
Loutre d'AmériquedDu Sud
Lontra longicaudis(Olfers, 1818)
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Lontra longicaudis.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
NT · Quasi menacéecritères A3c↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2022 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 4000 m
- Profondeur
- 14 – 0 m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Estimates of Neotropical Otter’s population size and density have been obtained using different approaches at various times in different study areas. Most estimates are derived from visual censuses performed at distinct localities within the species’ distribution and are highly variable when compared to each other. For example, a density estimate of 0.21 otters per linear km of river (km) was reported for southern Mexico (Orozco-Meyer 1998), whereas in Argentina it was reported to be 0.06-0.47 individuals/km (Gil-Carbó 2003). In Mexico and Guatemala, additional density estimates (0.34-4.4 otters/km) were obtained through calculating the number of faeces/km or the defecation rate (Gallo 1996, Nicolás et al.2012, Duque-Dávila et al. 2013, Quintana-Morales 2013). In Brazil, Quadros (2012) estimated the population size in a dam lake system based on the number of active dens, as previously proposed for Lutra lutra (Kruuk et al. 1989).
The use of such methods for population estimation was a widespread theme of discussion during the 1980s and 1990s. Several authors argued that these indirect approaches are not a reliable tool for calculating density and population size, as there is little or no direct correlation between otter abundance and the number of faeces or latrines, or between the number of females and the number of dens (Mason and Macdonald 1987, Kruuk et al. 1989, Gallant 2007). Numbers of dens and faeces may vary enormously due to the climate, environmental conditions and features of the waterbody and its margins (Kruuk and Conroy 1987, Mason and Macdonald 1987). It is important to highlight that reports of density and population sizes in Neotropical Otter are informative for local management purposes, and that density represents the only comparable datum.
Population size was recently estimated through non-invasive molecular approaches. Latorre-Cardenas et al. (2020) reported a density of 0.88 to 1.66 individuals per km in three river basins located in Mexico. Despite seeming that population sizes are good, the effective population size (Ne) per basin was considerably lower than those suggested that a population should have in order to maintain the genetic variation in the short-term. Ortega et al. (2012) reported a population size of 154 individuals in a watershed of Mexico. In a similar approach, by using faecal DNA analyses, Trinca et al. (2013) estimated linear density and population size of an otter population from an Atlantic Forest area in southern Brazil. They reported one otter per linear km and estimated a population size of 31 individuals during two years of sampling. Additionally, it was possible to estimate relatedness between individuals in the population, and to recover the population pedigree, as well as to gain insights into spatial organization patterns. According to their results, male otters tend to disperse larger distances than females, and relatedness among otters in the same watercourse seems to be higher that among otters from distinct streams, especially in cases of mother-daughter dyads, corroborating the hypothesis of female philopatry.
Population relative abundance was determined in a stream of northwestern México using camera traps, resulting in a 2.2 otters/km in a portion of 5 km of lineal survey of a river, with as many as 11 different otters using different latrines in the surveyed area (Gallo-Reynoso et al. submitted), The use of this methodology reveals population structure in the area (i.e. number of adult males, adult females, females with cubs, and juveniles).
Menaces identifiées(17 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
11_1Habitat shifting & alterationRapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Future2_1_3Agro-industry farmingRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing2_2_2Agro-industry plantationsRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing2_3_3Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmingRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_1_1Intentional use (species is the target)Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_1_3Persecution/controlRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing5_4_4Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing7_2_11Dams (size unknown)Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing9_1_1SewageRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing9_3_4Type Unknown/UnrecordedRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
+ 7 menaces supplémentaires
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
The modification and fragmentation of natural habitats by human activities represents the main threat to the species, leading to population isolation and reduction. The species may occur in areas with some degree of human activity and habitat degradation (Rheingantz et al. 2014, Rheingantz and Trinca 2015, Rheingantz et al. 2017a), but its presence has been negatively correlated with human population density (Gomez et al. 2014, Rheingantz et al. 2014). There are stable populations in more pristine areas throughout the species’ range, but populations are decreasing in more heavily human-modified areas (Rheingantz and Trinca 2015).
The species was severely hunted until the 1970s for the international fur market, with hundreds of thousands of pelts exported from South American ports between 1945 and 1975 (Brack Egg 1978, Donadio 1978, Larivière 1999, Utreras and Jorgenson 2003). Despite the ban on the international pelt trade, Neotropical Otters are still hunted illegally and killed in conflicts with fishermen and fish farmers due to supposed fish depredation (Chehébar 1990, Barbieri et al. 2012). Although fishermen often have a negative perception of the otter, many of them report that actual damage from Neotropical Otter is small (Fonseca and Marmontel 2011, Barbieri et al. 2012, Castro et al. 2014, Hernández-Romero et al. 2018). Indeed, fishermen from northeastern Mexico showed a positive attitude toward the development of conservation actions for the otter (Mayagoitia-González et al. 2013). Otters can also become entangled in fishing nets, as reported in southern Brazil (Quintela et al. 2011).
Bioaccumulation of toxins is known to harm the species (Josef et al. 2008, Ramos-Rosas et al. 2013). Mercury has been observed in fur and tissues samples of the species from the Pantanal (Fonseca et al. 2004), as well as high levels in otter spraints from southeastern Brazil (Josef et al. 2008). Studies show that Neotropical Otter may have high levels of other heavy metals such as lead and cadmium even in protected areas of Mexico (Ramos-Rosas et al. 2013), and other Persistent Organic Pollutants (Latorre-Cárdenas 2013). Industrial waste spills increase heavy metal levels in watercourses and have been associated with otter mortality in Mexico (Gallo-Reynoso 1997). In Ecuador, recent oil spills, increasing mining activities, intense use of agrochemicals and incorrect treatment of residual waters from the cities continue increasing the pollution of many hydrological systems where otters are present. Among other threats, we also find destructive fishing practices including the use of dynamite, electrocution and chemicals.
Roadkills of Neotropical Otters have been documented in the Guianas (Duplaix 2004), in southern and southeastern Brazil (Quintela et al. 2011), in Costa Rica and Mexico (V.M. Santiago-Plata pers. comm.).
Episodes of intense rainfall are becoming more frequent and when combined with deforestation along riverbanks, can cause landslides and flooding. According to Navarro and Quadros (2017) this can force otters to abandon an area, to which they return slowly.
Severe and long drought periods cause additional ecological stress to Neotropical Otters, which can be worrying if compounded with other normally tolerated environmental impacts, as pollution, cattle ranching and deforestation. This may have been the cause of the recent absence of Neotropical Otters in some river basins of Piauí state (Northeastern Brazil), where otters have not been seen in the last 50 years (Rosas-Ribeiro et al. 2017).
The effect of cattle ranching in the riparian habitat of some rivers in Mexico, as well in other countries, has devastated the biodiversity, causing significant riverbank erosion and turning the river ecosystem into an anoxic environment with reduced fish availability. There is also a concern that zoonotic diseases may be transmitted by cattle (J.P. Gallo-Reynoso pers. comm.).
The long-term impacts of dam construction on the species are poorly understood. Dams degrade the environment by changing flowing to standing water and by decreasing functional connectivity for both individuals and populations. Dams also change the local prey community, affecting otter diet in unknown ways (Quadros 2012).
The protozoans Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. were recently first reported for L. longicaudis from northern and northeastern Brazil (Borges et al. 2017a, b). Although clinical significance of these results is still unclear, they raise concerns about transmission to other aquatic mammals and even humans, since oocysts and cysts may remain infectious for long periods (LeChevallier et al. 1991). Mortality of otters due to diseases such as canine distemper (Hernández-Romero pers. obs.) is also a threat. Canine parvovirus infection was documented in an adult otter in southern Brazil, that died after treatment (Echenique et al. 2018). This problem is rapidly expanding to rural areas, where interactions with feral dogs and cats are more frequent. The intensity and impacts of diseases on local otter populations need to be further investigated.
The use of Neotropical Otter cubs as pets has been reported in several states of México (Gallo-Reynoso 1989), in the Brazilian Amazon (Marmontel et al. 2011, Fonseca da Silva pers. comm.), and in northern Costa Rica (Santiago-Plata pers. comm.), Colombia (Restrepo et al. 2018) and the Coast and Amazon region of Ecuador (Utreras et al. 2013). In some locations, medicinal use of otters has been documented, for example, in the Brazilian Amazon an infusion of Neotropical Otter skins is said to cure shortness of breath and asthma (Fonseca and Marmontel 2011).
The intensity and effect of these threats on otter populations is poorly known, but there is a perception that populations are declining across the range (Rheingantz and Trinca 2015). Considering the expansion of human activities in Latin America, this otter may be subjected to further population decline in the future. This is more acute in some regions, such as in northeastern Brazil, where otter populations are concentrated in well-drained lowland rivers, which are also prime locations for agriculture, ranching and other human activities (Rosas-Ribeiro 2017).Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
12_5Marine Intertidal - Salt Marshes (Emergent Grasses)★13_5Marine Coastal/Supratidal - Coastal Freshwater Lakes★15_1Artificial/Aquatic - Water Storage Areas (over 8ha)★15_2Artificial/Aquatic - Ponds (below 8ha)★15_3Artificial/Aquatic - Aquaculture Ponds★15_9Artificial/Aquatic - Canals and Drainage Channels, Ditches★5_1Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls)★5_3Wetlands (inland) - Shrub Dominated Wetlands★5_5Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Lakes (over 8ha)★5_7Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha)★9_10Marine Neritic - Estuaries★13_4Marine Coastal/Supratidal - Coastal Brackish/Saline Lagoons/Marine Lakes
+ 15 habitats supplémentaires
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Lontra longicaudis is legally protected in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, French Guiana, Trinidad, Tobago, Uruguay, and Venezuela. It is classified as Vulnerable (VU) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome (Rodrigues et al. 2013) and on the Minas Gerais state Red List (Anonymous 2010a), as well as in Ecuador (Utreras et al. 2013) and Colombia (Rodríguez-Mahecha et al. 2006). It is considered Near Threatened (NT) in Bolivia (Zambrana et al. 2009), São Paulo (Bressan et al. 2009) and Paraná (Anonymous 2010b) states in Brazil, and Susceptible in Uruguay (González and Martinez-Lanfranco 2010). The species is Endangered (EN) in Argentina (Ojeda et al. 2012), Mexico (Sánchez and Gallo-Reynoso 2007), and in Central American countries such as El Salvador (Anonymous 2009a), Guatemala (Anonymous 2009b) and Nicaragua (Rivera and Manzanarez 2013). In Honduras, Neotropical Otter is listed as a Species of Special Concern (Cerrato et al. 2002) and it is protected under Act No. 4 of 1981 in Belize (Anonymous 2000). It is considered Critically Endangered in Trinidad and Tobago (Anonymous 2013) and it is protected and regulated by the Law of Conservation of Wildlife No. 7317 in Costa Rica (Anonymous 2005).
The Global Otter Conservation Strategy for the species (Rheingantz et al. 2018) recommends priority actions that include:
- Mitigation of impacts of human activities such as dams, cooper and gold mining, agriculture, cattle ranching along rivers, deforestation and overfishing, as well as regulating the release of domestic and toxic waste in riverine systems near critical populations of otters.
- Implementing monitoring programs with standardized methods in protected areas and combining data from all range countries to compare regional status.
- Developing of National otter conservation plans for those range countries that do not yet have them, and implementation of such plans in range countries that already have them. National conservation plans determine regional threats and design specific conservation actions at a country and regional level.
- Enforcement of existing legal protection, the expansion of protected areas that consider otters requirements, and the adoption of policies that mitigate the impact of humans on riverine and coastal habitats.
- Surveys in areas with little information, such in Suriname, Guyana, Paraguay and most countries of Central America. We recommend long-term research inside and outside protected areas throughout the species range, to understand how human activities affect Neotropical Otter. Knowledge on the geographic distribution of the species needs to be improved, especially in the border areas of its distribution such as Mexico, Argentina and northeastern Brazil. This will advance an understanding of which climatic and ecological factors influence the limitations on the species range as well as the role of corridors and geographical barriers.
- Public awareness of the ecological role of otters in aquatic systems and the impact of otters on fisheries need attention, particularly in areas of conflict. Effective education programs help change the negative perception of otters by fishermen in coastal and riverine habitats. Such programs already exist in Mexico, Colombia, French Guiana and Brazil, and need to be expanded throughout the species range. Training local people to work in the field and community involvement generates empathy for Neotropical Otter.
- Development of strategies to prevent otter predation on fish farms and damage to fishnets. We recommend the adoption of fences in fish farms as used in Europe for Lutra lutra. A baseline evaluation of the economic impact of otters in fisheries and fish farms is also needed, and, at indigenous and community levels, the design and implementation of community agreements for responsible fishing.
- Requirement of environmental impact studies for all hydroelectric projects and legal instruments to ensure compensatory measures for negative impacts on otters. Monitoring the impact of dams on Neotropical Otters before and after dam implementation is needed to assess changes in population dynamics and genetic structure.
- Establishment of long-term Neotropical Otter conservation programs in Atlantic Forest coastal areas, Mexico, Brazilian Cerrado, Central America, Argentina and Amazon Basin.
Actions de conservation (8)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
2_3Habitat & natural process restoration4_1Formal education4_2Training4_3Awareness & communications5_1_3Sub-national level5_4_2National level5_4_3Sub-national level6_1Linked enterprises & livelihood alternatives
Stress écologiques (25)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (1)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
10Wearing apparel, accessoriessubsistance
Priorités de recherche (7)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Taxonomy1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats1_6Actions2_1Species Action/Recovery Plan3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 09 December 2021).
- Gallo-Reynoso JP, Macías-Sánchez S, Armenta-Méndez L, Barba-Acuña I, Nuñez-Ramos VA, Loya-Jaquez A, Ponce-García G, Gardea-Bejar AA. Submitted. Camera traps and otter latrines, what do they tell us? <i>IUCN Otter Specialist Group Bulletin</i>.
- Latorre-Cárdenas MC, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez C, Rico Y. 2020. Estimating genetic and demographic parameters relevant for the conservation of the Neotropical otter, Lontra longicaudis, in Mexico. <i>Conservation Genetics</i> 21(4): 719-734.
- Gallo-Reynoso JP, S Macías-Sánchez, VA Nuñez-Ramos, A Loya-Jaquez, ID Barba-Acuña, J Guerrero-Flores, G Ponce-García, and AA Gardea-Bejar. 2019. Identity and distribution of the Nearctic otter (Lontra canadensis) at the Rio Conchos Basin, Chihuahua, Mexico. <i>Therya</i> 10(3): 243-253.
- Echenique JV, Soares MP, Mascarenhas CS, Bandarra PM, Quadros P, Driemeier D, Schild AL. 2018. Lontra longicaudis infected with canine parvovirus and parasitized by Dioctophyma renale. <i>Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira</i> 38(9): 1844-1848.
- Hernández-Romero PC, Botello F, Hernández GN, Espinoza Rodríguez J. 2018. New altitudinal record of neotropical otter (Lontra longicaudis Olfers, 1818) and conflict with fish farmers in Mexico. <i>IUCN/SCC Otter Specialist Group Bulletin.</i> 35(4): 193 - 197.
- Rheingantz ML, Valenzuela A, Botero-Botero A, Thoisy B, Trujillo F, González I, Gallo-Reynoso JP, Marmontel M, Hernández-Romero PC, Rosas-Ribeiro PF, Wallace R, Utreras VM. 2018. Neotropical otter. In: Duplaix, N. and M. Savage (eds). <i>Global Otter Conservation Strategy</i> IUCN Otter Specialist Group. Pages: 82-89.
- Hernández-Romero PC, Guitiérrez-Rodríguez C, Valdespino C, Prieto-Torres DA. 2018. The role of geographical and ecological factors on population divergence of the Neotropical otter Lontra longicaudis (Carnivora, Mustelidae). <i>Evolutionary Biology</i> 45(1): 37-55.
- Restrepo CA, Botero-Botero A, Puerta-Parra JC, Franco-Pérez LM, Guevara G. 2018. The case of the Neotropical Otter (Lontra longicaudis Olfers, 1818) as a wild pet at the Magdalena River (Colombia). Boletín Científico. Centro de Museos. <i>Museo de Historia Natural</i> 22(2): 76-83.
- Pimenta NC, Antunes AP, Barnett AA, Macedo VW, Shepard GH Jr. 2018. Differential resilience of Amazonian otters along the Rio Negro in the aftermath of the 20th century international fur trade. <i>PLOS ONE</i> 13(3): e0193984.
- Rheingantz, ML, Menezes JFS, Galliez M, Fernandez FAS. 2017b. Biogeographic patterns in the feeding habits of the opportunist and semiaquatic Neotropical otter. <i>Hydrobiologia</i> 792: 1-15.
- Borges, J.C.G., Lima, D.S., Silva, E.M., Moreira, A.L.O., Marmontel, M., Amaral, R.S., Lazzarini, S.M. and Alves, L.C. 2017b. Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia sp. in aquatic mammals in northern and northeastern Brazil. <i>Diseases of Aquatic Organisms</i> 126(1): 25-31.
- Rheingantz ML, Santiago‐Plata VM, Trinca CS. 2017a. The Neotropical otter Lontra longicaudis: a comprehensive update on the current knowledge and conservation status of this semiaquatic carnivore. <i>Mammal Review.</i> 47: 291-305.
- Borges, J.C.G., Lima, D.S., Calera, B.M., Marmontel, M., Silva, E.M., Moreira, A.L.O. and Alves, L.C. 2017a. Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia sp. In Neotropical river otters (Lontra longicaudis) and giant otters (Pteronura brasiliensis) in northern Brazil. <i>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</i> 98(8): 2153-2157.
- Navarro MA Quadros J. 2017. Impacto de um desastre natural sobre o habitat e a ocorrência de Lontra longicaudis (Mustelidae, Carnivora) na Serra da Prata, Paraná, Brasil. <i>Iheringia. Série Zoologia</i> 107: e2017039.
- Rosas-Ribeiro PF, Ranulpho R, Venticinque E. 2017. New records and update on the geographic distribution of Lontra longicaudis (Olfers, 1818) (Carnivora: Mustelidae) in seasonally dry tropical forests of northeastern Brazil. <i>Check List</i> 13(3): 2108.
- Rheingantz ML, Leuchtenberger C, Zucco CA, Fernandez FAS. 2016. Differences in activity patterns of the Neotropical otter Lontra longicaudis between rivers of two Brazilian ecoregions. <i>Journal of Tropical Ecology</i> 32: 170-174.
- Rheingantz M.L., Trinca C.S. 2015. Lontra longicaudis. <i>The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species</i> 2015: e. T12304A21937379.
- Mesquita, G. P., & Meneses, R. F. 2015. Registro de Lontra longicaudis (Olfers, 1818) no estado do Maranhão, Nordeste do Brasil.. <i>Scientia Plena</i> 11(7): 7.
- Gomez JJ, Túnez JI, Fracassi N, Cassini MH. 2014. Habitat suitability and anthropogenic correlates of Neotropical river otter (Lontra longicaudis) distribution. <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i> 95: 824–833.
- Castro FR, Stutz-Reis S, Reis SS, Nakano- Oliveira E, Andriolo A. 2014. Fishermen’s perception of Neotropical otters (Lontra longicaudis) and their attacks on artisanal fixed fence traps: The case of caiçara communities. <i>Ocean & Coastal Management</i> 92: 19–27.
- Rheingantz ML, Menezes JFS, Thoisy B. 2014. Defining Neotropical otter Lontra longicaudis distribution, conservation priorities and ecological frontiers. <i>Tropical Conservation Science.</i> 7: 214-229.
- Quintana-Morales Y. 2013. Distribución y Estado de Conservación de la Nutria de río (Lontra longicaudis, Olfers, 1818) en los Humedales del Sistema Guatemalteco de Áreas Protegidas y su Conservación. Organización Nacional para la Conservación y el Ambiente, Guatemala, Guatemala.
- Mayagoitia-González PE, Fierro-Cabo A, Valdez R, Andersen M, Cowley D, Steiner R. 2013. Uso de hábitat y perspectivas de Lontra longicaudis en un área protegida de Tamaulipas, México. <i>Therya</i> 4: 243–256.
- Latorre-Cardenas MC. 2013. Evaluación de respuesta al estrés, bioacumulación de contaminantes y calidad de hábitat de la nutria neotropical en Veracruz, México. MSc dissertation.
- Ramos-Rosas N, Valdespino C, García Hernández J, Gallo Reynoso JP, Olguín E. 2013. Heavy metals in the habitat and throughout the food chain of the Neotropical Otter, Lontra longicaudis, in protected Mexican wetlands. <i>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</i> 184(1): 11.
- Pacifici, M., Santini, L., Di Marco, M., Baisero, D., Francucci, L., Grottolo Marasini, G., Visconti, P. and Rondinini, C. 2013. Generation length for mammals. <i>Nature Conservation</i> 5: 87–94.
- Anonymous. 2013. Forestry, Protected Areas and Wildlife Conservation Bill. Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.
- Duque-Dávila, D. L., Martínez-Ramírez, E., Botello-López, F. J., & Sánchez-Cordero, V. 2013. Distribución, abundancia y hábitos alimentarios de la nutria (Lontra longicaudis annectens major, 1897) en el Río Grande, Reserva de la Biósfera Tehuacán-Cuicatlán, Oaxaca, México. <i>Therya</i> 4(2): 281-296.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Rheingantz, M.L., Rosas-Ribeiro, P., Gallo-Reynoso, J., Fonseca da Silva, V.C., Wallace, R., Utreras, V. & Hernández-Romero, P. 2022. Lontra longicaudis (amended version of 2021 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T12304A219373698. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
Morphologie(4)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Chant
2 captations · Xeno-cantoHot-link CDN Xeno-canto. Chaque captation porte sa propre licence Creative Commons (visible quand la piste est active) et l'attribution de son auteur.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page
- Lutra longicaudisOlfers, 1818
- Lutra longicaudis longicaudisOlfers, 1818
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).