Ontologia
Phoque barbu

Phoque barbu

Erignathus barbatus(Erxleben, 1777)

NTLR Monde (IUCN)
  1. Animal
  2. Chordata
  3. Mammalia
  4. Carnivora
  5. Phocidae
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir

Description

espèce de mammifères

Source : Wikidata

Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Chargement du graphe…

Indicateurs du réseau écologique

Comment lire ce graphe

Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Erignathus barbatus et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.

Limites principales

  • Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
  • Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
  • Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
  • Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
  • Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
  • Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.

Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées

Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :

  • Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
  • Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
  • Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
  • Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
  • Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)

Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).

Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).

Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata

145 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.

Partenaires
145
Espèces avec interactions documentées
Types d'interactions
7
Prédation, pollinisation, parasitisme…
Connectance
0.077
Densité des liens dans le sous-graphe affiché
Rang animalia
98 %
Percentile vs ensemble des animalia

Liste rouge IUCN

NT · Quasi menacéecritères A3ce?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2025 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
5000 m
État de la populationExpert
Population sizes and trends are unknown for Bearded Seals within the European marine assessment area (see Kovacs et al. 2021 for a summary). The species has never been surveyed in Svalbard or western Russian waters. In northeast Greenland some survey effort has been undertaken in the Northeast Water Polynya area (NEW) for marine mammals generally, with some few Bearded Seals sighting (eight in winter and 14 in summer) in quite vast areas (c. 9,000 and 30,000 km2), so a population estimate was not possible based on these data (NAMMCO 2023). The natural low density of Bearded Seals and the fact that they spend very little of their time hauled out outside the moulting season (5%; Hamilton et al. 2018) makes it very challenging to determine the abundance of this species. Additionally, numbers on the surface are heavily influenced by wind and temperature conditions as well as seasonal patterns (Hamilton et al. 2018, London et al. 2022; see Scherdin et al. 2022 for more details). However, their distinctive spring breeding calls are easily monitored using passive acoustic listening/recording networks and such data suggests that this species remains widespread in the Atlantic Arctic (Moore et al. 2012, Ahonen et al. 2017, Llobet et al. 2023).

In other parts of the world, Bearded Seal abundance has been estimated, though most reports note that there are many regional gaps and that the species is in fact data deficient. Additionally, many older estimates should be considered educated guesses as opposed to actual estimates. Heide-Jørgensen et al. (2013, 2016) produced estimates for Bearded Seals in the North Water Polynya in West Greenland of some 6,000 animals. This is likely an underestimate for this important hotspot, given that these authors applied a Ringed Seal haul-out correction factor of 41% and available data suggests that individual Bearded Seals spend much less time than this on the ice surface (Hamilton et al. 2018). Fuirst et al. (2023) provide a thorough review of Bearded Seal estimates in Canadian waters, concluding that data coverage is too fragmentary to provide a comprehensive abundance estimate or trend, but regional populations range from some hundreds to low thousands of animals.

Population estimation of Bearded Seals has received considerable effort in the Pacific Arctic. A comprehensive review by Cameron et al. (2010) concluded that combined estimates for all regions in the Pacific Arctic summed to some 250,000 animals. More recently, Ver Hoef et al. (2014) analysed line transect survey data from the Bering Sea collected in spring 2007 using a series of models and estimated there were 61,800 Bearded Seals (95% CI 34,900–171,600) in their study area. A lot of effort has gone into methods to extrapolate survey observations to abundance estimates in the broad Pacific region for ice-seals (Conn et al. 2014, 2015, 2016; McClintock et al. 2015, Sigler et al. 2015), but only estimates from Russian territories have been published to date (in the Russian scientific literature) from the large-scale survey efforts. These studies suggest 42,000 Bearded Seals occurred in the Russian parts of the Bering Sea and 14,590 (CV 31%) were in the Russian parts of the Chukchi and Eastern Siberian Sea (Chernook et al. 2018, 2019). Boveng (in NAMMCO 2023) suggested that the total population size for the Bering and Chukchi Sea was 500,000, but Conn and Trukhanova (2022) concluded that abundance estimates from the large-scale aerial surveys for Bearded Seals (and Ringed Seals) in particular should be interpreted with caution because of the lack of age-sex specific data for calculating correction factors; low area coverage (2%) and low numbers of sighting in vast areas are additional concerns. However, close-kin mark-recapture estimates for Bearded Seals in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas (Quakenbush, in NAMMCO 2023, citing Taras et al. 2023) also produce a large population estimate number - 409,000 (CV = 0.35). This region of shallow seas is undoubtedly a stronghold for Bearded Seal (Citta et al. 2018). Crance et al. (2022) found a year-round presence of Bearded Seals based on acoustics, throughout the Alaskan Chukchi and northern Bering Sea.

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 9_2_1
    Oil spills
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 9_6_3
    Noise pollution
    Negligible declinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_4_2
    Intentional use: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownPast, Unlikely to Return
  • 11_1
    Habitat shifting & alteration
    Slow, Significant DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
  • 5_4_1
    Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    No declineMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Global climate warming is currently causing major reductions in the extent and duration of sea ice cover in the Arctic, creating a threat to all ice-associated marine mammals. Bearded Seals are dependent on sea ice for pupping, moulting, resting, and access to foraging areas (Laidre et al. 2008, 2015; Huntington et al. 2016, 2017; Kovacs 2011, 2012, 2018, 2021). Increasing disease risks with a warming climate is a major concern; Bearded Seals experienced significant mortality during a recent UME (unexplained mortality event) in the Pacific Arctic (Vanwormer et al. 2019, Barratclough et al. 2023). Declines in calling rates have been detected in areas where Atlantic Water intrusions are increasingly common in areas where Arctic Water prevailed some decades ago in the Atlantic Arctic (Llobet et al. 2021) and sightings rates have declined in the southern parts of Svalbard (while increasing in the northern parts of the archipelago; Bengtsson et al. 2021). Increases in toxic algal blooms in the Arctic are a special concern for the benthically-feeding Bearded Seal in a climate change context, as are reductions in benthic production (Grebmeier et al. 2018, Hendrix et al. 2021).

Increasing development and industrialisation of the Arctic may threaten Bearded Seals in several ways. Oil spills from offshore extraction and transportation could negatively affect them through direct contact with oil and damage to foraging areas and stocks of prey, particularly benthic invertebrates, that are vulnerable to oil contamination. An increase in human-created noise in the Arctic could cause marine mammals, including Bearded Seals that are very vocal during their breeding season, to abandon areas of habitat they otherwise might use. Increased shipping will pose a greater threat of marine accidents and disturbance of marine mammals. Cameron et al. (2010) concluded that these factors could constitute low to moderate threats to Bearded Seals.

Hunting by indigenous peoples continues throughout most of the species’ range. There is no evidence of population-level impacts from hunting. Reports from Alaska Native subsistence hunters do not give any indication that Bearded Seal numbers have declined (Quakenbush et al. 2011) and Nelson et al. (2019) assessed Alaskan harvests as sustainable.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 10_1Marine Oceanic - Epipelagic (0-200m)
  • 10_2Marine Oceanic - Mesopelagic (200-1000m)
  • 17Other
  • 9_1Marine Neritic - Pelagic
  • 9_4Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy
  • 9_5Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy-Mud
  • 9_6Marine Neritic - Subtidal Muddy
  • 12_2Marine Intertidal - Sandy Shoreline and/or Beaches, Sand Bars, Spits, Etc
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Norway listed Bearded Seals on the national Red List in 2021 (as Near Threatened) because of the threats posed to the species through habitat deterioration due to global warming (Eldegard et al. 2021). However, licensed hunters can shoot Bearded Seals in Svalbard, outside protected areas and during open seasons, that are set in periods when Bearded Seals shot in the water are least likely to sink (Kovacs and Lydersen 2006). Bearded Seals are able to use glacier ice pieces that have calved into the sea as haul-out platforms, so tidal glacier fronts are increasingly important to them in areas where sea ice declines are marked and where tide-water glaciers are common (Lydersen et al. 2014). Such glacier fjords occur mainly in East Greenland, Svalbard and Frans Josef Land i.e. in the European Mammal Assessment Area. These areas might represent important breeding refugia for some time to come, so should be considered for special conservation status. Throughout Russia, including the European Assessment Area, the “Law of Fisheries and Preservation of Aquatic Resources” provides for subsistence harvest of seals by aboriginal Russian peoples, including Bearded Seals.

The species is included on Annex V (animal and plant species of community interest whose taking in the wild and exploitation may be subject to management measures) of the EU Habitats Directive, and on Appendix III (protected fauna species) of the Bern Convention (Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats.

The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada assessed this species in Canada as being of high priority conservation concern. In the USA they are listed on as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (Federal Registry 2012 - ESA 77 FR 76740) because of the threats from climate change (Cameron et al. 2010). This has resulted in a Designation of Critical Habitat for the Beringia Bearded Seal Population (Federal Register 2022). The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the taking of Bearded Seals except for Alaska Native subsistence hunts or for production of handicrafts.

Both the research community and Arctic indigenous knowledge holders call for changing ice concentrations to be considered in the management and conservation of this species (Gryba et al. 2021, Kovacs et al. 2021).

Further habitat and population monitoring is recommended.
Actions de conservation (1)Expert
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
Stress écologiques (7)Expert
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 1Food - human
    nationalsubsistance
  • 10Wearing apparel, accessories
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (5)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Palearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Marine

Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs)

Barents SeaArctic OceanWest Greenland ShelfIberian CoastalEast Greenland ShelfIceland ShelfFaroe Plateau ShelfNorth SeaNorwegian SeaCeltic-Biscay

Zones de pêche FAO

Arctic SeaAtlantic - northeast
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2025. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 27 March 2025).
  2. Taras, B.D., Conn, P.B., Bravington, M.V., Quakenbush, L., Kilian, A., Lang, A.R. and Bryan, A. 2023. <i>Close-kin mark-recapture used to estimate bearded seal population abundance and demographics. (poster)</i>. Alaska Marine Science Symposium, January 2023, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  3. NAMMCO. 2023. Report of the NAMMCO Panarctic Bearded Seal Workshop. March 2023. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO), Tromsø. Available at: https://nammco.no/scientific-workshops-symposia-reports
  4. Barratclough, A., Ferguson, S.H., Lydersen, C., Thomas, P.O. and Kovacs, K.M. 2023. A review of circumpolar Arctic marine mammal health – a call to action in a time of rapid environmental change. <i>Pathogens</i> 12: 937.
  5. Society for Marine Mammalogy (SMM). 2023. List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies. June 2023. Yarmouth Port, MA: Committee on Taxonomy, Society for Marine Mammalogy. Available at: <a href="https://marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/">https://marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/</a>. (Accessed: 23 October 2023).
  6. Llobet, S.M., Ahonen, H., Lydersen, C. and Kovacs, K.M. 2023. The Arctic and the future Arctic? Soundscapes and marine mammal communities on the east and west sides of Svalbard characterized through acoustic data. <i>Frontiers in Marine Science</i> 10: 1208049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1208049
  7. Fuirst, M., Ferguson, S.H., Higdon, J.W., Young, B.G., Lea, E.V., Koski, W.R. and Yurkowski, D.J. 2023. A review of aerial survey density estimates of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) in the Canadian Arctic highlights important knowledge gaps and research needs. <i>Polar Biology</i> 46: 1251-1263.
  8. Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Aars, J., Acquarone, M., Atwood, T., Baylis, A., Biuw, M., Boltunov, A.N., Born, E.W., Boveng, P., Brown, T.M., Cameron, M., Citta, J., Crawford, J., Dietz, R., Elias, J., Ferguson, S.H., Fisk, A., Folkow, L.P., Frost, K.J., Glazov, D.M., Granquist, S.M., Gryba, R., Harwood, L., Haug, T., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Hussey, N.E., Kalinek, J., Laidre, K.L., Litovka, D.I., London, J.M., Loseto, L.L., MacPhee, S., Marcoux, M., Matthews, C.J.D., Nilssen, K., Nordøy, E.S., O’Corry-Crowe, G., Øien, N., Olsen, M.T., Quakenbush, L., Rosing-Asvid. A., Semenova, V., Shelden, K.E.W., Shpak, O.V., Stenson, G., Storrie, L., Sveegaard, S., Teilmann, J., Ugarte, F., von Duyke, A.L., Watt, C., Wiig, Ø., Wilson, R.R., Yurkowski, D.J. and Kovacs, K.M. 2022. Marine mammal hotspots across the circumpolar Arctic. <i>Diversity and Distribution</i> 28(12): 2729-2753.
  9. Conn, P.B., and Trukhanova, I.S. 2022. Modeling vital rates and age-sex structure of Pacific Arctic phocids: influence on aerial survey correction factors. <i>Marine Mammal Science </i> 39: 648-661.
  10. London, J.M., Conn, P.B., Hardy, S.K., Richmond, E.L., Ver Hoef, J.M., Cameron, M.F., Crawford, J.A., von Duyke, L.T., Quakenbush, A.L. and Boveng, P.L. 2022. Spring haul-out behavior of seals in the Bering and Chukchi seas. <i>bioRxiv</i>: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.07.487572
  11. Scherdin, N., Djukarić, J. and Desportes, G. 2022. Bearded seals in the Atlantic Arctic: review of post 2010 knowledge available for informing stock assessments. <i>NAMMCO Scientific Publications</i> 12: https://doi.org/10.7557/3.6883
  12. Crance, J.L., Berchok, C.L., Kimber, B.M., Harlacher, J.M., Braen, E.K. and Ferguson, M.C. 2022. Year-round distribution of bearded seals, <i>Erignathus barbatus</i>, throughout the Alaskan Chukchi and northern Bering Sea. <i>Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography</i> 206: 105215.
  13. Olnes, J., Quakenbush, L.T., Nelson, M., Simon, A., Burns, J., and the Ice Seal Committee. 2022. Trends in the subsistence harvest of ice seals in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region, Alaska, 1962–2018. <i>Arctic</i> 75: 449-461.
  14. Federal Register. 2022. Endangered and threatened species; designation of critical habitat for the Beringia distinct population segment of the bearded seal. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/04/01/2022-06173/endangered-and-threatened-species-designation-of-critical-habitat-for-the-beringia-distinct
  15. Eldegard, K., Syvertsen, P.O., Bjørge, A., Kovacs, K., Støen, O.-G. and Kooij, J. 2021. Pattedyr: Vurdering av storkobbe <i>Erignathus barbatus</i> for Norge. Rødlista for arter 2021. Artsdatabanken. http://www.artsdatabanken.no/lister/rodlisteforarter/2021/835. (Accessed: 20/11/2023).
  16. Hendrix, A.M., Lefebvre, K.A., Quakenbush, L., Bryan, A., Stimmelmayr, R., Sheffeld, G., Wisswaesser, G., Willis, M.L., Bowers, E.K., Kendrick, P., Frame, E., Burbacher, T. and Marcinek, D.M. 2021. Ice seals as sentinels for algal toxin presence in the Pacific Arctic and subarctic marine ecosystems. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 37: 1292-1308.
  17. Llobet, S.M., Ahonen, H., Lydersen, C., Berge, J., Ims, R. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Bearded seal vocalisations across seasons and habitat types in Svalbard, Norway. <i>Polar Biology</i> 44: 1273-1287.
  18. Bengtsson, O., Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Andersen, M. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Distribution and habitat characteristics of pinnipeds and polar bears (<i>Ursus maritimus</i>) around the Svalbard Archipelago, based on observations from 2005-2018. <i>Polar Research </i> 40: 5326.
  19. Hamilton, C.D., Lydersen, C., Aars, J., Biuw, M., Boltunov, A.N., Born, E.W., Dietz, R., Folkow, L.P., Glazov, D.M., Haug, T., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Kettemer, L.E., Laidre, K.L., Øien, N., Nordøy, E.S., Rikardsen, A.H., Rosing-Asvid, A., Semenova, V., Shpak, O.V., Svegaard, S., Ugarte, F., Wiig, Ø. and Kovacs, K.M. 2021. Marine mammal hotspots in the Greenland and Barents Seas. <i>Marine Ecology Progress Series </i> 659: 3-28.
  20. Gryba, R., Huntington, H.P., von Duyke, A.L., Adams, B., Frantz, B., Gatten, J., Harcharek, Q., Olemaun, H., Sarren, R., Skin, J., Henry, G. and Auger-Methe, M. 2021. Indigenous knowledge of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>), ringed seals (<i>Pusa hispida</i>), and spotted seals (<i>Phoca largha</i>) behaviour and habitat use near Utqiagvik, Alaska, USA. <i>Arctic Science</i> 7(4): 832-858. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0052
  21. Kovacs, K.M., Belikov, S., Boveng, P., Desportes, G., Ferguson, S., Hansen, R., Laidre, K., Stenson, G., Thomas, P., Ugarte, F. and Vongraven, D. 2021. 2021 State of the Arctic Marine Biodiversity Report (SAMBR) Update: 2021. Technical Report. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat. Akureyri, Iceland.
  22. Kovacs, K.M., Krafft, B. and Lydersen, C. 2020. Bearded seal (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) pup growth - body size, behavioral plasticity, and survival in a changing climate. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 28: 414-436.
  23. Heimrich, A.F., Halliday, W.D., Frouin-Mouy, H., Pine, M.K., Juanes, F. and Insley S.J. 2020. Vocalizations of bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) and their influence on the soundscape of the western Canadian Arctic. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 37: 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12732
  24. Olnes, J., Crawford, J., Citta, J.J., Druckenmiller, M.L., von Duyke, A.L., and Quakenbush, L. 2020. Movement, diving, and haul-out behaviors of juvenile bearded seals in the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort seas, 2014–2018. <i>Polar Biology</i> 43: 1307-1320.
  25. VanWormer, E., Mazet, J. A. K., Hall, A., Gill, V. A., Boveng, P. L., London, J. M., Gelatt, T., Fadely, B. S., Lander, M. E., Sterling, J., Burkanov, V. N., Ream, R. R., Brock, P. M., Rea, L. D., Smith, B. R., Jeffers, A., Henstock, M., Rehberg, M. J., Burek-Huntington, K. A., Cosby, S. L., Hammund, J.A., and Goldstein, T. 2019. Viral emergence in marine mammals in the North Pacific may be linked to Arctic sea ice reduction. <i>Scientific reports</i> 9(1): 15569.
  26. Hamilton, C.D., Kovacs, K.M. and Lydersen, C. 2019. Sympatric use of a glacial fjord by two Arctic endemic seals. <i>Marine Ecology Progress Series</i> 615: 205-220.
  27. Chernook, V.I., Trukhanova, I.S., Vasiliev, A.N., Litovka, D.I., Glazov, D.M. and Burkanov, V.N. 2019. First instrumental aerial survey of ringed seals (<i>Pusa hispida</i>) and bearded seals (<i>Erignathus barbatus</i>) in the Russian zone of the Chukchi and East-Siberian Seas in spring 2016 [in Russian]. <i>Известия ТИНРО</i> 199(4): 152-162. https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2019-199-152-162
  28. Nelson, M.A., Quakenbush, L.T., Taras, B.T. and the Ice Seal Committee. 2019. Subsistence harvest of ringed, bearded, spotted, and ribbon seals in Alaska is sustainable. <i>Endangered Species Research</i> 40: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00973
  29. Grebmeier, J.M., Frey, K.E., Cooper, L.W. and Kędra, M. 2018. Trends in benthic macrofaunal populations, seasonal sea ice persistence, and bottom water temperatures in the Bering Strait region. <i>Oceanography</i> 31: 136–151.
  30. Citta, J.J., Lowry, L.F., Quakenbush, L.T., Kelly, B.P., Fischbach, A.S., London, J.M., Jay, C.V., Frost, K.J., O’Corry Crowe, G., Crawford, J.A., Boveng, P.L., Camerons, M., Von Duyke, A.L., Nelson, M., Harwood, L.A., Richard, P., Suydam, R., Heide-Jørgensen, M.P., Hobbs, R.C., Litovka, D.I., Marcoux, M., Whiting, A., Kennedy, A.S., George, J.C., Orr, J., and T. Gray. 2018. A multi-species synthesis of satellite telemetry data in the Pacific Arctic (1987-2015): Overlap of marine mammal distributions and core use areas. <i>Deep-Sea Research II</i> 152: 132-153.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Kovacs, K.M.
evaluator
Wiig, Ø. & Allen, D.J.

Kovacs, K.M. 2025. Erignathus barbatus (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T8010A258586234. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

20 valeurs · 6 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
373 kg
AnAge
Masse naissance
35 kg
AnAge
Masse au sevrage
75,8 kg
AnAge
Longueur
2,3 m
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
31 ans
PanTHERIA
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Sevrage
4 sem.
AnAge
Taille de portée
1
AnAge
Maturité sexuelle
6,1 ans
AnAge
Portées par an
1
AnAge
Gestation
8,5 mois
AnAge
Intervalle naissances
1,7 ans
AnAge

Écologie & habitat(9)

Invertébrés (%)
60 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Fruits (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
40 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale

Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (5)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Phoca barbataErxleben, 1777
  • Phoca lepecheniiLesson, 1828
  • Phoca leporinaLepechin, 1778
  • Phoca parsoniiLesson, 1828
  • Phoca parsonsiiLesson, 1828

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).