Froment à Queue

Aegilops caudataL.

Plante

LCLR Monde (IUCN)

Filtrer le graphe par contexte spatialPays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome

Graphe en cours d’indexation

Calcul du tissu écologique de Aegilops caudata.

Le graphe apparaîtra automatiquement dès que le calcul est terminé (rafraîchissement toutes les 5s).

Liste rouge IUCN

LC · Préoccupation mineure→Stable

Évaluation complète

Évaluation: 2017 · v3.1
Altitude: 0 – 1850 m
Profondeur: – m

État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert

This species is known to be stable in its native range in Europe (Uzundzhalieva et al. 2011). Van Slageren (1994) notes that it is locally abundant and known to form dense stands, often together with other Aegilops species.

Menaces identifiées(1 menace classée CMP-IUCN)

2_3_2
Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
UnknownUnknownUnknown

Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert

It is threatened by overgrazing in some areas of Europe (Uzundzhalieva et al. 2011).

Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)

14_1Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land★
4_4Grassland - Temperate★
1_4Forest - Temperate

Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert

The genus Aegilops is listed in Annex I of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture as part of the wheat gene pool.

It has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EC 27 (Uzundzhalieva et al. 2011).

There are 173 germplasm accessions of wild origin reported by Genesys of which 50 are backed up at a second genebank. Furthermore, 33 accessions are duplicated and conserved ex situ in the Svalbard Seed Vault. Out of the 173 accessions, 170 were collected within the species' native range (114 from Greece, 27 from Turkey, 17 from Lebanon, eight from Bulgaria and four from Syria). One accession was collected in the USA which is outside the species' native range and two come from undisclosed country of origin (Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources 2017).

Actions de conservation (1)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert

3_4_2Genome resource bank

Stress écologiques (2)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert

2_1Species mortality
2_2Species disturbance

Priorités de recherche (4)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert

1_2Population size, distribution & trends
1_5Threats
3_1Population trends
3_4Habitat trends

Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert

Royaumes biogéographiques

Palearctic

Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)

Terrestrial

Formes de croissance

AnnualGraminoid

Références bibliographiques (12)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert

Sotelo, H. and Helpdesk, G.N. 2018. A global database for the distributions of crop wild relatives. Version 1.3. Occurrence Dataset accessed via GBIF. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/jyrthk accessed via GBIF.org">https://doi.org/10.15468/jyrthk accessed via GBIF.org</a>. (Accessed: 25-05-2018).
USDA, ARS, GRIN. 2017. Germplasm Resources Information Network [online]. Beltsville (MD) Available at: <a href="http://www.ars-grin.gov/">http://www.ars-grin.gov/</a>. (Accessed: June 2017).
IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-3. Available at: <a href="www.iucnredlist.org">www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 5 December 2017).
ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas). 2017. ICARDA database. (Accessed: July 2017).
Genesys Global Portal on Plant Genetic Resources. 2017. Available at: <a href="www.genesys-pgr.org">www.genesys-pgr.org</a>. (Accessed: June 2017).
Bioversity International. 2014. Collecting Missions Database. Rome. Available at: <a href="http://bioversity.github.io/geosite/">http://bioversity.github.io/geosite/</a>. (Accessed: July 2017).
Vincent, H., Wiersema, J., Kell, S., Fielder, H., Dobbie, S., Castañeda-Alvarez, N.P., Guarino, L., Eastwood, R., Leόn, B. and Maxted, N. 2013. A prioritized crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security. Biological Conservation 167: 265–275.
Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. Zookeys 150: 117–126.
Uzundzhalieva, K., Economou, G. and Strajeru, S. 2011. Aegilops caudata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172198A6847328. Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/172198/1">http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/172198/1</a>. (Accessed: July 2017).
Valdés, B. and Scholz, H.; with contributions from Raab-Straube, E. von and Parolly, G. 2009. Poaceae (pro parte majore). Euro+Med Plantbase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Available at: <a href="http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/">http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/</a>. (Accessed: 11 March 2010).
van Slageren, M.W. 1994. Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A. (eds). 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Évaluateurs & contributeurs (3)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert

assessor

Magos Brehm, J.

contributor

Uzundzhalieva, K., Economou, G., Strajeru, S., Kell, S.P. & Hargreaves , S.

evaluator

Goettsch, B.

Magos Brehm, J. 2017. Aegilops caudata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T172198A72036553. Accessed on 05 May 2026.

Indicateurs écologiquesTolérance thermique · radar EIVE · triangle CSR

Indicateurs écologiques Ellenberg-type

EIVE 1.0 — Dengler 2023

Position de l'espèce sur les 5 dimensions écologiques européennes (M / N / R / L / T), échelle 0-10. La zone estompée représente la niche width (variabilité tolérée).

Humidité: xérophile ↔ hygrophile
Azote: oligotrophe ↔ nitrophile
Réaction (pH): silicicole ↔ calcicole
Lumière: sciaphile ↔ héliophile
Température: cryophile ↔ thermophile

Source : EIVE 1.0 (Dengler et al. 2023). CC-BY 4.0. Échelle harmonisée 0-10 (équivalent inverse-rang sur les systèmes Ellenberg, Landolt, Pignatti, etc.). Niche width = écart-type d'estimation, indicateur de fiabilité (zone estompée).