
Loutre géante
Pteronura brasiliensis(Zimmermann, 1780)
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Pteronura brasiliensis.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
EN · En dangercritères A2cde+3ce↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2023 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 1000 m
- Profondeur
- 0 – 0 m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
There is no current total population estimate and current population trends are unknown: however, there is evidence that populations may be recovering in the Yavarí-Mirín River in northern Peru (Recharte and Bodmer 2010, Deza pers. comm. 2012), the Madidi and Itenéz or Guaporé Rivers in Bolivia (Ayala et al. 2015, Zambrana Rojas et al. 2012), the Lagarto-Cocha and Cuyabeno rivers in the northeastern Ecuadorian Amazon (Utreras pers. comm. 2018), in the Amanã Reserve in Brazil Amazon (Marmontel et al. 2015) and the Brazilian Pantanal (Leuchtenberger and Mourão 2008, Ribas et al. 2012, Tomás et al. 2015). However, in other regions, such as in the Department of Madre de Dios in southeastern Peru (R. Williams pers. comm. 2012) and in western Colombia (J.C. Botello pers. comm. 2012), populations are on the decline due to habitat loss and degradation, and other human activities. Most populations remain isolated from each other. Population estimates based on surveys exist for some areas:
- Brazil: In the Pantanal, 1,100 breeding individuals or 3,950 individuals in 7,350 km of rivers (Tomas et al. 2015); Xixuaú River in Amazon, 15 groups (30 breeding individuals, 80 individuals) in 40 km of river (Evangelista and Rosas 2011); Balbina lake in Amazon, 67 groups (134 breeding individuals, 280 individuals) (Palmeirim et al. 2014); Amanã Reserve in Amazon: 12 groups (24 breeding individuals, 75 individuals) (Lima et al. 2014); Araguaia, above Bananal Island, Brazil: upper Araguaia basin in Cerrado: 200 individuals (G. Georgiadis pers. comm. 2018); Cantão State Park: 4 groups (eight breeding individuals, 20 individuals), (Georgiadis et al. 2015). These surveys suggest a population of at least 1,296 breeding individuals, and a total population size of 4,659 individuals in Brazil.
- Bolivia: in the northwest, Madre de Dios-Beni sub-basin: 271 individuals in 1,318.6 km of rivers and streams and 42.14 km² of lakes (Ayala et al. 2015); in the Pantanal (Paraguay river sub-basin), 50 individuals in 118,031 km²; and in the northeast (Itenez sub-basin), 600 individuals in 186,460 km², totalling an estimated 1,021 individuals in Bolivia.
- Peru: southeastern Peru, Madre de Dios: 180–400 individuals (R. Williams pers. comm. 2012); Manu National Park: 81 individuals and 11 groups in 2006 (Groenendijk et al. 2014);
- Ecuador: Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve, nine groups (18 breeding individuals, 45 individuals), but Utreras and Tirica (2011) suggest that the Ecuador population is less than 250 individuals;
- French Guiana: at least 200 individuals (Benoit de Thoisy pers. comm. 2012);
- Paraguay: 24–32 individuals (Cartes and R. Pickles pers. comm. 2011);
- Guyana: Rewa Head: minimum of 35 individuals (Pickles et al. 2011).
Although the distribution range of Giant Otters is apparently large, their occurrence is irregular, making overall population size estimates a challenge, especially because the number of groups is not available for all surveyed areas. Also, due to their social organization, the total number of adult individuals does not represent the effective population size, as only the alpha couple of a given group reproduces.
Accelerating habitat destruction, degradation, and exploitation throughout the Giant Otter's range represents the greatest threat to the species, and is suspected to have caused a population decline of more than 50% in the past 25 years (three generations, based on Groenendijk et al. 2014), and (based on current trends) is suspected to lead to a future reduction of more than 50% in population size over the next 25 years.
Menaces identifiées(21 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
1_1Housing & urban areasRapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing1_2Commercial & industrial areasRapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing2_2_2Agro-industry plantationsRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing3_2Mining & quarryingRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing4_2Utility & service linesRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_1_1Intentional use (species is the target)Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing5_1_2Unintentional effects (species is not the target)Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_3_5Motivation Unknown/UnrecordedRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_4_4Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing7_2_10Large damsRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
+ 11 menaces supplémentaires
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
The species is threatened by multiple human activities throughout its range, destruction of riparian habitat, overfishing, contamination of water bodies—especially by gold mining, fossil fuel exploration, and the use of pesticides and fertilizers, diseases spread by domestic animals, and mismanaged tourism (Duplaix 1980, Schenck 1999, Utreras and Tirira 2011). Human populations are increasing and expanding. In the last census, the Amazon region registered the highest population growth in Brazil. Illegal settlements, road opening and deforestation threaten pristine habitats. Colonization of new areas are expected, followed by intensive exploitation of natural resources. Furthermore, proposed mega-projects in the 2007 Brazilian Growth Acceleration Plan represent a significant threat to Brazilian Amazonian and Pantanal habitats. Changes in government and environmental protection policies in Brazil endanger the pristine areas of the Amazon, Pantanal and Cerrado. Between 2017 and 2019 4,500 km² of the Amazon were lost due to deforestation and burning, of which 65% occurred in 2019 (Cannon 2019, https://news.mongabay.com/2019/11/deforestation-preceded-fires-in-massive-area-of-amazon-in-2019/). From August to November of 2019, at least 1.5 million hectares of Brazilian Pantanal were burned (https://www.dw.com/en/brazils-next-fire-disaster-in-the-pantanal-wetlands/a-51199164).
Hunting for the pelt trade was the greatest threat to the Giant Otter in the past and the species came close to extinction in the early 1970s in Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, and Brazilian Pantanal (Duplaix 1980). From 1960 to 1969, records indicated a regional harvest of 12,390 giant otter skins. In 1973, giant otters were placed on CITES Appendix I, and the enforcement of international trade restrictions on Giant Otter skins in 1975 finally ended Giant Otter hunting (Recharte and Bodmer 2010).
The Giant Otter remains endangered because of the low recuperation rate of relict populations now also under pressure from human activities (Groenendijk et al. 2015). Direct conflict between humans and otters is an increasing problem. Otters may be killed for fun or out of fear, or, more often, because they are seen as competitors for fish by loggers, miners, and fishermen, who often blame them for depleting fish resources used for local and commercial consumption (Gómez and Jorgensen 1999, Recharte et al. 2008, Rosas-Ribeiro et al. 2012, Utreras and Tirira 2011). Giant Otters can drown in fishing nets and traps and are also blamed for damaging them (Rosas-Ribeiro et al. 2012, Utreras et al. 2013). Fish farming is rapidly increasing in the species’ range, for example in parts of the Ecuadorian Amazon, and expose otters to retaliation killing (V. Utreras pers. obs.). Cubs are sometimes captured illegally to be kept as pets (M. Marmontel pers. obs).
Giant Otters are highly susceptible to persecution: they are large, conspicuous, social, and very vocal. They are active at daytime and occupy open habitats and stable territories. Their signs—latrines and dens—are easily recognizable, making it possible to identify areas of recent activity by a group (Groenendijk et al. 2005). Individuals and groups often react to people by approaching to investigate. Moreover, only the dominant pair produces young, and usually only once a year. During the pelt trade years, these life history attributes made them an easy target for fishermen. In 2017, a Giant Otter group was killed by fishermen in the Pantanal and according to locals, kills occur frequently during the fishing season (C. Leuchtenberger pers. obs.). In 2011–2012, the Kanamari indigenous people promoted a massive Giant Otter killing in their territory (Território Indígena Kanamari), based on their perception that the species was overfishing the river turtle population. The community leader bought 300 cartridges for the hunters, who shot 64 Giant Otters (Endo pers. comm. 2012). Such incidents of targeted killing can lead to extinction of small populations in a watershed.
Gold mining, artisanal as well as industrial, is a significant threat to the species, particularly in the Guiana Shield region, in southeastern Peru, the western region of the Ecuadorian Amazon, and northern Pantanal. The main impacts are habitat destruction, sedimentation of rivers, and pollution (Kimbrough 2014). Gold miners cut swathes into the floodplain forest and blast river banks with pressure hoses, using mercury to amalgamate gold particles. Gold prices are at a record high, whereas mercury is inexpensive. Forest conversion to mining increased six-fold from 2003–2006 to 2006–2009 (Swenson et al. 2011). Even a decade after mining stopped, areas affected still had depleted fish populations and had not been re-colonized by otters. In areas of gold mining, fish are contaminated with mercury. Gutleb et al. (1997) found that mercury concentrations in the majority of fish near Manu National Park were higher than considered tolerable for the Eurasian otter. Migration of contaminated fish and long-range atmospheric transport of mercury probably increase the area of influence of such contaminants. Contamination of otters by other heavy metals through pesticides and other agrochemicals is still poorly understood.
The many planned hydroelectric dams in the species’ range are a major threat to Giant Otters. These will alter hydrological regimes of rivers and affect fish populations and habitat (Latrubesse et al. 2017). Dams disrupt the annual cycles of inundations, vital for the maintenance of populations of flood dependent species such as the Giant Otter (Mourão et al. 2010, Alho and Sabino 2011). One hundred and eighty-four new dams are planned or under construction, greater than two MW capacity over the next 20 years in the Amazon. These dams would include five of the six major Andean tributaries of the Amazon. Sixty per cent of the dams would cause the first major break in connectivity between protected Andean headwaters and the lowland Amazon. Giant Otters are able to live in some artificial lakes, such as the shallow Balbina Reservoir in Brazil (Rosas et al. 2007). In other areas, hydroelectric dams have depleted Giant Otter populations, as did the Curuá-Una Hydroelectric in the Brazilian Amazonia (Rosas et al. 2007). Around the Pantanal, there are over 115 projects of small hydroelectric plants. Other major infrastructure projects include the Inter-oceanic highway in southeastern Peru, and the Initiative for the Integration of the Regional Infrastructure of South America (V. Utreras pers. comm. 2012).
Giant Otters are vulnerable to disturbance from poorly managed tourism, including sport fishing. It is important to control increasing levels of tourism on lakes and rivers both in and outside protected areas (Groenendijk and Hajek 2006). Research has shown that Giant Otter reproductive success and sighting success by tourists is considerably lower on unmanaged lakes than on managed lakes (Groenendijk and Hajek 2006).
Giant Otter cubs held in captivity have died of canine parvovirus, and all mustelids are susceptible to canine distemper, so domestic animal diseases may pose a serious threat to wild Giant Otter populations. Infection can also occur in remote areas, since transient otters and people hunting with dogs travel large distances with potential for contact and infection of vulnerable otter populations (Schenck et al. 1999).
Climatic changes are predicted to increase suitable areas for Giant Otters (Cianfrani et al. 2018). However, long-term habitat and climatic modifications will increase the exposure of suitable core otter areas to the negative effects of the surrounding unsuitable areas (Cianfrani et al. 2018). The species also has a high specialized niche, making it more vulnerable to climate change.Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
5_1Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls)★5_3Wetlands (inland) - Shrub Dominated Wetlands★5_4Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands★5_5Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Lakes (over 8ha)★13_5Marine Coastal/Supratidal - Coastal Freshwater Lakes1_7Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level5_2Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers/Streams/Creeks5_6Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent Freshwater Lakes (over 8ha)5_7Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha)5_8Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha)15Artificial/Aquatic & Marine5_9Wetlands (inland) - Freshwater Springs and Oases
+ 1 habitats supplémentaires
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
The Giant Otter is listed on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and as Endangered under the United States Endangered Species Act, 1973. The Global Otter Conservation Strategy for the species (Leuchtenberger et al. 2018) recommends priority actions that include:
- Establish protected areas in all range countries, including fish corridors to connect fragmented populations and protect stable populations.
- Implement reintroduction programs to recover lost historical populations in Argentina (Corrientes) and Brazil (Paraná Basin).
- Establish national conservation plans throughout the species range.
- Foster multinational cooperation (i.e. Amapá-Brazil and French Guiana, Suriname and Guyana, Southern Amazon and the Pantanal) to coordinate management of transboundary or connected protected areas, control of illegal mining and the integrity of continuous otter habitat.
- Create protocols in all range countries to regulate mitigation and compensation for projects like hydroelectric dams, gold mining, agriculture, deforestation and overfishing in Giant Otter habitat.
- Implement resilience/recovery projects in areas of human activities to help the return of Giant Otters after threat mitigation.
- Create global guidelines for Giant Otter watching by ecotourists including mandatory responsible behaviour.
- Train locals to participate as field assistants in research activities, or as ecotourism guides.
- Promote the value of Giant Otters through environmental education programs in communities that coexist with otters.
- Develop management plans to regulate overfishing to reduce conflicts and protect the prey base.
- Implement sustainable economic alternatives for communities that coexist with Giant Otters by training locals to guide otter watchers and strengthen local networks to participate in the regional decision-making processes.
- Create a map of risk and decision scenarios for stakeholders, incorporating otter presence and the current and future threats.
- Conduct population surveys in areas with poor or no knowledge about Giant Otter occurrence in the last 10 years.
- Establish long-term Giant Otter conservation programs for key populations in Brazil (Pantanal, Amazonia, Cerrado), Bolivia (Amazonia), Peru (Amazonia), and Colombia (Orinoco).
- Conduct population surveys in parts of Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil (Paraná Basin) where there is little or no knowledge about Giant Otter presence in the last decade.
- Document the illegal trade in Guyana where animals are taken from the wild by traders either to trade or breed for pets.
- Build strong local networks to create the capacity for local communities to participate in the regional decision-making process.
Actions de conservation (8)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection1_2Resource & habitat protection2_1Site/area management2_3Habitat & natural process restoration3_2Species recovery4_2Training5_4_2National level5_4_3Sub-national level
Stress écologiques (43)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (2)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humansubsistance10Wearing apparel, accessoriessubsistance
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_5Threats2_1Species Action/Recovery Plan3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2023. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 07 December 2023).
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- Cannon, J, C. 2019. Deforestation preceded fires in ‘massive’ area of Amazon in 2019. Mongabay. 14 nov 2019.
- Cianfrani, C., O. Broennimann, A. Loy, & A. Guisan. 2018. More than range exposure: Global otter vulnerability to climate change. <i>Biological Conservation.</i>.
- Leuchtenberger et al. 2018. Giant otter. In: Nicole Duplaix and Melissa Savage (2018), The Global Otter Conservation Strategy. IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group, Salem, Oregon, USA. Pp:74-81.
- Latrubesse E.M., E.Y. Arima, T. Dunne, E. Park, V.R.Baker, F.M. dHorta, C. Wight, F. Wittmann, J. Zuanon, P.A. Baker, C.C. Ribas, R.B. Norgaard, N. Filizola, A. Ansar, B. Flyvbjerg, & J.C. Stevaux. 2017. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. <i>Nature</i> 546: 363-369.
- Mumm, C. A., & Knörnschild, M. 2017. Territorial choruses of giant otter groups (Pteronura brasiliensis) encode information on group identity. <i>PloS one</i> 12(10): e0185733.
- Ribas, C., H.A. Cunha, G. Damasceno, W.E. Magnusson, A. Solé-Cava, & G. Mourão. 2016. More than meets the eye: Kinship and social organization in giant otters (Pteronura brasiliensis). <i>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology</i> 70(1): 61-72.
- Marmontel, M., U.J. Calvimontes U., & O. Carvalho Jr. 2015. Rediscovery of Pteronura brasiliensis in the Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve, Amazonas, Brazil. <i>Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals.</i> 10(2): 147-151.
- Tomás, W.M., A. R. Camilo, C. Ribas, C. Leuchtenberger, P.A.L. Borges, G. Mourão, & L.A. Pellegrin. 2015. Distribution and conservation status of giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis) in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. <i>Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals.</i> 10(2): 107-114.
- Leuchtenberger C, W.E. Magnusson, & G. Mourão. 2015. Territoriality of giant otter groups in an area with seasonal flooding. <i>PLoS ONE</i> 10(5): e0126073.
- Groenendijk, J., F. Hajek, C. Schenck, E. Staib, P.J. Johnson, & D.W. MacDonald, 2015. Effects of territory size on the reproductive success and social system of the giant otter, south‐eastern Peru. <i>Journal of Zoology</i> 296(3): 153-160.
- Ayala, G., R.B. Wallace, M. Viscarra, & C. Jurado. 2015. Giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis) distribution, relative abundance and conservation in northwestern Bolivia. <i>Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammalogy</i> 10(2): 179-186.
- Georgiadis, G., S. Campello, & B.N. Leles. 2015. Protection and monitoring of the giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis). <i>Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals</i> 10(2): 152-155.
- Kimbrough, L. 2014. Gold mining expanding rapidly along Guiana Shield, threatening forests, water, wildlife. Mongabay.
- Palmeirim, A. F., C.A. Peres, & F.C. Rosas. 2014. Giant otter population responses to habitat expansion and degradation induced by a mega hydroelectric dam. <i>Biological Conservation</i> 174: 30-38.
- Lima, D.S., M. Marmontel, & E. Bernard. 2014. Reoccupation of historical áreas by the endangered giant river otter Pteronura brasiliensis (Carnivora, Mustelidae) in Central Amazonia, Brazil. <i>Mammalia</i> 78(2): 177-184.
- Groenendijk, J., F. Hajek, P.J. Johnson, D.W. Macdonald, J. Calvimontes, E. Staib, E., & C. Schenck. 2014. Demography of the giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis) in Manu National Park, south-eastern Peru: Implications for conservation. <i>PloS One</i> 9(8): e106202.
- Leuchtenberger, C., L.G.R. Oliveira-Santos, W. Magnusson, & G. Mourão. 2013. Space use by giant otter groups in the Brazilian Pantanal. <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i> 94(2): 320–330.
- Utreras, V., F. Trujillo, & S. Usma. 2013. Plan de Acción para la Conservación de los Mamíferos Acuáticos en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. WCS, Fundación Omacha, Ministerio del Ambiente y WWF. Quito.
- Zambrana Rojas V., R.S. Pickles, & P.A. Van Damme. 2012. Abundancia relativa de la londra (Pteronura brasiliensis) en los ríos Blanco y San Martín (cuenca del río Iténez, Beni-Bolivia). pp. 183-194. In: P.A. Van Damme, M. Maldonado, M. Pouilly, C.R. C. Doria C.R.C. 2012. Aguas del Iténez o Guaporé: recursos hidrobiológicos de un patrimonio binacional (Bolivia y Brasil). Edit. INIA, Cochabamba, Bolivia. 420 pp.
- Spracklen, D.V., Arnold, S.R. and Taylor, C.M. 2012. Observations of increased tropical rainfall precede by air passage over forests. <i>Nature</i> 489: 282-285.
- Pickles, R.S.A., Groombridge, J.J., Zambrana Rojas, V.D., Van Damme, P., Gottelli, D., Ariani, C.V. and Jordan, W.C. 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure in the endangered giant otter. <i>Conservation Genetics</i> 13: 235-245.
- Ribas, C., Damasceno, G., Magnusson, W., Leuchtenberger, C. and Mourão, G. 2012. Giant otters feeding on caiman: evidence for an expanded trophic niche of recovering populations. <i>Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment</i> 47(1): 19-23.
- Lima. D.S., Marmontel, M. and Bernard, E. 2012. Site and refuge use by giant river otters (Pteronura brasiliensis) in the Western Brazilian Amazonia. <i>Journal of Natural History</i> 46. 11-12(2012): 729-739.
- Swenson, J.J, Carter, C.E, Dome, J.-C. and Delgado, C.I. 2011. Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon: Global Prices, Deforestation, and Mercury Imports. <i>PLoS ONE</i> 6(4): e18875.
- Alho, C.J.R., & J. Sabino. 2011. A conservation agenda for the Pantanal's biodiversity. <i>Brazilian Journal of Biology.</i> 71(1): 327-335.
- Oliveira, G.C., Barcellos, J.F.M., Lazzarini, S.M. and Rosas, F.C.W. 2011. Gross anatomy and histology of giant otter (<i>Pteronura brasiliensis</i>) and neotropical otter (<i>Lontra longicaudis</i>) testes. <i>Animal Biology </i> 61: 175-183.
- Rosas-Ribeiro, P.F., Rosas, F.C.W., and Zuanon, J. 2011. Conflict between fishermen and giant otters (<i>Pteronura brasiliensis</i>) in western Brazilian Amazon. <i>Biotropica</i> 44(3): 437-444.
- Pickles, R.S.A., Groombridge, J.J., Zambrana Rojas, V.D., van Damme, P., Gottelli, D., Kundu, S., Bodmer, R., Ariani, C.V., Iyengar, A and Jordan, W.C. 2011. Phylogeography and identification of evolutionary significant units in the giant otter. <i>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</i> 61: 616-627.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Groenendijk, J., Leuchtenberger, C., Marmontel, M., Van Damme, P.A., Wallace, R. & Schenck, C. 2023. Pteronura brasiliensis (amended version of 2022 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: e.T18711A244867206. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
Morphologie(4)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Chant
7 captations · Xeno-cantoVoir 2 captations de plusReplier
Hot-link CDN Xeno-canto. Chaque captation porte sa propre licence Creative Commons (visible quand la piste est active) et l'attribution de son auteur.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (15)— redirigent vers cette page
- Lutra brasilianaShaw, 1800
- Lutra brasiliensisZimmermann, 1780
- Lutra brasiliensis(Gmelin, 1788)
- Lutra lupinaSchinz, 1821
- Lutra paraguensisSchinz, 1821
- Lutra paranensisRengger, 1830
- Mustela brasiliensisGmelin, 1788
- Mustela brasilinensisGmelin, 1788
- Mustela lutris brasiliensisGmelin, 1788
- Pteronura brasiliensis(Gmelin, 1788)
- Pteronura brasiliensis brasiliensis(Gmelin, 1788)
- Pteronura brasiliensis paraguensis(Schinz, 1821)
- Pteronura brasiliensis paranensis(Rengger, 1830)
- Pteronura sambachiiGray, 1837
- Pterura sanbachiiWiegmann, 1838
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).