Ontologia
Palmier d'eau

Palmier d'eau

Nypa fruticansWurmb

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Nypa fruticans.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2010 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
This species has a very dynamic population. It has experienced general declines due to localized threats throughout its range. This species has almost disappeared in the Indian Sundarbans due to reduced fresh water flow (Kathiresan pers. comm.). However, in some areas it is also increasing due to planting. In the Phillippines for example, other mangrove species have been cleared to plant this species, which may pose a threat to mangrove biodiversity (J. Primavera pers. comm.). In some parts of Africa where it has been introduced, it has become invasive and is considered a pest.

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 11_1
    Habitat shifting & alteration
    Ongoing
  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Ongoing
  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_4_3
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    Ongoing
  • 5_3_5
    Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
As this species prefers more freshwater environments, hyper-saline conditions and strong wave action (including that caused by passing ships) can threaten this species. Although local estimates are uncertain due to differing legislative definitions of what is a 'mangrove' and to the imprecision in determining mangrove area, current consensus estimates of mangrove loss in the last quarter-century report an approximately 20% decline in mangrove areas in countries within this species range since 1980 (FAO 2007).

Sea level rise is a major threat, especially to back mangroves that have no area in which to expand. Mangrove species with a habitat on the landward margin may be particularly vulnerable to sea-level rise if owing to coastal development their movement inland is blocked. In the Sunderbans Delta of India, for example, which has a relatively high rate of sea-level rise, provides insight to what may be common elsewhere as global sea levels rise (Mukherjee 1984). There, Nypa fruticans is blocked from inland migration owing to coastal development, and its area and occurrence has been declining (K. Kathiresan pers. comm.)

All mangrove ecosystems occur within mean sea level and high tidal elevations, and have distinct species zonations that are controlled by the elevation of the substrate relative to mean sea level. This is because of associated variation in frequency of elevation, salinity and wave action (Duke et al. 1998). With rise in sea-level, the habitat requirements of each species will be disrupted, and species zones will suffer mortality at their present locations and re-establish at higher elevations in areas that were previously landward zones (Ellison 2005). If sea-level rise is a continued trend over this century, then there will be continued mortality and re-establishment of species zones. However, species that are easily dispersed and fast growing/fast producing will cope better than those which are slower growing and slower to reproduce.

In addition, mangrove area is declining globally due to a number of localized threats. The main threat is habitat destruction and removal of mangrove areas. Reasons for removal include cleared for shrimp farms, agriculture, fish ponds, rice production and salt pans, and for the development of urban and industrial areas, road construction, coconut plantations, ports, airports, and tourist resorts. Other threats include pollution from sewage effluents, solid wastes, siltation, oil, and agricultural and urban runoff. Climate change is also thought to be a threat, particularly at the edges of a species range. Natural threats include cyclones, hurricane and tsunamis.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 12_7Marine Intertidal - Mangrove Submerged Roots
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
There are no conservation measures specific to this species, but its range may include some marine and coastal protected areas. Continued monitoring and research is recommended, as well as the inclusion of mangrove areas in marine and coastal protected areas.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
Stress écologiques (9)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (1)Expert
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

AustralasianIndomalayanOceanian

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

TerrestrialFreshwater (=Inland waters)Marine

Formes de croissance

Shrub - size unknown

Zones de pêche FAO

Indian Ocean - easternPacific - northwestPacific - western central
Références bibliographiques (12)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.2). Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org">http://www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 29 June 2010).
  2. FAO. 2007. The World's Mangroves 1980-2005. FAO Forestry Paper 153. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
  3. McKenzie, L., Campbell, S. and Lasi, F. 2006. Seagrasses and Mangroves: Solomon Islands Marine Assessment. TNC Pacific Island Countries Report No 1/06. TNC.
  4. Duke, N. 2006. <i>Australia's Mangroves. The authoritative guide to Australia's mangrove plants</i>. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  5. Ellison, J.C. 2005. Holocene palynology and sea-level change in two estuaries in Southern Irian Jaya. <i>Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology</i> 220: 291-309.
  6. Falanruw, M.C. 2002. FSM National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan Project: Terrestrial Biodiversity of the Federated States of Micronesia. FSM Department of Economic Affairs.
  7. Duke, N. C., Ball, M.C. and Ellison, J.C. 1998. Factors influencing biodiversity and distributional gradients in mangroves. <i>Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters</i> 7: 27-47.
  8. Spalding, M.D., Blasco, F. and Field, C.D. (eds). 1997. <i>World Mangrove Atlas</i>. The International Society for mangrove Ecosystems, Okinawa, Japan.
  9. Li, M.S. and Lee, S.Y. 1997. Mangroves of China: a brief review. <i>Forest Ecology and Management</i> 96: 241-259.
  10. Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. 1992. <i>Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems</i>. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
  11. Robertson, A.I., Daniel, P.A. and Dixon, P. 1991. Mangrove forest structure and productivity in the Fly river estuary, Papua New Guinea. <i>Marine Biology</i> 111: 147-155.
  12. Mukherjee, A.K. 1984. The environmental impact analysis for three mangroves species of Indian Sunderbans. <i>Bulletin of the Botanical Survey of India</i> 26(3-4): 181-182.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Ellison, J., Koedam, N.E., Wang, Y., Primavera, J., Jin Eong, O., Wan-Hong Yong, J. & Ngoc Nam, V.
evaluator
Polidoro, B.A., Livingstone, S.R., Carpenter, K.E. (Global Marine Species Assessment Coordinating Team) & Baker, W.J. (Palm Red List Authority)

Ellison, J., Koedam, N.E., Wang, Y., Primavera, J., Jin Eong, O., Wan-Hong Yong, J. & Ngoc Nam, V. 2010. Nypa fruticans. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T178800A7610085. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (7)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Cocos nypaLour.
  • Nipa arborescensWurmb ex H.Wendl.
  • Nipa fructicans(Wurmb) Thunb.
  • Nipa fruticans(Wurmb) Thunb.
  • Nipa litoralisBlanco
  • Nypa arborescensWurmb ex H. Wendl., nom. inval.
  • Nypa fruticans var. neameanaF.M.Bailey

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).