Ontologia

Musa bauensis

Häkkinen & Meekiong

CRLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa bauensis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

CR · En danger critiquecritères D?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
30275 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Häkkinen and Meekiong (2004) reported that the species is only represented by a few plants. More recently, it has been estimated that 20 plants are present at the type locality, and a further 15–20 plants occur at Plaman Raso, giving an overall population size of 35–40 plants (K. Meekiong pers. comm. 2021). It is suspected that threatening processes contributing to a decline in habitat quality may also be contributing to a decreasing population trend; however, a continuing decline in the number of mature individuals cannot be inferred with certainty. Given the very small population size, research into population status and trends is urgently required.

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 7_3
    Other ecosystem modifications
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsWhole (>90%)Future
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 7_1_1
    Increase in fire frequency/intensity
    UnknownUnknownPast, Likely to Return
  • 10_3
    Avalanches/landslides
    Very Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Future
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    Very Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Future
Description complète des menacesExpert
Within a 5 km radius of the type collection at Gunung Doya, nearly 20% of forest cover has been lost between 2001 and 2018 (GFW 2019). However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). In fact, Häkkinen and Meekiong (2004) hypothesise that the plants at the type locality may have germinated as a result of forest clearing, and that the species may not be able to germinate beneath a closed canopy. Without a better understanding of the life history of the species, though, significant proximal deforestation must be considered a threat. Certainly, conversion of forested land to an agricultural land use would not permit growth of the species. Satellite imagery shows that on limestone hills of similar topography, mining operations cover whole slopes and the establishment of similar operations at Kampung Seromah and Plaman Raso is a plausible future threat. However, the threat of this occurring at the type locality has lessened as it now lies within the boundaries of the Dered Krian National Park (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019). Natural forest fires also present a plausible future threat; an area of Gunung Doya (type locality) was recently burnt off as a result of natural forest fire, and the regeneration rate of limestone vegetation is very slow (K. Meekiong pers. comm. 2021). Finally, landslides may also threaten the species as these are frequent on the steep limestone slopes of the Bau region (Suhaimi and Selaman 2013). Given the highly restricted distribution and population for this species, any ongoing threat could significantly contribute to its extinction risk, and research into threats is therefore urgently recommended.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). Three botanical gardens are listed as sites of ex situ conservation (BGCI 2019). Since the type collection was made, the Gunung Doya area has been gazetted as part of the Dered Krian National Park (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019); passive conservation is presumed here, but it is not known whether active management is practised. There are no germplasm accessions held (Ruas et al. 2017, Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2019). As such, gathering of wild germplasm material for ex situ conservation from extant wild plants is a conservation priority.
Actions de conservation (3)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 3_2Species recovery
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
Stress écologiques (13)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_2Competition
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (5)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 2_1Species Action/Recovery Plan
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Indomalayan

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (16)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. GFW. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  3. Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2019. Genesys. Available at: <a href="https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome">https://www.genesys-pgr.org/welcome</a>. (Accessed: 4 February 2019).
  4. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  5. IUCN and UNEP-WCMC. 2019. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>. (Accessed: 4 January 2019).
  6. BGCI (Botanic Gardens Conservation International). 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
  7. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  8. Suhaimi, D.N.A.A. and Selaman, O.S. 2013. A Study on Correlation between Pore Water Pressure, Rainfall and Landslide Occurrence. <i>UNIMAS e-Journal of Civil Engineering</i> 4(2): 24-27.
  9. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  10. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  11. Meekiong, K. and Tawan, C.S. 2010. <i>Wild Banana of Sarawak: Systematic Study of the Genus </i>Musa<i> (Musaceae)</i>. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
  12. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  13. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  14. Häkkinen, M. and Meekiong, K. 2004. A new species of the wild banana genus, <i>Musa</i> (Musaceae), from Borneo. <i>Systematics and Biodiversity</i> 2(2): 169-173.
  15. Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
  16. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. <i>The evolution of the Bananas</i>. Longmans, London.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
evaluator
Meekiong, K.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.

Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2022. Musa bauensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T158541019A158544243. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie