Ontologia
Loutre de mer

Loutre de mer

Enhydra lutris(Linnaeus, 1758)

ENLR Monde (IUCN)
5 photos · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir

Description

espèce de mammifères

Source : Wikidata

Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Enhydra lutris.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

EN · En dangercritères A2abeDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2021 · v3.1
Altitude
00 m
Profondeur
820 m
État de la populationExpert

In the early 1700s, the worldwide population was estimated to be between 150,000 (Kenyon 1969) and 300,000 individuals (Johnson 1982), occurring along the North Pacific from northern Japan to the central Baja Peninsula in Mexico. Its abundance was greatly reduced by human exploitation. Although it appears that First Nations harvests periodically led to local reductions of Sea Otters (Simenstad et al. 1978, Jones et al. 2011), the species remained abundant throughout its range until the mid-1700s. Following the arrival in Alaska of Russian explorers in 1741, extensive commercial harvest of Sea Otters over the next 150 years resulted in the near extirpation of the species. When sea otters were afforded protection by the International Fur Seal Treaty in 1911, probably fewer than 2,000 animals remained in 13 remnant colonies (Kenyon 1969): two in the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka; one in the Commander Islands; a total of 10 in the following areas: Aleutian Islands (2) and along the Alaska Peninsula (3); Kodiak Archipelago (1), Prince William Sound (1), the Queen Charlotte Islands (1), central California (1), and San Benito Islands (1). However, the Queen Charlotte, Canada and San Benito Island, Mexico remnant Sea Otter populations became extinct and likely did not contribute to the recolonization of the species following near extirpation (Kenyon 1969).

Sea Otters currently have established populations in parts of the Kuril Islands, the Russian east coast, throughout coastal Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, and California, and there have been reports of single-animal observations in Mexico and Japan (a recent maximum of 20 in the latter). Population estimates and counts made between 2000–2018 give a generalised worldwide estimate of 128,902 Sea Otters. However, many populations have not been surveyed regularly or recently. The biggest change during this time being the decrease in the northern Kuril Islands and the Kamchatka Peninsula which have declined from approximately 22,000 Sea Otters to approximately 12,100 since the early 2000s (Kornev 2007, Kornev 2010), representing a decline of approximately 55% for this subpopulation within the last 21 years (three generations). This is a long-established region for Sea Otters (holding approximately 9–10% of the global population) and there are no documented reasons for this decline. The population in the Commander Islands is believed to be stable and had one of the longest time-series for population surveys for the species—however, this region has not been surveyed since the late 1990s. It is thought that budget restrictions have prevented any current population assessments for the species in this region.

In Alaska, precipitous population declines occurred in the Aleutian Islands beginning in the late 1980s–2005. In the 1980s, around 90,000 Sea Otters were thought to occur in the Aleutian Islands. By 2000,this population had decreased by 90% (to around 9,000), with a declining trend continuing through to 2005 and an estimated loss to the population of 62,000–90,000 Sea Otters (Burn et al. 2003, Doroff et al. 2003, Estes et al. 2005, Burn and Doroff 2005). The probable cause of the decline was increased predation by Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) (Estes et al. 1998). To date, there is no indication of further declines in counts and no real indication that the population is showing signs of significant recovery. Population counts also remain low for the Alaska Peninsula (Burn and Doroff 2005, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stock Assessment Reports). In this listed population, the Kodiak archipelago and lower Cook Inlet appeared stable or increasing during the same period that population declines were documented in the Aleutian chain. A generalised estimate of Sea Otter numbers in Alaska is 98,780 (representing around 77% of the global population); in addition to ~9,000 in the Aleutian Islands, there are ~16,340 on the Alaskan Peninsula, ~46,700 in the Gulf of Alaska, and 25,700 in Southeast Alaska, however, many of these areas have not been surveyed thoroughly for over a decade (S. Larson pers. comm. 2021).

Between 1969 and 1972, 89 Sea Otters were translocated from Alaska (66% from Prince William Sound and 33% from Amchitka Island in the Aleutians) to the west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, where they established a healthy population. Sea Otter range expansion has continued and in 2008 it was documented that they have left Vancouver Island and moved into northern Queen Charlotte Strait and the adjacent British Columbia mainland coast and in some portions of the central British Columbia mainland coast. The most recent population estimate is 6,754 (Nichol et al. 2015), representing around 7–8% of the global population.

During 1969 and 1970, 59 Sea Otters were translocated from the remnant population of Amchitka Island to Washington State. The most recent surveys in 2019 indicate the population is approximately 2,785 (around 2% of the global population) with an estimated average annual growth rate of 9.8% and continued range expansion is expected (Jefferies et al. 2019).

California's Sea Otters are the descendants of a single colony of about 50 southern Sea Otters discovered near Big Sur in 1938. The southern Sea Otter population in California is recovering to near its threshold for delisting under the Endangered Species Act (1973), however, the present distribution is only a fraction of the historic distribution (Tinker et al. 2019). The latest survey results report a three-year average of 2,962 Sea Otters (around 2% of the global population), including the mainland and the San Nicolas Island population, which represents a <1% growth rate per year (Hatfield et al. 2019). Population range expansion has been greatly impacted by shark-bite mortality in the northern end of the subspecies’ range (Hatfield et al. 2019). The Pacific Northwest has had major reductions in canopy-forming kelp in the past decade due to the loss of sea stars through a wasting disease and now an abundance of urchins that graze intensively on kelp (Roger-Bennett and Catton 2019). The giant kelp likely afforded Sea Otters protection from shark predation, and the loss of this habitat has been a factor intensifying the predation. On the southern end of the range, at San Nicolas Island, the reintroduced population originally established in the mid-1980s from the Central California population is now well established, numbering over 100 animals, and has an estimated annual growth rate of 10.5% for the past five years (Hatfield et al. 2019). Schramm et al. 2014, based on reports of sea otters in Baja California, Mexico, suggested that a higher frequency of Sea Otters than in the past.

In Japan, small numbers of Sea Otters (E. l. lutris) have been observed regularly on the eastern side of Hokkaido Islands since the 1970s (Hattori et al. 2005). The most recent estimate is 20 individuals, but at present this is not believed to be an established population.

Menaces identifiées(10 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 5_1_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
  • 5_4_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
  • 5_4_5
    Persecution/control
    Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 6_1
    Recreational activities
    Rapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 9_2_1
    Oil spills
    Rapid DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
  • 11_4
    Storms & flooding
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsWhole (>90%)Future
  • 8_2_2
    Named species
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 8_4_2
    Named species
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 8_4_2
    Named species
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 8_5_2
    Named species
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert

Oil spills are the greatest anthropogenic threat to Sea Otters (Geraci and Williams 1990). Sea Otters become hypothermic when oiled because oiled Sea Otter fur loses its insulation property and Sea Otters have no blubber layer. Oil can be ingested while grooming, leading to gastrointestinal disorders, other ailments and death. Thevolatile components of oil inhaled by sea otters can cause lung damage. Estimates of sea otter mortality following the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound ranged from 2,650 (Garrott et al. 1993) to 3,905 (DeGange et al. 1994).

Significant numbers of Sea Otters drowned in gill and trammel nets in California from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s (Estes 1990). Population declines in California’s sea otters may be incidental to summer commercial fisheries. Estes et al. (2003) found that Sea Otter mortality was elevated in the summer months and that commercial fin fish landings in the coastal live trap fishery increased.

An ongoing and long-term study of sea otter health, body condition, and causes of death for the southern Sea Otter indicate that shark bite mortality is the most common primary cause of death followed by acanthocephalan peritonitis, probable domoic acid intoxication, cardomyopathy, end-of-lactation-syndrome, and primary bacterial infection (Miller et al. 2017, Hatfield et al. 2019). In Alaska, Streptococcal endocarditis, encephalitis and/or septicemia, referred to as Strep. syndrome has been identified in northern Sea Otters, as well as trauma from boat strikes. Goldstein et al. (2009) found northern Sea Otters from the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak and Kachemak Bay area infected with phocine distemper.

Killer Whales (Orcinus orca), Great White Sharks (Carcharodon carcharias), Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Coyotes (Canis latrans), wolves (Canis lupus), and Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) have been documented as predators of Sea Otters (Riedman and Estes 1990). Predation by Killer Whales is one factor believed to have caused Sea Otter population declines across the Western Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands (Doroff et al. 2003, Estes et al. 1998, Hatfield et al. 1998). Significant declines in preferred prey species populations—Northern Fur Seals (Callorhinus ursinus), Harbour Seals (Phoca vitulina), and Steller Sea Lions (Eumetopias jubatus) are believed to have caused Killer Whales to prey switch and consume Sea Otters, a less preferred prey because of their lack of blubber layer (Estes et al. 1998).

Unquantified environmental stressors to all the subspecies populations may include future ocean conditions becoming warmer, acidifying, and deoxygenating (IPCC 2019). Warmer oceans favour the range expansion and prevalence of dinoflagellate phytoplankton, many of which are toxin producing and will impact Sea Otter prey in ways that are not yet understood. In California, effects of harmful algal and cyanobacterial blooms may be acute or chronic on Sea Otters (Kreuder et al. 2003, Miller et al. 2010, Miller et al. 2017). Ongoing studies are looking at the living population and data from necropsies to elucidate the complex relationship between cardiomyopathy and domoic acid exposure (Moriarty et al. 2019). Work in Alaska suggests that Sea Otters can detect and avoid consuming clams with low levels of saxitoxin or paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) that is accumulated in Butter Clams (Saxidomus gigantea; Kvitek et al. 1991, Kvitek and Bretz 2004). Recent studies have shown saxitoxins increase in toxicity through biochemical changes associated with lower pH (Roggatz et al. 2019), this has the potential to decrease available prey in future scenarios for Sea Otters. Bivalves are an important prey species for Sea Otters living in soft-sediment habitat regions, like the Kodiak archipelago, where Butter Clams constitute >50% of the Sea Otter diet. In addition, calcium carbonate shell forming bivalves are thought to decrease with increasing ocean acidification (Waldbusser et al. 2015). The effect that changing and decreasing bivalve abundance will have on Sea Otter populations is unprecedented, is likely to be negative.

Studies in Alaska, and Washington have shown that Sea Otter predation on sea urchins may indirectly enhance the growth of kelp and kelp-associated marine communities. Shellfish are important to commercial, recreational, and tribal fisheries throughout the species range, and predation by sea otters can be significant and result in localized depletion of commercial and subsistence shell fisheries. Emerging studies are looking at the benefits of kelp-dominated ecosystems such as increasing fin fish populations and ecosystem stability in the face of climate change (Markel and Shurin 2015).

Toxoplasmosis, a disease caused by Toxoplasma gondii, is a major cause of mortality and contributor to the slow rate of population recovery for southern Sea Otters in California (Conrad et al. 2005). Thomas and Cole (1996) reported that mortality from infectious diseases, such as peritonitis, protozoal encephalitis, toxoplasmosis, etc. were occurring at a high rate, wherein, some diseases appeared to be on the rise while others were newly reported. Several of the diseases were predominately affecting prime age, breeding adults.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 10_1Marine Oceanic - Epipelagic (0-200m)
  • 9_2Marine Neritic - Subtidal Rock and Rocky Reefs
  • 9_3Marine Neritic - Subtidal Loose Rock/pebble/gravel
  • 9_7Marine Neritic - Macroalgal/Kelp
  • 9_10Marine Neritic - Estuaries
  • 9_4Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy
  • 9_5Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy-Mud
  • 9_6Marine Neritic - Subtidal Muddy
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Enhydra lutris nereis is listed on CITES Appendix I. All other populations are included in CITES Appendix II. In Canada, sea otters are protected and managed under the Species at Risk Act (SARA). In the United States, Sea Otters are protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) and in Southwest Alaska and California, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is the federal agency responsible for their conservation and management. The ESA also makes it illegal to buy, sell or possess any part of endangered species or items made from them. However, both the ESA and the MMPA allow for coastal Native people in Alaska to harvest Sea Otters for personal use, trade, barter, and the development of cottage industry. Native subsistence harvest of sea otters is monitored by the Service through a Marking, Tagging and Reporting program. The Service and Native organizations conduct joint population surveys and dialog on important conservations issues. The MMPA also mandates that efforts must be made to recover the species, which means creating and implementing a plan for returning them to healthy population levels.
Actions de conservation (5)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 2_3Habitat & natural process restoration
  • 3_2Species recovery
Stress écologiques (14)Expert
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 1_3Indirect ecosystem effects
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Usage & commerce (2)Expert
  • 10Wearing apparel, accessories
    subsistance
  • 9Construction or structural materials
    subsistance
Priorités de recherche (7)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_4Harvest, use & livelihoods
  • 1_5Threats
  • 2_2Area-based Management Plan
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_2Harvest level trends
  • 4Other
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

NearcticPalearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

TerrestrialMarine

Zones de pêche FAO

Atlantic - northwest
Références bibliographiques (30)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
  2. IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 09 December 2021).
  3. Moriarty, M.E, Miller, M.A., Tinker, M.T., Kudela, R.M., Zubkousky-White, V., Tomoleoni, J.A., Fujii, J.A., Staedler, M.M., Greenwald, K., Batac, F.I., Dodd, E.M., Negrey, K.H. and Johnson, C.K. 2019. Longitudinal assessment of domoic acid exposure and relative hazard to death due to cardiomyopathy in southern sea otters (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>). Presentation at the sea otter workshop in Seattle Mar 2019.
  4. Rogers-Bennett, L. and Catton, C.A. 2019. Marine heat wave and multiple stressors tip bull kelp forest to sea urchin barrens. <i>Sci Rep</i> 9: 15050.
  5. Jeffries, S., Lynch, D., Waddell, J., Ament, S. and Pasi, C. 2019. Results of the 2019 survey of the reintroduced sea otter population in Washington State. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lakewood, Washington, USA.
  6. Tinker, M.T., Tomoleoni, J.A., Weitzman, B.P., Staedler, M., Jessup, D., Murray, M.J., Miller, M., Burgess, T., Bowen, L., Miles, A.K. and Thometz, N. 2019. Southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) population biology at Big Sur and Monterey, California--Investigating the consequences of resource abundance and anthropogenic stressors for sea otter recovery (No. 2019-1022). US Geological Survey.
  7. IPCC. 2019. Summary for Policymakers. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M. Weyer (eds.)]. (in press).
  8. Davis, R.W., Bodkin, J.L., Coletti, H.A., Monson, D.H., Larson, S.E., Carswell, L.P. and Nichol, L.M. 2019. Future directions in sea otter research and management. <i>Frontiers in Marine Science</i> 5: 510.
  9. Roggatz, C.C., Fletcher, N., Benoit, D.M., Algar, A.C., Doroff, A., Wright, B., Wollenberg Valero, K.C., and Hardege, J.D. 2019. Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin bioavailability increases in future oceans. <i>Nature Climate Change</i>.
  10. Hatfield, B.B., Yee, J.L., Kenner, M.C., and Tomoleoni, J.A. 2019. California sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>) census results, spring 2019: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1118, 12 p.
  11. Gagne, R.B., Tinker, M.T., Gustafson, K.D., Ralls, K., Larson, S., Tarjan, L.M., Miller, M.A. and Ernest, H.B. 2018. Measures of effective population size in sea otters reveal special considerations for wide‐ranging species. <i>Evolutionary Applications</i> 11(10): 1779-1790.
  12. Miller, M.A., Moriarty, M.E., Dodd, E.M., Burgess, T., Tinker, M.T., Batac, F.I. and Kreuder Johnson, C. 2017. The dead do tell tales: investigating sea otter mortality patterns (1998–2012). Final report. California Coastal Conservancy, Entity, Oakland, California, USA.
  13. Tinker, M.T., Hatfield, B.B., Harris, M.D. and Ames, J.A. 2016. Dramatic increase in sea otter mortality from white sharks in California. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 32: 309–326. doi: 10.1111/mms.12261.
  14. Nichol, L.M., Watson, J.C., Abernethy, R., Rechsteiner, E. and Towers, J. 2015. Trends in the abundance and distribution of sea otters (<i>Enhydra lutris</i>) in British Columbia updated with 2013 survey results. Science Advisory Report 2015/039. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/Publications/ResDocs-DocRech/2015/2015_039-eng.html.
  15. Waldbusser, G.G., Hales, B., Langdon, C.J., Haley, B.A., Schrader, P., Brunner, E.L., Gray, M.W., Miller, C.A. and Gimenez, I. 2015. Saturation-state sensitivity of marine bivalve larvae to ocean acidification. <i>Nature Climate Change</i> 5(3): 273.
  16. Bodkin, J.L. 2015. Historic and contemporary status of sea otters in the North Pacific. In Sea otter conservation (pp. 43-61). Academic Press.
  17. Markel, R.W. and Shurin, J.B. 2015. Indirect effects of sea otters on rockfish (<i>Sebastes</i> spp.) in giant kelp forests. <i>Ecology</i> 96(11): 2877-2890.
  18. Schramm, Y., Heckel, G., Sáenz‐Arroyo, A., López‐Reyes, E., Baez‐Flores, A., Gómez‐Hernández, G. and de los Ángeles Milanés‐Salinas, M. 2014. New evidence for the existence of southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) in Baja California, Mexico. <i>Marine Mammal Science</i> 30: 1264-1271.
  19. USFWS. 2013b. Southwest Alaska DPS of the Northern Sea Otter (<i>Enhydra lutris kenyoni</i>) 5- Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 7, Alaska. 18 pp.
  20. USFWS. 2013a. Southwest Alaska Distinct Population Segment of the Northern Sea Otter (<i>Enhydra lutris kenyoni</i>) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 7, Alaska.
  21. Larson, S., Jameson, R., Etnier, M., Jones, T. and Hall, R. 2012. Genetic diversity and population parameters of sea otters, <i>Enhydra lutris</i>, before fur trade extirpation from 1741–1911. <i>PLoS One</i> 7(3): p.e32205.
  22. Jones, T.L., Culleton, B.J., Larson, S., Mellinger, S. and Porcasi, J.F. 2011. Toward a prehistory of the southern sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>). Human impacts on seals, sea lions, and sea otters: integrating archaeology and ecology in the Northeast Pacific.: 243-71.
  23. Miller, M.A., Kudela, R.M., Mekebri, A., Crane, D., Oates, S.C., Tinker, M.T., Staedler, M., Miller, W.A., Toy-Choutka, S., Dominik, C. 2010. Evidence for a novel marine harmful algal bloom: cyanotoxin (microcystin) transfer from land to sea otters. <i>PLOS ONE</i> 5: e12576.
  24. Johnson, C.K., Tinker, M.T., Estes, J.A., Conrad, P.A., Staedler, M.S., Miller, M.A., Jessup, D. A. and Mazet, J.A. 2009. Prey choice and habitat use drive sea otter pathogen exposure in a resource-limited coastal system. <i>PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i> 106(7): 2242-2247.
  25. Goldstein, T., Mazet, J.A.K., Gill, V.A., Doroff, A.M., Burek, K.A. and Hammond, J.A. 2009. Phocine distemper virus in northern sea otters in the Pacific Ocean, Alaska, USA. <i>Emerging infectious diseases</i> 15: 925-927.
  26. Tinker, M.T., Doak, D.F. and Estes, J.A. 2008. Using demography and movement behavior to predict range expansion of the southern sea otter. <i>Ecological Applications</i> 18(7): 1781-1794.
  27. von Biela, V.R., Testa, J.W., Gill, V.A. and Burns, J.M. 2008. Evaluating cementum to determine past reproduction in northern sea otters. <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i> 72(3): 618-624.
  28. Doroff, A.M. 2007. Sea otter. An update on the species status. Paper presented at Xth International Otter Colloquium, Hwacheon, 2007.
  29. Kornev, S. I. 2007. Estimate of northern sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris lutris</i>) status based on population density and nutrition criteria. <i>Proceedings of the Sea Otter Conservation Workshop</i> 5: 28-30.
  30. Burdin, A. 2007. Recent status of the Commandar Islands population of the Sea Otter. Paper presented at Xth International Otter Colloquium. Hwacheon.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Doroff, A., Burdin, A. & Larson, S.
evaluator
Hussain, S.A. & Duplaix, N.
1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.

Doroff, A., Burdin, A. & Larson, S. 2021. Enhydra lutris (errata version published in 2022). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T7750A219377647. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

22 valeurs · 7 sources

Morphologie(4)

Masse adulte
26 kg
AnAge
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
1,9 kg
AnAge
Masse au sevrage
13,4 kg
AnAge

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
27 ans
AnAge
Voir 17 traits de plus (3 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Maturité sexuelle
2,7 ans
AnAge
Gestation
4,6 mois
AnAge
Intervalle naissances
1,5 ans
AnAge
Taille de portée
1
AnAge
Portées par an
1
AnAge
Sevrage
5,7 mois
AnAge

Écologie & habitat(9)

Fruits (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Invertébrés (%)
50 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
50 %
elton_mammals

Divers(2)

Température corporelle
37,5 °C
AnAge
Taux métabolique
98.48 W
AnAge

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (1)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Mustela lutrisLinnaeus, 1758

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).