Caracal
Caracal caracal(Schreber, 1776)
1 photo · Licences CC (Wikimedia Commons / iNaturalist)Click pour agrandir
Description
espèce de mammifères
Source : Wikidata
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Chargement du graphe…
Indicateurs du réseau écologique
Comment lire ce graphe
Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Caracal caracal et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.
Limites principales
- Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
- Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
- Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
- Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
- Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
- Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.
Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées
Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :
- Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
- Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
- Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
- Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
- Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)
Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).
Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).
Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata
97 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.
Partenaires
97
Espèces avec interactions documentées
Types d'interactions
7
Prédation, pollinisation, parasitisme…
Connectance
0.069
Densité des liens dans le sous-graphe affiché
Rang animalia
97 %
Percentile vs ensemble des animalia
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure?Inconnue- Évaluation
- 2016 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 3300 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
In sub-Saharan Africa, the Caracal is common in parts of its range, especially in South Africa and southern Namibia where it is expanding into new, and recolonizing vacant, areas, however, in central and West Africa, where they are largely absent, densities are apparently lower, possibly due to finer partitioning of resources in a more diverse carnivore community (Stuart and Stuart 2013). Avenant and Nel (1998) recorded a density of 0.23-0.47 Caracal/km² in the West Coast N.P. in the Western Cape of South Africa.
In north Africa, the Caracal is considered threatened (Stuart and Stuart 2013). In Egypt it is considered rare (Hunter 2004). However, as it is an elusive species, it may is more widespread than indicated by records (Hunter 2004). In northern South Africa, the Caracal is considered as common and widespread (Thorn et al. 2011).
On the Arabian Peninsula, the Caracal is widespread and seems to be stable and was classified as Least Concern (Mallon and Budd 2011). Nevertheless, the species appears to be declining in some range states and may is already close to classify for Near Threatened (Mallon and Budd 2011). The Caracal is regarded as rare in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (Mallon and Budd 2011). However, the population trend in Saudi Arabia is not clear. There are some indications for a population decline based on less individuals found in road kills and less detections of the species (Mallon and Budd 2011). Also in Oman, the trend is unknown. In United Arab Emirates, the Caracal is declining whereas in Yemen it is more likely to be stable and was described as widely distributed and common in the Hawf area (Khorozyan et al. 2014). The regional Caracal population is likely to fluctuate based on prey availability (Mallon and Budd 2011).
In Turkey, according to Albayrak et al. (2012), the Caracal is probably endangered in the country. Also Bunaian et al. (2001) noted that the species is undergoing severe population declines throughout the country. In the Badia area, for example, it is considered as Endangered (Bunaian et al. 2001). Nevertheless, there is very little information on its status and distribution in Turkey available (Albayrak et al. 2012). In Iran, the Caracal population is thought to be decreasing due to habitat destruction (Hassan-Beigi et al. 2014). There are only few records from Afghanistan. The Caracal is thought to be declining in the country and is classified as threatened (Habibi 2004). The Caracal is considered rare in the Central Asian republics and India (Nowell and Jackson 1996). The Caracal occurs at low densities, making it vulnerable to extinction. In India, it is estimated that <10-15 animals survive in the Kutch region, Gujarat, and <50 individuals in Rajasthan, (Singh et al. 2014). The Caracal has a wide but patchy distribution and seems to be restricted to specific pockets in central and western India (Kolipaka 2011). Locally, the species is endangered in India (Kolipaka 2011).
In north Africa, the Caracal is considered threatened (Stuart and Stuart 2013). In Egypt it is considered rare (Hunter 2004). However, as it is an elusive species, it may is more widespread than indicated by records (Hunter 2004). In northern South Africa, the Caracal is considered as common and widespread (Thorn et al. 2011).
On the Arabian Peninsula, the Caracal is widespread and seems to be stable and was classified as Least Concern (Mallon and Budd 2011). Nevertheless, the species appears to be declining in some range states and may is already close to classify for Near Threatened (Mallon and Budd 2011). The Caracal is regarded as rare in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (Mallon and Budd 2011). However, the population trend in Saudi Arabia is not clear. There are some indications for a population decline based on less individuals found in road kills and less detections of the species (Mallon and Budd 2011). Also in Oman, the trend is unknown. In United Arab Emirates, the Caracal is declining whereas in Yemen it is more likely to be stable and was described as widely distributed and common in the Hawf area (Khorozyan et al. 2014). The regional Caracal population is likely to fluctuate based on prey availability (Mallon and Budd 2011).
In Turkey, according to Albayrak et al. (2012), the Caracal is probably endangered in the country. Also Bunaian et al. (2001) noted that the species is undergoing severe population declines throughout the country. In the Badia area, for example, it is considered as Endangered (Bunaian et al. 2001). Nevertheless, there is very little information on its status and distribution in Turkey available (Albayrak et al. 2012). In Iran, the Caracal population is thought to be decreasing due to habitat destruction (Hassan-Beigi et al. 2014). There are only few records from Afghanistan. The Caracal is thought to be declining in the country and is classified as threatened (Habibi 2004). The Caracal is considered rare in the Central Asian republics and India (Nowell and Jackson 1996). The Caracal occurs at low densities, making it vulnerable to extinction. In India, it is estimated that <10-15 animals survive in the Kutch region, Gujarat, and <50 individuals in Rajasthan, (Singh et al. 2014). The Caracal has a wide but patchy distribution and seems to be restricted to specific pockets in central and western India (Kolipaka 2011). Locally, the species is endangered in India (Kolipaka 2011).
Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
2_1_3Agro-industry farmingFuture2_3_1Nomadic grazingFuture2_3_2Small-holder grazing, ranching or farmingFuture2_3_3Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmingFuture5_1_2Unintentional effects (species is not the target)Ongoing5_1_3Persecution/controlOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
As Caracals are capable of taking small domestic livestock, they are often subject to persecution. Stuart (1982) recorded that over the years 1931-1952 an average of 2,219 Caracals per year were killed in control operations in the Karoo, South Africa. Similarly, Namibian farmers responding to a government questionnaire reported killing up to 2,800 Caracals in 1981 (Nowell and Jackson 1996). Brand (1989) found that Caracals were responsible for the loss of up to 5.3 domestic stock per 100 km² per annum in the former Cape Province of South Africa. Severity of depredation appears to be dependent on the availability of wild prey and husbandry techniques (Stuart and Stuart 2013).
Habitat destruction (agriculture and desertification) is a significant threat in central, west, north and northeast Africa where Caracals are naturally sparsely distributed (Ray et al. 2005). It is also likely to be the main threat in the Asian part of its range (Sunquist and Sunquist 2002).
On the Arabian Peninsula, habitat loss and fragmentation due to road and settlement expansion are major threats (Mallon and Budd 2011). However, also retaliation killing due to livestock predation is a threat (Mallon and Budd 2011). Additionally, prey base declines could negatively affect the Caracal too (Mallon and Budd 2011). In the United Arab Emirates, Caracals are found in the international pet trade. However, the source of these animals and the impact of this trade on the population are unknown (Mallon and Budd 2011).
In parts of Turkey, people dislike the species and persecute it because they think it predates on small stock animals (Albayrak et al. 2012). Around Termessos National Park Caracals also get killed in road accidents (Albayrak et al. 2012).
In Iran, major threats are attacks by herd dogs and road kills (Ghoddousi et al. 2009). In Afghanistan, hunting pressure and habitat loss due to the extension of agriculture are major threats causing population decline (Habibi 2004). In India, habitat loss and fragmentation and increased human disturbance are the main threats to the Caracal (Kolipaka 2011).
Habitat destruction (agriculture and desertification) is a significant threat in central, west, north and northeast Africa where Caracals are naturally sparsely distributed (Ray et al. 2005). It is also likely to be the main threat in the Asian part of its range (Sunquist and Sunquist 2002).
On the Arabian Peninsula, habitat loss and fragmentation due to road and settlement expansion are major threats (Mallon and Budd 2011). However, also retaliation killing due to livestock predation is a threat (Mallon and Budd 2011). Additionally, prey base declines could negatively affect the Caracal too (Mallon and Budd 2011). In the United Arab Emirates, Caracals are found in the international pet trade. However, the source of these animals and the impact of this trade on the population are unknown (Mallon and Budd 2011).
In parts of Turkey, people dislike the species and persecute it because they think it predates on small stock animals (Albayrak et al. 2012). Around Termessos National Park Caracals also get killed in road accidents (Albayrak et al. 2012).
In Iran, major threats are attacks by herd dogs and road kills (Ghoddousi et al. 2009). In Afghanistan, hunting pressure and habitat loss due to the extension of agriculture are major threats causing population decline (Habibi 2004). In India, habitat loss and fragmentation and increased human disturbance are the main threats to the Caracal (Kolipaka 2011).
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★2_1Savanna - Dry★3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★4_4Grassland - Temperate★4_5Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry★8_1Desert - Hot★8_2Desert - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Populations in Asian range states are included in CITES Appendix I; populations in African range states are included on Appendix II. Hunting of the species is prohibited in Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan (updated from Nowell and Jackson 1996). In sub-Saharan Africa, the Caracal is protected from hunting in about half of its range states (Nowell and Jackson 1996). In Namibia and South Africa, the Caracal is classified as a Problem Animal, which permits landowners to kill the species without restriction; nonetheless, Caracals have persisted and remain widespread.
The Caracal is legally protected in all range countries on the Arabian Peninsula. In Oman, the Caracal is included into the National Red Data Book. (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Caracal is present in many large, and well-managed protected areas, across their vast range. Beside others, it is recorded in the Serengeti National Park, from the border of the Ikorongo and Grumeti Game Reserve, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Manyara National Park, Tarangire National Park, Katavi and Ruaha National Parks and Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Tanzania (TAWIRI 2009). It is found in Dana in Jordan, Arabian Oryx Sanctuary and Jebel Samhan in Oman, in Harrat Al Harrah, Rayda and Shada in Saudi Arabia as well as in Jebel Bura’a, Hawf and Otamah in Yemen (Mallon and Budd 2011, Khorozyan et al. 2014). Captive breeding populations exist in Al Ain Wildlife Park and Resort, the Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife in United Arab Emirates and Riyadh Zoo in Saudi Arabia (Mallon and Budd 2011). It is found in the Termessos National Park, Turkey (Giannatos et al. 2006, Albayrak et al. 2012) and in the Badhyz State Nature Reserve, Turkmenistan (Kaczensky and Linnell 2014). Caracal was recorded in Bahram’gur Protected Area, Siah-kuh protected area and Kavir National Park, Iran (Ghoddousi et al. 2009, Hassan-Beigi et al. 2014). Caracal is a protected species according to the Iranian Department of Environment and their hunting is prohibited /Ghoddousi et al. 2010). Caracal was also recorded in the Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve and Sariska Tiger Reserve, western India (Singh et al. 2014). According to Kolipaka (2011) there are Caracal sightings from the Melaghat National Park, Maharashtra and from the Bagdara Sanctuary.
As the Caracal may is close to extinction in India, it is important to determine its distribution, abundance and status in the country (Singh et al. 2014).
The Caracal is legally protected in all range countries on the Arabian Peninsula. In Oman, the Caracal is included into the National Red Data Book. (Mallon and Budd 2011).
Caracal is present in many large, and well-managed protected areas, across their vast range. Beside others, it is recorded in the Serengeti National Park, from the border of the Ikorongo and Grumeti Game Reserve, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Manyara National Park, Tarangire National Park, Katavi and Ruaha National Parks and Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Tanzania (TAWIRI 2009). It is found in Dana in Jordan, Arabian Oryx Sanctuary and Jebel Samhan in Oman, in Harrat Al Harrah, Rayda and Shada in Saudi Arabia as well as in Jebel Bura’a, Hawf and Otamah in Yemen (Mallon and Budd 2011, Khorozyan et al. 2014). Captive breeding populations exist in Al Ain Wildlife Park and Resort, the Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife in United Arab Emirates and Riyadh Zoo in Saudi Arabia (Mallon and Budd 2011). It is found in the Termessos National Park, Turkey (Giannatos et al. 2006, Albayrak et al. 2012) and in the Badhyz State Nature Reserve, Turkmenistan (Kaczensky and Linnell 2014). Caracal was recorded in Bahram’gur Protected Area, Siah-kuh protected area and Kavir National Park, Iran (Ghoddousi et al. 2009, Hassan-Beigi et al. 2014). Caracal is a protected species according to the Iranian Department of Environment and their hunting is prohibited /Ghoddousi et al. 2010). Caracal was also recorded in the Ranthambhore Tiger Reserve and Sariska Tiger Reserve, western India (Singh et al. 2014). According to Kolipaka (2011) there are Caracal sightings from the Melaghat National Park, Maharashtra and from the Bagdara Sanctuary.
As the Caracal may is close to extinction in India, it is important to determine its distribution, abundance and status in the country (Singh et al. 2014).
Actions de conservation (3)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection2_1Site/area management5_1_2National level
Stress écologiques (10)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_6Actions3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
AfrotropicalPalearctic
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (30)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 04 September 2016).
- IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 07 December 2016).
- Kaczensky, P. and Linnell, J.D.C. 2014. Rapid assessment of the mammalian community in the Badhyz Ecosystem, Turkmenistan, October 2014. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.
- Hassan-Beigi, Y., Fernandes, C., Farhadinia, M. and Montazami, S. 2014. Phylogeny and genetic diversity of caracal in Iran. <i>Wildlife Middle East </i> 7(1): 6.
- Singh, R., Qureshi, Q., Sankar, K., Krausman, P.R. and Goyal, S.P. 2014. Population and habitat characteristics of caracal in semi-arid landscape, western India. <i>Journal of Arid Environments</i> 103: 92-95.
- Khorozyan, I., Stanton, D., Mohammed, M., Al-Ra'il, W. and Pittet, M. 2014. Patterns of co-existence between humans and mammals in Yemen: some species thrive while others are nearly extinct. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 23: 1995-2013.
- Hickisch, R. and Aebischer, T. 2013. African golden cat, caracal and serval in the Chinko/Mbari Drainage Basin, CAR. <i>Cat News</i> 58: 22-23.
- Stuart, C. and Stuart, T. 2013. Caracal caracal. In: J. S. Kingdon and M. Hoffmann (eds), <i>The Mammals of Africa</i>, Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cowan, P.J. 2013. An annotated checklist of the Mammals of Kuwait. <i>Sultan Qaboos University Journal of Science</i> 18: 19-24.
- Pacifici, M., Santini, L., Di Marco, M., Baisero, D., Francucci, L., Grottolo Marasini, G., Visconti, P. and Rondinini, C. 2013. Generation length for mammals. <i>Nature Conservation</i> 5: 87–94.
- Braczkowski, A., Watson, L., Coulson, D., Lucas J., Peiser, B. and Rossi, M. 2012. The diet of caracal, Caracal caracal in two areas of the southern Cape, South Africa, as determined y scat analysis. <i>South African Journal of Widllfie Research</i> 42(2): 111-116.
- Albayrak, T., Giannatos, G. and Kabasakal, B. 2012. Carnivore and ungulate populations in the Beydaglari mountains (Antalya, Turkey): border region between Asia nad Europe. <i>Polish Journal of Ecology</i> 60(2): 419-428.
- Thorn, M., Green, M., Keith, M., Marnewick, K., Bateman, P.W., Cameron, E.Z. and Scott, D.M. 2011. Large-scale distribution patterns of carnivores in northern South Africa: implications for conservation and monitoring. <i>Oryx</i> 45(4): 579-586.
- Mallon, D. and Budd, K. 2011. Regional Red List Status of Carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula. IUCN and Environment and Protected Areas Authority, Cambridge, UK; Gland, Switzerland; and Sharjah, UAE.
- Kolipaka, S.S. 2011. <i>Caracals in India. The forgotten Cat</i>. IBD, Dehradun.
- Avgan, B. 2011. Abundance and habitat use of two medium-sized cat species in a Mediterranean ecosystem in Turke. Faculty of Science, University of Bern.
- Ilemin, Y. and Gürkan, B. 2010. Status and activity pattern of the Caracal, <i>Caracal caracal</i> (Schreber, 1776), in Catca and Bozburun Peninsulas, Southwestern Turkey. <i>Zoology in the Middle East</i> 50: 3-10.
- TAWIRI. 2009. Tanzania Carnivore Conservation Action plan. TAWIRI, Arusha, Tanzania.
- Ghoddousi, A., Ghadirian, T. and Fahimi, H. 2009. Status of caracal in Bahram’gur Protected Area, Iran. <i>Cat News</i> 50: 10-13.
- Farhadinia, M.S., Akbari, H., Beheshti, M., Sadeghi, A. and Halvani, M.R. 2008. Felids of Abbasabad Naein Reserve, Iran. <i>Cat News</i> 48: 14-16.
- Stuart, C. and Stuart, M. 2007. Diet of leopard and caracal in the northern United Arab Emirates and adjoining Oman territory. <i>Cat News</i> 46: 30-31.
- Giannatos, G., Albayrak, T. and Erdogan, A. 2006. Status of the Caracal in Protected Areas in south-western Turkey. <i>Cat News</i> 45: 23-24.
- Johnson, W.E., Eizirik, E., Pecon-Slattery, J., Murphy, W.J., Antunes, A., Teeling, E. and O'Brien, S.J. 2006. The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: A genetic assessment. <i>Science</i> 311: 73-77.
- Marker, L. L. and Dickman, A. J. 2005. Notes on the spatial ecology of caracals (<i>Felis caracal</i>), with particular reference to Namibian farmlands. <i>African Journal of Ecology</i> 43: 73-76.
- Ray, J.C., Hunter, L. and Zigouris, J. 2005. Setting conservation and research priorities for larger African carnivores. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, USA.
- Habibi, K. 2004. <i>Mammals of Afghanistan</i>. Zoo Outreach Organisation/USFWS, Coimbatore, India.
- Mukherjee, S., Goyal, S. P., Johnsingh, A. J. T. and Pitman, M. R. P. L. 2004. The importance of rodents in the diet of jungle cat (<i>Felis chaus</i>), caracal (<i>Caracal caracal</i>) and golden jackal (<i>Canis aureus</i>) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India. <i>Journal of Zoology (London)</i> 262: 405-411.
- Hunter, M. 2004. The Greater and Lesser Wild Cats of Egypt. Available at: <a href="http://www.touregypt. Net/featurestories/cats.htm">http://www.touregypt. Net/featurestories/cats.htm</a>.
- Sheikh, K.M. and Molur, S. (eds). 2004. <i>Status and Red List of Pakistan's Mammals. Based on the Conservation Assessment and Management Plan</i>. IUCN Pakistan.
- Cuzin, F. 2003. Les grands mammifères du Maroc méridional (Haut Atlas, Anti Atlas et Sahara): Distribution, Ecologie et Conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, Laboratoire de Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertèbrés, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université Montpellier II.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Avgan, B., Henschel, P. & Ghoddousi, A.
contributor
Sogbohossou, E.
evaluator
Nowell, K., Hunter, L., Hoffmann, M., Mallon, D., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Lanz, T. & Breitenmoser, U.
⚠ 1 erratum publié après l'évaluation.
Avgan, B., Henschel, P. & Ghoddousi, A. 2016. Caracal caracal (errata version published in 2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T3847A102424310. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Traits biologiques
21 valeurs · 7 sources
Morphologie(5)
Cycle de vie(1)
Voir 15 traits de plus (2 catégories)Replier
Reproduction(6)
Écologie & habitat(9)
Sources priorisées par qualité scientifique (peer-reviewed spécialisées → Wikidata fallback). Unités auto-converties, valeur max retenue en cas de mesures multiples. Méthodologie · Citations.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page
- Felis caracalSchreber, 1776
- Lynx caracal(Schreber, 1776)
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).