Ontologia

Musa lawitiensis

Nasution & Supard.

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa lawitiensis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
501600 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Musa lawitiensis populations have established in isolated gaps in mountainous valleys which has led to genetic variation within the species (Häkkinen 2006). In the Betung Kerihun National Park in West Kalimantan and along the river Mengiong in Sarawak, the varieties lawitiensis and kapitensis grow abundantly along riverbanks (Nasution and Supardiyono 1998, Häkkinen 2006). By contrast, the varieties suratii and sarawakensis are limited to single populations along logging roads, totalling 8 and 15 plants, respectively (Häkkinen 2006). No further numerical population information is available, and the current population trend is unknown. Research into population status and trends is therefore recommended.

Menaces identifiées(2 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_2_2
    Agro-industry plantations
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Within its Indonesian range, the species is known from the Betung Kerihun National Park and the remote mountainous areas of West Kutai regency; these are areas of almost untouched primary forest. Across the remainder of its range in the North Borneo coast river basin, inclusive of Sarawak, Sabah and Brunei, about 24% of forest cover has been lost between 2001 and 2018 (GFW 2019). Between 2001 and 2017, 1.85 Mha of industrial plantation was established in Malaysian Borneo and industrial oil palm development has been identified as the major driver of the area's deforestation (Gaveau et al. 2016, 2018). However, the impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). Musa lawatiensis has been found growing along logging tracks (Häkkinen 2006); on this basis, it is thought that industrial-scale land conversion is more likely to constitute a threat to the species than smaller-scale disturbance.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). Musa lawitiensis has been collected from multiple protected areas across its range and has been observed in abundance in the 8,000 km2 Betung Kerihun National Park (Häkkinen 2006), so passive conservation is presumed in these localities (Protected Planet 2019); it is unclear whether active management is apparent in any of these areas. The species is not known to be conserved ex situ (Ruas et al. 2017, BGCI 2019, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). As such, gathering of wild germplasm material for ex situ conservation from extant wild plants is highly recommended.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (8)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (3)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    subsistance
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (3)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (22)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 04 September 2021).
  2. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 December 2020).
  3. GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  4. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  5. BGCI. 2019. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  6. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  7. Protected Planet. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  8. Gaveau, D.L.A., Locatelli, B., Salim, M.A., Yaen, H., Pacheco, P. and Sheil, D. 2018. Rise and fall of forest loss and industrial plantations in Borneo (2000-2017). <i>Conservation Letters</i> 12(e12622).
  9. BGCI. 2018. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  10. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  11. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  12. Gaveau, D.L., Sheil, D., Salim, M.A., Arjasakusuma, S., Ancrenaz, M., Pacheco, P. and Meijaard, E. 2016. Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion in Borneo. <i>Scientific Reports</i> 6: 32017.
  13. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  14. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  15. Kennedy, J. 2009. Bananas and People in the Homeland of Genus <i>Musa</i>: Not just pretty fruit. <i>Ethonobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 179-198.
  16. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  17. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  18. Häkkinen, M. 2006. <i>Musa lawitiensis</i> Nasution & Supard. (Musaceae) and its intraspecific taxa in Borneo. <i>Adansonia, ser. 3</i> 28(1): 55-65.
  19. Christensen, H. 2002. <i>Ethnobotany of the Iban & the Kelabit</i>. NEPCon, University of Aarhus; Forest Department, Sarawak, Malaysia., Aarhus.
  20. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  21. Nasution, R.E. and Supardiyono. 1998. New Species: <i>Musa lawitiensis</i> Nasution & Supardiyono Spec. Nova. From Bentuang-Karimun National Park, West Kalimantan. <i>Buletin Kebun Raya Indonesia</i> 8(4): 128-130.
  22. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Rahman, W.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2020. Musa lawitiensis (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T158541290A201906917. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie