Ontologia

Parajubaea sunkha

M.Moraes

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B1ab(iii)c(iv)+2ab(iii)c(iv)?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2006 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
According to Vargas (1994) (eee the Supplementary Material for figure 2: location of the Parajubaea sunkha subpopulations according to Vargas (1994)):

There are 14 locations recorded, most of which show only a few individuals (1–100). The only significant populations are to be found in locations number 11 (Mataralcito) and 12 (El Palmar) with an estimate of up to 17,000 mature individuals.

Degree of fragmentation is high. Approximately the half of the populations are fragmented and are estimated to be only little viable.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_2
    Commercial & industrial areas
    Ongoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 4_1
    Roads & railroads
    Ongoing
  • 5_3_1
    Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    Ongoing
  • 7_1_3
    Trend Unknown/Unrecorded
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
If the palm remains undisturbed it shows an abundant regeneration in its natural habitat, but overgrazing, land clearing, fires and human use of the palm’s fibres have a strong impact on the regeneration dynamics of this rare species (Vargas 1994).

On many sites the palm is a direct competitor to agriculture. The custom of felling the tallest trees when their productivity ceases, shows clearly that the palm will not be conserved unless it provides important socio-economic benefits to the farmers. This means that there is a dilemma between the usefulness and the subsequent overexploitation of the species, and the uselessness and clear cutting of the remaining populations.

See the Supplementary Material for figure 1: population structure of four representative palm stands.

A first inventory was carried out in January 2001. The diagrams of the forest inventory (fig. 1) depict the population structure of four representative palm stands of 1ha in size that belong to four different farmers. The diagrams show clearly that the population structure is unbalanced: while 2–5 years old palm plants are very abundant in all populations, the generation of 0.5 m tall palm trees is missing completely in populations P1 and P2 and is underrepresented in populations P3 and P4.

The absence of palms around 0.5 m of height (+/-20 years old) can be traced back to the construction of a road that connects the rural area with the town. Before the road was built, farmers transported the fibre with donkeys and on their backs to the local market. This limited them in terms of the quantity they could transport and secured the fructification of adult palms to ensure regeneration. Since the road was build in 1984, it is possible to harvest and transport much larger quantities of palm fibre. Farmers confirm that in this time almost all palms were under exploitation. As a result, regeneration almost came to a halt. This is shown by the absence of the 0.5 m tall palms in the populations 1 and 2 (fig. 1). These palm stands are directly linked to the road and as consequence were exploited heavily.

The populations 3 and 4 belong to farmers that live within about an hour walk from the road. As a result, exploitation in these palm stands was not as intensive and regeneration could occur to some degree. This is testified by the presence of more young palms between 0.5–1 m of height compared to population 1 and 2 (fig.1).

Utilization
The palm produces a fibre, which grows in its leaf axils and is locally used to make mattresses, ropes and saddle pillows. Apart from subsistence use these products are sporadically sold on local markets.

The leaves are used to manufacture hats, baskets and fans (Vargas 1994). Leafs and fruits serve as fodder for livestock. Furthermore, the species is internationally traded as ornamental plant.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_4Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens
  • 14_5Artificial/Terrestrial - Urban Areas
  • 1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land
  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
There is not yet any in-situ conservation activity in place. The habitat of the palm is not covered by any kind of protected area.

Ex-situ conservation is provided by the Bolivian NGO “FAN-Bolivia” who has made efforts for in vitro propagation. Furthermore, seeds of the palm can be purchased on the internet from various ornamental palm dealers. This kind of trade, however, is not legally approved by international and Bolivian national legislation article 15 of the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) and the Decision 391 of the treaty of Cartagena (in Bolivia: Decreto supremo 24676, Art. 3).

Project proposals for in situ conservation are ready (FAN-Bolivia 2003), but lack of financing and the implementation of national legislation are hindering the proceedings.

In 2008, a second inventory will be carried out in order to re-asses the status of conservation of the species
Actions de conservation (12)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 3_1_1Harvest management
  • 3_1_2Trade management
  • 3_2Species recovery
  • 4_1Formal education
  • 4_2Training
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
  • 5_4_2National level
  • 5_4_3Sub-national level
  • 6_1Linked enterprises & livelihood alternatives
Stress écologiques (9)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_1Species mortality
Priorités de recherche (2)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Tree - size unknown
Références bibliographiques (6)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2006. <i>IUCN Red List of Threatened Species</i>.
  2. Enssle, J., Ibisch, P.L. and Ferrufino, H. 2006. Conservation status and economic potential of <i>Parajubaea sunkha</i>, an endemic palm tree of the inter-Andean valleys of central Bolivia. <i>Palms</i> 50(3): 143-151.
  3. Ibisch, P.L. 2004. Degradation and loss of terrestrial biodiversity through direct use. In: P.L. Ibsich & G. Mérida (eds). <i>Biodiversity, the richness of Bolivia</i>. pp: 209 and 429. Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza (FAN) 2004.
  4. Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza (FAN-Bolivia). 2003. Perfil de proyecto: Conservación, manejo y commercializavión de la palmera endémica <i>Parajubaea sunkha</i> Moraes. Santa Cruz, 04/2003 (unpublished).
  5. Moraes, R.M. 1996. Novelities of the genera <i>Parajubaea</i> and <i>Syagrus</i> (Palmaea) from interandean valleys of Bolivia. <i>Novon</i> 6: 85–92.
  6. Vargas, C.I. 1994. Ecology and uses of <i>Parajubaea torallyi</i> in Bolivia. <i>Principes</i> 38: 146–152.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Enssle, J.
evaluator
Zona, S. & Maunder, M. (Palm Red List Authority)

Enssle, J. 2006. Parajubaea sunkha. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T61421A12479273. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale

Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie