Musa flaviflora
N.W.Simmonds
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa flaviflora.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue- Évaluation
- 2022 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 70 – 914 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
In his collection notes Simmonds (1956) describes the species as locally abundant between Nowgong and Golaghat, and along the lower Manipur road above Dimapur, while Häkkinen et al. (2014) describe the species as widely distributed in northeast India; as such, it is suspected that the population is large. However, no numerical population information is available, and the current population trend is unknown. Research into population status and trends is therefore recommended.
Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
2_1_1Shifting agricultureUnknownUnknownOngoing2_1_2Small-holder farmingUnknownUnknownOngoing2_1_3Agro-industry farmingUnknownUnknownOngoing2_3_1Nomadic grazingUnknownUnknownOngoing5_3_3Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]UnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Within the native range of the species, forestry is the dominant driver of tree cover loss (GFW 2019) and the region has witnessed excessive logging historically (Chatterjee 2008). Other drivers of this land use change are shifting cultivation (jhum), encroachment for grazing, and an increase in commercial agricultural plantations, especially in the Brahmaputra and Barak valleys of Assam (Chatterjee 2008). However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). Although within its native range, there has been a loss of about 10% of forest cover between 2001 and 2018 (GFW 2019), 64% of northeast India is under forest cover (Chatterjee 2008) and it is suspected that large tracts of pristine forest habitat remain. Very little is known about the habitat and ecological preferences of M. flaviflora so it is difficult to infer whether the species is tolerant of disturbed habitat. As such, research into the threats affecting the species, as well as its ecological requirements, is recommended.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). The species is held in ex situ conservation at the Botanical Survey of India, Arunachal Pradesh Regional Center in Itanagar (R. Gogoi and S. Borah pers. obs. 2017), but it is not known to be represented in ex situ conservation elsewhere (Ruas et al. 2017, BGCI 2019, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). As such, gathering of further wild germplasm material for ex situ conservation from extant wild plants is recommended. Musa flaviflora has not been collected from any protected areas, although it was collected in close proximity to the 140.3 km2 Itanagar Sanctuary; however, its range overlaps with multiple protected areas and it is suspected to occur within some of these (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019).
Actions de conservation (1)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (15)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humansubsistance17Other (free text)internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Indomalayan
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (18)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
- Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
- IUCN and UNEP-WCMC. 2019. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>. (Accessed: 4 January 2019).
- WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
- BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
- Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
- Häkkinen, M., Gogoi, R. and Borah, S. 2014. A taxonomic study of <i>Musa flaviflora</i> and <i>M. thomsonii</i> (Musaceae). <i>Nordic Journal of Botany</i> 32: 578-583.
- Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
- Kennedy, J. 2009. Bananas and People in the Homeland of Genus <i>Musa</i>: Not just pretty fruit. <i>Ethonobotany Research and Applications</i> 7: 179-198.
- FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
- Chatterjee, S. 2008. Biodiversity conservation issues of Northeast India. <i>International Forestry Review </i> 10(2): 315-324.
- Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
- Subbaraya, U. 2006. <i>Farmers' Knowledge of wild Musa in India</i>. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
- Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
- Simmonds, N.W. 1956. Botanical results of the banana collecting expedition, 1954-5. <i>Kew Bulletin</i> 11(3): 463-489.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Borah, S.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa flaviflora. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541195A158544283. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s
Phénologie
Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s