
Phoque barbu
Erignathus barbatus(Erxleben, 1777)
Description
espèce de mammifères
Source : Wikidata
Indicateurs du réseau écologique
Comment lire ce graphe
Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Erignathus barbatus et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.
Limites principales
- Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
- Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
- Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
- Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
- Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
- Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.
Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées
Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :
- Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
- Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
- Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
- Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
- Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)
Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).
Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).
Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata
145 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.
Liste rouge IUCN
NT · Quasi menacéecritères A3ce?Inconnue- Évaluation
- 2025 · v3.1
- Altitude
- – m
- Profondeur
- 500 – 0 m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
In other parts of the world, Bearded Seal abundance has been estimated, though most reports note that there are many regional gaps and that the species is in fact data deficient. Additionally, many older estimates should be considered educated guesses as opposed to actual estimates. Heide-Jørgensen et al. (2013, 2016) produced estimates for Bearded Seals in the North Water Polynya in West Greenland of some 6,000 animals. This is likely an underestimate for this important hotspot, given that these authors applied a Ringed Seal haul-out correction factor of 41% and available data suggests that individual Bearded Seals spend much less time than this on the ice surface (Hamilton et al. 2018). Fuirst et al. (2023) provide a thorough review of Bearded Seal estimates in Canadian waters, concluding that data coverage is too fragmentary to provide a comprehensive abundance estimate or trend, but regional populations range from some hundreds to low thousands of animals.
Population estimation of Bearded Seals has received considerable effort in the Pacific Arctic. A comprehensive review by Cameron et al. (2010) concluded that combined estimates for all regions in the Pacific Arctic summed to some 250,000 animals. More recently, Ver Hoef et al. (2014) analysed line transect survey data from the Bering Sea collected in spring 2007 using a series of models and estimated there were 61,800 Bearded Seals (95% CI 34,900–171,600) in their study area. A lot of effort has gone into methods to extrapolate survey observations to abundance estimates in the broad Pacific region for ice-seals (Conn et al. 2014, 2015, 2016; McClintock et al. 2015, Sigler et al. 2015), but only estimates from Russian territories have been published to date (in the Russian scientific literature) from the large-scale survey efforts. These studies suggest 42,000 Bearded Seals occurred in the Russian parts of the Bering Sea and 14,590 (CV 31%) were in the Russian parts of the Chukchi and Eastern Siberian Sea (Chernook et al. 2018, 2019). Boveng (in NAMMCO 2023) suggested that the total population size for the Bering and Chukchi Sea was 500,000, but Conn and Trukhanova (2022) concluded that abundance estimates from the large-scale aerial surveys for Bearded Seals (and Ringed Seals) in particular should be interpreted with caution because of the lack of age-sex specific data for calculating correction factors; low area coverage (2%) and low numbers of sighting in vast areas are additional concerns. However, close-kin mark-recapture estimates for Bearded Seals in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas (Quakenbush, in NAMMCO 2023, citing Taras et al. 2023) also produce a large population estimate number - 409,000 (CV = 0.35). This region of shallow seas is undoubtedly a stronghold for Bearded Seal (Citta et al. 2018). Crance et al. (2022) found a year-round presence of Bearded Seals based on acoustics, throughout the Alaskan Chukchi and northern Bering Sea.
Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
9_2_1Oil spillsCausing/Could cause fluctuationsMinority (<50%)Ongoing9_6_3Noise pollutionNegligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing5_4_2Intentional use: (large scale) [harvest]UnknownUnknownPast, Unlikely to Return11_1Habitat shifting & alterationSlow, Significant DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing5_4_1Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]No declineMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Increasing development and industrialisation of the Arctic may threaten Bearded Seals in several ways. Oil spills from offshore extraction and transportation could negatively affect them through direct contact with oil and damage to foraging areas and stocks of prey, particularly benthic invertebrates, that are vulnerable to oil contamination. An increase in human-created noise in the Arctic could cause marine mammals, including Bearded Seals that are very vocal during their breeding season, to abandon areas of habitat they otherwise might use. Increased shipping will pose a greater threat of marine accidents and disturbance of marine mammals. Cameron et al. (2010) concluded that these factors could constitute low to moderate threats to Bearded Seals.
Hunting by indigenous peoples continues throughout most of the species’ range. There is no evidence of population-level impacts from hunting. Reports from Alaska Native subsistence hunters do not give any indication that Bearded Seal numbers have declined (Quakenbush et al. 2011) and Nelson et al. (2019) assessed Alaskan harvests as sustainable.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
10_1Marine Oceanic - Epipelagic (0-200m)★10_2Marine Oceanic - Mesopelagic (200-1000m)★17Other★9_1Marine Neritic - Pelagic★9_4Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy★9_5Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy-Mud★9_6Marine Neritic - Subtidal Muddy★12_2Marine Intertidal - Sandy Shoreline and/or Beaches, Sand Bars, Spits, Etc
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
The species is included on Annex V (animal and plant species of community interest whose taking in the wild and exploitation may be subject to management measures) of the EU Habitats Directive, and on Appendix III (protected fauna species) of the Bern Convention (Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats.
The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada assessed this species in Canada as being of high priority conservation concern. In the USA they are listed on as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (Federal Registry 2012 - ESA 77 FR 76740) because of the threats from climate change (Cameron et al. 2010). This has resulted in a Designation of Critical Habitat for the Beringia Bearded Seal Population (Federal Register 2022). The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the taking of Bearded Seals except for Alaska Native subsistence hunts or for production of handicrafts.
Both the research community and Arctic indigenous knowledge holders call for changing ice concentrations to be considered in the management and conservation of this species (Gryba et al. 2021, Kovacs et al. 2021).
Further habitat and population monitoring is recommended.
Actions de conservation (1)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_2Resource & habitat protection
Stress écologiques (7)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Use & Trade — IUCNExpert
1Food - humannationalsubsistance10Wearing apparel, accessoriessubsistance
Priorités de recherche (5)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Taxonomy1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_5Threats3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs)
Zones de pêche FAO
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2025. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 27 March 2025).
- Taras, B.D., Conn, P.B., Bravington, M.V., Quakenbush, L., Kilian, A., Lang, A.R. and Bryan, A. 2023. <i>Close-kin mark-recapture used to estimate bearded seal population abundance and demographics. (poster)</i>. Alaska Marine Science Symposium, January 2023, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
- NAMMCO. 2023. Report of the NAMMCO Panarctic Bearded Seal Workshop. March 2023. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO), Tromsø. Available at: https://nammco.no/scientific-workshops-symposia-reports
- Barratclough, A., Ferguson, S.H., Lydersen, C., Thomas, P.O. and Kovacs, K.M. 2023. A review of circumpolar Arctic marine mammal health – a call to action in a time of rapid environmental change. <i>Pathogens</i> 12: 937.
- Society for Marine Mammalogy (SMM). 2023. List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies. June 2023. Yarmouth Port, MA: Committee on Taxonomy, Society for Marine Mammalogy. Available at: <a href="https://marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/">https://marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/</a>. (Accessed: 23 October 2023).
- Llobet, S.M., Ahonen, H., Lydersen, C. and Kovacs, K.M. 2023. The Arctic and the future Arctic? Soundscapes and marine mammal communities on the east and west sides of Svalbard characterized through acoustic data. <i>Frontiers in Marine Science</i> 10: 1208049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1208049
- Fuirst, M., Ferguson, S.H., Higdon, J.W., Young, B.G., Lea, E.V., Koski, W.R. and Yurkowski, D.J. 2023. A review of aerial survey density estimates of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) in the Canadian Arctic highlights important knowledge gaps and research needs. <i>Polar Biology</i> 46: 1251-1263.
- Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Aars, J., Acquarone, M., Atwood, T., Baylis, A., Biuw, M., Boltunov, A.N., Born, E.W., Boveng, P., Brown, T.M., Cameron, M., Citta, J., Crawford, J., Dietz, R., Elias, J., Ferguson, S.H., Fisk, A., Folkow, L.P., Frost, K.J., Glazov, D.M., Granquist, S.M., Gryba, R., Harwood, L., Haug, T., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Hussey, N.E., Kalinek, J., Laidre, K.L., Litovka, D.I., London, J.M., Loseto, L.L., MacPhee, S., Marcoux, M., Matthews, C.J.D., Nilssen, K., Nordøy, E.S., O’Corry-Crowe, G., Øien, N., Olsen, M.T., Quakenbush, L., Rosing-Asvid. A., Semenova, V., Shelden, K.E.W., Shpak, O.V., Stenson, G., Storrie, L., Sveegaard, S., Teilmann, J., Ugarte, F., von Duyke, A.L., Watt, C., Wiig, Ø., Wilson, R.R., Yurkowski, D.J. and Kovacs, K.M. 2022. Marine mammal hotspots across the circumpolar Arctic. <i>Diversity and Distribution</i> 28(12): 2729-2753.
- Conn, P.B., and Trukhanova, I.S. 2022. Modeling vital rates and age-sex structure of Pacific Arctic phocids: influence on aerial survey correction factors. <i>Marine Mammal Science </i> 39: 648-661.
- London, J.M., Conn, P.B., Hardy, S.K., Richmond, E.L., Ver Hoef, J.M., Cameron, M.F., Crawford, J.A., von Duyke, L.T., Quakenbush, A.L. and Boveng, P.L. 2022. Spring haul-out behavior of seals in the Bering and Chukchi seas. <i>bioRxiv</i>: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.07.487572
- Scherdin, N., Djukarić, J. and Desportes, G. 2022. Bearded seals in the Atlantic Arctic: review of post 2010 knowledge available for informing stock assessments. <i>NAMMCO Scientific Publications</i> 12: https://doi.org/10.7557/3.6883
- Crance, J.L., Berchok, C.L., Kimber, B.M., Harlacher, J.M., Braen, E.K. and Ferguson, M.C. 2022. Year-round distribution of bearded seals, <i>Erignathus barbatus</i>, throughout the Alaskan Chukchi and northern Bering Sea. <i>Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography</i> 206: 105215.
- Olnes, J., Quakenbush, L.T., Nelson, M., Simon, A., Burns, J., and the Ice Seal Committee. 2022. Trends in the subsistence harvest of ice seals in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region, Alaska, 1962–2018. <i>Arctic</i> 75: 449-461.
- Federal Register. 2022. Endangered and threatened species; designation of critical habitat for the Beringia distinct population segment of the bearded seal. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/04/01/2022-06173/endangered-and-threatened-species-designation-of-critical-habitat-for-the-beringia-distinct
- Eldegard, K., Syvertsen, P.O., Bjørge, A., Kovacs, K., Støen, O.-G. and Kooij, J. 2021. Pattedyr: Vurdering av storkobbe <i>Erignathus barbatus</i> for Norge. Rødlista for arter 2021. Artsdatabanken. http://www.artsdatabanken.no/lister/rodlisteforarter/2021/835. (Accessed: 20/11/2023).
- Hendrix, A.M., Lefebvre, K.A., Quakenbush, L., Bryan, A., Stimmelmayr, R., Sheffeld, G., Wisswaesser, G., Willis, M.L., Bowers, E.K., Kendrick, P., Frame, E., Burbacher, T. and Marcinek, D.M. 2021. Ice seals as sentinels for algal toxin presence in the Pacific Arctic and subarctic marine ecosystems. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 37: 1292-1308.
- Llobet, S.M., Ahonen, H., Lydersen, C., Berge, J., Ims, R. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Bearded seal vocalisations across seasons and habitat types in Svalbard, Norway. <i>Polar Biology</i> 44: 1273-1287.
- Bengtsson, O., Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Andersen, M. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Distribution and habitat characteristics of pinnipeds and polar bears (<i>Ursus maritimus</i>) around the Svalbard Archipelago, based on observations from 2005-2018. <i>Polar Research </i> 40: 5326.
- Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Aars, J., Biuw, M., Boltunov, A.N., Born, E.W., Dietz, R., Folkow, L.P., Glazov, D.M., Haug, T., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Kettemer, L.E., Laidre, K.L., Øien, N., Nordøy, E.S., Rikardsen, A.H., Rosing-Asvid, A., Semenova, V., Shpak, O.V., Svegaard, S., Ugarte, F., Wiig, Ø. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Marine mammal hotspots in the Greenland and Barents Seas. <i>Marine Ecology Progress Series </i> 659: 3-28.
- Gryba, R., Huntington, H.P., von Duyke, A.L., Adams, B., Frantz, B., Gatten, J., Harcharek, Q., Olemaun, H., Sarren, R., Skin, J., Henry, G. and Auger-Methe, M. 2021. Indigenous knowledge of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>), ringed seals (<i>Pusa hispida</i>), and spotted seals (<i>Phoca largha</i>) behaviour and habitat use near Utqiagvik, Alaska, USA. <i>Arctic Science</i> 7(4): 832-858. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0052
- Kovacs, K.M., Belikov, S., Boveng, P., Desportes, G., Ferguson, S., Hansen, R., Laidre, K., Stenson, G., Thomas, P., Ugarte, F. and Vongraven, D. 2021. 2021 State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report (SAMBR) Update: 2021. Technical Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat. Akureyri, Iceland.
- Kovacs, K.M., Krafft, B. and Lydersen, C. 2020. Bearded seal (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) pup growth - body size, behavioral plasticity, and survival in a changing climate. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 28: 414-436.
- Heimrich, A.F., Halliday, W.D., Frouin-Mouy, H., Pine, M.K., Juanes, F. and Insley S.J. 2020. Vocalizations of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) and their influence on the soundscape of the western Canadian Arctic. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 37: 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12732
- Olnes, J., Crawford, J., Citta, J.J., Druckenmiller, M.L., von Duyke, A.L., and Quakenbush, L. 2020. Movement, diving, and haul-out behaviors of juvenile bearded seals in the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort seas, 2014–2018. <i>Polar Biology</i> 43: 1307-1320.
- VanWormer, E., Mazet, J. A. K., Hall, A., Gill, V. A., Boveng, P. L., London, J. M., Gelatt, T., Fadely, B. S., Lander, M. E., Sterling, J., Burkanov, V. N., Ream, R. R., Brock, P. M., Rea, L. D., Smith, B. R., Jeffers, A., Henstock, M., Rehberg, M. J., Burek-Huntington, K. A., Cosby, S. L., Hammund, J.A., and Goldstein, T. 2019. Viral emergence in marine mammals in the North Pacific may be linked to Arctic sea ice reduction. <i>Scientific reports</i> 9(1): 15569.
- Hamilton, C.D., Kovacs, K.M. and Lydersen, C. 2019. Sympatric use of a glacial fjord by two Arctic endemic seals. <i>Marine Ecology Progress Series</i> 615: 205-220.
- Chernook, V.I., Trukhanova, I.S., Vasiliev, A.N., Litovka, D.I., Glazov, D.M. and Burkanov, V.N. 2019. First instrumental aerial survey of ringed seals (<i>Pusa hispida</i>) and bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) in the Russian zone of the Chukchi and East-Siberian Seas in spring 2016 [in Russian]. <i>Известия ТИНРО</i> 199(4): 152-162. https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2019-199-152-162
- Nelson, M.A., Quakenbush, L.T., Taras, B.T. and the Ice Seal Committee. 2019. Subsistence harvest of ringed, bearded, spotted, and ribbon seals in Alaska is sustainable. <i>Endangered Species Research</i> 40: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00973
- Grebmeier, J.M., Frey, K.E., Cooper, L.W. and Kędra, M. 2018. Trends in benthic macrofaunal populations, seasonal sea ice persistence, and bottom water temperatures in the Bering Strait region. <i>Oceanography</i> 31: 136–151.
- Citta, J.J., Lowry, L.F., Quakenbush, L.T., Kelly, B.P., Fischbach, A.S., London, J.M., Jay, C.V., Frost, K.J., O’Corry Crowe, G., Crawford, J.A., Boveng, P.L., Camerons, M., Von Duyke, A.L., Nelson, M., Harwood, L.A., Richard, P., Suydam, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Hobbs, R.C., Litovka, D.I., Marcoux, M., Whiting, A., Kennedy, A.S., George, J.C., Orr, J., and T. Gray. 2018. A multi-species synthesis of satellite telemetry data in the Pacific Arctic (1987-2015): Overlap of marine mammal distributions and core use areas. <i>Deep-Sea Research II</i> 152: 132-153.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Kovacs, K.M. 2025. Erignathus barbatus (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T8010A258586234. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
Morphologie(4)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (5)— redirigent vers cette page
- Phoca barbataErxleben, 1777
- Phoca lepecheniiLesson, 1828
- Phoca leporinaLepechin, 1778
- Phoca parsoniiLesson, 1828
- Phoca parsonsiiLesson, 1828
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).