Coelogyne augustii
M.W.Chase & Schuit.
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Graphe en cours d’indexation
Calcul du tissu écologique de Coelogyne augustii.
Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).
Liste rouge IUCN
EN · En dangercritères B1ab(iii)↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2018 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 1600 – 2700 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
No population information is available for this species. It is suspected that the population will be declining due to ongoing threats to habitat.
Menaces identifiées(7 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
10_3Avalanches/landslidesUnknownUnknownOngoing1_1Housing & urban areasUnknownUnknownOngoing3_2Mining & quarryingUnknownUnknownOngoing4_1Roads & railroadsUnknownUnknownOngoing7_1_1Increase in fire frequency/intensityUnknownUnknownOngoing2_1_2Small-holder farmingSlow, Significant DeclinesUnknownOngoing5_3_3Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]Slow, Significant DeclinesUnknownOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Mount Pulag where this species has been recorded, is under threat from illegal logging activity, with many trees cut down for commercial use. Continuing agricultural encroachment was a noted threat (Wikramanayake et al. 2002). Jacobs (1972) reported that virgin forest had been destroyed and that fires were an ongoing threat. In 2014 more than 10 hectares of forest inside the Mount Pulag National Park were reported burned, cleared and converted to farmland (Cawis 2014). Commercial vegetable farms were still noted to be expanding into it and road construction was facilitating an increase in human settlement (Cawis 2014). Degradation of the environment has been observed on Mt Santo Tomas, with illegal logging, erosion as a result of road building on the mountain side, deforestation as a result of the expansion of vegetable cultivation, even in quite inaccessible areas, and small scale illegal mining activity (Aning 2014). Satellite imagery shows building development, possibly related to communication masts and agricultural fields even near the summit. Housing has been built near to this radar station and the forest facing Baguio city has been completely annihilated and the species is unlikely to remain here (D. Tiu pers. comm. 2016). Pedersen (1997) observed that the slopes of Mt Santo Tomas in Benguet are largely deforested. Commercial temperate vegetable production is also noted to be a threat, particularly on the lower slopes, on Mount Data (Hamilton et al. 1995). It was noted that over the decades vegetable farming has expanded to cover virtually all the Mt Data National Park and its removal from the list of protected areas was recommended (La Viña et al. 2010). Fire is a natural process in the ecoregion but the increase in human induced fires is limiting the regeneration of forests and making areas susceptible to invasive grasses (Wikramanayake et al. 2002). Additionally strong earthquakes have caused loss of vegetation as a result of associated landslides in some areas (M. Agoo pers. comm. 2016).
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Mt Data was listed as an IUCN category V protected area and Mt Pulag category II (Wikramanayake 2002). Mt Pulag National Park has also been identified as a key biodiversity area (KBA), and Mt Data and Mt Santo Tomas as a candidate KBAs, as priority sites for conservation (Conservation International Philippines 2006). Mt Pulag National Park was designated in 1987 and covers 11,500 ha and is a National Integrated Protected Areas Programme site and submitted to the World Heritage tentative site list in 2006 (UNESCO 2016). Dendrochilum species are protected under Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of wild fauna and flora legislation (CITES 2016). It is not thought that species is conserved ex situ (Sanders 2016). Further research is needed into the distribution, population status and trends, life history and ecology, and the specific threats and conservation actions required for this orchid. Monitoring is likely to be necessary and further site protection, together with the raising of awareness of this endemic species.
Actions de conservation (5)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection2_1Site/area management3_4_1Captive breeding/artificial propagation3_4_2Genome resource bank4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (14)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality
Priorités de recherche (6)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats1_6Actions3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Indomalayan
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Epiphyte
Références bibliographiques (13)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2018. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 15 November 2018).
- CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species). 2016. Checklist of CITES species. Available at: <a href="https://www.cites.org/eng">https://www.cites.org/eng</a>. (Accessed: 2016).
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2016. Mt Pulag National Park. Available at: <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5030/">http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5030/</a>. (Accessed: 2016).
- Aning, J. 2014. SC stops activities in Mt. Santo Tomas forest. <i>Philippine Daily Inquirer</i>.
- Cawis, R. 2014. Mount Pulag under threat from illegal loggers, settlers. <i>Northern Philippine Times</i>.
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
- La Viña, A.G.M, Kho, J.L. and Caleda, M.J. 2010. Legal Framework for Protected Areas: Philippines. Available at: <a href="http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/philippines.pdf">http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/philippines.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 2016).
- Conservation International Philippines. 2006. <i>Priority sites for conservation in the Philippines: key biodiversity areas</i>. CI/Dept. Environ. Nat. Resour./Haribon Foundation, Quezon City, Philippines.
- Wikramanayake, E., Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Olson, D., Morrison, J., Lamoreux. J., Mcknight, M. and Hedao, P. 2002. <i>Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: a conservation assessment</i>. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
- Pedersen, H. 1997. The Genus Dendrochilum (Orchidaceae) in the Philippines- a taxonomic revision. <i>Opera Botanica</i> 131: 5-205.
- Hamilton, L.S., Juvik, J.O. and Scatena, F.N. 1995. The Puerto Rico Tropical Cloud Forest symposium: Intriduction and Workshop Synthesis. In: Hamilton, L.S., Juvik, J.O. and Scatena, F.N. (eds), <i>Tropical Montane Cloud Forests</i>, pp. 1-24. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Jacobs, M. 1972. <i>The Plant World on Luzon's Highest Mountains.</i> Rijksherbarium, Leiden.
- Merrill, E.D. and Merritt, M.L. 1910. The Flora of Mount Pulog (concluded). <i>Philippine Journal of science</i> 5: 371-406.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (5)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Chadburn, H.
contributor
Agoo, E.M.G., Baines, D. & Tiu, D.A.
evaluator
Rankou, H.
facilitators
Clarkson, J. & Hargreaves, S.
institutions
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Chadburn, H. 2018. Dendrochilum loheri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T22486424A22486998. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Distribution mondiale
Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s
Phénologie
Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s
Consulter sur les bases externes
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page
- Acoridium loheri(Ames) Ames
- Dendrochilum loheriAmes
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).