Ontologia

Aloidendron pillansii

(L.Guthrie) Klopper & Gideon F.Sm.

CRLR Monde (IUCN)
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Aloidendron pillansii.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

CR · En danger critiquecritères A4aceDécroissante
Évaluation complète
Évaluation
2022 · v3.1
Altitude
1201100 m
Profondeur
m
État de la populationExpert

The population has three distinct subpopulations (northern, central and southern) each with differing climatic and habitat characteristics. The total population number was estimated to be around 5,935 with 1,891 of those individuals subject to an ongoing monitoring effort (Swart and Hoffman 2013). Discovery of a few additional stands of plants since 2013 means that the population can be confirmed to be more than 5,935 individuals but less than 9,000 individuals.

The northern subpopulation in southern Namibia is senescent, it has the highest density of individuals with 46% of the overall population occurring here. It receives the highest concentration of winter rainfall and fog. This subpopulation occurs predominantly on east and southwest facing slopes and receives the coolest average annual temperature. There is a 4.6:1 ratio of dead to live individuals (77% of known individuals are dead). The majority of the live individuals are adults between 3 and 7 m tall (Swart and Hoffman 2013). There are no seedlings and very few juveniles. While dead skeletons persist for long periods of time, and the rate of decay is not known, this species has a very long generation length of over 150 years, the proportion of dead individuals are therefore assumed to represent those that have died in the past two generations (300 years). This subpopulation has therefore declined by at least 70% over the past two generations.

The central subpopulation constitutes an estimated 16% of the population and occurs mainly in and on the outskirts of the Richtersveld Transfrontier Park. This subpopulation has the lowest density of individuals in comparison to the other two subpopulations. Plants occur on all slope aspects and receive both winter and summer rainfall. For every two live individuals there is one dead skeleton, this subpopulation has a higher concentration of juvenile individuals than the northern population (Swart and Hoffman 2013). It is subject to significant recent threat from stock overgrazing and illegal collection for the horticultural trade. There has been extensive monitoring at one of the stands within this subpopulation that occurs at Cornellskop which constitutes around 5% of the individuals from this central subpopulation. A study in 2006 noted that the number of mature individuals at Cornellskop had halved between 1937 and 2004 (Duncan et al. 2006). This same study showed there to be an annual mortality of 1.4% for individuals above 3 m leading to the conclusion that within 60 years there will be no more adults on Cornellskop. While this stand of individuals does have recruitment taking place (juveniles and seedlings were observed to be present), there has also been a significant loss of small individuals to illegal poaching with 10–15% of juveniles stolen in one year. Cornellskop has since 2018 also been losing habitat to large movement of sand, with the western slopes now covered in sand. This is a new form of habitat change that started in 2015 and occurs as a result of loss of vegetation cover from drought and overgrazing, and changes in wind direction and frequency linked to ongoing climatic change within the Richtersveld region. In other parts of the central subpopulation between the years 2017 and 2020 a number of mature individuals were observed to have died as a result of the severe and prolonged drought that took place between 2015 and 2019. At Five Sisters, another stand in the central subpopulation, 70% of individuals that were alive in 2007 had died 2020. Given these observations of recent declines and decline of 70% of this central subpopulation over the past two generations (300 years) is also inferred.

The southern subpopulation, that constitutes an estimated 38% of the population, is blocked off from winter precipitation due to its location east of the Stinkfontein mountains. This subpopulation receives the highest average annual temperature. Plants grow predominantly on east and west aspects. There were almost four live individuals for every dead skeleton here and the population was considered to be growing prior to 2015 due to a high concentration, almost 50% of the subpopulation, consisting of seedlings and juveniles (Swart and Hoffman 2013). Unfortunately, there has been high mortality between 2015–2020 which has been caused by predation from baboons. Monitoring of individuals present in 2006 indicated that by 2014, 6.4% had died while by 2020, 48.8% of the 2006 individuals had died. This reflects that the drought that took place from 2016–2020 has caused increases in mortality.

Given the above data the population is inferred to have declined by at least 61% over the past 300 years (two generations). Future declines to the population are extremely likely since modelled climate envelopes for the time period 2061–2080, have very low overlap with the current species occupied habitat (supporting information). Climate models for the likely emission scenarios where emissions stay at present day levels (RCP 2.6) (Hausfather and Peters 2020) and worst-case scenarios where emissions continue to increase during the 21st century (RCP 8.5) indicate that there will be a loss of suitable bioclimatic envelope of between 92% and 100% between 2061 and 2080 (see attached Supporting Information document). 

Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)

  • 8_2_2
    Named species
    Rapid DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 11_2
    Droughts
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 2_3_1
    Nomadic grazing
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMajority (50-90%)Ongoing
  • 3_2
    Mining & quarrying
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Ongoing
  • 5_2_1
    Intentional use (species is the target)
    Slow, Significant DeclinesMinority (<50%)Past, Likely to Return
Description complète des menacesExpert

Decline to the central subpopulation as a result of illegal collection for the succulent horticultural trade has been observed in the past (Duncan et al. 2005, 2006; Powell 2005). Both the northern and central subpopulations are experiencing ongoing habitat loss and degradation as a result of mining activities. The footprint of mines as well as secondary impacts from mining activities such as windblown sand dumps and sand blasting is expected to increase over the next 50 years. An influx of people may also lead to future poaching taking place.

The extreme droughts of the 21st century has caused decline to the population. The influence of anthropogenic climate change on rainfall regimes and extreme temperatures are considered a key current and future threat (Swart and Hoffman 2013, van Wilgen et al. 2016). The prolonged drought that started in 2016 and is still ongoing at the time of this assessment has caused mortality of mature individuals in the central and southern subpopulation, furthermore drought conditions and the general lack of forage available in the broader landscape has led to a significant increase in predation by baboons with these impacts particularly severe for plants occurring in the southern subpopulation. Drought events and their negative influence on grazing/browsing availability in combination with high concentrations of livestock have increased pressure on the juvenile population across this species range. Furthermore, modelled climate envelopes for the time period 2061–2080, show little to no overlap with the current species range (see attached Supporting Information document). These models predict that the pressure from climate change is likely to continue to cause significant population decline. 

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

  • 3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
  • 6Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
Mesures de conservation recommandéesExpert
The species is listed in CITES Appendix I (CITES 2019), and is recorded in 25 ex situ collections (BGCI 2020).

A large portion of the population falls within the Ai /Ais-Richtersveld Transfrontier Park where active management, protection and monitoring is possible.

Key research questions  include the need to understand rates of decay of carcasses to inform interpretation of the ratio of live to dead individuals. This is a key factor in understanding relative population trend with this long lived species. The ability to respond to climate change is limited by the populations ability to disperse which in turn depends on seed dispersal. Past and current levels of dispersal needs to be better understood by conducting a genetic analyses of the meta-population. A population viability model needs to be constructed using in field repeat monitoring data collected over the past 10 years this will allow for improved predictions of the rate of future declines.
Stress écologiques (13)Expert
  • 1_1Ecosystem conversion
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 1_2Ecosystem degradation
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_1Species mortality
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_2Species disturbance
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
  • 2_3_7Reduced reproductive success
Usage & commerce (1)Expert
  • 13Pets/display animals, horticulture
    internationalnational
Priorités de recherche (5)Expert
  • 1_3Life history & ecology
  • 1_5Threats
  • 1_6Actions
  • 3_1Population trends
  • 3_3Trade trends
Niche IUCN globaleExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Afrotropical

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

Succulent - tree
Références bibliographiques (23)Expert
  1. IUCN. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 21 July 2022).
  2. BGCI. 2020. Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) - Plant Search. Available at: <a href="https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php">https://tools.bgci.org/plant_search.php</a>.
  3. Hausfather, Z. and Peters, G.P. 2020. Emissions - the 'business as usual' story is misleading. <i>Nature</i> 577: 618-620.
  4. CITES - The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. 2019. Appendices I, II and III valid from 26 November 2019. Available at: <a href="https://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php">https://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php</a>. (Accessed: March 2020).
  5. van Wilgen, N. J.; Goodall, V.; Holness, S.; Chown, S. L.; McGeoch, M. A. 2016. Rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns in South Africa's national parks. <i>International Journal of Climatology</i> 36: 706-721.
  6. Van Wyk, B.-E. and Smith, G.F. 2014. <i>Guide to the Aloes of South Africa</i>. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
  7. Swart, E. and Hoffman, M.T. 2013. A baseline database for <i>Aloe pillansii</i> in southern Africa to enable quantitative conservation status assessments. <i>South African Journal of Botany</i> Volume 86, May 2013: Page 167.
  8. Cousins, S.R. and Witkowski, E.T.F. 2012. African aloe ecology: a review. <i>Journal of Arid Environments</i> 85: 1-17.
  9. Van Jaarsveld, E. 2011. The tree Aloes of Southern and Eastern Africa. <i>Cactus and Succulent Journal</i> 83(1): 9-21.
  10. Duncan, J., Hoffman, T., Rohde, R., Powell, E. and Hendricks, H. 2006. Long-term population changes in the Giant Quiver tree, <i>Aloe pillansii</i> in the Richtersveld, South Africa. <i>Plant Ecology</i> 185: 73-84.
  11. Powell, E. 2005. Can the plunder of quiver trees be controlled? <i>Veld & Flora</i> 91(2): 70-72.
  12. Duncan, J., Hoffmann, T. and Rohde, R. 2005. Is the flagship of the Richtersveld sinking? <i>Veld & Flora</i> 91(4): 180-181.
  13. Bolus, C., Hoffmann, T., Todd, S., Powell, E., Hendricks, H. and Clark, B. 2004. The distribution and population structure of <i>Aloe pillansii</i> in South Africa in relation to climate and elevation. <i>Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa</i> 59(2): 133-140.
  14. Powell, E., Hendricks, H., Clark, B., Pretorius, L., Roderick, J. and Garrett, D. 2003. The Plight of <i>Aloe pillansii</i>: investigating the startling decline of the bastard quiver trees of the Richtersveld. <i>Veld & Flora</i> 89(4): 150-151.
  15. Loots, S. and Mannheimer, C. 2003. The status of <i>Aloe pillansii</i> L. Guthrie (Asphodelaceae) in Namibia. <i>Bradleya</i> 21: 57-62.
  16. van Wyk, A.E. and Smith, G.F. 2001. <i>Regions of floristic endemism in Southern Africa: a review with emphasis on succulents</i>.
  17. Williamson, G. 1998. The ecological status of <i>Aloe pillansii</i> (Aloaceae) in the Richtersveld with particular reference to Cornellskop. <i>Bradleya</i> 16(1998): 1-8.
  18. Hilton-Taylor, C. 1998. <i>Aloe pillansii</i>. <i>The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species</i> 1998: e.T31016A9600617. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T31016A9600617.en.
  19. Midgeley, J. 1997. The decline of <i>Aloe pillansii</i> at Cornell's Kop in the Richtersveld. <i>Aloe</i> 34(1&2): 39.
  20. Midgley, J.J., Cowling, R.M., Hendricks, H., Desmet, P.G., Esler, K. and Rundel, P. 1997. Population ecology of tree succulents (<i>Aloe</i> and <i>Pachypodium</i>) in the arid western Cape: decline of keystone species. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 6: 869-876.
  21. Midgley, J.J., Cowling, R.M., Hendricks, H., Desmet, P.G., Esler, P.G. and Rundel, P. 1996. Tree succulents in the Richtersveld: some charismatic keystone species. <i>Veld & Flora</i> 82(3): 74-75.
  22. Hilton-Taylor, C. (ed.). 1996. <i>Red Data List of Southern African Plants</i>. Strelitzia 4. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
  23. Bond, W. 1983. Dead leaves and fire survival in southern African tree aloes. <i>Oecologia</i> 58: 110-114.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Expert
assessor
Swart, E., Raimondo, D., Geldenhuys, C., Hoffman, M.T., Van Wyk, P.C.V., Loots, S., Eastment, C. & Guo, D.
contributor
Hilton-Taylor, C.
evaluator
Mtshali, H. & Hilton-Taylor, C.

Swart, E., Raimondo, D., Geldenhuys, C., Hoffman, M.T., Van Wyk, P.C.V., Loots, S., Eastment, C. & Guo, D. 2022. Aloidendron pillansii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T31016A110113558. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Répartition mondiale (heatmap GBIF)Construction en cours

0 obs · 0 cellules
Construction par partitions temporelles GBIF0%

Source : GBIF — observations agrégées par hexagones 0.2° × 0.2° (~22km). Filtre qualité : précision coordonnée < 10 km. Coloration quantile (q50/70/90/99). Fond carte : OpenFreeMap · © OpenStreetMap.

Distribution mondiale

Calcul de la distribution GBIF· ~10–60 s

Phénologie

Calcul du calendrier d'apparition· ~5–30 s

Consulter sur les bases externes

Observations & statuts

Cartographie

Bibliographie

Note nomenclaturale & synonymesExpert

Note nomenclaturale

TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHN

Synonymes (2)— redirigent vers cette page

  • Aloe dichotoma subsp. pillansii(L.Guthrie) Zonn.
  • Aloe pillansiiL.Guthrie

Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).