Ontologia
Renard De Sechura

Renard De Sechura

Lycalopex sechurae(Thomas, 1900)

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Canidae
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir

Description

espèce de mammifères

Source : Wikidata

Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Lycalopex sechurae.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéecritères C1?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2017 · v3.1
Altitude
02000 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
This species was judged by Grimwood (1969) as being abundant at the time and not in need of protection. The Sechuran Fox is uncommon in Ecuador, where it is considered to be in decline (Tirira et al. 2011). Asa et al. (2008) estimated the total population to number fewer than 15,000 mature individuals, but these numbers must be regarded with caution since they are supported by very little empirical data. Surveys based on footprints in Coto de Caza El Angolo in Piura, Peru, recorded an average of 12.6 foxes/km (CDC 1989) and an evaluation in San Pedro de Vice mangroves (Piura) estimated a population of 18-23 individuals in 3,013 ha (Chávez-Villavicencio et al. 2015), giving a population density of 0.6-0.76 individuals per km².

Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_4
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_1_3
    Persecution/control
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    No declineMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_1_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    No declineMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
The most important threats to this species are from the market for handicrafts and amulets and from persecution because of damage to livestock. In Peru, the typical attitude towards this species is one of persecution (68.3% of correspondents) or indifference (31.7%). The stated reasons for persecution were due to damage on domestic fowl and guinea pigs (65% of correspondents), the consumption of vegetal or stored goods (13.3%), and the belief of goat predation (10%) (Asa and Cossíos 2004). The Sechuran Fox also faces some pressure in agricultural zones and from urbanization and habitat degradation; indeed, habitat reduction or loss is considered the main threat to this species in Ecuador (Tirira 2001, Tirira et al. 2011).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 3_6Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 8_1Desert - Hot
  • 14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land
  • 14_2Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Legislation
Not included in the CITES Appendices. Currently listed nationally as Near Threatened in Peru and Vulnerable in Ecuador (Tirira et al. 2011).

Between 1975 and 2000, a governmental authorization was required to hunt the species in Peru. Since 2000, hunting outside the established areas and trade of the species has been prohibited. The police and the Ministry of Agriculture are responsible for the control of illegal trade. However, it has proven especially difficult to control trade in rural areas and in some cities. 

Presence in protected areas
This species occurs in several protected areas in Ecuador and Peru. The Sechuran Fox was not traditionally protected, for cultural reasons, until recently. Now it is protected in Santa Catalina de Chongoyape, a rural community of Lambayeque department, because they are considered important for tourism and as seed dispersers (Asa and Cossios 2004).

Presence in captivity
Some specimens are kept in the authorized collections, including Parque de las Leyendas Zoo, Lima and Atocongo Zoo, Lima.

Gaps in knowledge
The main priorities for research include elaborating the southern extent of range and better defining altitudinal limits of distribution. In addition, there is limited knowledge of the impact of disease in this species.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 2_1Site/area management
Stress écologiques (6)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (3)Expert
  • 10Wearing apparel, accessories
    nationalsubsistance
  • 12Handicrafts, jewellery, etc.
    nationalsubsistance
  • 3Medicine - human & veterinary
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (2)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (17)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 14 September 2017).
  2. Chávez-Villavicencio C., García-Olaechea, A. and Casas-Mena L. 2015. Tasa de ocurrencia de </i>Lycalopex sechurae</i> (Canidae, Carnivora) en el sitio Ramsar Manglares San Pedro de Vice (Piura, Perú): base para monitoreo del impacto por explotación de hidrocarburos. <i>The Biologist (Lima)</i> 13: 1-10.
  3. Tirira, D.G. 2011. <i>Libro Rojo de los Mamíferos del Ecuador</i>. Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación, Pontiificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador y Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
  4. Perini, F.A., Russo, C.A.M. and Schrago, C.G. 2010. The evolution of South American endemic canids: a history of rapid diversification and morphological parallelism. <i>Journal of Evolutionary Biology</i> 23: 311-322.
  5. Cossios, E.D. 2009. <i>Lycalopex sechurae</i>. <i>Mammalian Species</i> 42: 1-6.
  6. Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C.M., Mikkelsen, T.S., Karlsson, E.K., Jaffe, D.B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J.L., Kulbokas, E.J., Zody, M.C., Mauceli, E., Xie, X., Breen, M., Wayne, R.K., Ostrander, E.A., Ponting, C.P., Galibert, F., Smith, D.R., deJong, P.J., Kirkness, E., Alvarez, P., Biagi, T., Brockman, W., Butler, J., Chin, C.W., Cook, A., Cuff, J., Daly, M.J., DeCaprio, D., Gnerre, S., Grabherr, M., Kellis, M., Kleber, M., Bardeleben, C., Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., Hitte, C., Kim, L., Koepfli, K.P., Parker, H.G., Pollinger, J.P., Searle, S.M.J., Sutter, N.B., Thomas, R., Webber, C. and Lander, E.S. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. <i>Nature </i> 438(7069): 803-819.
  7. Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), <i>Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition</i>, pp. 532-628. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  8. Asa, C A. and Cossios, E.D. 2004. Sechuran Fox <i>Pseudalopex sechurae</i> (Thomas, 1900). In: Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M. & Macdonald, D.W. (ed.), <i>Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan</i>, pp. 69-72. Gland, IUCN.
  9. Zrzavý, J. and Řičánkova, V. 2004. Phylogeny of recent Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora): relative reliability and utility of morphological and molecular datasets. <i>Zoologica Scripta </i> 33: 311-333.
  10. Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (comps and eds). 1996. <i>1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  11. Zunino, G.E., Vaccaro, O.B., Canevari, M. and Gardner, A.L. 1995. Taxonomy of the genus <i>Lycalopex</i> (Carnivora: Canidae) in Argentina. <i>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington </i> 108: 729–747.
  12. Groombridge, B. (ed.). 1994. <i>IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  13. IUCN. 1990. <i>IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  14. Langguth, A. 1975. Ecology and evolution in the South American canids. In: M. W. Fox (ed.), <i>The wild canids. Their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution</i>, pp. 192-206. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, USA.
  15. Huey, R. 1969. Winter diet of the Peruvian desert fox. <i>Ecology</i> 50: 1089-1091.
  16. Grimwood, I.R. 1969. Notes on the distribution and status of some Peruvian mammals. Special Publication Number 21. American Committee for International Wild Life Protection and New York Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
  17. Cabrera, A. 1931. On some South American canine genera. <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i> 12: 54-67.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Cossios, D.
contributor
Asa, C. & Williams, R.S.R.
evaluator
Hoffmann, M. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.
facilitators
Hoffmann, M.

Cossios, D. 2017. Lycalopex sechurae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T6925A86074993. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 5 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
4 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
9,9 ans
AnAge
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Gestation
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Taille de portée
-999
PanTHERIA
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Sevrage
-999 j
PanTHERIA

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
20 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
30 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
30 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (3)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Canis sechuraeThomas, 1900
  • Dusicyon sechuraeThomas, 1900
  • Pseudalopex sechurae(Thomas, 1900)

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).