Brazil Scrambling Bamboo
Chusquea bambusoides(Raddi) Hack.
Pays · région · aire protégée · écorégion · biome
Chargement du graphe…
Indicateurs du réseau écologique
Comment lire ce graphe
Ce graphe représente les interactions écologiques documentées entre Chusquea bambusoides et d'autres espèces, à partir de la base GloBI (Global Biotic Interactions, agrégation mondiale de la littérature scientifique) — source principale, complétée par d'autres jeux de données d'interactions agrégés par Ontologia. Il faut le comprendre comme une carte du savoir documenté, pas une carte de la réalité écologique exhaustive.
Limites principales
- Incomplet. La majorité des interactions écologiques en milieu naturel n'ont jamais été publiées. Une espèce sans liens visibles n'est pas isolée — elle est probablement mal étudiée.
- Biais publication pharmaco-agronomique. La littérature des interactions est polarisée par les enjeux économiques et sanitaires : parasitism / pathogen sur-pondéré sur les mammifères (recherche zoonoses, vecteurs), herbivory sur-pondéré sur les insectes phytophages (entomologie agronomique). À l'inverse, mutualisms, commensalisms et interactions sol/microbiote sont sous-cités. Conseil de lecture : sur les hubs mammifères ou les insectes ravageurs de culture, lire les arêtes parasitism / herbivory dominantes relativement au contexte de littérature, pas comme une mesure d'intensité écologique brute. Détails §10.1.
- Biaisé vers les espèces étudiées. Quelques espèces (oiseaux communs, abeille mellifère, espèces modèles) concentrent disproportionnellement plus d'interactions documentées. Notre score composite ajoute un malus aux hubs de littérature pour atténuer cette dominance visuelle.
- Interactions documentées globalement. Toutes les espèces affichées sont observées en France métropolitaine (les observations sont filtrées sur le territoire métropolitain), mais les interactions entre elles proviennent de la littérature scientifique mondiale. Une interaction documentée à l'étranger peut ne pas se réaliser à l'identique sur votre territoire. Le filtre « restreindre à ma commune » tient compte de la co-occurrence spatiale locale mais ne garantit pas l'interaction effective.
- Sans dimension temporelle. Les variations saisonnières (migration, floraison, cycle de vie) ne sont pas modélisées.
- Force d'interaction approximative. L'épaisseur des liens reflète le nombre de fois où l'interaction a été rapportée dans la littérature, pas son importance écologique réelle.
Comment nous sélectionnons les espèces affichées
Le graphe affiche au plus 31 nœuds par fiche (1 centre + 15 bulles depth=1 + 15 partenaires depth=2). Le serveur sélectionne intelligemment :
- Bulles famille créées si une cascade taxonomique existe ou si ≥3 espèces directement documentées partagent une même famille — les espèces sont absorbées dans la bulle (pas de doublon visuel)
- Espèces individuelles uniquement quand <3 dans une famille (sans cascade) — relations directes documentées
- Pas d'espèces inférées affichées en doublon — les cascades sont représentées via les bulles famille uniquement
- Partenaires depth=2 sélectionnés via algo priorité : candidat partagé par ≥2 docs de la famille (food web central) → reliant entre bulles → top sum_obs en dernier recours
- Sous-types GloBI traduits en français au survol de la flèche (chasse, parasite, parasitoïde, mycorhize…)
Le toggle Profondeur 1 ↔ 2 client-side cache ou affiche les partenaires depth=2 sans refetch. Filtres règne, type d'interaction, ordres/familles, patrimoniales et commune recalculent côté serveur (slow path live ~1-2 s).
Indicateurs avancés (mode expert) : Modularité Q (Newman 2006, PNAS), communautés (Louvain, Blondel et al. 2008, J. Stat. Mech.), nestedness NODF (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Oikos).
Source : GloBI · TAXREF v18 (INPN/MNHN) · BDC-Statuts · Wikidata
3 partenaires écologiques documentés directement dans GloBI.
Partenaires
3
Espèces avec interactions documentées
Types d'interactions
2
Prédation, pollinisation, parasitisme…
Connectance
0.400
Densité des liens dans le sous-graphe affiché
Rang plantae
47 %
Percentile vs ensemble des plantae
Liste rouge IUCN
LC · Préoccupation mineure→Stable- Évaluation
- 2013 · v3.1
- Altitude
- 1 – 1094 m
- Profondeur
- – m
État de la populationTexte officiel évaluation IUCNExpert
There are no population data available for this species.
Menaces identifiées(5 menaces classées CMP-IUCN)
4_1Roads & railroadsUnknownUnknownOngoing2_3_4Scale Unknown/UnrecordedOngoing3_2Mining & quarryingOngoing5_3_5Motivation Unknown/UnrecordedOngoing7_1_3Trend Unknown/UnrecordedOngoing
Description complète des menacesTexte détaillé évaluation IUCNExpert
Areas with the highest anthropogenic influence where this species is found: Ipiranga, São Paulo, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro (e.g., Barra da Trijuca, Morro Queimado and Guanabara). There are no direct threats affecting this species, however there are several threats which affect the eco-regions in which it is found: In Cerrado, the major threats include agricultural expansion (which may include frequent burning), charcoal production, and water projects. Cattle grazing, which destroys native grassland habitats, is also a threat. In the Atlantic forests (Bahia coastal and interior forests, Serra do Mar coastal forests, and Araucaria moist forests) the major habitat threats include urbanization, industrialization, logging, agricultural expansion, and road building. In the flooded forests of Marajó Varzeá, selective logging of the kapok tree and virola is accelerating deforestation. The open floodplains are threatened by conversion to cattle ranching. Roads built through the region open up access to previously remote areas and lead to erosion and increased use of the natural resources. In the Alto Paraná Atlantic forests timber extraction and agriculture represent continuous threats. Such activities will increase as human populations expand and put increased pressure on timber trees.
Habitats préférentiels (classification IUCN)
1_6Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland1_9Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane
Mesures de conservation recommandéesStratégies de conservation IUCNExpert
This species has been found in the following protected areas, however there is no specific conservation management of the species:
One specimen possibly found in Discovery Coast Atlantic Forest Reserves (World Heritage Convention), or in the proposed buffer zone surrounding the reserve. Both existing and proposed conservation units are in an excellent state of conservation, and include almost 80% of remaining Atlantic forest that remains in Brazil. Timber extraction and transportation of vegetation has been banned.
Four specimens were found within the Atlantic Forest Southeast Reserves (World Heritage Convention), one of which may overlap with the Superagüi National Park (IUCN category II). All the Atlantic forest occurring in Sao Paulo State has been declared under special protection and management plans are being implemented in all protected areas.
Four specimens have been found in Tijuca National Park (IUCN category II). However, the park is located virtually within the city of Rio de Janeiro, in an urban area with 5 million inhabitants and suffers from uncontrolled visiting and insufficient funds.
There have also been three specimens located in the vicinity of the national parks of Iguaçu, São Joaquim, and Caparaó. The latter two are both IUCN category II.
Ecoregion level conservation:
Much of the Atlantic Forests in Brazil have been lost to urban development. WWF, Conservation International, SOS Mata Atlântica, and many other colleagues are working to conserve the largest, most viable forest remnants and prevent any additional deforestation or degradation of these remnants. They are also working with the government to establish and maintain a network of protected areas. At the same time, they are working with private landowners to develop strategies for restoring degraded areas and protect corridors that will link the remaining tracts of forest and protect highly endangered rain forest species. To protect the biodiversity of the Marajó Varzeá ecoregion, part of the strategy is to establish new protected areas and build the capacity of local park staff to manage and protect these areas, addressing the issues of deforestation in the floodplains and headwaters, and dam building, which destroys natural flood and sedimentation cycles.
One specimen possibly found in Discovery Coast Atlantic Forest Reserves (World Heritage Convention), or in the proposed buffer zone surrounding the reserve. Both existing and proposed conservation units are in an excellent state of conservation, and include almost 80% of remaining Atlantic forest that remains in Brazil. Timber extraction and transportation of vegetation has been banned.
Four specimens were found within the Atlantic Forest Southeast Reserves (World Heritage Convention), one of which may overlap with the Superagüi National Park (IUCN category II). All the Atlantic forest occurring in Sao Paulo State has been declared under special protection and management plans are being implemented in all protected areas.
Four specimens have been found in Tijuca National Park (IUCN category II). However, the park is located virtually within the city of Rio de Janeiro, in an urban area with 5 million inhabitants and suffers from uncontrolled visiting and insufficient funds.
There have also been three specimens located in the vicinity of the national parks of Iguaçu, São Joaquim, and Caparaó. The latter two are both IUCN category II.
Ecoregion level conservation:
Much of the Atlantic Forests in Brazil have been lost to urban development. WWF, Conservation International, SOS Mata Atlântica, and many other colleagues are working to conserve the largest, most viable forest remnants and prevent any additional deforestation or degradation of these remnants. They are also working with the government to establish and maintain a network of protected areas. At the same time, they are working with private landowners to develop strategies for restoring degraded areas and protect corridors that will link the remaining tracts of forest and protect highly endangered rain forest species. To protect the biodiversity of the Marajó Varzeá ecoregion, part of the strategy is to establish new protected areas and build the capacity of local park staff to manage and protect these areas, addressing the issues of deforestation in the floodplains and headwaters, and dam building, which destroys natural flood and sedimentation cycles.
Actions de conservation (2)Conservation Actions Classification Scheme — IUCNExpert
2_1Site/area management5_4_4Scale unspecified
Stress écologiques (8)Stresses Classification — IUCNExpert
1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_1Ecosystem conversion1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation1_2Ecosystem degradation
Priorités de recherche (5)Research Needed Classification — IUCNExpert
1_2Population size, distribution & trends1_3Life history & ecology1_5Threats1_6Actions3_1Population trends
Niche IUCN globaleRealms · Systems · LMEs · Growth forms · FAOs — biogéographie IUCNExpert
Royaumes biogéographiques
Neotropical
Systèmes (terrestre/eau douce/marin)
Terrestrial
Formes de croissance
Graminoid
Références bibliographiques (4)Sources scientifiques de l'évaluation IUCNExpert
- Shirasuna, R.T. 2013. <i>Chusquea</i> in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Available at: <a href="http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB13092">http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB13092</a>. (Accessed: 05/08/2013).
- IUCN. 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2013.2). Available at: <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org">http://www.iucnredlist.org</a>. (Accessed: 13 November 2013).
- Wanderly, M.G.L., Shepherd G.J. and Giulietti, A.M. 2001. <i>Flora Fanerogâmica do Estado de São Paulo</i>. FAPESP, Sao Paulo.
- Judziewicz, E.J., Clark, L.G., Londoño, X. and Stern, M.J. 1999. <i>American Bamboos</i>. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Évaluateurs & contributeurs (2)Personnes ayant contribué à l'évaluation IUCNExpert
assessor
Lockwood, H.
evaluator
Moraes, M.
Lockwood, H. 2013. Chusquea bambusoides. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T44393225A44463875. Accessed on 05 May 2026.
Répartition mondiale
Aucune observation géoréférencée avec précision suffisante (<10 km) dans GBIF pour cette espèce.
Consulter sur les bases externes
Observations & statuts
Cartographie
Note nomenclaturale & synonymesDétails taxonomiques + synonymes CoLExpert
Note nomenclaturale
TAXREF v18 — INPN/MNHNSynonymes (6)— redirigent vers cette page
- Chusquea bambusoides var. bambusoides
- Chusquea bambusoides var. minorMcClure & L.B.Sm.
- Chusquea gaudichaudiiKunth
- Nastus brunneusDesv.
- Rettbergia bambusaeoidesRaddi
- Rettbergia bambusoidesRaddi
Sources : Catalogue of Life Cross-References (synonymes) · TAXREF v18 INPN/MNHN (commentaires FR).