Ontologia

Musa lutea

R.V.Valmayor, D.D.Lê & Häkkinen

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa lutea.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
124350 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The species is abundantly present in specific valleys in northern Viet Nam (S. Janssens pers. comm. 2020). It is not as common as some other wild banana species across its native range, but it is not rare either (G. Sachter-Smith pers. comm. 2019, S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020). However, no numerical population information is available, and the current population trend is unknown. Further research into population status and trends is therefore recommended.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_3_1
    Nomadic grazing
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_2_2
    Unintentional effects (species is not the target)
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 7_2_10
    Large dams
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
The native range is thought to largely fall within the Northern Indochina subtropical forests ecoregion, as delineated by Olson et al. (2001).Forests in Việt Nam have been extensively cleared, and only very small fragments on steep mountainsides remain in this heavily cultivated area (MacKinnon 1997, S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020). The major threats to biodiversity in the Vietnamese part of the ecoregion are presented by land clearing for small-holder cultivation, particularly rice and cinnamon, and logging. Although human population density is low, cultivation in steep and unproductive land accounts for large-scale forest clearing (Carpenter et al. 2001, S. Kallow pers. comm. 2020). It should be noted, though, that the impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). Although collections of this species have been made from disturbed areas, the extent to which it is tolerant of disturbance is not clear. It is also suspected that one former collection site (Harder #2429) may have been submerged following the construction of the Na Hang dam. Research into the scale and severity of threats affecting the species is recommended.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). The species is not known to have been explicitly recorded from protected areas; however, distribution records are imprecise and its range overlaps with multiple protected areas so it may occur within some of these (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020); in particular, it has been recorded in very close proximity (<1 km) to Thượng Tiến and Nà Hẩu Nature Reserves (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020, A. Mertens pers. comm. 2021). If the species does occur within any protected areas, passive conservation is presumed. A single M. lutea germplasm accession of wild origin is held by the Bioversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). A living collection is reported to held at the Phu Tho Fruit Research centre (Häkkinen 2010) along with seed collections from three wild subpopulations (A. Mertens pers. comm. 2021, V.D. Toan pers. comm. 2021); the species is not known to be conserved ex situ elsewhere in botanic gardens (BGCI 2019).
Stress écologiques (21)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (19)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
  3. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  4. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  5. GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  6. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  7. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  8. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  9. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  10. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  11. Häkkinen, M. 2010. Thirteenth Botanical Expedition Exploring for Wild Bananas of Vietnam. <i>Fruit Gardener California Rare Fruit Growers</i> 42(5): 25-27.
  12. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  13. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  14. Valmayor, R.V., Danh, L.D. and Häkkinen, M. 2004. Rediscovery of <i>Musa splendida</i> A. Chevalier and description of two new species (<i>Musa viridis</i> and <i>Musa lutea</i>). <i>The Philippine Agricultural Scientist</i> 87(1): 110-118.
  15. Liu, A-Z., Li, D-Z., Li X-W. 2002. Taxonomic notes on wild bananas (Musa) from China. <i>Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica</i> 43(1): 77-81.
  16. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  17. Carpenter, C., Boonratana, R. and Rundel, P. 2001. Southeastern Asia: China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. WWF. Available at: <a href="https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0137">https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0137</a>. (Accessed: 24 March 2020).
  18. MacKinnon, J. 1997. <i>Protected Areas Systems Review of the Indo-Malayan Realm</i>. Asian Bureau for Conservation / WCMC/ World Bank, Canterbury, UK.
  19. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J., Janssens, S., Sachter-Smith, G. & Kallow, S.
evaluator
Mertens, A.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Plummer, J., Janssens, S., Sachter-Smith, G. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa lutea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541331A158544343. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie