Ontologia

Musa serpentina

Swangpol & Somana

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa serpentina.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B2ab(iii); DDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
240570 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The species has been described as growing vigorously at a locality in Kanchanaburi, and as growing robustly along a stream bank in Mae Hong Son. The total number of mature individuals of Musa serpentina, though, sums to fewer than 250 (Swangpol and Somana 2011). No information is available around the size and status of specific subpopulations and the current population trend is unknown. The seed set is poor with fruits producing no more than 10 seeds; as such, it is likely that recruitment levels are low making it more probable that the population is in decline (Swangpol and Somana 2011). Further research into population status and trends is required to confirm whether a decline is apparent and ongoing.

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    UnknownUnknownFuture
  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    UnknownUnknownFuture
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownFuture
Description complète des menacesExpert
The primary threat to this species is the continued fragmentation of its mixed deciduous forest habitat, as documented by Swangpol and Somana (2011). The species is limited to the Kayah-Karen montane rain forests ecoregion, as delineated by Olson et al. (2001). Although the ecoregion is considered to be fairly intact, this is largely the result of extensive protected area coverage; outside of these areas, about a third of the forests in the ecoregion have been cleared or degraded (Wikramanayake and Carpenter 2001). The species does not occur in protected areas and it is therefore vulnerable to the impacts of shifting agriculture, and increasing pressure to convert forest into more intensive agricultural land, commercial logging concessions and urban areas, driven by projected population growth in the region (Wikramanayake and Carpenter 2001, Trisurat et al. 2010). The impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). This species has been observed to grow in highly disturbed habitats (Swangpol and Somana 2011); on this basis, it is thought that industrial-scale land conversion is more likely to constitute a threat to the species than smaller-scale disturbance.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). The species is not known from any protected areas, although it occurs in close proximity to the 6,222 km2 Thungyai-Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries World Heritage Site (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020). It is not known to be conserved ex situ elsewhere (Ruas et al. 2017, BGCI 2020, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2020). As such, gathering of wild germplasm material for ex situ conservation from extant wild plants is a conservation priority.
Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (19)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    national
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (15)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. WCSP. 2020. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: <a href="https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do">https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do</a>.
  3. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
  4. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2020. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>.
  5. BGCI. 2020. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  6. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  7. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  8. Swangpol, S. and Somana, J. 2011. Musa serpentina (Musaceae): a new banana species from western border of Thailand. <i>Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany)</i> 39: 31-36.
  9. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  10. Trisurat, Y., Alkemade, R. and Verburg, P.H. 2010. Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in northern Thailand. <i>Environmental Management</i> 45: 626-639.
  11. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  12. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  13. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  14. Wikramanayake, E. and Carpenter, C. 2001. Kayah-Karen montane rain forests. WWF. Available at: <a href="https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0119">https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0119</a>. (Accessed: 16 January 2020, 2021).
  15. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Diaz, R., Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
evaluator
Swangpol, S.C.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
institutions
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Diaz, R., Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa serpentina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T98248134A98248136. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie