Ontologia

Musa maclayi

F.Muell. ex Mikl.-Maclay

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa maclayi.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
01067 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Given its widespread distribution, it is suspected that the global population of the species is large. Argent (1976) observes that the species sometimes forms extensive pure stands on allulvial gravels but also grows as isolated clumps and patches. In the vicinity of Lae, the species is very abundant (Simmonds #B.E. 44). Given its large range, reported frequency, and ability to grow in areas of disturbance, it is suspected that the population is large and stable. However, no numerical population information is available, so research into population status and trends is recommended.

Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
New Guinea's rainforests are being logged, cleared, and converted at a rapid rate due to timber extraction, subsistence agriculture, and expansion of industrial agriculture, with a further threat posed by the mining industry. Between 1972 and 2002, Papua New Guinea lost more than five million hectares of forest; since 2002, a further 2% of the country's primary forest has been lost (Butler 2006, Mongabay 2019). In the Solomon Islands, tree cover has decreased by 5.9% between 2001 and 2018, with more than 50% of this loss occurring within the final five years of that period. In both areas, shifting agriculture has been the major driver of tree cover loss. Drivers of permanent deforestation in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, namely urbanisation and commodity-driven deforestation, were only identified as dominant drivers in 3.6% and 12% of 10 km grid cells analysed, respectively (GFW 2019). It should be noted that the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). Felling of trees along narrow stretches of roadside may actually provide suitable habitat for some Musa species (Kiew 1987) and M. maclayi has been observed growing at seral sites (Argent 1976). Further research into threats to the species may beneficial to better understand how the species responds to disturbance and to identify whether any threats, named or unidentified, pose a more significant risk.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_4Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens
  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 17Other
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_8Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). There are 13 M. maclayi germplasm accessions of wild origin held worldwide, 11 collected from Papua New Guinea and two of unknown origin. Seven are held by the Bioversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium, three are held by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), South Johnstone in Australia, and one is held by each of the Centre africain de recherche sur bananes et plantains (CARBAP) in Cameroon, the Institute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IFTR/GDAAS) in China, and the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) in Guadeloupe (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). One botanical garden is listed as a site of ex situ conservation for this species (BGCI 2019). This species is not known to have been collected from within any protected areas but its native range overlaps with many of them (Protected Planet 2019); if it occurs within any of these protected areas, passive conservation is presumed.
Stress écologiques (15)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (4)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    subsistance
  • 11Other household goods
    subsistance
  • 12Handicrafts, jewellery, etc.
    subsistance
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (3)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Australasian

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (22)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 December 2020).
  2. Protected Planet. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  3. Mongabay. 2019. Deforestation statistics for Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm</a>. (Accessed: 21/10/2019).
  4. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  5. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  6. GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  7. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  8. Sardos, J., Christelová, P., Cížková, J., Paofa, J., Sachter-Smith, G.L., Janssens, S.B., Rauka, G., Ruas, M., Daniells, J.W., Doležek, J. and Roux, N. 2018. Collection of new diversity of wild and cultivated bananas (<i>Musa</i> spp.) in the Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Papua New Guinea. <i>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution</i> 65(8): 2267-2286.
  9. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  10. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  11. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  12. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  13. FAO. 2010. The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome.
  14. Lentfer, C. 2009. Tracing domestication and cultivation of bananas from phytoliths: an update from Papua New Guinea. <i>Ethnobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 247–270.
  15. Kennedy, J. 2009. Bananas and People in the Homeland of Genus <i>Musa</i>: Not just pretty fruit. <i>Ethonobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 179-198.
  16. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  17. Butler, R.A. 2006. Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm</a>.
  18. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  19. Kiew, R. 1987. Notes on the Natural History of the Johore Banana, <i>Musa gracilis</i> Holttum. <i>Malayan Nature Journal</i> 41: 239-248.
  20. Argent, G.C.G. 1976. The Wild Bananas of Papua New Guinea. <i>Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh</i> 35(1): 77-114.
  21. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
  22. Simmonds, N.W. 1956. Botanical results of the banana collecting expedition, 1954-5. <i>Kew Bulletin</i> 11(3): 463-489.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Sharrock, S.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2020. Musa maclayi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T158541341A158544348. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie