Ontologia

Aulotandra kamerunensis

Loes.

VULR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Aulotandra kamerunensis.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

VU · Vulnérablecritères B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)?Inconnue
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
400650 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert
The population is likely to be relatively stable in habitats that are still intact.

Menaces identifiées(6 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 2_1_1
    Shifting agriculture
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 2_1_3
    Agro-industry farming
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_3
    Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 5_3_4
    Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]
    UnknownUnknownOngoing
  • 1_1
    Housing & urban areas
    Very Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 1_2
    Commercial & industrial areas
    Very Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
Description complète des menacesExpert
The species has been documented from the Southwest, Central, Littoral and South Regions. In the Southwest Region, the species has been collected from Muyuka, near Mount Cameroun. Agriculture is important in the Mount Cameroon area, where it accounts for about 80% of household incomes in most towns (Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife 2014). The fertile volcanic soils of Mount Cameroon have attracted farmers – both subsistence and agro-industrial – to the area, and this has resulted in much of the forest being lost to farms (Fotso et al. 2001, Awono et al. 2014, Cronin et al. 2014).

In the Central Region, in both areas where the species has been collected, the forests have been subject to intense logging, followed by farming of cocoa and other crops (Onana and Cheek 2011). In the Makak area, there are also a number of smallholder oil palm plantations (Colfer 2010, Google Earth 2020).

In the South Region of Cameroon, the species has been collected near Bipindi, near Kribi, and from the Campo Ma'an National Park. Large amounts of forest have been lost in this area, mainly due to urban development and industrial agriculture surrounding Kribi (WWF 2018, Google Earth 2020). A particular threat is presented by the development of the Kribi Port and Industrial Complex, and the associated urbanisation and extractive industry infrastructure (Onana and Cheek 2011, WWF 2018). The port complex, which includes an industrial zone and a residential area, is being developed on a 26,000 ha site around Kribi, where it is responsible for forest loss and degradation (Romain et al. 2017, Tichafogwe and Nji 2018). Subsistence agriculture is also a threat, with slash and burn agriculture widely practiced across Cameroon, including in this area (Tchouto 2004, Onana and Cheek 2011). The main economic activity of Bipindi is agriculture, with a slash and burn approach used in the area to grow crops including plantain, cassava, macabo, and cocoa (Communes et Villes Unies du Cameroun 2020). Although crops are mainly grown for local consumption, food grown in Bipindi is increasingly being sold to Kribi (Communes et Villes Unies du Cameroun 2020). Agro-industrial plantations also pose a threat to this species, and in 2018, an oil palm concession was signed for over 18,000 ha of land near to Bipindi town (Ngeunga 2019). The Campo Ma’an National Park probably represents a relatively secure site. Subsistence agriculture may pose a threat to this species, with slash and burn agriculture widely practiced across Cameroon, including in the Campo Ma'an area (Tchouto 2004, Onana and Cheek 2011). The area immediately surrounding the national park is currently being, or has previously been, subject to logging and this could potentially impact this species (Fotso et al. 2001, Global Forest Watch 2020).

In the Littoral region, the species has been collected near Edea, which now represents a large urban settlement, and it is likely that urban expansion and associated cultivation impact the species here.

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
There are currently no known ex situ conservation sites for this species (BGCI 2020). The species occurs within the Campo-Ma'an National Park (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2020). The Mefou proposed NP could represent an important focal point for conservation of this species, should it be gazetted. Conservation action should involve staff at the National Herbarium of Cameroon, who have collected this species, and attempts to locate the species should be made in April, as this is when it flowers and is more conspicuous. It may then be possible to better protect the plant, collect subpopulation data, and investigate multiplication and seed banking possibilities.
Actions de conservation (2)Expert
  • 1_1Site/area protection
  • 3_2Species recovery
Stress écologiques (21)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
Priorités de recherche (3)Expert
  • 1_1Taxonomy
  • 2_1Species Action/Recovery Plan
  • 3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Afrotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Forb or Herb
Références bibliographiques (20)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 21 July 2022).
  2. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2020. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) / The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME)] [On-line]. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: <a href="https://www.protectedplanet.net/">https://www.protectedplanet.net/</a>.
  3. Global Forest Watch. 2020. Interactive Forest Change Mapping Tool. Available at: <a href="http://www.globalforestwatch.org/">http://www.globalforestwatch.org/</a>.
  4. ZRC. 2020. Zingiberaceae Resource Centre. Available at: <a href="http://padme.rbge.org.uk/ZRC/welcome">http://padme.rbge.org.uk/ZRC/welcome</a>.
  5. Communes et Villes Unies du Cameroun. 2020. Carte Communale. Available at: <a href="http://cvuc.cm/national/index.php/fr/">http://cvuc.cm/national/index.php/fr/</a>.
  6. Google Earth. 2019. Satellite Imagery. Available at: <a href="https://earth.google.com/web/">https://earth.google.com/web/</a>.
  7. Ngeunga, M. 2019. Cameroon: The Bagyeli women strongly opposing Biopalm. Available at: <a href="https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/node/50402">https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/node/50402</a>.
  8. BGCI. 2018. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  9. WWF. 2018. The saving of Campo Ma’an National Park. Available at: <a href="https://wwf.panda.org/?325912/The-saving-of-Campo-Maan-National-Park">https://wwf.panda.org/?325912/The-saving-of-Campo-Maan-National-Park</a>.
  10. Tichafogwe, T.R. and Nji, F.Z. 2018. The Kribi deep sea port creation as acatalyst to population mobility and development. <i>International Journal of Development and Sustainability</i> 7(4): 1273-1285.
  11. Romain, N.J., Lagarde, B.J., Emmanuel, D.K., Caroline, M.S.M. and Félicité, T.L. 2017. Deforestation, biodiversity and biomass losses in Kribi deep sea port area (Cameroon): Some mitigating measures. <i>Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment</i> 9(6): 87-98.
  12. The Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife. 2014. The management plan of the Mount Cameroon National Park and its peripheral zone 2015-2019.
  13. Awono, A., Tambe, A.A., Owona, H. and Barreau, E. 2014. REDD+ around Mount Cameroon, southwest region of Cameroon. In: Sills, E.O., Atmadja, S.S., de Sassi, C., Duchelle, A.E., Kweka, D.L., Resosudarmo, I.A.P. and Sunderlin W.D. (eds), <i>REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe.</i>, pp. 188-202. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
  14. Cronin, D.T., Libalah, M.B., Bergl, R.A. and Hearn, G.W. 2014. Biodiversity and conservation of tropical montane ecosystems in the Gulf of Guinea, West Africa. <i>Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research</i> 46: 891-904.
  15. Cheek, M., Harvey, Y. and Onana, J.M. 2011. <i>The Plants of Mefou Proposed National Park, Yaoundé, Cameroon: a conservation checklist.</i> Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey.
  16. Onana, J.M. and Cheek, M. 2011. <i>Red Data Book of the Flowering Plants of Cameroon: IUCN Global Assessments</i>. Kew Publishing, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
  17. Colfer, C.J.P. 2010 . <i>The Complex Forest: "Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management"</i>. Routledge.
  18. Tchouto, M.G.P. 2004. Plant diversity in a central African rain forest: implications for biodiversity conservation in Cameroon. PhD Thesis. Department of Plant Sciences, Biosystematics Group, Wageningen University.
  19. Fotso, R.; Dowsett-Lemaire, F.; Dowsett, R. J.; Cameroon Ornithological Club; Scholte, P.; Languy, M.; Bowden, C. 2001. Cameroon. In: Fishpool, L.D.C.; Evans, M.I. (ed.), <i>Important Bird Areas in Africa and associated islands: Priority sites for conservation</i>, pp. 133-159. Pisces Pubications and BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series No.11), Newbury and Cambridge, UK.
  20. Koechlin, J. (ed.). 1965. Scitaminales: Musacées - Marantacées. In: Aubreville, A. (ed.), <i>Flore du Cameroun</i>, Muséum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Expert
assessor
Cheek, M. & Poulsen, A.D.
evaluator
Onana, J.-M.

Cheek, M. & Poulsen, A.D. 2022. Aulotandra kamerunensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T109271624A110074004. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Bibliographie