
Chat de Chine
Prionailurus bengalensis(Kerr, 1792)
Description
espèce de mammifères
Source : Wikidata
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Prionailurus bengalensis.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure→Stable- Évaluation
- 2023 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 4474 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Information on the Mainland Leopard Cat’s population status is limited despite the widespread use of camera-traps across the species’ geographic range. Its population has not been estimated in most parts of its range and there is little information on the abundance of this species except for some very small and isolated areas or specific protected areas where its estimates are often the result of bycatch data. This reflects the species’ low interest to researchers.
Despite the general paucity of information on the Mainland Leopard Cat population size and trends, the species is generally considered to be abundant and stable based on the following observations: (1) the Mainland Leopard Cat appears to be widely distributed throughout its historical geographic range and (2) it appears to tolerate human modified environments to a better degree than other sympatric cat species. However, this does not mean the species is invulnerable to habitat loss and degradation, as previous studies suggest the species is at least somewhat dependent on nearby forest cover and avoids large artificial open areas (e.g. non-woody agriculture) if vegetation cover is insufficient (e.g. Chen et al. 2016). Furthermore, any potentially detrimental effects of habitat loss and degradation will be exacerbated by illegal hunting, likely causing population declines in some regions. This is evident in parts of Southeast Asia where some Mainland Leopard Cat populations appear to have been negatively influenced due to ongoing wire-snaring crises (e.g. Coudrat et al. 2014a,b; Willcox et al. 2014).
Published spatial capture-recapture derived density estimates for this species vary substantially (2.9-21.42 individuals / 100 km2) and are currently available from only a few locations, making generalizations about broader population abundance difficult at this time. These include six locations in India: Pakke Tiger Reserve: 2.9/100 km2 (Selvan et al.2014), Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Tiger Reserve: 4.48/100 km2 (Srivathsa et al.2015), Bhadra Tiger Reserve: 10.45 / 100 km2 (Srivathsa et al.2015) and Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve: 17.52/100 km2 (Bashir et al.2013), one from Nepal: Banke National Park: 4.85/100 km2 (Dhakal 2018) and one location in Thailand: Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve: 17.7/100 km2 (Petersen et al.2019b). The highest density for the species (89.4±17.2 (SE) individuals/100 km2) has been recorded from Tekong Island, Singapore (an estimate of 21 adults; Chua et al. 2016).
Mainland Leopard Cat population densities presumably vary by habitat type and level of human disturbance as those factors influence resource availability, foraging success, and the potential for inter-specific competition. Petersen et al.(2019b) found that Leopard Cat density varied by habitat type within a degraded forest fragment in north-eastern Thailand (Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve), being highest in semi-evergreen forest (21.42/100 km2), followed by mixed-acacia/eucalyptus plantation forest (7.9/100 km2). Detections were too few to estimate Leopard Cat density in the site’s third major forest type, dry dipterocarp forest. Spatial capture-recapture derived estimates of rodent biomass were highest in the semi-evergreen forest during the study period, followed by dry dipterocarp, and plantation forests (Petersen et al. 2019b). The potential for inter-specific competition between Leopard Cats and other sympatric small terrestrial carnivores was found to be greatest in the dry dipterocarp forest (Petersen et al. 2019a). Similarly, Srivathsa et al. (2015), using bycatch data from four camera-trap surveys targeting the Tiger (Panthera tigris) in the Western Ghats (India), found high Mainland Leopard Cat densities to be clustered around secondary, disturbed, or partly modified forests and human-use areas, and attributed the high leopard cat densities to presumably high rodent abundances in those same areas. Leopard Cat density estimates from core areas of larger, closer to intact forest landscapes, however, are lacking. Past studies from such areas have reported lower Mainland Leopard Cat photo-encounter rates than for some other sympatric felids (e.g. Petersen et al. 2020; with similar findings reported for the Sunda Leopard Cat (Prionailurus javanensis): McCarthy et al. 2015), suggesting the high Mainland Leopard Cat densities reported from smaller forest fragments and other disturbed locations should not be extrapolated to these less disturbed areas.
Country-specific reliable population estimates for the species are not available though several educated guesses have been made across its range. Not more than 1,600 individuals are believed to inhabit the whole range on the territory of Russia (Yudin 2015) while only fewer than 2,500 and 100-150 individuals are believed to exist in Nepal and Pakistan respectively (Jnawali et al. 2011). A total of around 50 individuals were estimated from Singapore. For the islands Iriomote and Tsushima in Japan and for Taiwan, the population sizes of the Mainland Leopard Cat are supposed to be very small (Ross et al. 2015). Khan (2015) and Khan (2018) both labelled the species as uncommon in Bangladesh. Population size or trends are not known for any other country. In China, the population size of the MLC is about 230,000, and the population trend is stable (Jiang et al. 2021).
Menaces identifiées(14 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
2_1_2Small-holder farmingCausing/Could cause fluctuationsUnknownOngoing5_1_2Unintentional effects (species is not the target)Causing/Could cause fluctuationsUnknownOngoing1_1Housing & urban areasNegligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing1_2Commercial & industrial areasNegligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing2_1_3Agro-industry farmingNegligible declinesUnknownOngoing5_3_4Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing11_1Habitat shifting & alterationUnknownUnknownFuture2_1_1Shifting agricultureUnknownUnknownOngoing2_2_1Small-holder plantationsUnknownUnknownOngoing2_2_2Agro-industry plantationsUnknownUnknownOngoing
+ 4 menaces supplémentaires
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Potential threats to Mainland Leopard Cat vary across its geographic range, but overall, there is no evidence of any serious threats operating over large areas. Hunting and snaring occur in most parts of Mainland Leopard Cat’s range and is particularly intense in South-east Asia (Gray et al. 2018, Harrison et al. 2016, Willcox et al. 2014). But surveys in areas affected by heavy snaring show the Mainland Leopard Cat to be one of the most resilient species of small carnivores (Willcox et al. 2014). Hence there is little evidence to suggest that hunting and/or snaring is reducing Mainland Leopard Cat’s population at a global scale. The species is traded or hunted for meat in parts of north-east India (Selvan et al. 2013), in parts of Afghanistan (Karlstetter 2008), Bangladesh (S. Chaudhary pers. comm. 2021) and in South-east Asia (Willcox et al. 2014) but there is no evidence that this practice has dramatically reduced the species’ populations in those areas. A recent report shows that from North China to Sichuan, from Jiangxi to Yunnan, and areas like Guangxi and Guangdong showed a lower than expected number of wild Mainland Leopard Cat. The contributing reason behind the population decline in southern China is believed to be hunting for food and fur, however, more recently evidence shows illegal adoption, domestication, and hybrid breeding of Bengal Leopard Cat maybe other main factors (CFCA 2017). In recent years, the data indicate that the hunting pressure on the Chinese Mainland Leopard Cat populations has been dramatically reduced (Yu 2010). Additionally, China’s massive natural forest protection campaign since 1998 may also be very helpful for habitat recovery, which should be beneficial for the Leopard Cat (Yu 2010).
Retaliatory killings in response to perceived poultry depredation are common though not at a rate to threaten its population either locally or globally. Misidentifications (as, for example mistaking the species as Leopard Panthera pardus or Snow Leopard Panthera uncia cub or Fishing Cat Prionailurus viverrinus) leading to lethal anthropogenic responses are common in countries like Bangladesh and Nepal. These perspectives instil fear, resulting in stern retaliatory anthropogenic responses however most of these responses are few and far between, with little impact in the global or even local scale.
Deforestation is potentially an important driver of habitat deterioration and may be a localised threat to Mainland Leopard Cat survival in certain areas such as the eastern Afghanistan. Habitat loss or deterioration from other countries in its range has also been documented. Also, a recent study using ecological niche models suggests that the primary macroscale factors that negatively impact Leopard Cat are, climate change and human induced habitat degradation (Silva et al. 2020). However, its occurrence in areas without actual forests indicates that this is less of a threat than previously perceived. In Thailand, it is presumed to have higher mortality due to increased proximity to humans (Haines et al. 2004), but recent research in China shows much better adaptation by the species to human disturbance (Wu et al. 2018). The species’ overall tolerance to human disturbance allows for a much wider population of the species than would be the case if it inhabited in areas infrequented by humans. The species’ ability to disperse between the many isolated forest fragments in which it currently occurs is unknown, though available evidence suggests it may be limited in Taiwan (Chen et al. 2016). By contrast, in southern Korea, the species disperses freely across non-forest landscapes as shown by its strong colonisation of newly-reclaimed areas of formerly intertidal habitat converted to rice fields and brackish wetlands. In principle, inter-patch dispersal ability depends on the structure and composition of the surrounding matrix and overall landscape permeability, features that can be both site- and period-specific (Metzger and Décamps 1997). As such, the long-term viability of isolated populations living within many forest fragments is uncertain and probably variable.
Free roaming dogs, Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) transmission from feral cats and reduced prey availability can also threaten the Mainland Leopard Cat in specific areas, such as for example the population on Tsushima island, Japan (Ministry of the Environment of the Government of Japan, no date). Protoparvovirus have also been found in Mainland Leopard Cat in China (Chen et al. 2019). Road kills in and around protected areas and forests is another visible potential issue for the Mainland Leopard Cat in some areas (Kim et al. 2019, Chen et al. 2016, Baskaran and Bhoominathan 2010, Izawa et al. 2009), though it is presumably not a prominent overall threat at the moment.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_1Forest - Boreal★1_4Forest - Temperate★1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland★1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane★3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★3_6Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist★3_7Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude★16Introduced vegetation14_3Artificial/Terrestrial - Plantations14_4Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens14_5Artificial/Terrestrial - Urban Areas
+ 6 habitats supplémentaires
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Conservation measures tailored to the Mainland Leopard Cat are scarce, except the protected areas which provide safe refuge to the species, often under the umbrella of other keystone species. Generally, its population trend and status is not well known. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Leopard Cat is data deficient, hence the first concrete steps in these countries would be the systematic assessment of the species’ current range, abundance and threats. Its status in other countries of its geographic range is relatively more common though a comprehensive assessment in China regarding the illegal trade of the species would be a good step. In China, the species has been listed as Category II of National Key Protected Wild Animals (2021). The populations of the species in nature reserves are under protection, and it has been listed as Vulnerable in the China's Red List of Biodiversity (Jiang et al. 2021). Systematic monitoring of potential threats to the species is really the primary need, in case any of them should change into serious threats.
Generally, the species is widely reported and presumably abundant in Nepal, India, Malaysia, Myanmar and Thailand. Thus, dedicated conservation measures targeting this species are rare in these countries. One of the important conservation initiatives for the Mainland Leopard Cat includes enlisting the species in the schedule I of National Park and Wildlife Conservation Act 1973 in Nepal. The species is also protected in Bangladesh, included in schedule I of the Wildlife (Conservation and Protection) Act 2012. Myanmar too has provided complete protection to the species according to the newly updated Conservation of Biodiversity and Protected Area Law (2018). In Japan the species has been declared a National Nature Monument in 1971 and an endangered species in 1994 and a conservation project plan has been initiated since 1995. The species is listed in the schedule I of the Forest and Nature Conservation Act of Bhutan 1995. Hence, hunting or trade of any sort is completely prohibited in the country.
Since the species is not highly sought after by researchers it will be a great initiative if researchers from across its global range collaborate to produce a range-wide estimation of its habitat suitability including the already existing presence data of the species.
Actions de conservation (2)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
2_1Site/area management4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (27)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_3_8Other2_3_8Other2_3_8Other
Usage & commerce (3)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humansubsistance10Wearing apparel, accessoriesinternationalnationalsubsistance13Pets/display animals, horticultureinternationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods1_5Threats3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. no date. Let’s protect Japan’s wildlife. What we can do to help. Available at: <a href="https://www.env.go.jp/nature/kisho/pamphlet/mamorou_2017en.pdf.">https://www.env.go.jp/nature/kisho/pamphlet/mamorou_2017en.pdf.</a>.
- IUCN. 2023. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 07 December 2023).
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 21 July 2022).
- Jamtsho Y., Dendup P., Dorji T., Dorji R. and Dorji R. 2021. Jigme Dorji National Park: A wild felid biodiversity hotspot in Bhutan. <i>Cat News</i> 71: 30-34.
- Kim K., Jang Y. and Borzée A. 2021. Update on the range of leopard cats in the Republic of Korea. <i>Cat News</i> 72: 38–39.
- Clements, G. R., Rostro-García, S., Kamler, J. F., Llang, S. H. and Hashim, A. K. B.A. 2021. Conservation status of large mammals in protected and logged forests of the greater Taman Negara Landscape, Peninsular Malaysia. <i>Biodiversitas</i> 22: 272-277.
- Petersen, W.J., Steinmetz, R., Sribuarod, K. and Ngoprasert, D. 2020b. Density and movements of mainland clouded leopards (<i>Neofelis nebulosa</i>) under conditions of high and low poaching pressure. <i>Global Ecology and Conservation</i>: 1-11.
- Brakels, P. and Somdachit, T. 2020. Record of cats from Phou Hin Poun National Protected Area, Lao PDR. <i>Cat News</i> 71: 7-8.
- Griffin, O., Suzuki, A., Willard, C., Ommanney, K. and Mahood, S. 2020. WCS Cambodia camera trap occurrence data. Version 1.14. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/tjl4lg ">https://doi.org/10.15468/tjl4lg </a>. (Accessed: GBIF.org on 2020-07-16).
- Ueda, K. 2020. iNaturalist Research-grade Observations. iNaturalist.org. Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/ab3s5x . Available at: <a href="https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2429609569">https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2429609569</a>. (Accessed: GBIF.org on 2020-11-17).
- FON Nepal. 2020. Wildlife Research Techniques Training 2020. Friends of Nature, Kathmandu.
- Silva, A.P., Mukherjee, S., Ramakrishnan, U., Fernandes, C. and Björklund, M. 2020. Closely related species show species-specific environmental responses and different spatial conservation needs: Prionailurus cats in the Indian subcontinent. <i>Scientific Reports </i> 10: 18705.
- Can, Ö.E., Yadav, B.P., Johnson, P.J., Ross, J., D’Cruze, N. and Macdonald, D.W. 2020. Factors affecting the occurrence and activity of clouded leopards, common leopards and leopard cats in the Himalayas. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 29(3): 839-851.
- MONREC. 2020. National Red List of Threatened Species in Myanmar. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
- Noor, A., Mir, Z.R., Veeraswami, G.G. and Habib, B. 2020. Density of leopard in a moist-temperate forest of western Himalaya, India. <i>Tropical Ecology </i> 61: 301-310.
- Mccann, G., Pawlowski, K. and Soukhon, T. 2020. The Standard Four' in Virachey National Park, north-east Cambodia. <i>Cat News </i> 71: 9-13.
- Liu, Y., Song, D., Liu, B., Xia, F., Chen, Y., Wang, Y. and Huang, Q. 2020. Overview of the Camera-trapping Platform for Felid Species in China: Data integration by a conservation NGO. <i>Biodiversity Science</i> 28(9): 1067-1074.
- Ota. A., Takagi. E., Yasuda. M., Hashim. M., Hosaka. T. and Numata. S. 2020. Effects of nonlethal tourist activity on the diel activity patterns of mammals in a National Park in Peninsular Malaysia. <i>Global Ecology and Conservation</i> 20(e00772).
- Jia D., Li P., Zhao X., Cheng C., Xiao L. and Lü Z. 2020. Overview of Sanjiangyuan community-based camera-trapping monitoring platform. <i>Biodiversity science </i> 28: 1104-1109.
- Li X., Hu W., Pu C., Li Q., Yu Q., Hu Z., Bleisch W. V. and Jiang X. 2020. Camera-trapping monitoring platform for mammals and pheasants in the Longitudinal Range and Gorge Region of Southwest China: Protocol, progress and future outlook. <i>Biodiversity Science </i> 28: 1090-1096.
- Ash, E., Kaszta, Z., Noochdumrong, A., Redford, T., Chanteap, P., Hallam, C., Jaroensuk, B., Raksat, S., Srinoppawan, K. & Macdonald, D.W. 2020. Opportunity for Thailand’s forgotten tigers: assessment of the Indochinese tiger <I>Panthera tigris corbetti</i> and its prey with camera trap surveys. <i>Oryx</i> 55: 204-211.
- Jhala, Y.V., Qureshi, Q. and Nayak, A.K. 2020. Status of tigers, copredators and prey in India, 2018. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Government of India, New Delhi, and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.
- Freeland Foundation. 2019b. Surveying Indochinese tigers in Nam Tok Huai Yang National Park. FSI 2019. India State of Forest Report 2019. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, India.
- Petersen, W.J., Savini, T., Steinmetz, R. and Ngoprasert, D. 2019b. Estimating leopard cat <i>Prionailurus bengalensis</i> Kerr, 1792 (Carnivora: Felidae) density in a degraded tropical forest fragment in north-eastern Thailand. <i>Journal of Threatened Taxa </i> 11: 13448-13458.
- Petersen, W.J., Savini, T., Steinmetz, R. and Ngoprasert, D. 2019a. Periodic resource scarcity and potential for interspecific competition influences distribution of small carnivores in a seasonally dry tropical forest fragment. <i>Mammalian Biology </i> 95: 112-122.
- Freeland Foundation. 2019a. Khao Laem: Conservation in one of Thailand’s Frontier Tiger Parks. Interim Report.
- Joshi, B., Syiem, B.L.N., Kuotsu, R., Menon, A., Gogoi, J., Goswami, V.R. and Vasudev, D. 2019. Records of the Marbled Cat <i>Pardofelis marmorata</i> and the Asiatic Golden Cat <i>Catopuma temminckii</i> (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) from the community forests surrounding the Dzukou Valley in Nagaland, India. <i>Journal of Threatened Taxa </i> 11: 14363-14367.
- Chen, C.C., Chang, A.M., Wada, T., Chen, M.T. and Tu, Y.S. 2019. Distribution of carnivore protoparvovirus 1 in free-living leopard cats (<i>Prionailurus bengalensis chinensis</i>) and its association with domestic carnivores in Taiwan. <i>PLoS ONE </i> 14(9): e0221990.
- Naing, H., Ross, J., Burnham, D., Htun, S. and Macdonald, D. W. 2019. Population density estimates and conservation concern for clouded leopards <i>Neofelis nebulosa</i>, marbled cats <i>Pardofelis marmorata</i> and tigers <i>Panthera tigris</i> in Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary, Sagaing, Myanmar. <i>Oryx</i> 53: 654–662.
- Mukherjee, S., Singh, P., Silva, A.P., Ri, C., Kakati, K., Borah, B., Tapi, T., Kadur, S., Choudhary, C., Srikant, S., Nadig, S., Navya, R., Bjorklund, M. and Ramakrishnan, U. 2019. 2019. Activity patterns of the small and medium felid (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) guild in northeastern India. <i>Journal of Threatened Taxa </i> 11: 13432−13447.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Ghimirey, Y., Petersen, W., Jahed, N., Akash, M., Lynam, A.J., Kun, S., Din, J., Nawaz, M.A., Singh, P., Dhendup, T., Chua, M.A.H., Gray, T.N.E. & Phyoe Kyaw, P. 2023. Prionailurus bengalensis (amended version of 2022 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: e.T223138747A226150742. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
Morphologie(4)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (13)— redirigent vers cette page
- Felis anastasiaeSatunin, 1905
- Felis bengalensisKerr, 1792
- Felis bengalensis euptiluraCorbet, 1978
- Felis bengalensis hainanaXu & Liu, 1983
- Felis bengalensis manchuricaTate, 1947
- Felis decolorataMilne-Edwards, 1872
- Felis euptilura microtisWon, 1968
- Felis ingramiBonhote, 1903
- Felis manchuricaMori, 1922
- Felis microtisMilne-Edwards, 1872
- Felis rickettiBonhote, 1903
- Felis sinensisSthih, 1930
- Mustela manchuricaMori, 1922
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).