Ontologia

Musa paracoccinea

A.Z.Liu & D.Z.Li

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa paracoccinea.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
2001300 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The species is abundantly present in specific valleys in northern Viet Nam and is very common in Hà Giang and Lào Cai provinces (S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020, S. Janssens pers. comm. 2020). However, no numerical population information is available, and the current population trend is unknown. Further research into population status and trends is therefore recommended.

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_3_1
    Nomadic grazing
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Specific threats to this species have not been documented, however, its native range is thought to fall entirely within the Northern Indochina subtropical forests ecoregion, as delineated by Olson et al. (2001). Forests in Viet Nam have been extensively cleared, and only very small fragments on steep mountainsides remain in this heavily cultivated area (MacKinnon 1997, S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020). The major threats to biodiversity in the Vietnamese part of the ecoregion are presented by land clearing for small-holder cultivation, particularly rice and cinnamon, and logging. Although human population density is low, cultivation in steep and unproductive land accounts for large-scale forest clearing (Carpenter et al. 2001, S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020). However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). It is difficult to infer whether this species displays tolerance to disturbed habitat, especially given that it has only been recorded from evergreen forests and valleys in sparsely populated, montane areas (Liu et al. 2002). As such, research into the scale and severity of threats affecting the species is recommended.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). Seed collections are held at the Plant Resources Center in Hanoi (S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020), but it is not known to be conserved ex situ elsewhere (Ruas et al. 2017, BGCI 2020, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2020). As such, gathering of wild germplasm material for ex situ conservation from extant wild plants is highly recommended. There are a number of protected areas in Lào Cai and Hà Giang provinces (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020); however, the precise distribution of the species is not clear, so it is not known whether the species occurs within these.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (11)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (6)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (15)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2020. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>.
  3. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
  4. WCSP. 2020. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: <a href="https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do">https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do</a>.
  5. BGCI. 2020. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  6. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  7. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  8. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  9. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  10. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  11. Liu, A-Z., Li, D-Z., Li X-W. 2002. Taxonomic notes on wild bananas (Musa) from China. <i>Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica</i> 43(1): 77-81.
  12. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  13. Carpenter, C., Boonratana, R. and Rundel, P. 2001. Southeastern Asia: China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. WWF. Available at: <a href="https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0137">https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0137</a>. (Accessed: 24 March 2020).
  14. MacKinnon, J. 1997. <i>Protected Areas Systems Review of the Indo-Malayan Realm</i>. Asian Bureau for Conservation / WCMC/ World Bank, Canterbury, UK.
  15. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J., Mertens, A., Janssens, S. & Kallow, S.
evaluator
Sachter-Smith, G.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Plummer, J., Mertens, A., Janssens, S. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa paracoccinea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541748A158544383. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie