Caladenia dienema
D.L.Jones
Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.
Liste rouge IUCN
EN · En dangercritères D→Stable- Évaluation
- 2022 · v3.1
- Altitude
- – m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Although the estimated total number of mature individuals of this species is very low, there is no evidence to suggest that the number has declined or will continue to decline. The subpopulation with the largest number of mature individuals occurs within the Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area (Threatened Species Section 2006). Despite the fact that this conservation area has been identified as suitable for a range of recreational and commercial developments, some protection is afforded to the species through the application of management guidelines and codes of practice (Threatened Species Section 2006). There are no details, either published or unpublished, concerning reported declines in subpopulations of this species with the exception of the presumed extinction of the northern subpopulation which was last reported in 1841 (Threatened Species Section 2006).
Menaces identifiées(4 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
1_1Housing & urban areasOngoing2_3_3Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmingOngoing6_1Recreational activitiesOngoing7_1_1Increase in fire frequency/intensityOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
The main identified threats are clearance for agriculture or coastal development, inappropriate disturbance regimes (including fire regimes) and recreational activities associated with the conservation area in which most subpopulations are known to occur (Threatened Species Section 2006).
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
3_4Shrubland - Temperate★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
This species is listed as Endangered under the Australian Government Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Existing Management Plans/Prescriptions relevant to the species
- Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area: Management Plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, 2002. Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area: Fire Management Plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, 2003.
- Tasmanian Reserve Management Code of Practice. Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts; Parks and Wildlife Service; Forestry Tasmania and Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment 2003.
- Listing Statement windswept spider orchid Arachnorchis dienema. Threatened Species Unit, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, 2001.
- Flora Recovery Plan: Tasmanian Threatened Orchids 2006–2010. Threatened Species Section Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, 2006.
Regional Priority Actions
The following regional priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of the Windswept Spider-orchid.
Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification
- Monitor known populations to identify key threats.
- Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary.
- Identify populations of high conservation priority.
- Ensure there is no disturbance in areas where the Windswept Spider-orchid occurs, excluding necessary actions to manage the conservation of the species.
- Investigate formal conservation arrangements, management agreements and covenants on private land, and for crown and private land investigate inclusion in reserve tenure if possible.
- Develop and implement a stock management plan for roadside verges and travelling stock routes.
Fire
- Implement the Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area: Fire Management Plan (Parks and Wildlife Service, 2003).
- Identify appropriate intensity and interval of fire to promote seed germination and/or vegetation regeneration.
- Where appropriate provide maps of known occurrences to local and state Rural Fire Services and seek inclusion of mitigative measures in bush fire risk management plan(s), risk register and/or operation maps.
Conservation Information
- Raise awareness of the Windswept Spider-orchid within the local community.
- Frequently engage with private landholders and land managers responsible for the land on which populations occur and encourage these key stakeholders to contribute to the implementation of conservation management actions.
Enable Recovery of Additional Sites and/or Populations
- Collect and store seed, germ plasm and mychorrizae, ensuring appropriate phytohygiene protocols are observed.
- Investigate options for linking, enhancing or establishing additional populations.
- Implement national translocation protocols (Vallee et al. 2004) if establishing additional populations is considered necessary and feasible.
Local Priority Actions
The following local priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of the Windswept Spider-orchid.
Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification
- Control access routes to suitably constrain public access to known sites on public land.
- Suitably control and manage access on private land and other land tenure.
- Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants.
- Minimise adverse impacts from land use at known sites.
- Manage any disruptions to water flows.
- Protect populations of the listed species through the development of conservation agreements and/or covenants.
Trampling, Browsing or Grazing
- If livestock grazing occurs in the area, ensure land owners/managers use an appropriate management regime and density that does not detrimentally affect this species, outside the growing season.
- Where appropriate, manage total grazing pressure at important/significant sites through exclusion fencing or other barriers.
Fire
- Implement an appropriate fire management regime for local populations.
This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to the Windswept Spider-orchid, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the Conservation Advice.
Research Priorities
Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include:
- Design and implement a monitoring program or, if appropriate, support and enhance existing programmes.
- More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements and the relative impacts of threatening processes.
- Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants.
- Undertake seed germination and/or vegetative propagation trials to determine the requirements for successful establishment, including mycorrhizal association trials.
- Undertake genetic analyses to:
- assess current gene flow (using markers and analyses capable of distinguishing population divergence on an evolutionary timescale, from that which might be due to more recent impacts); and
- identify populations with low genetic diversity that might benefit from artificial introduction of genetic material from other populations from which they have relatively recently diverged.
Actions de conservation (5)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection1_2Resource & habitat protection2_2Invasive/problematic species control3_4_2Genome resource bank4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (13)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_3Indirect ecosystem effects1_3Indirect ecosystem effects2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_1Species mortality2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats4Other
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Formes de croissance
Références bibliographiques (19)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 08 December 2022).
- IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. 2019. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf">http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf</a>.
- Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC). 2011. Approved Conservation Advice for <i>Caladenia dienema</i> (windswept spider-orchid). Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra, ACT. Available at: <a href="http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/64858-conservation-advice.pdf">http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/64858-conservation-advice.pdf</a>. (Accessed: 2021).
- Council of Heads of Australian Herbaria (CHAH). 2007. Australian Plant Census. Available at: <a href="http://www.anbg.gov.au/chah/apc/">http://www.anbg.gov.au/chah/apc/</a>.
- Threatened Species Section. 2006. Flora recovery plan: Tasmanian threatened orchids 2006–2010. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart.
- Threatened Species Section. 2006. Unpublished survey data for <i>Caladenia dienema</i>. Held by the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart.
- Buchanan, A.M. 2005. A census of the vascular plants of Tasmania & index to the student’s flora of Tasmania. Tasmanian Herbarium Occasional Publication No. 7, Hobart.
- Harris, S. and Kitchener, A. (eds). 2005. <i>From Forest to Fjaeldmark: Descriptions of Tasmania's Vegetation</i>. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart.
- Vallee, L., Hogbin, T., Monks, L., Makinson, B., Matthes, M.and Rossetto, M. 2004. <i>Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia – second edition</i>. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra.
- Hopper, S.D. and Brown, A.P. 2004. Robert Brown’s <i>Caladenia</i> revisited, including a revision of its sister genera <i>Cyanicula, Ericksonella</i> and <i>Pheladenia</i> (Caladeniiae: Orchidaceae). <i>Australian Systematic Botany</i> 17: 171-240.
- Parks and WIldlife Service. 2003. Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area: Fire Management Plan. Parks and Wildlife Service, Hobart.
- Parks and Wildlife Service, Forestry Tasmania and Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. 2003. Tasmanian Reserve Management Code of Practice. Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts, Hobart.
- Parks and Wildlife Service. 2002. Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area: Management Plan. Parks and Wildlife Service. Hobart.
- Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC). 2001. Listing statement windswept spider orchid <i>Arachnorchis dienema</i>. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Tasmania.
- Szlachetko, D.L. 2001. Nomenclatural adjustments in the Thelymitroideae (Orchidaceae). <i>Polish Botanical Journal</i> 46(2): 137-144.
- Jones, D.L., Clements, M.A., Sharma, I.K. and Mackenzie, A.M. 2001. A new classification of <i>Caladenia</i> R.Br. (Orchidaceae). <i>The Orchadian</i> 13(9): 289-419.
- Threatened Species Unit. 2001. Listing statement windswept spider orchid <i>Arachnorchis dienema</i>. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania.
- Jones, D., Wapstra, H., Tonelli, P. and Harris, S. 1999. <i>The Orchids of Tasmania</i>. Melbourne University Press, Carlton South, Victoria.
- Jones, D.L. 1998. Contributions to Tasmanian orchidology 1–9: 6: a taxonomic review of <i>Prasophyllum</i> R.Br. in Tasmania. <i>Australian Orchid Research</i> 3: 94-134.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Australian Government, Threatened Species Scientific Committee 2022. Caladenia dienema. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T97847040A97853991. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page
- Arachnorchis dienema(D.L.Jones) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem.
- Calonemorchis dienema(D.L.Jones) Szlach.
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).