
Arbre à noix longues
Juglans cinereaL.
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Juglans cinerea.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
EN · En dangercritères A2e+3e+4e↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2019 · v3.1
- Altitude
- – 1400 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Population is subject to a high rate of decline. This is a consequence of infection of trees by the fungus Ophiognomonia clavigignenti-juglandacearum, commonly known as butternut canker (Broders et al. 2015, NatureServe 2018). This fungal pest was first reported in 1967 and the population of butternut has continued to decline since its invasion. In some states up to 91% of trees can be infected, putting them at risk of death (McIlwrick et al. 2000). Seven midwestern states recorded a decline in butternut trees of 23% (Michler et al. 2006) while Wisconsin recorded a loss of between 27 and 92% by 1992 (Michler et al. 2006). Flickinger (2015) reports a decrease in number of butternut trees from 1.4 million individuals to 84,000 individuals, a 94% decline. In general, the average loss across reporting states is around 80% (McIlwrick et al. 2000). The species is also subject to decline in its Canadian range at a similar rate.
Despite this decline the species is still present in habitat as infected individuals, uninfected saplings, mature putative resistant trees (McIlwrick et al. 2000). The species currently maintains good genetic diversity and there is some natural resistance to O. clavigignenti-juglandacearum (Ross-Davis et al. 2008). Other causes of population decline are due to habitat loss, poor regeneration and genetic dilution (Parks et al. 2013).
The species produces seed from 20 to 60 years old, hence generation length is given as 40 years. Therefore, across three generations looking from 1967 to 2067 it is estimated that the population will experience decline between 50 and 80%. There has been a historical reduction of up to 80% based on the loss of trees due to butternut canker, and the variable rate this has occurred across the range. There is a high rate of infection and high rate of mortality of the tree. Decline will continue into the future as O. clavigignenti-juglandacearum is present across the entire species range and there is no known remedy (Parks et al. 2013). Decline over the next 100 years could also be as much as 80%, considering a conservative estimate.
Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
8_3Introduced genetic materialCausing/Could cause fluctuationsUnknownOngoing11_1Habitat shifting & alterationUnknownUnknownFuture2_1_4Scale Unknown/UnrecordedUnknownUnknownOngoing2_3_4Scale Unknown/UnrecordedUnknownMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Parks et al. 2013 also notes that the species is threatened by historical habitat loss, poor regeneration and genetic dilution caused by hybridisation with Juglans ailantifolia. Potter et al. 2017 also identified that the species may be 'vulnerable' to climate change but with some capacity to adapt.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_4Forest - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
There is currently no effective or practical management techniques known that completely protect Juglans cinerea from butternut canker. Various research is occurring to investigate remedies to butternut canker infection. This includes looking at in vitro propagation, breeding resistance, use of fungicides and pesticides, reducing timber harvest and developing ex situ conservation stands, DNA and seed banks (McIlwrick et al. 2000, NatureServe 2018). Remaining stands of the tree need to be managed to encourage regeneration, such as reducing canopy to better establishment of butternut (Parks et al. 2013). There needs to be continuing monitoring of the population for decline and regeneration. The species is present in at least 137 ex situ collections.
Actions de conservation (2)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
3_2Species recovery3_4_1Captive breeding/artificial propagation
Stress écologiques (8)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_3_1Hybridisation
Usage & commerce (5)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humannationalsubsistance11Other household goodsinternationalnational12Handicrafts, jewellery, etc.internationalnationalsubsistance3Medicine - human & veterinarynationalsubsistance9Construction or structural materialsinternationalnationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (2)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_5Threats3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Formes de croissance
Références bibliographiques (13)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 21 March 2019).
- NatureServe. 2018. <i>Juglans cinerea</i>. Available at: <a href="http://explorer.natureserve.org">http://explorer.natureserve.org</a>. (Accessed: 6 August 2018).
- Potter, K., Crane, B. and Hargrove, W. 2017. A United States national prioritization framework for tree species vulnerability to climate change. <i>New Forests</i>: 1–26.
- Broders, K., Boraks, A., Barbison, L., Brown, J. and Boland, G.J. 2015. Recent insights into the pandemic disease butternut canker caused by the invasive pathogen <i>Ophiognomonia clavigignenti‐juglandacearum</i>. <i>Forest Pathology</i> 45(1): 1-8.
- Flickinger, A. 2015. Potential Loss of Butternut from Iowa Forests. In: Gipp, C., Tauke, P. and Feeley, T. (eds), <i>Iowa's 2015 Forest Health Highlights</i>, pp. 47. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and USDA Forestry Service, Des Moines.
- Parks, A.M., Jenkins, M.A., Woeste, K.E. and Ostry, M.E. 2013. Conservation Status of a Threatened Tree Species: Establishing a Baseline for Restoration of <i> Juglans cinerea</i> L. In the Southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. <i>Natural Areas Journal</i> 33(4): 413-426.
- Ross-Davis, A., Ostry, M. and Woeste, K.E. 2008. Genetic diversity of butternut (Juglans cinerea) and implications for conservation. <i>Canadian Journal of Forest Research</i> 38(4): 899-907.
- eFloras. 2008. Flora of North America. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA Available at: <a href="http://www.efloras.org/">http://www.efloras.org/</a>.
- COSEWIC. 2008. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Rapids Clubtail <i>Gomphus quadricolor</i> in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa.
- Michler, C.H., Pijut, P.M., Jacobs, D.F., Meilan, R., Woeste, K.E. and Ostry, M.E. 2006. Improving disease resistance of butternut (<i>Juglans cinerea</i>), a threatened fine hardwood: a case for single-tree selection through genetic improvement and deployment. <i>Tree Physiology</i> 26(1): 121-128.
- McIlwrick, K., Wetzel, S., Beardmore, T., and Frobes, K. 2000. Ex situ conservation of American chestnut (<i>Castanea dentata</i> (Marsh.) Borkh.) and butternut (<i>Juglans cinerea</i> L.), a review. <i>The Forestry Chronicle</i> 76(5): 765-775.
- Coladonato, M. 1991. <i>Juglans cinerea</i>. Available at: <a href="https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/jugcin/all.html">https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/jugcin/all.html</a>. (Accessed: 7 August 2018).
- Burns, R.M. and Honkala, B.H. 1990. <i>Silvics of North America</i>. USDA, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Stritch, L. & Barstow, M. 2019. Juglans cinerea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T62019689A62019696. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Indicateurs écologiquesTolérance thermique · radar EIVE · triangle CSR
Indicateurs écologiques Ellenberg-type
EIVE 1.0 — Dengler 2023Position de l'espèce sur les 5 dimensions écologiques européennes (M / N / R / L / T), échelle 0-10. La zone estompée représente la niche width (variabilité tolérée).
- Humidité
- xérophile ↔ hygrophile
- Azote
- oligotrophe ↔ nitrophile
- Réaction (pH)
- silicicole ↔ calcicole
- Lumière
- sciaphile ↔ héliophile
- Température
- cryophile ↔ thermophile
Source : EIVE 1.0 (Dengler et al. 2023). CC-BY 4.0. Échelle harmonisée 0-10 (équivalent inverse-rang sur les systèmes Ellenberg, Landolt, Pignatti, etc.). Niche width = écart-type d'estimation, indicateur de fiabilité (zone estompée).
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (4)— redirigent vers cette page
- Juglans catharticaF.Michx.
- Juglans oblongaMill.
- Nux cinerea(L.) M.Gómez
- Wallia cinerea(L.) Alef.
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).