests, as it has been reported that Q. crispipilis is not able to regenerate under deep shade, but requires open patches in which browsing and trampling by ungulates is absent or minimal (Quintana-Ascencio et al. 1992).

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 11_1
    Habitat shifting & alteration
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_3_3
    Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_2
    Intentional use: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Since pre-Columbian times, extensive areas of forests in the highlands of Chiapas have been cleared for shifting cultivation of annual crops and logged for fuelwood and charcoal burning. Traditional land use patterns in the highlands of Chiapas are similar to those occurring elsewhere in populated tropical high land areas where Quercus crispipilis is also found. Under less-intensive land use, shifting agriculture in forested regions resulted in a heterogeneous landscape with stands of widely varying succession stages. More recently, this heterogeneity has tended to decrease as more extensive areas are permanently used as grazing lands, as the number of livestock per family has increased and as demand for basic cropland, commercial crops (tomato and chilli), fuel-wood, and timber has also increased (Quintana-Ascencio et al. 1992, Jiménez-Ferrer et al. 2007).

In Guatemala, Quercus crispipilis has been shown to grow faster in open sites than in forested stands. However, browsing and trampling by sheep, which typically occurs in non-forested habitats under current land use practices, was a common cause of plant death and biomass removal in the open stands (Quintana-Ascencio et al. 1992). Additionally, it was noted during the Global Trees Specialist Group meeting (Costa Rica 2019) that Guatemalan montane and pine-oak forests are disappearing, indicating a threat of declining habitat. This species has also been reported as sensitive to climate change and, in one study, was projected to lose anywhere from 13.1%- 48.4% (depending on the severity of the climate model used) of its suitable habitat by 2050. However, the same study also noted that adaptation to disturbed environmental conditions have been documented for Q. crispipilis (Gómez-Mendoza and Arriaga 2007).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species is found in three ex situ collections worldwide (BGCI 2018). Artificial propagation of this species is recommended, along with research into the current population size, distribution and trends.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 3_4_1Captive breeding/artificial propagation
Stress écologiques (10)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 17Other (free text)
  • 7Fuels
    nationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (1)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Tree - large
Références bibliographiques (7)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 13 June 2020).
  2. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  3. González-Espinosa, M., Meave, J.A., Lorea-Hernández, F.G., Ibarra-Manríquez, G. and Newton, A.C. (eds). 2011. <i>The Red List of Mexican Cloud Forest Trees</i>. pp. 152. FFI, BGCI, Cambridge, UK.
  4. Trehane, P. 2007-2018. The Oak Names Checklist. Available at: <a href="http://oaknames.org/search/goodnames.asp">http://oaknames.org/search/goodnames.asp</a>. (Accessed: 2 February 2016).
  5. Gómez-Mendoza, L. and Arriaga, L. 2007. Modeling the effect of climate change on the distribution of oak and pine species of Mexico. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 21(6): 1545-1555.
  6. Jiménez-Ferrer, G., Pérez-López, H., Soto-Pinto, L., Nahed-Toral, J., Hernández-López, L. and Carmona, J. 2007. Livestock, Nutritive Value and Local Knowledge of Fodder Trees in Fragment Landscapes in Chiapas, Mexico. <i>Interciencia</i> 32(4): 274-280.
  7. Quintana-Ascencio, P., Gonzalez-Espinosa, M. and Ramirez-Marcial, N. 1992. Acorn Removal, Seedling Survivorship, and Seedlings Growth of<i> Quercus crispipilis </i>in Successional Forests of the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. <i>Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club</i> 119: 6-18.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Jerome, D.
contributor
Carrero, C.
evaluator
MacVean, A.L. & Westwood, M.

Jerome, D. 2020. Quercus crispipilis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T194824A2363488. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (17)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Quercus aristigeraTrel.
  • Quercus brachystachys f. caeruleaTrel.
  • Quercus brachystachys f. venulosaTrel.
  • Quercus ceriferaTrel.
  • Quercus chichavacanaTrel.
  • Quercus chichavacana f. oblanceolataC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus chichavacana f. sublobataC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus chichavacana f. undulataC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus chimaltenanganaTrel.
  • Quercus cinnamomeaTrel.
  • Quercus crispipilis var. pannosifolia(C.H.Mull.) C.H.Mull.
  • Quercus lanuginosa var. bedoiNyman
  • Quercus pannosifoliaC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus skutchiiTrel.
  • Quercus skutchii f. oblanceolataC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus skutchii f. sublobataC.H.Mull.
  • Quercus skutchii f. undulataC.H.Mull.

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).