Ontologia
Chat des pampas

Chat des pampas

Leopardus colocola(Molina, 1782)

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Felidae
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Leopardus colocola.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéeDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2016 · v3.1
Altitude
05000 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The Pampas Cat populations living in the High Andes and Puna eco-regions appear to be able to reach relatively high densities (0.74-0.78 individuals/km2) in the most productive habitat patches (Gardner et al. 2010). The population appears to be stable in these regions of Argentina and in slight decline in Bolivia and Peru because of decreasing habitat quality caused by increased anthropogenic modification.

The Pampas Cat is a naturally rare species in most of Patagonia, where records of its presence are scarce in comparison with those of other felids (e.g. Geoffroy´s Cat, Puma).

In the Argentine Mesopotamia (Corrientes province), a couple of records (road-killed animals) were obtained during the last decade, but almost no evidence was recorded through camera trapping for the Iberá wetlands in spite of intensive trapping effort, thus suggesting that the species is rare in this region.

The Pampas Cat appears to be declining in central Argentina (Cordoba, San Luis), mainly due to habitat modification (i.e. soybean crop expansion), and is regionally extinct in the Pampas grasslands, where it only occurs in the southern and dry portion (Pereira et al. 2002 and recent unpublished surveys). In the Argentine Espinal, population numbers are low (0.11-0.17 individuals/ km2, lower than for the Geoffroy’s Cat, Caruso et al. 2012) and distribution is largely limited to grassland habitats that are threatened by human activities. Pampas cat are similarly rare in the adjacent southern part of the Monte eco-region (Pereira et al. 2011).

Pampas Cat records are very scarce in the Yungas eco-region of NW Argentina, where it is limited to the high-altitude grasslands (Di Bitetti et al. 2011).

A survey on small cats has found no records of Pampas Cats in the Bolivian Chaco dry forest (Cuellar et al. 2006).

In Brazil, the Pampas Cat inhabits open areas, such as the grasslands of the Pampas, the marshy Pantanal, and particularly the savannas of the Cerrado (Araujo Bagno 2004). The species is considered typically rare and with low population densities, typically of 0.01–0.05 individuals/km2 (or lower), throughout these regions, but may be relatively common in a few areas, usually protected, such as Emas National Parks in the Cerrado (Godoi et al. 2010), and Mirador State Park, where densities of 0.1–0.2 individuals/km2 are reached (Oliveira et al. 2010, Oliveira 2011).

In the Brazilian Pampas (southern portion of Rio Grande do Sul [RS] state), this felid is considered to occur only in well-preserved habitats areas (whose remaining area covers ca. 81,500 km²), and is always rarer than Geoffroy’s Cat.

Habitat loss and population decline is expected to be 14% in the next 21 years or three generations (assuming the same generation length of seven years). Because of this, the species was considered Vulnerable (C1) in Brazil (Queirolo et al. 2013). The situation is thought to be the same in Uruguay.

An interesting point revealed by recent molecular studies is that the populations in RS state (Brazilian pampas) and Uruguay are genetically distinct from those present in the Brazilian Cerrado and also from Argentinean populations, indicating that they have been demographically isolated for a considerable period (Santos, Trigo and Eizirik, in preparation). Such a result indicates that this region constitutes a distinct conservation unit for this species, which should be taken into consideration when assessing its overall status.

In Peru, the Pampas Cat is generally uncommon or rare. A seemingly separate subpopulation of Pampas Cat occurs in the Tumbesian region of western Ecuador and northwestern Peru. Individuals here are small and well-marked compared with the Andean form. This form inhabits mainly forested habitats, favoring dense vegetation along permanent water-courses and even in mangroves. It also occurs in agricultural fields, especially sugar cane plantations and in sparse desert habitats with little vegetation along the coast where shorebirds congregate. In this region, the high level of human impacts and settlement has resulted in widespread forest loss and the Pampas Cat is now extremely rare, being primarily found in protected areas.

Most of its subpopulations, which could in fact end up being considered as genetically different species, would be Vulnerable individually.

Menaces identifiées(9 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Ongoing
  • 2_1_2
    Small-holder farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_3
    Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 4_1
    Roads & railroads
    Ongoing
  • 5_1_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Ongoing
  • 5_1_2
    Unintentional effects (species is not the target)
    Ongoing
  • 5_1_3
    Persecution/control
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Habitat loss (to agricultural cropland) and degradation (by livestock grazing) is considered the major threat to this species throughout most of its range. Retaliatory killing for poultry depredation is also a threat, as are road kills.

In the High Andes of Bolivia and Peru the Pampas Cat is threatened by decreasing habitat quality caused by increased anthropogenic modification. In these regions, it is also actively persecuted by local people and often killed by dogs.

In Argentina, extensive habitat loss/modification due to the expansion of the agriculture frontier, mining, and oil extraction is the major threat.

The biggest threat to the species in Brazil is habitat loss, especially because of silviculture and agriculture expansion, as well as habitat conversion/degradation, mostly through fire. Given its rarity in Brazil, road kills are also considered a threat for some populations. In the Brazilian Pampas, predation by domestic dogs and hunting due to real or perceived conflicts, a problem that apparently has not been detected in the Cerrado yet (where it would be more incidental than widespread). A zone of hybridization between L. colocolo and L. tigrinus has been demonstrated by genetic analysis in central Brazil (Trigo et al. 2008).

In Peru, it is actively persecuted as it often kills chickens of local people, and is also impacted by dogs. Forest loss appears to be also an important threat.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 3_4Shrubland - Temperate
  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 3_6Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
  • 3_7Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
  • 3_8Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 4_6Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded
  • 4_7Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
  • 8_2Desert - Temperate
  • 1_8Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp

+ 1 habitats supplémentaires

Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert

Included on CITES Appendix II. The species is protected by national legislation across most of its range, with hunting prohibited in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, and Peru. It occurs in 13 National Protected Areas in Argentina (Pereira et al. 2002), eight in Bolivia (Noss et al. 2010), 11 in Brazil (Queirolo et al. 2013), 75 in Chile (A. Iriarte in litt.), and 11 in Peru (Fajardo and Pacheco 2011).

The Pampas Cat is listed as Vulnerable by the national Red Lists of Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil. In Peru is listed as Data Deficient.

Research into its ecology, distribution, taxonomy, and threats is urgently needed.

Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
Stress écologiques (14)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (3)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    subsistance
  • 12Handicrafts, jewellery, etc.
    subsistance
  • 2Food - animal
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (7)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
  • 1_5Threats
  • 1_6Actions
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
  2. Tellaeche, C. 2015. Uso del espacio y recursos tróficos por parte de dos especies de felinos silvestres gato andino (<i>Leopardus jacobita</i>) y gato de los pajonales (<i>Leopardus colocolo</i>) en la región Alto andina, Prov. de Jujuy. Universidad Nacional del Sur.
  3. Fajardo, U., Cossios, D. and Pacheco, V. 2014. Dieta de <i>Leopardus colocolo</i> (Carnivora: Felidae) en la Reserva Nacional de Junín, Junín, Perú. <i>Revista peruana de biología</i> 21: 61-70.
  4. Pacifici, M., Santini, L., Di Marco, M., Baisero, D., Francucci, L., Grottolo Marasini, G., Visconti, P. and Rondinini, C. 2013. Generation length for mammals. <i>Nature Conservation</i> 5: 87–94.
  5. Queirolo, D., Almeida, L.B. de, Beisiegel, B. and Oliveira, T.G. de. 2013. Avaliação do risco de extinção do gato-palheiro <i>Leopardus colocolo</i> (Molina, 1782) no Brasil. <i>Biodiversidade Brasileira</i> 3: 91-98.
  6. Caruso, N,. Manfredi, C., Luengos, Vidal, E., Casanave, E. and Lucherini, M. 2012. First density estimation of two sympatric small cats, <i>Leopardus colocolo</i> and <i>Leopardus geoffroyi</i>, in a shrubland area of central Argentina. <i>Annales Zoologici Fennici</i> 49: 181–191.
  7. Oliveira, T.G. de. 2011. Ecologia e conservação de pequenos felinos no Brasil e suas implicações para o manejo. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
  8. Pereira, J.A., Di Bitetti, M.S., Fracassi, N., Paviolo, A., De Angelo, C., Di Blanco, Y.E. and Novaro, A.J. 2011. Population density of Geoffroy's cat in scrublands of central Argentina. <i>Journal of Zoology </i> 283: 37-40.
  9. Fajardo, U. and Pacheco, V. 2011. Especies CITES de carnívoros peruanos. Informe Final. Ministerio del Ambiente, Dirección General de Diversidad Biológica. Museo de Historia Natural.
  10. Di Bitetti, M.S., Albanesi, S., Foguet, M.J., Cuyckens, G.A.E. and Brown, A. 2011. The Yungas Biosphere Reserve of Argentina: a hot spot of South American wild cats. <i>Cat News</i> 54: 25–29.
  11. Noss, A., Villalba, L. and Arispe, R. 2010. Felidae. In: R.B. Wallace, H. Gómez, Z.R. Porcel and D.I. Rumiz (eds), <i>Distribución, ecología y conservación de los mamíferos medianos y grandes de Bolivia</i>, pp. 401-444 . Centro de Ecología Difusión Simón I. Patiño, Santa Cruz de la Sierra.
  12. Gardner, B., Reppucci, J., Lucherini, M. and Royle, J.A. 2010. Spatially-explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. <i>Ecology</i> 91: 3376-3383.
  13. Oliveira, T.G. de, Tortato, M.A., Silveira, L., Kasper, C.B., Mazim, F.D., Lucherini M., Jácomo A.T., Soares J.B.G., Marques, R.V. and Sunquist, M.E. 2010. Ocelot ecology and its effect on the small-felid guild in the lowland neotropics. In: D.W. Macdonald and A.J. Loveridge (eds), <i>Biology and Conservation of the Wild Felids</i>, pp. 559-580. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  14. Godoi, M.N., Teribel, R., Bianchi, R., Olifiers, N., Concone, H.V.B. and Xavier Filho, N.L. 2010. New records of pampas cat for mato grosso do sul state, Brazil. <i>Cat News</i> 52: 28-29.
  15. Clark, M.L., Aide, T.M., Grau, H.R. and Riner, G. 2010. A scalable approach to mapping annual land cover at 250 m using MODIS time series data: A case study in the Dry Chaco ecoregion of South America. <i>Remote Sensing of Environment</i> 114: 2816-2832.
  16. Lucherini ,M., Reppucci, J.I., Walker, S., Villalba, L., Wurstten, A., Gallardo, G., Iriarte, A., Villalobos, R. and Perovic, P. 2009. Activity pattern segregation of carnivores in the High Andes. <i>Journal of Mammalogy </i> 90: 1404-1409.
  17. Trigo, T.C., Freitas, T.R.O., Kunzler, G., Cardoso, L., Silva, J.C.R., Johnson, W.E., O’Brien, S J., Bonatto, S.L. and Eizirik E. 2008. Inter‐species hybridization among Neotropical cats of the genus <i>Leopardus</i>, and evidence for an introgressive hybrid zone between <i>L. geoffroyi</i> and <i>L. tigrinus</i> in southern Brazil. <i>Molecular Ecology</i> 17: 4317-4333.
  18. Napolitano, C., Bennett, M., Johnson, W.E., O'Brien, S.J., Marquet, P.A., Barría, I., Poulin, E. and Iriarte, A. 2008. Ecological and biogeographical inferences on two sympatric and enigmatic Andean cat species using genetic identification of faecal samples. <i>Molecular Ecology</i> 17: 678-690.
  19. Eizirik, E., Trigo, T.C. and Haag, T. 2007. Conservation genetics and molecular ecology of Neotropical felids. In: J. Hughes and R. Mercer (eds), <i>Felid Biology and Conservation Conference 17-19 September: Abstracts</i>, pp. 40-41. WildCRU, Oxford, UK.
  20. Cossíos, D.E., Madrid, A., Condori, J.L. and Fajardo, U. 2007. Update on the distribution of the Andean cat <i>Oreailurus jacobita</i> and the pampas cat <i>Lynchailurus colocolo</i> in Peru. <i>Endangered Species Research</i> 3: 313-320.
  21. Cossios, E.D. and Angers, B. 2007. Phylogeography and conservation of small cats from the high Andes. In: J. Hughes and R. Mercer (eds), <i>Felid Biology and Conservation Conference 17-20 September: Abstracts</i>, pp. 79. WildCRU, Oxford, UK.
  22. Dotta, G., Queirolo, D. and Senra, A. 2007. Distribution and conservation stuatus of small felids on the Uruguyan savanna ecoregion, southern Brazil and Uruguay. In: J. Hughes and R. Mercer (eds), Felid Biology and Conservation Conference , pp. 105. Oxford, UK.
  23. Walker, R. S., Novaro, A., Perovic, P., Palacios, R., Donadio, E., Lucherini, M., Pia, M. and López, M. S. 2007. Diet of the Andean and pampas cats (<i>Leopardus jacobita</i> and <i>L. colocolo</i>) and culpeos (<i>Lycalopex culpaeus</i>) in high-altitude deserts of Argentina. <i>Journal of mammalogy</i> 88: 519-525.
  24. Johnson, W.E., Eizirik, E., Pecon-Slattery, J., Murphy, W.J., Antunes, A., Teeling, E. and O'Brien, S.J. 2006. The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: A genetic assessment. <i>Science</i> 311: 73-77.
  25. Cuellar, E., Maffei, L., Arispe, R. and Noss, A. 2006. Geoffroy’s cats at the northern limit of their range: activity patterns and density estimates from camera trapping in Bolivian dry forests. <i>Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment</i> 41: 169–177.
  26. Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), <i>Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition</i>, pp. 532-628. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  27. Silveira, L., Jacomo, A.T.A. and Furtado, M.M. 2005. Pampas cat ecology and conservation in the Brazilian grasslands. Cat Project of the Month. IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group.
  28. Villalba, L., Lucherini, M., Walker, S., Cossíos, D., Iriarte, A., Sanderson, J., Gallardo, G., Alfaro, F., Napolitano, C. and Sillero-Zubiri, C. 2004. <i>The Andean cat: Conservation action plan</i>. Andean Cat Alliance, La Paz, Bolivia.
  29. Araujo Bagno, M., Guimaraes Rodrigues, F.H., Prada Villalobos, M., Dalponte J.C., Albuquerque Brandão, R., Britto, B., Cunha de Paula, R. and Ramos Bezerra, A.M. 2004. Notes on the natural history and conservation status of pampas cat, <i>Oncifelis colocolo</i>, in the Brazilian Cerrado. <i>Mammalia</i> 68: 75–79.
  30. Ruiz-Garcia, M., Payan, C.E. and Hernandez-Camacho, J.I. 2003. Possible records of <i>Lynchailurus</i> in south-western Colombia. <i>Cat News</i> 38: 37-39.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Lucherini, M., Eizirik, E., de Oliveira, T., Pereira, J. & Williams, R.S.R.
contributor
Leite-Pitman, M.R.P.
evaluator
Nowell, K., Hunter, L., Schipper, J., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Lanz, T. & Breitenmoser, U.

Lucherini, M., Eizirik, E., de Oliveira, T., Pereira, J. & Williams, R.S.R. 2016. Leopardus colocolo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T15309A97204446. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 6 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
2,95 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
20 ans
AnAge
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Gestation
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Taille de portée
3
AnAge
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Sevrage
-999 j
PanTHERIA

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
100 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (7)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Felis colocolaMolina, 1782
  • Felis colocoloMolina, 1782
  • Leopardus colocola colocola(Molina, 1782)
  • Leopardus colocolo(Molina, 1782)
  • Leopardus colocolo colocolo(Molina, 1782)
  • Lynchailurus colocolo(Molina, 1782)
  • Oncifelis colocolo(Molina, 1782)

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).