Ontologia

Musa schizocarpa

N.W.Simmonds

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa schizocarpa.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
01500 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The species is widely distributed on the New Guinea mainland, and commonly occurs as occasional clumps; however, it may form almost pure stands, with the largest stands observed north of Lae and near Finschhafen (Argent 1976). It is described as common in disturbed areas on the Arfak Plains (Johns, K, #8140). Given its widespread distribution and observed frequency at collection sites, as well as its ability to grow in disturbed areas, it is suspected that the population is stable. However, no numerical population information is available with which to confirm this so research into population status and trends is recommended.

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
New Guinea's rainforests are being logged, cleared, and converted at a rapid rate due to timber extraction, subsistence agriculture, and expansion of industrial agriculture, with a further threat posed by the mining industry. Between 1972 and 2002, Papua New Guinea lost more than five million hectares of forest; since 2002, a further 2% of the country's primary forest has been lost (Butler 2006, Mongabay 2019). However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). Felling of trees along narrow stretches of roadside may actually provide suitable habitat for some Musa species (Kiew 1987) and M. schizocarpa has been observed growing along logging tracks and in disturbed areas (Argent 1976, Streimann, L, #NGF39469). Further research into threats to the species may beneficial to better understand how the species responds to disturbance and to identify whether any threats, named or unidentified, pose a more significant risk.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_8Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). There are 23 M. schizocarpa germplasm accessions of wild origin held worldwide. 13 are held by the Bioversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium, six by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), South Johnstone in Australia, two by the Centre africain de recherche sur bananes et plantains (CARBAP) in Cameroon, and one by each of the Institute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IFTR/GDAAS) in China, and the National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) in Uganda (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). Two botanical gardens are listed as sites of ex situ conservation for this species (BGCI 2019). This species has been collected from within, or in close proximity to, the 15.02 km2 Mt. Kaindi Wildlife Management Area and its range overlaps with multiple protected areas (Protected Planet 2019); if it occurs in any of these, passive conservation is presumed, but it is not known whether active management is apparent.
Stress écologiques (12)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (6)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    subsistance
  • 11Other household goods
    subsistance
  • 12Handicrafts, jewellery, etc.
    subsistance
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
  • 9Construction or structural materials
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Australasian

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (25)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 04 September 2021).
  2. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 December 2020).
  3. Protected Planet. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  4. Nandwani, D. (ed.). 2019. Genetic Diversity in Horticultural Plants. <i>Sustainable Development and Biodiversity</i>, pp. 297. Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
  5. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  6. Mongabay. 2019. Deforestation statistics for Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm</a>. (Accessed: 21/10/2019).
  7. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  8. Němečková, A.; Christelová, P.; Čížková, J.; Nyine, M.; Van den houwe, I.; Svačina, R.; Uwimana, B.; Swennen, R.; Doležel, J.; Hřibová, E. 2018. Molecular and Cytogenetic Study of East African Highland Banana. <i>Frontiers in Plant Science</i> 9(1371).
  9. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  10. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  11. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  12. Sardos, J., Rouard, M., Hueber, Y., Cenci, A., Hyma, K.E., van den Houwe, I., Hribova, E., Courtois, B. and Roux, N. 2016. A Genome-Wide Association Study on the Seedless Phenotype in Banana (Musa spp.) Reveals the Potential of a Selected Panel to Detect Candidate Genes in a Vegetatively Propagated Crop. <i>PLoS ONE</i> 11(5): e0154448.
  13. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  14. Hippolyte, I., Jenny, C., Gardes, L., Bakry, F., Rivallan, R., Pomies, V., Cubry, P., Tomekpe, K., Risterucci, A.M., Roux, N., Rouard, M., Arnaud, E., Kolesnikova-Allen, M. and Perrier, X. 2012. Foundation characteristics of edible <i>Musa </i>triploids revealed from allelic distribution of SSR markers. <i>Annals of Botany</i> 109: 937–951.
  15. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  16. Kennedy, J. 2009. Bananas and People in the Homeland of Genus <i>Musa</i>: Not just pretty fruit. <i>Ethonobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 179-198.
  17. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  18. Lentfer, C. 2009. Tracing domestication and cultivation of bananas from phytoliths: an update from Papua New Guinea. <i>Ethnobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 247–270.
  19. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  20. Butler, R.A. 2006. Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm</a>.
  21. Carreel, F., Faure, S., Gonzalez de Leon, D., Lagoda, P. and Perrier, X. 1994. Evaluation de la diversité génétique chez les bananiers diploides (Musa sp.). <i>Genetics Selection Evolution</i> 26: 125–136.
  22. Kiew, R. 1987. Notes on the Natural History of the Johore Banana, <i>Musa gracilis</i> Holttum. <i>Malayan Nature Journal</i> 41: 239-248.
  23. Argent, G.C.G. 1976. The Wild Bananas of Papua New Guinea. <i>Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh</i> 35(1): 77-114.
  24. Harlan, J.R. and de Wet, J.M.J. 1971. Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. <i>Taxon</i> 20(4): 509-517.
  25. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Rahman, W.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2020. Musa schizocarpa (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T158541961A201906590. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie