%20Figures%202%E2%80%935%20(cropped).jpg?width=220)
Encholirium spectabile
Mart. ex Schult. & Schult.f.
Indicateurs du réseau écologique
Comment lire ce graphe
Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Encholirium spectabile et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.
Limites principales
- Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
- Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
- Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
- Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
- Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
- Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.
Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées
Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :
- Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
- Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
- Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
- Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
- Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)
Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).
Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).
Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata
3 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure→Stable- Évaluation
- 2013 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 0 – 1000 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Caatinga is the largest dry forest region in South America and certainly one of the richest dry forests in the world. This forest originally covered ca 70% of the vegetative cover of northeast Brazil. At least 50% of the Caatinga has been either completely converted from its native vegetation or modified in a major way by human activities (i.e., the second/third most degraded ecosystem in Brazil) (Da Silva 2001, Leal et al. 2005). Vegetation remnants are distributed in different sized fragments. A high proportion of the Caatinga is under high human pressure. Unsustainable timber extraction for fuel, clearance for pastures, overgrazing, slash and burn agriculture, "Sertanjos" (conversion of remnant vegetation to new and short lived crops), desertification, extensive and uncontrolled fires and, more recently, cotton and sugar cane cultivation are all playing critical roles in the nearly complete destruction of these important regional ecosystems. Deforestation rates have been higher than in the Amazon rainforest and numerous plant species are threatened by extinction. Twenty percent of plant species threatened by extinction do not occur within any protected areas. Other threats to plant species include the spread of invasive African grasses, environmentally harmful agricultural practices, probable regional climate modification, water pollution and development of tourism (Klink and Machado 2005, Silva et al. 2006). Natural habitats in the cerrado and the Atlantic forests where the taxon is more rarely found have also been greatly degraded and are under high human pressure. Rock outcrops have frequently been preserved from human impact as they don't present much agricultural interest and they are often the last refuges of natural vegetation types. Anthropogenic disturbance may considerably modify the vegetation composition of these fragile ecosystems (Mereilles et al. 1999). Intense mining activities take place on rock outcrops in part of the region. Encholirium spectabile was collected in areas which have a medium to high human foot print (Sanderson et al. 2002). Loss of habitat is likely to erode the genetic diversity of the population.
Over the last 20 years bromeliads have become more popular in Brazil as home and garden ornamentals and this has promoted increasing collection pressures on natural populations (Versieux and Wanderley 2007, Versieux and Wendt 2007). International trade of Bromeliaceae has also rapidly expanded (Read 1989). Plants highly adapted to these hostile environments are appreciated for ornamental purposes. This creates an illegal commerce of plants extracted by local people and sold along the roads of the region. In the northeastern Atlantic forest, some ornamental bromeliads have been intensively collected and almost eliminated from forest fragments close to human settlements (Filho and Tabarelli 2006). The exact impact of extraction on the population is unknown.
The increased frequency and intensity of fires may also directly threaten the population of Encholirium spectabile. Although some Encholirium spp. have been reported to resist fires with thick mantles of persisting insulating leaf bases (Benzing 2000), Versieux and Wendt (2007) report that many Bromeliads from Campos rupestre do not seem to tolerate fire as previously thought. During their field work in Minas Gerais, they retuned to many places where fires were so intense that entire populations disappeared within a few years, regardless of their saxicolous life forms. Fires may cause complete destruction of soil islands on rock outcrops preventing recolonization by the native flora and favouring spread of invasive African grasses (Benzing 2000, Versieux and Wendt 2007).
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_5Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Dry2_1Savanna - Dry3_5Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
New conservation initiatives on a small scale are now being implemented and new protected areas developed. The region is important due to its high number of species and endemics and to the fact that it is an island of aridity amid tropical mesic biomes (Leal et al. 2005). Parks and reserves in the region often fail to protect resident taxa. Illegal logging, illegal collections and corruption are common but seldom reported. Proper management plans and law enforcement are needed as well as facilitation of the much needed scientific collections and studies in these parks and reserves (Da Silva 2001, Leal et al. 2005). Forty-one percent of the Caatinga has never been surveyed by scientists and 80% of what has been was surveyed poorly (Da Silva 2001, Leal et al. 2005). Field surveys must be conducted in sites of historical collections and potentially suitable sites. The size and current range of the species must be determined.
The population should be regularly monitored. The impacts of fires, potential wild harvesting and anthropogenic disturbances on the population dynamics should be studied as well as the genetic structure of the population. Seeds should be collected for germplasm conservation.
Actions de conservation (2)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
3_4_2Genome resource bank4_3Awareness & communications
Priorités de recherche (2)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Formes de croissance
Références bibliographiques (20)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- IUCN. 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2013.2). Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org">http://www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 13 November 2013).
- Versieux, L.M. and Wendt, T. 2007. Bromeliaceae diversity and conservation in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 16: 2989-3009.
- Felfili, J.M., Terra Nascimento, A.R., Fagg, C.W. and Meirelles, E.M. 2007. Floristic composition and community structure of a seasonally forest on limestone outcrops in Central Brazil. <i>Revista Brasileira de Botânica</i> 30(4): 611-621.
- Filho, J.A.S. and Leme, E.M.C. 2007. <i>Fragments of the Atlantic forest of Northeast Brazil</i>. Andrea Jakobsson Estudio, Rio de Janeiro.
- Versieux, L.M. and Wanderley, M.G.L. 2007. Two new species of <i>Alcantarea</i> (Bromeliaceae, Tillandsioideae) from Brazil. <i>Brittonia</i> 59(1): 57-64.
- Barbará, T., Martinelli, G., Fay, M.F., Mayo, S.J. and Lexer, C. 2007. Population differentiation and species cohesion in two closely related plants adapted to neotropical altitude "inselbergs" <i>Alcanarea imperialis</i> and <i>Alcantarea geniculata</i> (Bromeliaceae). <i>Molecular Ecology</i> 16(10): 1981-1992.
- Silva, J.F., Farinas, M.R., Felfili, J.M. and Klink, C.A. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the cerrado region of Brazil. <i>Journal of Biogeography</i> 33: 536-548.
- Cavallari, M.M., Forzza, R.C., Veasey, E.A., Zucchi, M.I. and Oliveira, G.C. 2006. Genetic variation in three Endangered species of <i>Encholirium</i> (Bromeliaceae) from Cadeia do Espinhaço, Brazil, selected using RAPD markers. <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i> 15(14): 4357-4373.
- Leal, I.R., da Silva, J.M.C., Tabarelli, M. and Lacher, T.E. 2005. Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the caatinga of northeastern Brazil. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 19(3): 701-706.
- Klink, C.A. and Machado, R.B. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. <i>Conservation Biology</i> 19(3): 707-713.
- Forzza, R.C. 2005. Revisao taxonomica de <i>Encholirium</i> Mart. (Pitcairnioideae - Bromeliaceae). <i>Boletim de Botânica da Universidade de São Paulo</i> 23(1): 1-49.
- Ramalho, M., Batista, M.A. and Silva, M. 2004. <i>Xylocopa</i> (<i>Monoxylocopa</i>) <i>abbreviata</i> Hurd & Moure (Hymenoptera:Apidae) e <i>Encholirium spectabile</i> (Bromeliaceae): Uma Associação Estreita Semi-Árido do Brasil Tropical. <i>Neotropical Entomology</i> 33(4): 417-426.
- Forzza, R.C., Christianin, A.V., Wanderley, M.G.L. and Buzato, S. 2003. <i>Encholirium</i> (Pitcairnioideae – Bromeliaceae): conhecimento atual e sugestões para conservação. <i>Vidalia</i> 1: 7-20.
- Rocha, P.L.B., Queiroz, L.P. and de and Pirani, J.R. 2003. Plant species and habitat structure in a sand dune field in the Brazilian Caatinga: a homogeneous habitat harbouring an endemic biota. <i>Revista Brasileira de Botânica</i> 27(4): 739-755.
- Sanderson, E.W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M.A., Redford, K.H., Wannebo, A.V. and Woolmer, G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. <i>Bioscience</i> 52(10): 891-904.
- da Silva, J.M.C. 2001. Caatinga (NT1304). Available at: <a href="http://worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/nt1304">http://worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/nt1304</a>.
- Benzing, D.H. 2000. <i>Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation</i>. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Meirelles, S.T., Pivello, V.R. and Joly, C.A. 1999. The vegetation of granite rock outcrops in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and the need for its protection. <i>Environmental Conservation</i> 26(1): 10-20.
- Read, M. 1989. Bromeliaceae threatened by trade. <i>Curtis Botanical Magazine</i> 6(1): 22-29.
- Smith, L.B. and Downs, R.J. 1974. <i>Flora Neotropica, Pitcairnoideae (Bromeliaceae)</i>. Hafner Press, New York.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
Romand-Monnier, F. 2013. Encholirium spectabile. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T44393680A44499793. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (11)— redirigent vers cette page
- Dyckia spectabilis(Mart. ex Schult. & Schult.f.) Baker
- Encholirium bahianumL.B.Sm. & Read
- Encholirium densiflorumUle
- Encholirium harleyiL.B.Sm. & Read
- Encholirium hoehneanumL.B.Sm.
- Encholirium lutziiL.B.Sm.
- Encholirium paraibaeL.B.Sm. & Read
- Encholirium patensL.B.Sm.
- Encholirium pernambucanumL.B.Sm. & Read
- Encholirium rupestreUle
- Puya saxatilisMart.
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).