Ontologia

Musa nanensis

Swangpol & Traiperm

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa nanensis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii); DDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
679835 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Musa nanensis is rare. At the type locality, there are fewer than 50 plants (Swangpol et al. 2015). A slightly larger subpopulation of c. 100 plants has recently been discovered close to the type locality (S. Swangpol pers. obs. 2020), and three small subpopulations have been identified in Lao PDR near Kasi (WWF 2016, S.W. Gale pers. comm. 2021); the Laotian subpopulations have been described as smaller than the subpopulations in Amphoe Bo Kluea comprising 25, 35 and 35 mature individuals, respectively (S.W. Gale pers. comm. 2021). As such, the global population is estimated to number fewer than 250 individuals, with fewer than 100 individuals in the largest subpopulation. Heavy deforestation is apparent in the Amphoe Bo Kluea and Kasi areas (Swangpol et al. 2015, GFW 2020), so it is suspected that the population is declining, but further research is recommended to verify this. Given the precarious status of the wild population, research into population status and trends is urgently required.

Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 8_6
    Diseases of unknown cause
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Due to the limited locality information around the species, it is difficult to infer the specific impact of threats, especially for the subpopulation in Lao PDR, for which there is limited information. In both the Amphoe Bo Kluea area in Thailand and Kasi district in Lao PDR, the species is threatened by deforestation and habitat fragmentation (Swangpol et al. 2015). Across Dong Phaya, approximately 21% of tree cover has been lost since the species was last collected in 2012, and in Kasi district, 10% of tree cover was lost between 2001 and 2020. Additionally, the species has only been recorded between 679–835 m asl, and most of this deforestation has taken place below 1,000 m asl (GFW 2020). Within the Bo Kluea district, the majority of land is dedicated to cultivating maize or rice for sustenance. Often this cultivation occurs on steep gradients, increasing the likelihood of soil erosion. In combination with low PH and low fertility of soil, the harvested fields are commonly subjected to slash-and-burn agriculture in order to increase the fertility and productivity of crops. Pastoral agriculture also contributes to degradation of forest habitat (Kitchaicharoen et al. 2015). Additionally, this species is susceptible to diseases (Swangpol et al. 2017), which may be a consequence of limited genetic variation due to its small population size. However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). A better understanding of the ecological requirements of this species are necessary to infer the extent to which the species is tolerant of disturbed habitat.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). The species is not known to be represented in formal ex situ conservation (BGCI 2020, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2020), although it has been observed growing ex situ in Chiang Mai (S. Swangpol pers. comm. 2021). The species occurs within the protected area of the Khun Nan national park, therefore, passive conservation is presumed (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020). Swangpol et al. (2015) recommended that the species be categorised as Critically Endangered using IUCN Red List Criteria; however, additional subpopulations have been identified since this recommendation was made. Given the precarious status of the wild population, conservation measures including habitat protection and the banking of seed germplasm are recommended.
Actions de conservation (4)Expert
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 3_2Species recovery
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (11)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (7)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
  • 1_6Actions
  • 2_2Area-based Management Plan
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (17)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. BGCI. 2020. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  3. WCSP. 2020. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: <a href="https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do">https://wcsp.science.kew.org/home.do</a>.
  4. GFW. 2020. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  5. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
  6. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2020. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>.
  7. Swangpol, S.C., Viboonjun, U., Kongsawadworakul, P., Chuenwarin, P., Inta, W. and Traiperm, P. 2017. Taxonomic notes on ornamental bananas in Thailand . <i>Acta Horticulturae</i> 1167: 169-176.
  8. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  9. WWF-Greater Mekong. 2016. Species Oddity. New Species Discoveries. WWF.
  10. Swangpol, S.C.; Traiperm, P.; Somana, J.; Sukkaewmanee, N.; Srisanga, P.; Suksathan, P. 2015. <i>Musa nanensis</i>, a New Banana (Musaceae) Species from Northern Thailand. <i>Systematic Botany</i> 40(2): 426-432.
  11. Kitchaicharoen, J., Suebpongsang, P., Sangchyoswat, C. and Promburom, P. 2015. Situational Analysis in Support of the Development of Integrated Agricultural Systems in the Upland Areas of Nan Province, Thailand. Humidtropics, a CGIAR Research Program, Chiang Mai.
  12. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  13. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  14. Robinson, J.C. and Gálan Saúco, V. 2010. <i>Bananas and Plantains</i>. CAB International, Wallingford.
  15. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  16. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  17. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Duffell, J., Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Gale, S.
evaluator
Swangpol, S.C.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Duffell, J., Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa nanensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T98248458A98248465. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie