
Renard d'Aszara
Lycalopex gymnocercus(G. Fischer von Waldheim, 1814)
Description
espèce de mammifères
Source : Wikidata
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Lycalopex gymnocercus.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure→Stable- Évaluation
- 2016 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 3500 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
In the coastal area of central Argentina, a study based on scent-stations found that Pampas Fox signs were more frequent than Molina's Hog-nosed Skunk (Conepatus chinga) and Grison (Galictis cuja) (García and Kittlein 2005). Similarly, the frequency of observation of Pampas Fox was higher than that of Molina's Hog-nosed Skunk, Grison, and Geoffroy's Cat (Leopardus geoffroyi) both in a Sierra grassland area and in a cropland area of Buenos Aires Province (Luengos et al. 2005). Recent camera trapping data indicate that it is the most common carnivore in an area of 27,300 km² of the Argentine Espinal (Caruso 2015). In areas where the Pampas Fox is sympatric with the Crab-eating Fox (Cerdocyon thous), the former would be more abundant in open habitats, while the latter would more frequently inhabit woodland areas (Vieira and Port 2007, Di Bitetti et al. 2009, Faria-Corrêa et al. 2009).
The Pampas Fox seems to be tolerant of human disturbance, being common in rural areas, where introduced exotic mammals, such as the European hare (Lepus europaeus), could form the bulk of its food intake (Crespo 1971, Farias and Kittlein 2008, D. Birochio and M. Lucherini pers. obs.).
Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
5_1_3Persecution/controlNegligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing2_1_3Agro-industry farmingNo declineMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_1_1Intentional use (species is the target)Past, Unlikely to Return
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Most of the species' range has suffered massive habitat alteration. For instance, the Pampas, which represents a large proportion of the species' distribution range, has been affected by extensive cattle breeding and agriculture. Approximately 0.1% of the original 500,000 km² range remains unaffected. However, due to the species' adaptability, the Pampas Fox seems able to withstand the loss and degradation of its natural habitat, as well as hunting pressure. Since no studies are available on its population dynamics in rural ecosystems, caution is required, since the sum of these threats may eventually promote the depletion of fox populations. Hunting pressure has resulted in diminished populations in the provinces of Tucumán (Barquez et al. 1991) and Salta (Cajal 1986) of north-western Argentina.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
2_2Savanna - Moist★3_4Shrubland - Temperate★4_4Grassland - Temperate★14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land14_2Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Included in CITES – Appendix II.
In Argentina, it was declared not threatened in 1983 and its trade was prohibited in 1987. However, this species continues to be hunted and demand for its fur exists. In Uruguay, all foxes are protected by law, and the only legal exception is the government's so-called "control hunting permission", which does not allow the taking of animals for the fur trade. The situation is very similar in Paraguay.
Presence in protected areas
Although it occurs in a number of protected areas in Argentina, the proportion of its range under protection is low in this country. In Uruguay, the Pampas Fox has been reported in many protected areas; however, illegal hunting of foxes still occurs within these areas (Y. Hernandez pers. comm. 2015).
Presence in captivity
In Argentina, the Pampas Fox has been successfully bred in captivity and presently is the best represented carnivore species in captivity in the country (Aprile 1999).
Gaps in knowledge
Many aspects of the species' ecology remain unknown. Studies on population dynamics in agricultural land, impact and sustainability of hunting, effect of predation on livestock and game species are needed, particularly for an appropriate management of wild populations. In addition, as noted under Taxonomy, the status of this species with respect to the Chilla requires further investigation.
Actions de conservation (3)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
2_1Site/area management3_1_1Harvest management3_1_2Trade management
Stress écologiques (4)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (1)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
10Wearing apparel, accessoriessubsistance
Priorités de recherche (3)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Taxonomy1_3Life history & ecology1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
- Caruso, N. C. 2015. Factores determinantes de la distribución de cuatro especies de carnívoros en el Sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Universidad Nacional del Sur.
- Austin, J.J., Soubrier, J., Prevosti, F.J., Prates, L., Trejo, V., Mena, F. and Cooper, A. 2013. The origins of the enigmatic Falkland Islands wolf. <i>Nature Communications</i> 4: 1552.
- Prevosti, F.J., Segura, V., Cassini, G. and Martin, G.M. 2013. Revision of the systematic status of patagonian and pampean gray foxes (canidae: <i>Lycalopex griseus</i> and <i>L. gymnocercus</i>) using 3D geometric morphometrics. <i>Mastozoologia Neotropical</i> 20: 289-300.
- Luengos Vidal, E.M., Sillero-Zubiri, C., Marino, J., Casanave, E.B. and Lucherini, M. 2012. Spatial organization of the Pampas fox in a grassland relict of central Argentina: A flexible system. <i>Journal of Zoology</i> 287: 133-141.
- Spatial organization of the Pampas fox. 2012. Spatial organization of the Pampas fox in a grassland relict of central Argentina: a flexible system. <i>Journal of Zoology</i> 287: 133-141.
- Perini, F.A., Russo, C.A.M. and Schrago, C.G. 2010. The evolution of South American endemic canids: a history of rapid diversification and morphological parallelism. <i>Journal of Evolutionary Biology</i> 23: 311-322.
- Di Bitetti, M. S., Di Blanco, Y. E., Pereira, J. A., Paviolo, A. and Pérez, I. J. 2009. Time partitioning favors the coexistence of sympatric crab-eating foxes (<i>Cerdocyon thous</i>) and pampas foxes (<i>Lycalopex gymnocercus</i>). <i> Journal of Mammalogy </i> 90: 479-490.
- Slater, G.J., Thalmann, O., Leonard, J., Schweizer, R.M., Koepfli, K-P., Pollinger, J.P., Rawlence, N.J., Austin, J.J., Cooper, A. and Wayne, R.K. 2009. Evolutionary history of the Falklands wolf. <i>Current Biology</i> 19: 937–938.
- Luengos Vidal, E. M. 2009. Organización social y espacial de Pseudalopex gymnocercus en los pastizales pampeanos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional del Sus.
- Faria-Corrêa, M., Balbueno, R. A., Vieira, E. M., and de Freitas, T. R. 2009. Activity, habitat use, density, and reproductive biology of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and comparison with the pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) in a Restinga area in the southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. <i>Mammalian Biology</i> 74: 220-229.
- Farias, A. A. and Kittlein, M. J. 2008. Small-scale spatial variability in the diet of pampas foxes (Pseudalopex gymnocercus) and human-induced changes in prey base. <i>Ecological Research </i> 23: 543-550.
- Lucherini, M. and Luengos Vidal, E. M. 2008. <i>Lycalopex gymnocercus</i> (Carnivora, Canidae). <i>Mammalian Species </i> 820: 1-9.
- Vieira, E. M. and Port, D. 2007. Niche overlap and resource partitioning between two sympatric fox species in southern Brazil. <i>Journal of Zoology</i> 272: 57-63.
- Luengos Vidal, E. M., Manfredi, C., Castillo, D., Lucherini, M. and Casanave E. B. 2005. Variaciones en la composición del gremio de carnívoros en la región pampeana. In: M. Vaquero and M. Cernadas de Bulnes (eds), <i>Producción recursos y medioambiente en el Sudoeste Bonaerense—Actas III Jornadas Interdisciplinarias del Sudoeste Bonaerense</i>, pp. 97–106. EdiUNS, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
- Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), <i>Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition</i>, pp. 532-628. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
- Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C.M., Mikkelsen, T.S., Karlsson, E.K., Jaffe, D.B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J.L., Kulbokas, E.J., Zody, M.C., Mauceli, E., Xie, X., Breen, M., Wayne, R.K., Ostrander, E.A., Ponting, C.P., Galibert, F., Smith, D.R., deJong, P.J., Kirkness, E., Alvarez, P., Biagi, T., Brockman, W., Butler, J., Chin, C.W., Cook, A., Cuff, J., Daly, M.J., DeCaprio, D., Gnerre, S., Grabherr, M., Kellis, M., Kleber, M., Bardeleben, C., Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., Hitte, C., Kim, L., Koepfli, K.P., Parker, H.G., Pollinger, J.P., Searle, S.M.J., Sutter, N.B., Thomas, R., Webber, C. and Lander, E.S. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. <i>Nature </i> 438(7069): 803-819.
- García, V. B. and Kittlein, M. J. 2005. Diet, habitat use, and relative abundance of pampas fox (Pseudalopex gymnocercus) in northern Patagonia, Argentina. <i>Mammalian Biology</i> 71: 218-226.
- Zrzavý, J. and Řičánkova, V. 2004. Phylogeny of recent Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora): relative reliability and utility of morphological and molecular datasets. <i>Zoologica Scripta </i> 33: 311-333.
- Lucherini, M., Pessino, M. and Farias, A.A. 2004. Pampas Fox <i>Pseudalopex gymnocercus</i> (G. Fischer, 1814). In: Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M. and Macdonald, D.W. (eds), <i>Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan</i>, pp. 63-68. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, IUCN.
- García, V. B. 2001. Dieta, uso de ambiente y abundancia relativa del zorro gris pampeano, <i>Pseudalopex gymnocercus</i>, en la reserva de uso múltiple Bahía San Blas e Isla Gama, Provincia de Buenos Aires. B.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
- Ayala, J. and Noss, A. 2000. Censo por transectas en el Chaco Boliviano: limitaciones biológicas y sociales de la metodología. In: E. Cabrera, C. Mercolli, and R. Resquin (eds), <i>Manejo de fauna silvestre en Amazonia y Latinoamérica</i>, pp. 29. Ricor Grafic S.A., Asunción, Paraguay.
- Farias, A. A. 2000. Composición y variación estacional de la dieta del zorro gris pampeano (<i>Pseudalopex gymnocercus</i>?) en la laguna Mar Chiquita (Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina). B.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
- Díaz, G.B. and Ojeda, R.A. (eds). 2000. <i>Libro rojo: mamíferos amenazados de la Argentina</i>. pp. 106. Soc. Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos, Buenos Aires.
- Aprile, G. 1999. <i>Registro de Animales Silvestres Autóctonos en Establecimientos Zoológicos de la República Argentina</i>. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Jayat, J.P., Bárquez, R.M., Díaz, M.M. and Martínez, P.J. 1999. Aportes al conocimiento de la distribución de los carnívoros del Noroeste de Argentina. <i>Mastozoología Neotropical</i> 6:15-30.
- Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (comps and eds). 1996. <i>1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals</i>. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
- Zunino, G.E., Vaccaro, O.B., Canevari, M. and Gardner, A.L. 1995. Taxonomy of the genus <i>Lycalopex</i> (Carnivora: Canidae) in Argentina. <i>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington </i> 108: 729–747.
- Novaro, A.J. and Funes, M.C. 1994. Impact of hunting on Argentinean foxes. <i>Canid News</i> 2: 19-20.
- Chebez, J.C. 1994. <i>Los que se van: especies argentinas en peligro</i>. Albatros, Buenos Aires.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Lucherini, M. 2016. Lycalopex gymnocercus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T6928A85371194. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
Morphologie(4)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Chant
6 captations · Xeno-cantoVoir 1 captation de plusReplier
Hot-link CDN Xeno-canto. Chaque captation porte sa propre licence Creative Commons (visible quand la piste est active) et l'attribution de son auteur.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (9)— redirigent vers cette page
- Dusicyon gymnocercus(G. Fischer, 1814)
- Lycalopex gymnocercus antiquus(Ameghino, 1889)
- Lycalopex gymnocercus gymnocercus(G. Fischer von Waldheim, 1814)
- Procyon gymnocercusG. Fischer von Waldheim, 1814
- Pseudalopex gymnocercus(G. Fischer von Waldheim, 1814)
- Pseudalopex gymnocercus(G. Fischer, 1814)
- Pseudalopex gymnocercus antiquus(Ameghino, 1889)
- Pseudalopex gymnocercus gymnocercus(G. Fischer von Waldheim, 1814)
- Pseudalopex gymnocercus lordi(Massoia, 1982)
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).