Bombus balteatus
Dahlbom, 1832
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Chargement du graphe…
Indicateurs du réseau écologique
Comment lire ce graphe
Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Bombus balteatus et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.
Limites principales
- Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
- Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
- Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
- Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
- Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
- Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.
Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées
Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :
- Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
- Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
- Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
- Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
- Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)
Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).
Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).
Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata
60 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.
Partenaires
60
Espèces avec interactions documentées
Types d'interactions
3
Prédation, pollinisation, parasitisme…
Connectance
0.074
Densité des liens dans le sous-graphe affiché
Rang animalia
94 %
Percentile vs ensemble des animalia
Liste rouge IUCN
NT · Quasi menacéecritères A3c→Stable- Évaluation
- 2025 · v3.1
- Altitude
- – m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Populations are apparently stable at the moment and the species can be locally abundant, but climate and land use change may drastically reduce the area of suitable habitat available for many boreal and arctic species in the future (Franzen and Ockinger 2011, Franzen and Molander 2012, Rasmont et al. 2014, Rasmont et al. 2015, Ghisbain et al. 2023).
Models predicting the effects of climate change on the habitat of this species suggest that this species could lose up to 19.2% of suitable habitat in the next 10 years (see detail in Threats text) (Rhasmont et al. 2015, Ghisbain et al. 2023). Combined with additional threats not included in the model, it is possible that the species could lose up to 20-25% of its suitable habitat in the next 10 years, and a population reduction of the same scale is suspected.
Models predicting the effects of climate change on the habitat of this species suggest that this species could lose up to 19.2% of suitable habitat in the next 10 years (see detail in Threats text) (Rhasmont et al. 2015, Ghisbain et al. 2023). Combined with additional threats not included in the model, it is possible that the species could lose up to 20-25% of its suitable habitat in the next 10 years, and a population reduction of the same scale is suspected.
Menaces identifiées(1 menace classée CMP-IUCN)
11_1Habitat shifting & alterationCausing/Could cause fluctuationsWhole (>90%)Future
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Results from climate and land use change modelling suggest that Bombus balteatus is expected to lose a significant part of climatically suitable territories by the end of the century. Under the most severe climate change scenario modelled by Rasmont et al. (2015) (GRAS), the species could lose up to 94% of climatically suitable areas by 2100 (under both a no dispersal and full dispersal model). The latter authors placed the species into the category “Very high climate change risk”, reflecting the potential risk of climate change on this species. Projections of ecological niche models by Ghisbain et al. (2023), considering both land use change and climate change, also predict substantial reductions in ecologically suitable areas for B. balteatus in Europe by 2061-2080 (up to 69% under the SSP5-8.5 scenario). In addition, the potential for B. balteatus to remain in the areas that will remain climatically and/or ecologically suitable is unknown. It also remains unpredictable whether the areas that are projected to remain appear “suitable” for the species in the future will remain clear of additional anthropogenic stressors not considered in the models of Rasmont et al. (2015) and Ghisbain et al. (2023). These additional (and likely synergistic) pressures include infrastructure development, pollution (by nitrogen and its subsequent impact on nitrophobic flowering plants, or by heavy metals), wildfires, the spread of exotic invasive plants, the invasion of managed species and subsequent pathogen spill-over, among other potential stressors known to substantially impact bumblebee populations. Because the species is distributed in the northern part of the European continent, its potential for dispersing further north is null.
It is likely that climatic events not considered in the models of Rasmont et al. (2015) and Ghisbain et al. (2023), such as the increased occurrence of droughts, heat waves, or storms will impact this species. The work of Martinet et al. (2021) demonstrated that the resistance of B. balteatus to acute heat stress (measured as the average time the species resists to a thermal stress of 40°C) is especially low among bumblebees. Previous works on another bumblebee model have demonstrated impaired cognition of these bees at elevated temperature (Gérard et al. 2022), as well as reduced fertility (Martinet et al. 2020), and research is needed as to whether B. balteatus would be similarly threatened by repeated exposures to such temperatures.
Whether the flowering plants the species is most strongly associated with will remain sufficiently abundant in the future is also unknown. Wood et al. (2021) showed that the diet of B. balteatus is relatively strongly associated with Fabaceae. The decline of this resource could negatively affect the populations of B. balteatus in Europe.
It is likely that climatic events not considered in the models of Rasmont et al. (2015) and Ghisbain et al. (2023), such as the increased occurrence of droughts, heat waves, or storms will impact this species. The work of Martinet et al. (2021) demonstrated that the resistance of B. balteatus to acute heat stress (measured as the average time the species resists to a thermal stress of 40°C) is especially low among bumblebees. Previous works on another bumblebee model have demonstrated impaired cognition of these bees at elevated temperature (Gérard et al. 2022), as well as reduced fertility (Martinet et al. 2020), and research is needed as to whether B. balteatus would be similarly threatened by repeated exposures to such temperatures.
Whether the flowering plants the species is most strongly associated with will remain sufficiently abundant in the future is also unknown. Wood et al. (2021) showed that the diet of B. balteatus is relatively strongly associated with Fabaceae. The decline of this resource could negatively affect the populations of B. balteatus in Europe.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
3_1Shrubland - Subarctic★3_3Shrubland - Boreal★4_1Grassland - Tundra★4_2Grassland - Subarctic★
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
Bombus balteatus is included in the National Red Lists or Red Data Books of the following countries: Finland (Least Concern; Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (Least Concern; Artsdatabanken 2021) and Sweden (Near Threatened; SLU Artdatabanken 2020). The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action. It occurs in protected areas.
General efforts aimed at pollinator conservation may contribute to maintain Bombus balteatus populations. At the macroscale in particular, suitable efforts include strengthened regulations about greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the ongoing climate change and its subsequent impact on this species and other insects.
General efforts aimed at pollinator conservation may contribute to maintain Bombus balteatus populations. At the macroscale in particular, suitable efforts include strengthened regulations about greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate the ongoing climate change and its subsequent impact on this species and other insects.
Actions de conservation (1)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
1_1Site/area protection
Stress écologiques (2)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Ecosystem degradation2_1Species mortality
Priorités de recherche (2)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
3_1Population trends3_4Habitat trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Palearctic
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Références bibliographiques (20)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2025. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-2. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 10 October 2025).
- Ghisbain, G., Thiery, W., Massonnet, F., Erazo, D., Rasmont, P., Michez, D. and Dellicour, S. 2023 (online). Projected decline in European bumblebee populations in the twenty-first century. <i>Nature</i> 628: 337-341.
- Gérard, M., Amiri, A., Cariou, B. and Baird, E. 2022. Short-term exposure to heatwave-like temperatures affects learning and memory in bumblebees. <i>Global Change Biology</i> 28(14): 4251-4259. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16196
- Artsdatabanken. 2021. Norsk rødliste for arter 2021. Available at: <a href="https://www.artsdatabanken.no/lister/rodlisteforarter/2021">https://www.artsdatabanken.no/lister/rodlisteforarter/2021</a>.
- Wood, T., Ghisbain, G., Rasmont, P., Kleijn, D., Raemakers, I., Praz, C., Killewald, M., Gibbs, J., Bobiwash, K., Boustani, M., Martinet, B. and Michez, D. 2021. Global patterns in bumble bee pollen collection show phylogenetic conservation of diet. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i> 90(10): 2421-2430.
- Rasmont, P., Ghisbain, G. and Terzo, M. 2021. <i>Bumblebees of Europe and neighbouring regions</i>. NAP Editions, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
- Martinet, B., Dellicour, S., Ghisbain, G., Przybyla, K., Zambra, E., Lecocq, T., Boustani, M., Baghirov, R., Michez, D. and Rasmont, P. 2020. Global effects of extreme temperatures on wild bumblebees. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 35: 1507-1518.
- SLU Artdatabanken. 2020. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2020. SLU Artdatabanken, Uppsala.
- Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A. and Liukko, U.M. 2019. <i>The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species</i>. Ympäristöministeriö and Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki.
- Williams, P.H., Berezin, M.V., Cannings, S.G., Cederberg, B., Ødegaard, F., Rasmussen, C., Richardson, L.L., Rykken, J., Sheffield, C.S., Thanoosing, C. and Byvaltsev, A.M. 2019. The arctic and alpine bumblebees of the subgenus <i>Alpinobombus</i> revised from integrative assessment of species’ gene coalescents and morphology (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus). <i>Zootaxa</i> 4625: 1–68.
- Rasmont P., Franzén M., Lecocq T., Harpke A., Roberts S.P.M., Biesmeijer J.C., Castro L., Cederberg B., Dvorák L., Fitzpatrick Ú., Gonseth Y., Haubruge E., Mahé G., Manino A., Michez D., Neumayer J., Ødegaard F., Paukkunen J., Pawlikowski T., Potts S.G., Reemer M., J. Settele, J. Straka, Schweiger O. 2015. Climatic Risk and Distribution Atlas of European Bumblebees. Biorisk 10 (<i>Special Issue</i>).
- Williams, P.H., Byvaltsev, A.M., Cederberg, B., Berezin, M.V., Ødegaard, F., Rasmussen, C., Richardson, L.L., Huang, J., Sheffield, C.S., Williams, S.T. 2015. Genes Suggest Ancestral Colour Polymorphisms Are Shared across Morphologically Cryptic Species in Arctic Bumblebees. <i>PLoS ONE</i> 10(12): e0144544.
- Nieto, A., Roberts, S.P.M., Kemp, J., Rasmont, P., Kuhlmann, M., García Criado, M., Biesmeijer, J.C., Bogusch, P., Dathe, H.H., De la Rúa, P., De Meulemeester, T., Dehon, M., Dewulf, A., Ortiz-Sánchez, F.J., Lhomme, P., Pauly, A., Potts, S.G., Praz, C., Quaranta, M., Radchenko, V.G., Scheuchl, E., Smit, J., Straka, J., Terzo, M., Tomozii, B., Window, J. and Michez, D. 2014. <i>European Red List of bees</i>. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- Rasmont, P. and Iserbyt, S. 2012. The Bumblebees Scarcity Syndrome: Are heat waves leading to local extinctions of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: <i>Bombus</i>)? <i>Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.)</i> 48(3-4): 275-280.
- Franzén, M. and Molander, M. 2012. How threatened are alpine environments? a cross taxonomic study. <i>Biodiversity Conservation</i> 21: 517-526.
- Franzén, M. and Ockinger, E. 2011. Climate-driven changes in pollinator assemblages during the last 60 years in an Arctic mountain region in Northern Scandinavia. <i> Journal of insect conservation</i> 16: 227-238.
- Rasmont, P. and Iserbyt, I. 2010-2012. Atlas of the European Bees: genus <i>Bombus</i>. STEP Project. Atlas Hymenoptera. Mons Available at: <a href="http://www.zoologie.umh.ac.be//hymenoptera/page.asp?ID=169">http://www.zoologie.umh.ac.be//hymenoptera/page.asp?ID=169</a>.
- Goulson, D., Lye, G.C. and Darvil, B. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. <i>Annual Review of Entomology</i> 53: 11.1–11.18.
- Berezin, M.V. 1995. Geographical Diversity, Species Correlation, Population Structure and Cenotic Interactions of Arctic Bumble Bees (Apidae, <i>Bombus</i>). <i>Swedish-Russian Tundra Ecology-Expedition</i>, pp. 400. Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, Stockholm.
- Løken, A. 1973. Studies on Scandinavian Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). <i>Norsk entomologisk Tidsskrift</i> 20(1): 1-218.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (4)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Ghisbain, G., Praz, C., Rasmont, P., Williams, P., Cederberg, B., Devalez, J., Flaminio, S., Biella, P., Radchenko, V. & Dellicour, S.
contributor
Benrezkallah, J., Boustani, M., De Manincor, N., Michez, D. & Sentil, A.
evaluator
Tourbez, C.
facilitators
Bellotto, V., Put, S., Trottet, A. & Verëll, V.
Ghisbain, G., Praz, C., Rasmont, P., Williams, P., Cederberg, B., Devalez, J., Flaminio, S., Biella, P., Radchenko, V. & Dellicour, S. 2025. Bombus balteatus (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T88088443A88088510. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (18)— redirigent vers cette page
- Bombus kirbyellus pyropygusFriese, 1905
- Alpinibombus balteatusSkorikov, 1937
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus appropinquansSkorikov, 1914
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus gmeliniSkorikov, 1914
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus pyrrhopygoideusSkorikov, 1914
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus subbalteatusSkorikov, 1914
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus subcollarisSkorikov, 1914
- Alpinobombus kirbyellus var. subcollarisSkorikov, 1914
- Bombus kirbyellusDalla Torre, 1896
- Bombus kirbyellusSparre-Schneider
- Bombus kirbyellus frieseiSkorikov, 1908
- Bombus kirbyellus lysholmiFriese, 1905
- Bombus kirbyellus similisFriese, 1911
- Bombus kirbyellus var. frieseiSkorikov, 1908
- Bombus kirbyellus var. lysholmiFriese, 1905
- Bombus nivalis> Var. Nigricans Thomson, 1872
- Bombus nivalisDahlbom, 1832
- Bombus tricolorDahlbom, 1832
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).