Ontologia

Bourdon menteur

Bombus mendaxGerstäcker, 1869

LCLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Pas d'interactions documentées pour cette espèce.

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineureDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2025 · v3.1
Altitude
m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The populations of Bombus mendax seem to be in decline (P. Rasmont comm. pers. 2014), and are also severely fragmented, with little genetic exchange between them. The species is never abundant.

The species appears to be severely fragmented in Europe, i.e. with most individuals found in small and relatively isolated subpopulations, which is likely to increase the extinction risk of the species.

Menaces identifiées(3 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 11_3
    Temperature extremes
    Causing/Could cause fluctuationsWhole (>90%)Future
  • 2_3_4
    Scale Unknown/Unrecorded
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 11_1
    Habitat shifting & alteration
    Slow, Significant DeclinesWhole (>90%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
Results from climate and land use change (such as grazing) modelling suggest that Bombus mendax is expected to lose a significant part of climatically suitable territories by the end of the century. Under the most severe climate change scenario modelled by Rasmont et al. (2015) (GRAS), the species could lose up to 79% of climatically suitable areas by 2100 (under a no dispersal model, and up to 55% under a full dispersal model). The latter authors placed the species into the category “High climate change risk”, reflecting the potential risk of climate change on this species. Projections of ecological niche models by Ghisbain et al. (2023), considering both land use change and climate change, also predict reductions in ecologically suitable areas for B. mendax in Europe by 2061-2080 (up to 30% under the SSP5-8.5 scenario). In addition, the potential for B. mendax to successfully disperse in the areas that will remain climatically and/or ecologically suitable is probably very low, given that it is already trapped in high altitudes. Preliminary results by Biella et al. (submitted) suggest, however, that the species has shifted towards higher altitudes in the last decades.

It remains unpredictable whether the areas that are projected to appear “suitable” for the species in the future will remain clear of additional anthropogenic stressors not considered in the models of Rasmont et al. (2015) and Ghisbain et al. (2023). These additional (and likely synergistic) pressures include infrastructure development (for tourism and transport), pesticide use, pollution (by nitrogen and its subsequent impact on nitrophobic flowering plants, or by heavy metals), the spread of exotic invasive plants, the invasion of managed species and subsequent pathogen spillover, among other potential stressors known to substantially impact bumblebee populations.

It is possible that climatic events not considered in the models of Rasmont et al. (2015) and Ghisbain et al. (2023), such as the increased occurrence of droughts, heat waves, or storms will further modify the future range of this species. The resistance of B. mendax to acute heat stress is unknown, but previous works on another bumblebee model have demonstrated impaired cognition of these bees at elevated temperature (Gérard et al. 2022), as well as reduced fertility (Martinet et al. 2020), and research is needed as to whether B. mendax would be similarly threatened by repeated exposures to such temperatures.

Whether the flowering plants the species is most strongly associated with will remain sufficiently abundant in the future is also unknown. Wood et al. (2021) showed that the diet of B. mendax is strongly associated with Fabaceae. The decline of this resource could continue to negatively affect the populations of B. mendax in Europe.

The increased relative abundance of other species such as B. lapidarius and B. terrestris in sympatry with B. mendax could pose a threat to the latter in the Pyrenees (P. Rasmont pers. comm. 2023).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 4_4Grassland - Temperate
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
This species is included in the National Red Lists of Germany (Not Threatened; Westrich et al. 2011), Italy (Data Deficient/Least Concern; Quaranta et al. 2018) and Slovenia (Rare; Anonymous 2002). It occurs in protected areas.

General efforts aimed at pollinator conservation may contribute to maintain B. mendax populations. At the microscale, the development of tourist infrastructure within the area inhabited by the species should be carefully monitored. At the macroscale, suitable efforts include strengthened regulations about greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the ongoing climate change and its subsequent impact on this species and other insects.
Actions de conservation (2)Expert
  • 1_2Resource & habitat protection
  • 4_3Awareness & communications
Stress écologiques (5)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (4)Expert
  • 1_2Population size, distribution & trends
  • 1_5Threats
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Palearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (9)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2025. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 October 2025).
  2. Ghisbain, G., Thiery, W., Massonnet, F., Erazo, D., Rasmont, P., Michez, D. and Dellicour, S. 2023 (online). Projected decline in European bumblebee populations in the twenty-first century. <i>Nature</i> 628: 337-341.
  3. Gérard, M., Amiri, A., Cariou, B. and Baird, E. 2022. Short-term exposure to heatwave-like temperatures affects learning and memory in bumblebees. <i>Global Change Biology</i> 28(14): 4251-4259. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16196
  4. Wood, T., Ghisbain, G., Rasmont, P., Kleijn, D., Raemakers, I., Praz, C., Killewald, M., Gibbs, J., Bobiwash, K., Boustani, M., Martinet, B. and Michez, D. 2021. Global patterns in bumble bee pollen collection show phylogenetic conservation of diet. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i> 90(10): 2421-2430.
  5. Quaranta, M., Cornalba, M., Biella, P., Comba, M., Battistoni, A., Rondinini, C. and Teofili, C. 2018. Lista rossa IUCN delle api italiane minacciate. Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Roma.
  6. Rasmont, P., Franzén, M., Lecocq, T., Harpke, A., Roberts, S.P.M., Biesmeijer, J.C., Castro, L., Cederberg, B., Dvorák, L., Fitzpatrick, Ú., Gonseth, Y., Haubruge, E., Mahé, G., Manino, A., Michez, D., Neumayer, J., Ødegaard, F., Paukkunen, J., Pawlikowski, T., Potts, S.G., Reemer, M., Settele, J., Straka, J. and Schweiger, O. 2015. Climatic Risk and Distribution Atlas of European Bumblebees. <i>Pensoft</i>.
  7. Nieto, A., Roberts, S.P.M., Kemp, J., Rasmont, P., Kuhlmann, M., García Criado, M., Biesmeijer, J.C., Bogusch, P., Dathe, H.H., De la Rúa, P., De Meulemeester, T., Dehon, M., Dewulf, A., Ortiz-Sánchez, F.J., Lhomme, P., Pauly, A., Potts, S.G., Praz, C., Quaranta, M., Radchenko, V.G., Scheuchl, E., Smit, J., Straka, J., Terzo, M., Tomozii, B., Window, J. and Michez, D. 2014. <i>European Red List of bees</i>. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  8. Westrich, P., Frommer, U., Mandery, K., Riemann, H., Ruhnke, H., Saure, C. and Voith, J. 2011. Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Bienen (Hymenoptera, Apidae) Deutschlands - (5. Fassung, Dezember 2011) [Red List and complete species list of bees in Germany]. In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (ed.), <i>Rote Liste der gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands. Band 3: Wirbellose Tiere (Teil 1) [Red List of threatened animals, plants and fungi of Germany]</i>, pp. 371-416. Bonn.
  9. Anonymous. 2002. Uradni list from Republik of Slovenia. <i>Official Gazette, Minister for the Environment and Spatial Planning</i> 56/99 and 31/00: Annex 14.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Expert
assessor
Ghisbain, G., Praz, C., Rasmont, P., Williams, P., Cederberg, B., Devalez, J., Flaminio, S., Biella, P., Radchenko, V. & Dellicour, S.
contributor
Benrezkallah, J., Boustani, M., De Manincor, N., Michez, D. & Sentil, A.
evaluator
Tourbez, C.
facilitators
Bellotto, V., Put, S., Trottet, A. & Verëll, V.

Ghisbain, G., Praz, C., Rasmont, P., Williams, P., Cederberg, B., Devalez, J., Flaminio, S., Biella, P., Radchenko, V. & Dellicour, S. 2025. Bombus mendax. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T13342099A222199729. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale

Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (14)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Bombus latofasciatusVogt, 1909
  • Bombus mendax anonymusFriese, 1911
  • Bombus mendax atrocaudatusVogt, 1909
  • Bombus mendax bizonatusSkorikov, 1910
  • Bombus mendax flavopleuralisPittioni, 1939
  • Bombus mendax friseanusSkorikov, 1910
  • Bombus mendax latofasciatusVogt, 1909
  • Bombus mendax perfugaSkorikov, 1910
  • Bombus mendax pyrenesTkalcu, 1975
  • Bombus mendax quasilatofasciatusPittioni, 1939
  • Bombus mendax subglacialisPittioni, 1937
  • Bombus mendax var. anonymusFriese, 1911
  • Bombus mendax var. bizonatus
  • Mendacibombus mendax(Gerstaecker) Gerstaecker

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).