
Noyer noir de Californie
Juglans californicaS.Watson
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Juglans californica.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
NT · Quasi menacéecritères B2b(iii)↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2019 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 30 – 900 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
The species is most common in Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura counties. Small stands are found in the Simi Hills, Santa Susana Mountains, Santa Monica Mountains, San Jose Hills, Puente Hills and Chino Hills (Esser 1993). 3,500 living individuals were recorded from Sulphur Mount, Ventura County, California making up 49% of the basal area (Keeley 1990). In the same study, 1,130 living individuals were found on Mount Washington, LA County contributing to 90% of the basal area (Keeley 1990). Finally, at Montecito heights, LA County 1,710 living individuals were counted with a basal cover of 95% (Keeley 1990). At each of these three sites, there were also 50 to 100 dead individuals of the species (Keeley 1990). Keeley (1990), also looked at the size structure of the species and most individuals had a small dbh. Based on estimates from these three sites, population size is suspected to exceed 10,000 mature individuals. Nature Serve (2018) describes the population size as 'sufficient' and widespread. It can also be dominant in woodlands (Esser 1993). A lack of natural reproduction is also reported (NatureServe 2018). Subpopulations are found in protected areas and due to the species dominance in woodland, these can be large and stable subpopulations.
Riordan et al. (2015), looked at the possible behavior of this species and its' preferred habitat type in response to climate change. A potential 20,493 km2 of climatically suitable habitat was identified for the species, 31% of this habitat has already been subject to decline due to anthropogenic development of urban areas and agriculture and before 2080 a further 33% could be lost. Climate change also has the potential to cause 48 - 61% of currently suitable habitat to be lost, which alongside anthropogenic changes could see J. californica experience habitat loss of between 64 and 70% (worst case scenario). However, climate change may not have a negative impact and could see the range of the species expand along the coast by 218% (Riordan et al. 2015). More information is needed on how the species will disperse, and reproduce alongside fine scale habitat and ecological information (soil moisture etc.) is needed before these models can better predict what will happen to the population size of the species in response to climate change.
Considering these details, overall the population is experiencing decline due to loss of habitat and grazing of the natural habitat. Californian Walnut forests are also becoming more fragmented. There has been great historical decline due to human population growth in the state and this growth is predicted to continue if not increase into the future. This will have a major impact on the population of J. californica oustide of protected areas, as available habitat may be significantly reduced. However in the protected sites large stable subpopulations will persist.
Menaces identifiées(9 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
1_1Housing & urban areasRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing1_2Commercial & industrial areasRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing1_3Tourism & recreation areasRapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing4_1Roads & railroadsRapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing6_3Work & other activitiesRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing11_1Habitat shifting & alterationUnknownMinority (<50%)Future2_3_4Scale Unknown/UnrecordedUnknownUnknownOngoing7_1_1Increase in fire frequency/intensityUnknownUnknownOngoing8_3Introduced genetic materialUnknownUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_4Forest - Temperate5_1Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls)
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
This species is found in at least 19 ex situ collections (BGCI 2018). The range includes protected areas of Los Padres National Forest, Chino Hills and Cuyamaca Rancho State Park. There may be some more targeted, local conservation of the species but details are not available. The species has been recently reassessed at the state and global level as G4- apparently Secure (CNPS 2018). In the wake of climate change, protected areas should be adaptable and expanded to take in sites that species may move into following a change in climate (Riordan et al. 2015).
Population numbers for this species would be valuable and monitoring of changes in size to further quantify the rate of population decline.
Stress écologiques (27)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_3_1Hybridisation2_3_7Reduced reproductive success2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (3)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humannationalsubsistance13Pets/display animals, horticulturenationalsubsistance2Food - animalnationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (2)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Formes de croissance
Références bibliographiques (14)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 04 July 2019).
- Potter, D. Bartosh, H., Dangl, G., Yang, J., Bittman, R., and Preece, J. 2018. Clarifying the Conservation Status of Northern California Black Walnut (<i>Juglans hindsii</i>) Using Microsatellite Markers. <i>MADRONO </i> 65(3): 131-140.
- NatureServe. 2018. <i>Juglans californica</i>. Available at: <a href="http://explorer.natureserve.org">http://explorer.natureserve.org</a>. (Accessed: June 2018).
- CNPS. 2018. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. Available at: <a href="http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/detail/1704.html">http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/detail/1704.html</a>. (Accessed: December 2018).
- GBIF. 2018. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: <a href="http://data.gbif.org/species/">http://data.gbif.org/species/</a>.
- BGCI. 2018. PlantSearch online database. Richmond, UK Available at: <a href="www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>. (Accessed: 2018).
- Potter, K., Crane, B. and Hargrove, W. 2017. A United States national prioritization framework for tree species vulnerability to climate change. <i>New Forests</i>: 1–26.
- Riordan, E.C., Gillespie, T.W., Pitcher, L., Pincetl, S.S., Jenerette, G.D. and Pataki, D.E. 2015. Threats of future climate change and land use to vulnerable tree species native to Southern California. <i>Environmental conservation</i> 42(2): 127-138.
- Tibor, D. (compiler) 1998. Threatened tree information from the California Native Plant Society (unpublished).
- Stone, D.E. 1997. Juglandaceae. <i>Flora of North America</i>, Missouri Botanical Garden.
- Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. <i>Flora of North America North of Mexico, Volume 3: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae</i>. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Wickens, G.E. 1995. <i>Edible nuts</i>. Non-wood Forest Products 5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Lora Esser. 1993. <i>Juglans californica</i>. In: Fire Effects Information System. (Accessed: March 10).
- Keeley, J.E. 1990. Demographic structure of California black walnut (<i>Juglans californica</i>; Juglandaceae) woodlands in southern California. <i>Madroño</i>: 237-248.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Stritch, L. & Barstow, M. 2019. Juglans californica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T35154A61524825. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Phénologie
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page
- Juglans californica f. californica
- Juglans californica var. californica
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).