Caladenia hastata
(Nicholls) Rupp
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.
Liste rouge IUCN
CR · En danger critiquecritères B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v)↘Décroissante- Évaluation
- 2018 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 5 – 80 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Until the 1950's this orchid was locally common around the Portland area in south west Victoria but underwent an extensive decline and was thought to be possibly extinct (DEWHA 2009). In 1973 plants were found at Point Danger, Portland and several hundred plants were recorded in the early 1980's (DEWHA 2009). An aluminium smelter was built at Point Danger which opened in 1986 and many plants were removed into ex situ cultivation or translocated to the Discovery Bay Coastal Park. The number of individuals at Point Danger continued to decline until there were only six plants in 1996 (DEWHA 2009). Since then there has been an intensive recovery programme (Todd 2000) which has resulted in an increase in the number of plants at Point Danger and the discovery of a new sites.
Total numbers of individuals across the whole population has varied from 720 individuals reported in 2009 (DEWHA 2009) to approximately 375-450 individuals at present (inferred from 2008 and 2013 observations at the two subpopulations and suspected present numbers from a local experts (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). Although the population trend had been increasing from 1996 to 2009 due to the conservation activities by local scientists (DEWHA 2009) the population trend is now inferred to be decreasing. However as the reintroduction programme continues and new viable wild subpopulations are established then the population trend may increase again.
At the Point Danger subpopulation, 750 individuals were recorded in 2000 (DEWHA 2009), 175 recorded in 2008 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016) and approximately 200 individuals are present currently (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). The second subpopulation was discovered in 2003 at the Wilkin Flora and Fauna Reserve; there were 70 individuals recorded in 2008 (DEWHA 2009), up to 200 individuals recorded in 2013 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016) and approximately 250 individuals at present (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016).
At the remaining localities for this species which are excluded as non viable subpopulations there are estimated to be four plants. At Lower Glenelg National Park one plant was observed at one site in 2013 and at a second site one plant has been observed and monitored for the last three years (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016). At the Discovery Bay Coastal Park two plants were observed in 2013 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016).
Total numbers of individuals across the whole population has varied from 720 individuals reported in 2009 (DEWHA 2009) to approximately 375-450 individuals at present (inferred from 2008 and 2013 observations at the two subpopulations and suspected present numbers from a local experts (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). Although the population trend had been increasing from 1996 to 2009 due to the conservation activities by local scientists (DEWHA 2009) the population trend is now inferred to be decreasing. However as the reintroduction programme continues and new viable wild subpopulations are established then the population trend may increase again.
At the Point Danger subpopulation, 750 individuals were recorded in 2000 (DEWHA 2009), 175 recorded in 2008 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016) and approximately 200 individuals are present currently (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). The second subpopulation was discovered in 2003 at the Wilkin Flora and Fauna Reserve; there were 70 individuals recorded in 2008 (DEWHA 2009), up to 200 individuals recorded in 2013 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016) and approximately 250 individuals at present (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016).
At the remaining localities for this species which are excluded as non viable subpopulations there are estimated to be four plants. At Lower Glenelg National Park one plant was observed at one site in 2013 and at a second site one plant has been observed and monitored for the last three years (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016). At the Discovery Bay Coastal Park two plants were observed in 2013 (N. Reiter pers. comm. 2016).
Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
1_2Commercial & industrial areasRapid DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Past, Unlikely to Return12_1Other threatCausing/Could cause fluctuationsWhole (>90%)Ongoing7_1_3Trend Unknown/UnrecordedUnknownUnknownOngoing8_1_1Unspecified speciesUnknownWhole (>90%)Ongoing8_2_1Unspecified speciesUnknownWhole (>90%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
There are a number of threats to this spider orchid outlined in detail in the recovery plan (Todd 2000) and in the case study (DEWHA 2009). The largest subpopulation for this spider orchid is at Point Danger, Portland where an aluminium smelter was opened in 1986. Although some plants were translocated or taken into ex situ conservation, the size of available habitat at this site is now reduced and the effect of emissions from the smelter on this orchid and the vegetation needs further research (DEWHA 2009). Grazing by native and introduced herbivores and competition from introduced weeds and invasive native shrubs is a threat at most sites for this species (Todd 2000, DEWHA 2009). Inappropriate fire regimes can be detrimental to this species and its pollinators and further research is required (Todd 2000, DEWHA 2009). There is no evidence of illegal orchid collection but this remains a risk as there is easy access to the Point Danger site (Todd 2000).
One of the most serious threats for the long term survival of this species is the limited natural pollination which was reported to be low or absent at three sites (DEWHA 2009). As part of the recovery programme hand pollination was undertaken, particularly at Point Danger. However during monitoring at Point Danger a low level of natural pollination was observed in 2009 (Bowers) and at Wilkin Flora and Fauna reserve (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). In the long term changes in climate may cause this species to flower earlier which could also affect pollination timings (DEWHA 2009).
One of the most serious threats for the long term survival of this species is the limited natural pollination which was reported to be low or absent at three sites (DEWHA 2009). As part of the recovery programme hand pollination was undertaken, particularly at Point Danger. However during monitoring at Point Danger a low level of natural pollination was observed in 2009 (Bowers) and at Wilkin Flora and Fauna reserve (D. Pitts pers. comm. 2016). In the long term changes in climate may cause this species to flower earlier which could also affect pollination timings (DEWHA 2009).
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_4Forest - Temperate★3_4Shrubland - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Conservation measures for this spider orchid have been in place since the 1970's (DEWHA 2009), with the latest recovery plans (Todd 2000, DCE 2004) outlining conservation actions required for this and other threatened spider orchid species. A Threatened Orchid Recovery Team of local scientists, horticulturalists and land managers oversee threatened orchid conservation actions in Victoria (Todd 2000). Measures undertaken include ex situ and in situ propagation, ex situ seed conservation, reintroductions, hand pollination of flowers to aid seed set, caging plants to protect them from grazing, control of invasive weeds, surveys of historic and new sites and community engagement (Todd 2000, DCE 2004, DEWHA 2009). There has been extensive research to improve propagation of this species and other threatened spider orchids (Wight et al. 2009) and to isolate the fungal mycorrhiza (Todd 2000). However further research is still required including extent of natural pollination and the effect of fire (DCE 2004, DEWHA 2009).
Ex situ living and seed collections are conserved at Kings Park Botanic Gardens and Melbourne Royal Botanic Gardens and there is also a seed collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (DEWHA 2009). The majority of this spider orchid's population is found within protected areas, including Point Danger Coastal Reserve, Discovery Bay Coastal Reserve, Lower Glenelg National Park and Wilkin Flora and Fauna Reserve. Part of the population at Point Danger, Portland is found within private land belonging to Portland Aluminium (Todd 2000). The plants at the Discovery Bay Coastal Reserve were original translocated from the Point Danger, Portland site when the Portland aluminium smelter was built (DEWHA 2009). The Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne has an active reintroduction programme for this species running until 2018 (N. Reiter et al. 2016).
This spider orchid is listed as Endangered on the Commonwealth Environment Protections and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. In Victoria it is listed as Critically Endangered in 2005 by Backhouse and Cameron (with the criteria B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(ii,iii,iv,v), C2a(ii)), Endangered by the Advisory List of Rare or Threatened Vascular Plants in Victoria (DEPI 2014) and as a threatened species in the Victoria Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (DELWP 2015). This species is also listed on Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES 2016).
Ex situ living and seed collections are conserved at Kings Park Botanic Gardens and Melbourne Royal Botanic Gardens and there is also a seed collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (DEWHA 2009). The majority of this spider orchid's population is found within protected areas, including Point Danger Coastal Reserve, Discovery Bay Coastal Reserve, Lower Glenelg National Park and Wilkin Flora and Fauna Reserve. Part of the population at Point Danger, Portland is found within private land belonging to Portland Aluminium (Todd 2000). The plants at the Discovery Bay Coastal Reserve were original translocated from the Point Danger, Portland site when the Portland aluminium smelter was built (DEWHA 2009). The Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne has an active reintroduction programme for this species running until 2018 (N. Reiter et al. 2016).
This spider orchid is listed as Endangered on the Commonwealth Environment Protections and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. In Victoria it is listed as Critically Endangered in 2005 by Backhouse and Cameron (with the criteria B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(ii,iii,iv,v), C2a(ii)), Endangered by the Advisory List of Rare or Threatened Vascular Plants in Victoria (DEPI 2014) and as a threatened species in the Victoria Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (DELWP 2015). This species is also listed on Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES 2016).
Stress écologiques (6)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Australasian
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (17)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2018. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 15 November 2018).
- IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. 2016. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 12. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf">http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf</a>.
- CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. 2016. CITES Species Database. Available at: <a href="http://speciesplus.net/">http://speciesplus.net/</a>.
- Reiter, N., Whitfield, J., Pollard, G., Bedggood, W., Argall, M., Dixon, K., Davis, B., Swarts, N. 2016. Orchid re-introductions: an evaluation of success and ecological considerations using key comparative studies from Australia. <i>Plant Ecology</i>.
- DELWP - Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. 2015. Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988, Threatened List, May 2015.
- DEPI - Department of Environment and Primary Industries. 2014. Advisory list or rare or threatened plants in Victoria. The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries.
- Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. <i>Zookeys</i> 150: 117–126.
- Brown, G.R. 2010. Two new orchid-pollinating wasps (Hymenoptera: Thynnidae) from Australia. <i>The Beagle, Records of the Museums and Galleries of the Northern Territory</i> 26: 97-102.
- Wight, M., Cross, R., Dixon, K., Huynh, T., Lawrie, A., Nesbitt, L., Pritchard, A., Swarts, N. and Thomson, R. 2009. Propagation and reintroduction of Caladenia. <i>Australian Journal of Botany</i> 57: 373-387.
- DEWHA - Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 2009. Case study from Victoria: Mellblom's spider orchid <i>Caladenia hastata</i> . Assessment of Australia's Terrestial Biodiversity, 2008. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra.
- Pritchard, A. 2007. Threatened orchids of Southwest Victoria. <i>New Zealand Native Orchids</i> 105.
- Backhouse, G. and Cameron, D. 2005. Application of IUCN 2001 Red List Categories in determining the conservation status of native orchids of Victoria, Australia. <i>Selbyana</i> 25(2): 58-74.
- DCE - Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2004. Action statement: Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988, No. 103, Twelve threatened Spider-orchids Caladenia species. Department of Sustainability and Environment.
- Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. <i>Bioscience</i> 51: 933-938.
- Todd, J.A. 2000. Recovery plan for twelve threatened spider orchid Caladenia R.Br. taxa of Victoria and South Australia 2000-2004. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne, Victoria, Canberra.
- Backhouse, G.N. and Jeanes, J.A. 1995. <i>The Orchids of Victoria</i>. Melbourne University Press, Carlton.
- Bower, C. The distribution and abundance of Lestricothynnus 'hastatus' (ms), the pollinator of Mellblom's spider orchid, Caladenia hastata, in the Point Danger conservation reserve, Portland, Victoria. Department of Sustainablity and Environment, Victoria.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (5)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Williams, E.
contributor
Budden, A., Reiter, N., Pitts, D. & Cameron, D.
evaluator
Rankou, H.
facilitators
Clarkson, J.
institutions
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Williams, E. 2018. Caladenia hastata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T22486129A22487286. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (5)— redirigent vers cette page
- Arachnorchis hastata(Nicholls) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem.
- Caladenia patersonii var. hastataR.Br.
- Caladenia patersonii var. hastataNicholls
- Calonema hastatum(Nicholls) Szlach.
- Calonemorchis hastata(Nicholls) Szlach.
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).