Ontologia

Quercus acerifolia

(E.J.Palmer) Stoynoff & W.J.Hess

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Quercus acerifolia.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2016 · v3.1
Altitude
500800 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
In 2003, a total population census found 527 Quercus acerifolia trees across four localities. The two largest occurrences contained 288 and 147 trees, while the smallest held only 53 and 39 individuals each. Though this report provided no information on the number of reproductive (mature) individuals, a recent collecting trip (October 2014) located only one reproductive individual (with a total of three acorns) at the one visited locality, suggesting low reproductive success (T. Boland pers. comm. 2015). Evidence of a cynipid wasp was observed and suspected as a possible cause of the low levels of reproductive success, due to abortion of developing acorns. Flowering was reported to have been strong in the spring of the previous year. 

If this cynipid wasp is found to be reducing acorn production drastically, and if these wasps are present at other localities, then the number of mature individuals (interpreted to be the number of trees that flower and produce viable offspring) may be much smaller than the estimated total population size of just over 500.

Additionally, the Sugarloaf Mountain occurrence, which constitutes the largest subpopulation, was reported to have 288 total (immature and mature) individuals in 2003. If the current number of mature individuals at Sugarloaf Mountain is below 250 and those individuals are also experiencing continuing decline, Q. acerifolia may qualify as Endangered under C2a(i) in addition to qualifying under criterion B.

Menaces identifiées(9 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_2
    Commercial & industrial areas
    UnknownMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 1_3
    Tourism & recreation areas
    UnknownMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    UnknownMinority (<50%)Past, Unlikely to Return
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    UnknownMajority (50-90%)Past, Likely to Return
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownMinority (<50%)Unknown
  • 6_1
    Recreational activities
    UnknownMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 8_4_1
    Unspecified species
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 9_4
    Garbage & solid waste
    UnknownMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 7_1_2
    Supression in fire frequency/intensity
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Primary threats to Maple-leaved Oak are land use change and degradation, potential destruction of habitat and scientific specimen collection. The subpopulation at Sugarloaf Mountain in Sebastian County, which holds more than half of the total number of individuals, lies on privately owned land where no protective status or conservation agreement exists, as of 2003. Unrestricted access and recreational use of the site (resulting in camping, use of all-terrain vehicles and deposition of refuse and litter), as well as shale mining activity and electric tower construction, pose moderate threats. Furthermore, the private and unprotected nature of the land makes it vulnerable to development and destruction by future landowners. 

Following Western settlement of the area, changes to the ecology of Magazine Mountain (where the second largest and best-documented occurrence is found) have disrupted the disturbance regime of the site. Suppression of fire has lead to a decline in the early successional open-canopy woodland in which Quercus acerifolia thrives. 

Recent reports of a cynipid wasp possibly impacting acorn production at the Magazine Mountain location suggest another possible threat to this occurrence.

The Magazine Mountain occurrence, despite its proximity to recreation areas and campgrounds, is largely protected within the Magazine Mountain State Park, which strictly enforces rules regarding the plants. Occurrences at Pryor Mountain and Porter Mountain are located in remote areas with difficult terrain within the Quachita National Forest, and face little threat from human interference. The Porter Mountain site is further protected due to its inclusion in the Caney Creek Wilderness Area.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 6Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
  • 1_4Forest - Temperate
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Quercus acerifolia is listed by NatureServe and the state of Arkansas as Critically Imperiled (G1S1), but it has not been federally listed as threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collection and propagation efforts are currently underway by several botanic gardens to support and maintain ex situ conservation of this species.

Additional research is need to examine the scope and severity of the cynipid wasp suspected to be impacting acorn production at at least one locality.

Efforts to arrange a protective agreement or conservation easement with the private landowners of Sugarloaf Mountain should be pursued, if not already in place.
Actions de conservation (2)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 2_3Habitat & natural process restoration
Stress écologiques (12)Expert
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    nationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (2)Expert
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Nearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Shrub - largeTree - small
Références bibliographiques (8)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
  2. NatureServe. 2014. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life. [web application] Version 7.1. Arlington, Virginia Available at: <a href="http://www.natureserve.org">http://www.natureserve.org</a>. (Accessed: 3rd March 2015).
  3. Robison, H., McAllister, C., Carlton, C. and Tucker, G. 2008. The Arkansas Endemic Biota: An update with additions and deletions. 62: 84 - 96.
  4. Williams, D.X. 2003. Molecular systematics of selected members of <i>Quercus</i> section Lobatae and ecology and conservation of <i>Quercus acerifolia</i> (maple-leaf oak). University of Arkansas.
  5. Stein, J., Binion, D. and Acciavatti, R. 2003. <i>Field Guide to Native Oak Species of Eastern North America</i>. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
  6. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. <i>Flora of North America North of Mexico, Volume 3: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae</i>. Oxford University Press, New York.
  7. Rouw, D.W. and Johnson, G.P. 1994. The Vegetation of Maple-leaved Oak Sites on Sugarloaf and Magazine Mountains, Arkansas. <i>Proceedings Arkansas Academy of Science</i> 48: 154-157.
  8. Stoynoff, N. and Hess, W.J. 1990. A new status for <i>Quercus shumardii</i> var. <i>acerifolia</i> (Fagacaeae). <i>Sida</i> 14(2): 267-271.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Wenzell, K., Kenny, L. & Beckman, E.
evaluator
Oldfield, S.

Wenzell, K., Kenny, L. & Beckman, E. 2016. Quercus acerifolia. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T35039A2858212. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (3)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Quercus acerifolia(E.J.Palmer) Stoynoff & W.J.Hess ex R.J.Jensen
  • Quercus shumardii var. acerifoliaE.J.Palmer
  • Quercus shumardii var. acerifoliaBuckley

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).