Ontologia

Lagenocarpus compactus

D.A.Simpson

VULR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Lagenocarpus compactus.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

VU · Vulnérablecritères D2?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2014 · v3.1
Altitude
16001800 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
This species is a recently described species, which is only known from three collections and two locations. There is no information on the size and dynamics of the population.

Menaces identifiées(9 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Ongoing
  • 1_3
    Tourism & recreation areas
    Ongoing
  • 2_3_4
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    Past, Unlikely to Return
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    Past, Unlikely to Return
  • 5_2_4
    Motivation Unknown/Unrecorded
    Ongoing
  • 6_1
    Recreational activities
    Ongoing
  • 7_1_3
    Trend Unknown/Unrecorded
    Past, Unlikely to Return
  • 7_2_11
    Dams (size unknown)
    Ongoing
  • 9_3_4
    Type Unknown/Unrecorded
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Habitats have been altered by past anthropogenic disturbances (mining, grazing, and burning of savanna) and landscapes have been highly modified. The Chiapada Diamentina has been protected as a national park since 1994. Current threats to plant species in the region include: increased tourism, intensive use of water resources (including the construction of dams) and application of agro-chemicals in surroundings areas, urban expansion and extraction of ornamental native plants. How these threats directly impact this species is unknown.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 6Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species does not benefit from any legal protection. The Chapada Diamantina has large areas of Campo Rupestre and a rich endemic flora. It has been included in the federal system of protected areas since 1994, as a national park (IUCN Category II). The park was created with the intention of protecting beautiful mountain scenery and important water resources, but its boundaries have been drawn within a highly human-modified landscape. The resulting reserve has a very irregular shape, a low area/perimeter ratio, limited core areas, and excludes neighbouring ecosystems. Distances need to be maintained from agricultural fields and ecological corridors created. GIS techniques and extensive field work have allowed the identification of areas for potential corridors, which have high ecological gains for the reserve but low potential for generating serious conflicts with established human populations. Three areas were recommended for incorporation into the Park, and six for off-reserve conservation management (Funch 2007, Funch and Harley 2007). The Chapada Diamantina Foundation work to encourage less environmentally damaging and more sustainable agriculture practices around the park and seek to integrate private use of natural resources with public conservation planning. Other conservation units need to be created to protect Campo Rupestre habitats where there is a high frequency of endemic taxa that are presently headed for extinction (Leme 1998). Since the beginning of the 1990s, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, in collaboration with a large number of institutions and academics, has developed a major research program on the plants of northeast Brazil. The collaborative Project Flora de Bahia initiated in 1998, aims to provide detailed floras of the vascular plants of the region, vegetation maps, lists of endemics and endangered species and to determine priority areas for conservation within the state of Bahia. The Distribution of Campo Rupestre in Brazil has still not been fully mapped. Field surveys and monitoring of the population of this species should be conducted with examination of known, historical and potentially suitable areas to confirm local subpopulations, possibly find new ones, and document if local extinction does occur. The number, size and dynamics of the population should be studied as well as the ecology and biology of the taxon. Natural regeneration studies should be conducted for conservation and management. Seeds should be collected for germplasm and ex situ conservation (Harley 1995, Scarano 2007).
Actions de conservation (8)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 2_3Habitat & natural process restoration
  • 3_4_1Captive breeding/artificial propagation
  • 3_4_2Genome resource bank
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
  • 5_1_2National level
  • 5_1_3Sub-national level
Stress écologiques (14)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (5)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
  • 1_6Actions
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or HerbGraminoid
Références bibliographiques (9)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 12 June 2014).
  2. Scarano, F.R. 2007. Rock outcrop vegetation in Brazil: a brief overview. <i>Revista Brasileira de Botânica</i> 30(4): 561-568.
  3. Funch, R. 2007. Fundação Chapada Diamantina. Fundação Chapada Diamantina, Lencois, Bahia.
  4. Conceiao, A.A., Giullietti, A.M. and Merelles, S.T. 2007. Islands of vegetation on quartzite-sandstone outcrops, Pai Inácio Mountain, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil. <i>Acta Botanica Brasilica</i> 21(2): 335-347.
  5. Funch, R. and Harley, R.M. 2007. Reconfiguring the boundaries of the Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil) using ecological criteria in the context of a human-dominated landscape. <i>Landscape and Urban Planning</i> 83(4): 355-362.
  6. Leme, E.M.C. 1998. <i></i>Canistropis<i>, Bromeliads of the Atlantic Forest</i>. Salamandra, GMT editores, Rio de Janeiro.
  7. Harley, R.M. 1995. <i>Flora of Pico das Almas</i>. Whistable Litho Ltd.
  8. Simpson, D.A. 1995. <i>Flora of the Pico das Almas, Chapada Diamantina, Brazil</i>. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Whistable Litho Ltd., Kew.
  9. Simpson, D.A. 1993. New species and a new combination in Cyperaceae from Brazil: notes on Brazilian Cyperaceae: VI. <i>Kew Bulletin</i> 48(4): 699.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Romand-Monnier, F.
evaluator
Moraes, M.

Romand-Monnier, F. 2014. Lagenocarpus compactus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T44392249A44443114. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie