Ontologia

Musa boman

Argent

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa boman.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)Décroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
150900 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Musa boman is described as growing abundantly in two localities on the Bewani-Torricelli chain of mountains (Argent 1976) and as locally abundant between Sosi and Kilipau (Sharrock 1989). However, significant logging and conversion of land from forest to palm oil plantations is apparent in lowland areas of Sandaun (S. Janssens pers. comm. 2020). Between 2001 to 2018, the forest cover of the Aitape-Lumi area of Sandaun province decreased by 3.5%, while in the Vanimo-Green River area, forest cover decreased by 5.3%, with the vast majority of this loss taking place in the vicinity of Bewani (GFW 2019); given this, while no numerical population information is available, it is suspected that the population trend may be decreasing. Research into population status and trends is recommended to establish whether a decline is apparent.

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_2_2
    Agro-industry plantations
    Very Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Future
Description complète des menacesExpert
Significant logging and conversion of forest to palm oil, agricultural and mining land use is apparent in lowland areas, with logging activities increasingly visible in more montane regions (S. Janssens pers. comm. 2020, S. Carpentier pers. comm. 2021). The burning of forests by local people when hunting is also contributing to the degradation of forests (S. Carpentier pers. comm. 2021). Between 2001 to 2018, the forest cover of the Aitape-Lumi area of Sandaun province decreased by 3.5%, while in the Vanimo-Green River area, forest cover decreased by 5.3%, with the vast majority of this loss taking place in the vicinity of Bewani (GFW 2019). This is partly driven by shifting agriculture (GFW 2019) but a large-scale threat is also presented by timber concessions and oil palm plantations. The Vanimo timber permit covers an area stretching from the Indonesian border in the west to Aitape in the east and south to the foot of the Bewani-Torricelli mountain chain (FAO 2001). Within the area described, the Bewani Oil Palm Plantations Limited company is involved in the development of 100,000 hectares of land into large oil palm plantations through a Special Purpose Agriculture and Business Lease (SABL) as part of a government scheme (Gabriel et al. 2017). The species is not known from any protected areas so is susceptible to future expansion of these operations: although various attempts have been made to revoke SABL licenses, efforts to mitigate commodity-driven deforestation in Papua New Guinea have only had limited success (Harris 2018). Research into threats in action is necessary to quantify the impact of shifting agriculture and the likelihood, and scale, of plantation encroachment.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_4Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). One M. boman germplasm accession of wild origin is held by the Bioversity International Musa Germplasm Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium, and another is held by the Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura Tropical in Brazil but the details of the accession are limited (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). Several seed collections made in separate localities in Sandaun province are held by Meise Botanic Gardens (S. Janssens pers. comm. 2020, Kallow et al. 2020). However, the species is not known to be represented in living collections in botanic gardens (BGCI 2019) and the species is not known from any protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019). As such, gathering of wild material for ex situ conservation in living collections remains a priority.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
Stress écologiques (10)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Australasian

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (18)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. Kallow, S., Longin, K., Sleziak, N.F., Janssens, S.B., Vandelook, F., Dickie, J., Swennen, R., Paofa, J., Carpentier, S. and Panis, B. 2020. Challenges foreEx situ conservation of wild bananas: Seeds collected in Papua New Guinea have variable levels of desiccation tolerance. <i>Plants</i> 9: 1243.
  3. GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  4. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  5. IUCN and UNEP-WCMC. 2019. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>. (Accessed: 4 January 2019).
  6. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  7. Crop Trust. 2019. Wild About Bananas. Available at: <a href="https://www.cwrdiversity.org/wild-about-bananas/">https://www.cwrdiversity.org/wild-about-bananas/</a>. (Accessed: 17/03/2020).
  8. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  9. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  10. Gabriel, J., Nelson, P.N., Filer, C. and Wood, M. 2017. Oil palm development and large-scale land acquisitions in Papua New Guinea. In: S. McDonnell, M.G. Allen and C. Filer (eds), <i>Kastom, Property and Ideology: Land transformations in Melanesia</i>, pp. 205-250. ANU Press, Canberra.
  11. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  12. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  13. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  14. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  15. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2001. FOREST HARVESTING CASE-STUDY 15 Forest harvesting operations in Papua New Guinea The PNG Logging Code of Practice . Available at: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y2711E/y2711e00.htm#TopOfPage">http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y2711E/y2711e00.htm#TopOfPage</a>.
  16. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  17. Sharrock, S.L. 1989. Report on the fourth IBPGR-QDPI banana germplasm collecting mission to Papua New Guinea 4 June to 9 July 1989. IBPGR, Rome.
  18. Argent, G.C.G. 1976. The Wild Bananas of Papua New Guinea. <i>Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh</i> 35(1): 77-114.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J., Kallow, S. & Janssens, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Carpentier, S.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Plummer, J., Kallow, S. & Janssens, S. 2022. Musa boman. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541098A158544248. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie