Musa ruiliensis
W.N.Chen, Häkkinen & X.J.Ge
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa ruiliensis.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
CR · En danger critiquecritères B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v)↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2022 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 1000 – 1500 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Hundreds of individuals were found along the valley and stream around Daoba village (Häkkinen 2011, Chen et al. 2014). It is suspected that the construction of an airfield on the edge of Daoba in 2013 will have had a negative impact on the population, but no further population information is available to verify this. Given the suspected decline since the type collection and observations were made, and the restricted range of the species, research into population status and trends is urgently required.
Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
2_1_2Small-holder farmingUnknownUnknownOngoing4_1Roads & railroadsUnknownUnknownOngoing6_3Work & other activitiesUnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Häkkinen (2011) notes that the species grows under the canopy of larger trees, therefore the presence of a canopy is inferred to be required for this species to thrive. Within the maximal estimated extent of occurrence for the species, about 1 km2 of tree cover was lost between 2001 and 2018 (GFW 2020). Satellite imagery suggests that this is predominantly attributable to multiple small-scale deforestation events due to small-holder agricultural activities, rather than a single major development. As well as this, since the type collection was made in January 2013 (Chen et al. 2014), satellite imagery portrays the establishment of a large airstrip on the edge of Daoba, with construction consuming about 0.5 km2 of the valley. This development is suspected to present both a past and ongoing threat to the species, owing to the land conversion that took place during construction, and the suspected subsequent increase in road and air transport in the vicinity of Daoba.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). The species has not been collected from any protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020). Its wild population grows in close proximity to the Ruili Botanical Garden, but the species was not included in a near-comprehensive whole-genome sequencing project for species present in the botanical garden (Liu et al. 2019). There is one germplasm accession of wild origin held by the Bioversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2020) but it is not known to be conserved ex situ elsewhere (BGCI 2020). Given the suspected precarious status of the wild population, urgent in situ conservation measures are required.
Actions de conservation (2)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection1_2Resource & habitat protection
Stress écologiques (12)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
14Researchinternationalnational17Other (free text)internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (5)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_5Threats2_2Area-based Management Plan3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Indomalayan
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (16)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- BGCI. 2020. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
- Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2020. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>.
- GFW. 2020. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
- UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
- WCSP. 2020. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: <a href="https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do">https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do</a>.
- Liu, H., Wei, J., Yang, T., Mu, W., Song, B., Yang, T., Fu, Y., Wang, X., Hu, G., Li, W., Zhou, H., Chang, Y., Chen, X., Chen, H., Cheng, L., He, X., Cai, H., Cai, X., Wang, M., Li, Y., Sahu, S.K., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Mu, R., Liu, J., Zhao, J., Huang, Z., Xu, X. and Liu, X. 2019. Molecular digitization of a botanical garden: high-depth whole-genome sequencing of 689 vascular plant species from the Ruili Botanical Garden. <i>Gigascience</i> 8(4): giz007.
- Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
- Li, W.M., Dita, M.A., Wu, W., Hu, G.B., Xie, J.H. and Ge, X.J. 2015. Resistance sources to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 in banana wild relatives. <i>Plant Pathology</i> 64(5): 1061–1067.
- Chen, W.; Häkkinen, M.; Ge, X-J. 2014. <i>Musa ruiliensis</i> (Musaceae, Section <i>Musa</i>), a new species from Yunnan, China. <i>Phytotaxa</i> 172(2): 109–116.
- Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
- Häkkinen, M. 2011. Belated return to China. <i>Fruit Gardener California Rare Fruit Growers</i> 43(3): 10-20.
- FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
- Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
- Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Zhao, L.N.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa ruiliensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541860A158544413. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s
Phénologie
Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s