Ontologia
Moufette de Molina

Moufette de Molina

Conepatus chinga(Molina, 1782)

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir

Description

espèce de mammifères

Source : Wikidata

Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2016 · v3.1
Altitude
04100 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
This species is locally common. Density value reported for Chile is 5 individuals/km² (Cofré and Marquet 1999). In two different landscapes in Argentina, density values vary from 0.68 to 1.66 individuals/km² (Castillo et al. 2011a).

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_3_2
    Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
    Ongoing
  • 5_1_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Ongoing
  • 8_1_1
    Unspecified species
    Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Molina's Hog-nosed Skunks were heavily hunted for their fur in Argentina during the 1970s and early 1980s (Gruss and Waller 1988). Additionally extensive areas of skunk habitat, including the Patagonian steppe, have been severely degraded through overgrazing and soil erosion by livestock (i.e. primarily sheep) and feral, exotic species (Dinerstein et al. 1995, Novaro et al. 2000).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 3_7Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude
  • 4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 2_1Savanna - Dry
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
Suggested actions needed to reverse the decline of native species living in the Patagonian steppe include: prevent new introductions; create protected areas in the Patagonian steppe where livestock are excluded and the ecological role of native large fauna is restored; study other consequences of the introduction of exotic species and the ecological extinction of native ones (Novaro et al. 2000). It is also considered necessary to include species of Conepatus in CITES Appendix II in order to obtain data on the trade in the different species, to estimate the exploitation level, and to enforce a better control of the exports, and to avoid cases where one of the species can be exported under the name of any of the other species (IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid and Procyonid Specialist Group 1992).
Actions de conservation (2)Expert
  • 2_1Site/area management
  • 5_1_1International level
Stress écologiques (4)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 10Wearing apparel, accessories
    nationalsubsistance
Priorités de recherche (1)Expert
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Neotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (25)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 30 June 2016).
  2. Schiaffini, M.I., Gabrielli, M., Prevosti, F.J., Cardoso, Y.P., Castillo, D., Bo, R., Casanave, E. and Lizarralde, M. 2013. Taxonomic status of southern South American <i>Conepatus</i> (Carnivora: Mephitidae). <i>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</i> 167: 327-344.
  3. Kasper, C.B., Bastazini, V.A., Soares, J.B. and de Freitas, T.R. 2012b. Abundance of <i>Conepatus chinga</i> (Carnivora, Mephitidae) and other medium-sized mammals in grasslands of southern Brazil. <i>Iheringia. Série Zoologia</i> 102(3): 303-310.
  4. Kasper, C.B., Soares, J.B. and Freitas, T.R. 2012a. Differential patterns of home-range, net displacement and resting sites use of <i>Conepatus chinga</i> in southern Brazil. <i>Mammalian Biology - Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</i> 77(5): 358-362.
  5. Castillo, D.F., Lucherini, M. and Casanave, E B. 2011b. Denning ecology of Molina's Hog-nosed Skunk in a farmland area in the Pampas grassland of Argentina. <i>Ecological Research</i> 26(4): 845-850.
  6. Castillo, D.F., Lucherini, M., Luengos Vidal, E.M., Manfredi, C. and Casanave, E.B. 2011a. Spatial organization of Molina's Hog-nosed Skunk (<i>Conepatus chinga</i>) in two landscapes of the Pampas grassland of Argentina. <i>Canadian Journal of Zoology</i> 89(3): 229-238.
  7. Cherem, J. J., Kammers, M., Ghizoni-Jr, I. R., & Martins, A. 2007. Mamíferos de médio e grande porte atropelados em rodovias do Estado de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. <i>Biotemas</i> 20(3): 81-96.
  8. Wozencraft, W.C. 2005. Order Carnivora. In: D.E. Wilson and D.M. Reeder (eds), <i>Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition</i>, pp. 532-628. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  9. dos Santos, M.D.F.M., Pellanda, M., Tomazzoni, A.C., Hasenack, H. & Hartz, S.M. 2004. Mamíferos carnívoros e sua relação com a diversidade de hábitats no Parque Nacional dos Aparados da Serra, sul do Brasil. <i>Iheringia: série zoologia, Porto Alegre</i> 94(3): 235-245.
  10. Donadio, E., di Martino, S., Aubone, M. and Novaro, A. J. 2004. Feeding ecology of the Andean Hog-nosed Skunk (<i>Conepatus chinga</i>) in areas under different land use in north-western Patagonia. <i>Journal of Arid Environments</i> 56(4): 709-718.
  11. Cáceres, N. C. 2004. Occurrence of <i>Conepatus chinga</i> (Molina) (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) and other terrestrial mammals in the Serra do Mar, Paraná, Brazil. <i>Revista Brasileira de Zoologia</i> 21(3): 577–579.
  12. de Vivo, M. and Gregorin, R. 2001. Mamíferos. In: C. Leonel (ed.), <i>Intervales: Fundação Para Conservação e a Produção Florestal do Estado de São Paulo</i>.
  13. Donadio, E., di Martino, S., Aubone, M. and Novaro, A. J. 2001. Activity patterns, home-range, and habitat selection of the Common Hog-nosed Skunk, <i>Conepatus chinga</i> (Mammmalia, Mustelidae), in north-western Patagonia. <i>Mammalia</i> 65: 49-54.
  14. Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C. and Walker, R. S. 2000. Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Patagonia. <i>Biological Conservation</i> 92: 25-33.
  15. Cofré, H. and Marquet, P.A. 1999. Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: an assessment. <i>Biological Conservation</i> 88: 53-68.
  16. Travaini, A., Delibes, M., & Ceballos, O. 1998. Summer foods of the Andean Hog-nosed Skunk (<i>Conepatus chinga</i>) in Patagonia. <i>Journal of Zoology</i> 246: 443-486.
  17. Dragoo, J.W. and Honeycutt, L. 1997. Systematics of mustelid-like carnivores. <i>Journal of Mammalogy</i> 78: 426-443.
  18. Cimardi, A. V. 1996. <i>Mamíferos de Santa Catarina</i>. FATMA, Florianópolis.
  19. Mares, M.A., Barquez, R.M., Braun, J.K. and Ojeda, R.A. 1996. Observations on the mammals of Tucuman Province, Argentina. I. Systematics, distribution, and ecology of the Didelphimorphia, Xenarthra, Chiroptera, Primates, Carnivora, Perissodactyla, Artiodactyla, and Lagomorpha. <i>Annals of Carnegie Museum</i> 65: 89-152.
  20. Dinerstein, E., Olson, D. M., Graham, D. J., Webster, A. L., Primm, S. A., Bookbinder, M. P. and Ledec, G. 1995. A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank and World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
  21. IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid and Procyonid Specialist Group. 1992. Better protection for the Hog-nosed skunk? <i>Small Carnivore Conservation</i> 6.
  22. Redford, K.H. and Eisenberg, J.F. 1992. <i>Mammals of the Neotropics, The Southern Cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay</i>. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
  23. Gruss, J. and Waller, T. 1989. Diagnóstico y recomendaciones sobre la administración de recursos silvestres en Argentina: la década reciente. In: Traffic Sud América (ed.). WWF, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  24. Howard, W.H. and Marsh, R.E. 1982. Spotted and Hog-nosed Skunks. In: J.A. Chapman and G.A. Feldhammer (eds), <i>Wild Mammals of North America</i>, pp. 664-673. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  25. Cabrera, A. and Yepes, J. 1960. <i>Mamíferos Sudamericanos</i>. Ediar, Buenos Aires.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Emmons, L., Schiaffini, M. & Schipper, J.
evaluator
Duckworth, J.W.

Emmons, L., Schiaffini, M. & Schipper, J. 2016. Conepatus chinga. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T41630A45210528. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Traits biologiques

21 valeurs · 6 sources

Morphologie(5)

Masse adulte
3,4 kg
AnAge
Masse cerveau
16 g
AnimalTraits
Longueur
-999 mm
PanTHERIA
Masse naissance
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA
Masse au sevrage
-999000 mg
PanTHERIA

Cycle de vie(1)

Longévité max
10 ans
AnAge
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)

Reproduction(6)

Taille de portée
-999
PanTHERIA
Sevrage
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Portées par an
-999
PanTHERIA
Gestation
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Intervalle naissances
-999 j
PanTHERIA
Maturité sexuelle
-999 j
PanTHERIA

Écologie & habitat(9)

Invertébrés (%)
80 %
elton_mammals
Graines (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Fruits (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Nectar (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Charognard (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Poissons (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Autre végétal (%)
0 %
elton_mammals
Vert. ectothermes (%)
10 %
elton_mammals
Vert. endothermes (%)
0 %
elton_mammals

Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.

Répartition mondiale

Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Vicerra chingaMolina, 1782
  • Viverra chingaMolina, 1782

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).