Ontologia
Musa coccinea

Musa coccinea

Andrews

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Plante
  2. Tracheophyta
  3. Liliopsida
  4. Zingiberales
  5. Musaceae
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa coccinea.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)↘Décroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
0 – 600 m
Profondeur
– m
État de la populationExpert
It is suspected that the population of Musa coccinea in the wild has declined, given that it was historically recorded from the provinces of Guangdong, Guangxi and Yunnan in China (Wu and Raven 2000) but is now thought to be extinct in the wild in China and much of northern Vietnam (Liu et al. 2002, Häkkinen et al. 2012). Häkkinen (2010) postulates that the subpopulation in Pu Mat National Park may be one of the last wild subpopulations in the world, although collections have been recorded from two further Vietnamese localities since 2000 (Harder et al., MO, #7700;  Bui et al., B, #143). Given its rarity and suspected decline, research is urgently required to establish the population status of the species in the wild.

Menaces identifiées(1 menace classée CMP-IUCN)

  • 5_2_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
In China, the reason attributed to the decline of this banana is anthropogenic impact (Liu et al. 2002); however, the specifics of this impact are not detailed. Given its popularity in living collections and as an ornamental plant (Häkkinen et al. 2012), it is suspected that over-collection of the species may represent a major threat. In both southern China and Vietnam, total forest cover has decreased over the last 20-50 years (Fang et al. 2001, Butler 2019) so loss of habitat is also likely to have contributed to its decline. However, the major drivers behind this habitat loss are not clear.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert

The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). There are four M. coccinea germplasm accessions of wild origin held worldwide: one is held by the Millennium Seed Bank and was collected from a wild population in Vietnam; the remaining accessions are held by the Biodiversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre in Belgium, however, the country from which these collections were made is not detailed (Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). Thirty-two botanical gardens are listed as sites of ex situ conservation for this species (BGCI 2019). M. coccinea has been recorded from two protected areas in Vietnam: the 935.24 km2 Pu Mat National Park, which falls within the Tay Nghe An UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve, and the 374.87 km2 Bach Ma National Park (Protected Planet 2019).

Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 3_2Species recovery
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (1)Expert
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnationalsubsistance
  • 14Research
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (6)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
  • 1_5Threats
  • 1_6Actions
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (19)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 19 March 2020).
  2. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Plant Germplasm System. 2019. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN-Taxonomy). Beltsville, Maryland Available at: <a href="https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx">https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx</a>. (Accessed: January 2019).
  3. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  4. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  5. Protected Planet. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  6. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  7. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  8. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  9. Lim, T.K. 2012. <i>Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants: Volume 3, Fruits</i>. Springer Science & Business Media.
  10. Häkkinen, M. Väre, H., Christenhusz, M.J.M. 2012. Identity of a Pisang - historical concepts of Musa (Musaceae) and the reinstatment of Musa troglodytarum. <i>Folia Malaysiana</i> 13(2): 1-14.
  11. Mongabay. 2011. Vietnam Forest Information and Data. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Vietnam.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Vietnam.htm</a>. (Accessed: 6th August 2019).
  12. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  13. Häkkinen, M. 2010. Thirteenth Botanical Expedition Exploring for Wild Bananas of Vietnam. <i>Fruit Gardener California Rare Fruit Growers</i> 42(5): 25-27.
  14. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  15. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  16. Liu, A-Z., Li, D-Z., Li X-W. 2002. Taxonomic notes on wild bananas (Musa) from China. <i>Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica</i> 43(1): 77-81.
  17. Fang, J., Chen, A., Peng, C., Zhao, S., Ci, L. 2001. Changes in Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China Between 1949 and 1998. <i>Science</i> 292(5525): 2320-2322.
  18. Wu, Z.Y. and Raven, P.H. (eds). 2000. <i>Flora of China. Volume 24: Flagellariacae-Marantaceae</i>. pp. 431. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing and St. Louis.
  19. Danh, L.D., Nhi, H.H., Valmayor, R.V. 1998. Collecte, caractérisation et conservation du matériel génétique de bananier au Viêt-nam. <i>Infomusa</i> 7(1): 10-13.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Allen, R. & Plummer, J.
evaluator
Goettsch, B.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Allen, R. & Plummer, J. 2020. Musa coccinea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T111907070A111907072. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

GBIFiNaturalistEOLIUCN

Cartographie

GBIF Maps

Bibliographie

BHLOpenAlex
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (1)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Quesnelia lamarckiiBaker

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).