Ontologia

Musa banksii

F.Muell.

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Musa banksii.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureStable
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2020 · v3.1
Altitude
01750 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
Musa banksii is described as the most widespread Musa in New Guinea and Queensland, and as common throughout most of its range (Argent 1976, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator 2016). Given its large range, reported frequency, and ability to grow in areas of disturbance, it is suspected that the population is large and stable. However, no numerical population information is available, so research into population status and trends is recommended.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    Ongoing
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    Ongoing
  • 8_2
    Problematic native species/diseases
    Ongoing
  • 8_2_2
    Named species
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
In Queensland, major threats to biodiversity include land clearing for urban development and agriculture, inappropriate grazing and fire regimes, and invasive plants and animals (Department of Environment and Science 2018). New Guinea's rainforests are being logged, cleared, and converted at a rapid rate due to timber extraction, subsistence agriculture, and expansion of industrial agriculture, with a further threat posed by the mining industry: between 1972 and 2002, Papua New Guinea lost more than 5 million hectares of forest and a further 2% of the country's primary forest has been lost since (Butler 2006, Mongabay 2019). However, the specific impact of deforestation on members of the Musa genus is somewhat difficult to quantify: while clear-felling or land conversion is likely to be detrimental to the species, wild bananas spring up in transient, often man-made, habitats and thus may benefit from human disturbance to some extent (Simmonds 1962). As well as these larger-scale threats, Musa banksii is thought to suffer from a great burden of pests and diseases (Argent 1976), with banana freckle fungus particularly problematic in Queensland (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator 2016). The species is also a popular food plant for feral pigs which tend to eat the whole plant, while its suspected pollinator Syconycteris australis can also be a pest through consumption of the blossoms (Hyland et al. 2010, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator 2016).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 14_6Artificial/Terrestrial - Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest
  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
  • 1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The genus Musa is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) which aims to guarantee sustainable agriculture and food security through the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, as well as ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their use (FAO 2009). According to the Musa Germplasm Information System, 53 M. banksii germplasm accessions of wild origin are held worldwide; 25 of these were collected from Papua New Guinea, with the remaining 28 of unknown wild origin. Of these accessions, 30 are held by the International Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium; 12 by the Centre africain de recherche sur bananes et plantains (CARBAP) in Cameroon; four by the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) in Uganda; three by the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) in Guadeloupe, two by the Institute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IFTR/GDAAS) in China, and one by each of the Centre National de Recherches Agronomiques (CNRA) in Côte d'Ivoire and the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), South Johnstone in Australia (Ruas et al. 2017). Eight botanical gardens are listed as sites of ex situ conservation for this species (BGCI 2019). This species is known to occur in multiple protected areas across its range, so passive conservation is presumed in these localities (Protected Planet 2019); it is unclear whether active management is apparent in any of these areas.
Stress écologiques (15)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    internationalnational
  • 17Other (free text)
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (3)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Australasian

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 04 September 2021).
  2. IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 December 2020).
  3. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Plant Germplasm System. 2019. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN-Taxonomy). Beltsville, Maryland Available at: <a href="https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx">https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx</a>. (Accessed: January 2019).
  4. Mongabay. 2019. Deforestation statistics for Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/archive/Papua_New_Guinea.htm</a>. (Accessed: 21/10/2019).
  5. Protected Planet. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK Available at: <a href="www.protectedplanet.net">www.protectedplanet.net</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  6. WCSP. 2019. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Available at: <a href=" http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/"> http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/</a>.
  7. Liu, J.; Gao, C.-W.; Niu, Y.-F. 2019. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of <i>Musa banksii</i> and its phylogenetic analysis. <i>Mitochondrial DNA Part B</i> 4(1): 789–790.
  8. BGCI. 2019. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2019).
  9. Department of Environment and Science. 2018. Threats to Wildlife. Available at: <a href="https://environment.des.qld.gov.au/wildlife/animals/threats">https://environment.des.qld.gov.au/wildlife/animals/threats</a>.
  10. GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
  11. BGCI. 2018. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  12. Němečková, A.; Christelová, P.; Čížková, J.; Nyine, M.; Van den houwe, I.; Svačina, R.; Uwimana, B.; Swennen, R.; Doležel, J.; Hřibová, E. 2018. Molecular and Cytogenetic Study of East African Highland Banana. <i>Frontiers in Plant Science</i> 9(1371).
  13. Rouard, M.; Droc, G.; Martin, G.; Sardos, J.; Hueber, Y.; Guignon, V.; Cenci, A.; Geigle, B.; Hibbins, M.S.; Yahiaoui, N.; Baurens, F.-C.; Berry, V.; Hahn, M.W.; D'Hont, A.; Roux, N. 2018. Three New Genome Assemblies Support a Rapid Radiation in <i>Musa acuminata</i> (Wild Banana). <i>Genome Biology and Evolution</i> 10(12): 3129–3140.
  14. Ruas, M., Guignon, V., Sempere, G., Sardos, J., Hueber, Y., Duvergey, H., Andrieu, A., Chase, R., Jenny, C., Hazekamp, T., Irish, B., Jelali, K., Adeka, T., Ayala-Silva, T., Chao, C.P., Daniells, J., Dowiya, B., Effa effa, B., Gueco, L., Herradura, L., Ibobondji, L., Kempenaers, E., Kilangi, J., Muhangi, S., Xuan, P.N., Paofa, J., Pavis, C., Thiemele, D., Tossou, C., Sandoval, J., Sutanto, A., Vangu Paka, G., Yi, G., Van den houwe, I., Roux, N. and Rouard, M. 2017. MGIS: managing banana (<i>Musa</i> spp.) genetic resources information and high-throughput genotyping data. <i>Database</i> 2017(2017): bax046.
  15. Sardos, J., Rouard, M., Hueber, Y., Cenci, A., Hyma, K.E., van den Houwe, I., Hribova, E., Courtois, B. and Roux, N. 2016. A Genome-Wide Association Study on the Seedless Phenotype in Banana (Musa spp.) Reveals the Potential of a Selected Panel to Detect Candidate Genes in a Vegetatively Propagated Crop. <i>PLoS ONE</i> 11(5): e0154448.
  16. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator. 2016. The Biology of <i>Musa</i> L. (banana). Australian Government Department of Health.
  17. Janssens, S.B.; Vandelook, F.; De Langhe, E.; Verstraete, B.; Smets, E.; Vandenhouwe, I.; Swennen, R. 2016. Evolutionary dynamics and biogeography of Musaceae reveal a correlation between the diversification of the banana family and the geological and climatic history of Southeast Asia. <i>New Phytologist</i> 210(4): 1453–1465.
  18. Häkkinen, M. 2013. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (<i>Musaceae</i>). <i>Taxon</i> 62(4): 809-813.
  19. Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
  20. FAO. 2010. The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome.
  21. Hyland, B.P.M., Whiffin, T., Zich, F.A. <i>et al.</i>. 2010. Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants. Cairns, Australia Available at: <a href="http://keys.trin.org.au/key-server/data/0e0f0504-0103-430d-8004-060d07080d04/media/Html/taxon/Musa_banksii.htm">http://keys.trin.org.au/key-server/data/0e0f0504-0103-430d-8004-060d07080d04/media/Html/taxon/Musa_banksii.htm</a>. (Accessed: 21/10/2019).
  22. FAO. 2009. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) [Online]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. Available at: <a href="ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf">ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 18/12/2012).
  23. De Langhe, E. 2009. Relevance of Banana Seeds in Archaeology. <i>Ethnobotany Research & Applications</i> 7: 271-281.
  24. De Langhe, E., Vrydaghs, L., De Maret, P., Perrier, X. and Denham, T. 2009. Why Bananas Matter: An introduction to the history of banana domestication. <i>Ethnobotany Research & Applications</i> 7: 165-177.
  25. Häkkinen, M. & Väre, H. 2008. Typification and check-list of <i>Musa</i> L. names (Musaceae) with nomenclatural notes. <i>Adansonia, sér. 3</i> 30(1): 63-112.
  26. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S., Kell, S. and Scholten, M. 2006. Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15: 2673-2685.
  27. Ball, T.; Vrydaghs, L.; Van Den Hauwe, I.; Manwaring, J.; De Langhe, E. 2006. Differentiating banana phytoliths: wild and edible <i>Musa acuminata</i> and <i>Musa balbisiana</i>. <i>Journal of Archaeological Science</i> 33: 1228-1236.
  28. Butler, R.A. 2006. Papua New Guinea. Available at: <a href="https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm">https://rainforests.mongabay.com/20png.htm</a>.
  29. Pollefeys, P., Sharrock, S. and Arnaud, E. 2004. Preliminary analysis of the literature on the distribution of wild <i>Musa</i> species using MGIS and DIVA-GIS. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Quebec.
  30. Simmonds, N.W. & Weatherup, S.T.C. 1990. Numerical taxonomy of the wild bananas (<i>Musa</i>). <i>New Phytologist</i> 115: 567-571.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Plummer, J. & Kallow, S.
contributor
Mertens, A.
evaluator
Rahman, W. & Sharrock, S.
facilitators
Hargreaves, S.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Plummer, J. & Kallow, S. 2020. Musa banksii (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T158540980A201902256. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (7)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Musa acuminata subsp. banksiiColla
  • Musa acuminata subsp. banksii(F.Muell.) N.W.Simmonds
  • Musa banksianaKurz
  • Musa banksii var. banksii
  • Musa banksii var. muellerianaDomin
  • Musa banksii var. samoensisCheeseman
  • Musa charlioiW.Hill

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).